I agree with Linuxbg. We already have a media disadvantage because the west controls worldwide media. In order to chip away at that and make inorads we must act/pretend to be the most "objective". By pretending to be "objective" through the use of "neutral language" we will be able to pull some people to our side and make the opposing si…
I agree with Linuxbg. We already have a media disadvantage because the west controls worldwide media. In order to chip away at that and make inorads we must act/pretend to be the most "objective". By pretending to be "objective" through the use of "neutral language" we will be able to pull some people to our side and make the opposing side doubt themselves, leading to questioning the necessity of helping Ukraine. This is only good for Russias war effort. This is the part we can do, how we can contribute. So yes, I think @Simplicus should write in a more neutral fashion if not for our sake then for that of Russia.
I agree with Linuxbg. We already have a media disadvantage because the west controls worldwide media. In order to chip away at that and make inorads we must act/pretend to be the most "objective". By pretending to be "objective" through the use of "neutral language" we will be able to pull some people to our side and make the opposing side doubt themselves, leading to questioning the necessity of helping Ukraine. This is only good for Russias war effort. This is the part we can do, how we can contribute. So yes, I think @Simplicus should write in a more neutral fashion if not for our sake then for that of Russia.