425 Comments
User's avatar
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

I like the Oprah 'quote': is this really the kind of thing 'they' say, or is an extra degree of sarcasm provided by you

It gets very difficult for the alien to distinguish parody from reality

But do 'they' really think a fantasy CIA plot can be taken seriously enough by Trump to influence policy - or is it just the way that the agencies are set up to provide newsfeeds

All in closed court and one poor sap gets Guantanamo'd

Expand full comment
Triumphant Ape's avatar

We do all know this is an attempt to get the US into a war with Iran correct?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

Does this sound like the trickery Burns has becole so adept at?

What post will he enjoy in the new era?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

If your wife is Ukrainian can she not ask 'the' ukrainains

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

One could say the same about the US citizens, or most of them

It is possible to say that most in EU ditto, if not about the war then about some other aspect of their oppression

Nonetheless few people have greater interest in the outcome of the current war, and some few at least must able to think

If you have a better source of information let us know - you state that you do not

Well then, why not ask the Russians - they know - even if you might say they too are propagandised, you'll find some not

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

If you are genuinely interested to discover what is going on, from your place in the US, you are going to have to try, and to make an effort

Living in the US you may think of the rewards, especially material, but you should be aware of the disadvantages - which are having any clear idea of what is happening in the RoW, or being able to think straight, how do I do this style

It is not difficult to contact Russian news sources and then Russians

Do not read MSM or watch their TV, for both will corrupt and contaminate

Take a self taught course in reason and logic

Read VVP's speeches, widely reported by various sources especially -https://karlof1.substack.com/

Ditto for China

It will take awhile

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Grape Soda's avatar

“America was DJT’s ear: the bullet clipped us but did not kill.” Wow

Expand full comment
Steel's avatar

And there was me thinking Joni Mitchell was quite intelligent. Both Sides Now? Apparently not.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Jack Dee's avatar

Interesting and quite possibly true, hard facts are difficult to come by, but the intersection of narcotics, politics, presidents, gangsters, covert agencies and secret societies goes back centuries.

I think you will enjoy Al Profit's documentary on this subject "Cold War Heroin Heat'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50UORU-CZeM

and his follow up work on the political and racial nexus of cocaine in America "White Powder, Black Power"

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

"North Koreans in Ukraine ZOMG!" Is a pretext for further escalation.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Jullianne's avatar

Spot on.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Superb.

Expand full comment
Mikey Johnson's avatar

Best comments on the actual topics in the Simplicius article!

This creation of narrative and laying out of mental traps is so obvious. Trump has no media he can trust except his own. Least of all, Fox news. So there are no trial balloons from Trump. If he hasn't already finished his government, he's done. Everyone will try to get their Trojan horse into his cabinet.

The claim about Rubio is a pressure on Trump. The fat Hubba Pompeo is pure desperation from the deep state in their attempt to control Trump. As in the US, this is going on in Europe. Here they spew lies that Trump will abandon Ukraine and by portraying it as a betrayal of the entire Western world, they hope to put Trump in a position where he has to act pro-Ukraine (instead of America first).

Trump has a long way to create a strong team. Expect demonic media to trash everyone who appear in his cabinet. And to find a place for RFK, Musk, Vivek, Tulsi and make them play the same melody would be a huge task.

I totally agree with Cheetos!

Expand full comment
Jamis6528's avatar

But Trump is reactionary and egotistical. I like the guy but let's be serious. Look at how he went along with the Covid scam and immediately made the vaccine a military product by creating Operation Warp Speed. Didn't anybody think it was strange that the US military was escorting it worldwide and guarding the vials? They either played him like a violin or he was in on it. With his blatantly obvious fake assassassination attempt I lean towards him being part of the blob. I still hope he kills the green agenda.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Good analysis, and that may happen, but it is also entirely false to say the US-backed violent coup; the biolab CIA bases along the border; and the mega-$Bns in "aid", were the fault of the Europeans, and they should pay all the price.

It is a bit laughable for the Froggie ^&*£*% to claim that "Europe is herbivore", considering all the horror the Europeans are STILL inflicting all over the world.

Expand full comment
Jack Dee's avatar

Pigs are Omnivores.

"Day of judgement, God is calling

On their knees, the war pigs crawling

Begging mercy for their sins

Satan laughing, spreads his wings

Oh lord, yeah!"

War Pigs, Black Sabbath (1970)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3b6SGoN6dA

Expand full comment
Boris Petrov's avatar

Wow !!! Lyrics is incredible — thank you

Expand full comment
Saint Jimmy's avatar

Rock when it was actually good and not stupid ass rap or bubblegum pop.

Expand full comment
Anna Bee's avatar

Thanks! ... the golden age of rock!

Expand full comment
TMTO's avatar

May the Total Hohol Death and Ukrainian demilitarization continue, and may the US join them in the same shallow grave.

Expand full comment
Morgthorak the Undead 💀's avatar

I will hold off on judging a Trump peace plan for Ukraine until it comes from him officially. There's a lot of bullshit flying around right now, with the scumbag neocons pushing plans that are supposedly from Trump, but that have no official backing from him whatsoever.

My hope is that he and Putin can cut a deal and end the war. If not, then Trump should simply cut all funding to Ukraine and let it collapse. The Russians can take what they wish and hand the rest off to the EU. Let them deal with it since they helped make the mess in the first place.

The Russians will NOT accept any of the bullshit neocon plans, nor should they. They are winning the war and have the right to decide what's what by right of conquest.

Expand full comment
Bazza McKenzie's avatar

Yep, Trump's absolute priorities are the US and its people, not Ukraine or any other war.

He is not going to put the welfare of the US people at risk in a futile effort to prop up the neoCons' war in Ukraine. In fact he has recently referred to the extent to which US money being spent on Ukraine could be used to rebuild US infrastructure and do other work needed in the US.

And the people talking about a "$500 billion lend-lease program" for Ukraine are utter morons. No one will lend Ukraine 10c without a guarantee from a financially solid party, and the latter would never get their money back. Trump is a highly successful businessman. He understands where risk lies in borrowing arrangements and will not have a bar of such a proposal. He might agree with it in principle if European countries are the guarantors, which they're not in a position to be, but certainly won't agree to it with the US as guarantor.

It is also foolish to take what he may have said 18 months ago, when the war was at a very different situation than it plainly is now, and assume that reflects actions he will take on assuming office. The lodestar is that he will do what improves the economic welfare, safety and security of the American people. Anything else is a non-starter.

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

It's taxpayer's money, not his own. In any case, the Fed will simply print it and hand it over to the demons that run the MIC.

Expand full comment
averros's avatar

It does not work like that. Printing money is a form of tax since increasing mass of money chasing the same amount of goods will simply dilute the value of money. I.e. it causes price inflation.

And price inflation is one major reasons (and quite possibly THE reason) why Kamala lost. Americans are fed up with inflation. Trump understands that, and given a choice of destroying his popular support and giving up Ukraine he is not going to give any second thought about Ukraine. It simply is not important, as loss in Ukraine does not really affect security or prosperity of US. Inflation does.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Trump DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THIS. He's not a economist, and is very easily bamboozled by simplistic sounding plans. He's already going to be printing $3Tn a year just to cover the Govts expenses, another $500Bn might not sound a big deal to him - especially when it makes the MIC sweet.

I hope he DOESN'T do it, and that you're right and he can see through this, but I would not take that as concrete as you are doing.

Expand full comment
averros's avatar

This time he is surrounded with people who do understand. Vivek and Elon have shown that they understand Austrian economics, and I suspect Kennedy understands it, too (though it's not his forte). Vance so far did not espouse monetarist economic nonsense either. (Tulsi's grasp of economics is rather poor.)

Money printing will be necessary to avoid complete and sudden crash of both government and banks, but hopefully extricating US from foreign boondoggles and reducing government spending would help in reducing inflation.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Austrian economics is as bad as MMT, just in a different way. Problem with Trump is not who he has around him, it's who sounded authoritative most the last who spoke to him.

When he starts closing US bases, I'll believe you're right. But if I held my breath, I could collect a whole oceans worth of pearls, I suspect.

"Reducing Govt spending" under Trump, will almost certainly entail cutting social programs, rather than massively wasteful MIC/Big Corporates spending. With 50%+ of the US public already in poverty, and unable to pay bills, let alone afford healthcare, or saving for pensions, this is a recipe for catastrophe. Needless to say inflation is already considerably higher than admitted.

Workers are not just recipients of paychecks, they are also the consumers.

You think stinking billionaires like Musk are going to raise incomes by one cent?

Or cut the very Fed budgets he benefits from personally?

Trump MAY be OK on foreign matters, possibly end ONE war, but the American people are going to be a LOT poorer by the end of his term.

Expand full comment
Jack Dee's avatar

Donald Trump actually has a degree in economics, he graduated from the Ivy league University of Pennsylvanian with a bachelors degree in economics in 1968. Its rather amazing how few people know that.

His education in addition to the 40+ years in the Real Estate game make him both the most formally credentialed and practically experienced President in business and economics in a generation.

Expand full comment
Frank Sailor's avatar

economic education in the US is as poor as one can imagine, it's all about maximizing profit, economic models (mathematics) that have proven wrong over and over again but seem to be scrosanct in the academic field. The distinction between micro & macroeconomy almost doesn't exisit and the fundamental knowledge that once debt is the plus money of another is not understand even rudimentarily as it seems to me. Since we all in the west live by a debt driven system, cutting on state credit simply means that this money will no longer exist - that means that the purchase power will be gone and no need to produce anything that can't be sold on the markets - with all the following consequences.

In the end 0,001% will have (own) all the means of production and money and the rest is going to cut each others hair and earn not even enough to eat because the debt will choke every part of private and state activity.

The only possible outcome at that point will be civil war since fathers will be out there trying to feed their children by any means they have.

Expand full comment
Baba Yaga's avatar

He ran casinos into the ground, and is a superb grifter. His Daddy gave him his degree and his millions, but bred a hollow man -- the perfect president for self-destroying Empire like the USA.

Hey, the US is not even interesting: Caligula was MUCH more entertaining and as for Israel -- can anyone imagine a subject tribal leader going to Rome and excoriating the Emperor In the Roman Senate? Defying The Empire and leading it around Circus Maximus with aring in its nose?

Expand full comment
Gregorio's avatar

He obviously didn't learn much considering he still seems to believe that the Chinese will be the ones who pay for his tariffs.

Expand full comment
Hedgehog's avatar

billionaire>>economist

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Depends on which billionaire, and which economist. Many "billionaires" are as batshit as other mainstream businesspeople, and as Adam Smith said:

Smith states that the interest of manufacturers and merchants "in any particular branch of trade or manufactures, is always in some respects different from, and even opposite to, that of the public ... The proposal of any new law or regulation of commerce which comes from this order, ought always to be listened to with great precaution, and ought never be adopted till after having been long and carefully examined, not only with the most scrupulous but with the most suspicious attention."

Frankly, I hold most Economists and most Businesspeople with the same contempt.

Expand full comment
PrinceMyshkin's avatar

That's wrong, well the 'he's not a economist' part at least, the other part I am not sure to be honest. He has a business degree and worked in business his whole life, you mean maybe he was more a marketing/PR guy, which is true.

Expand full comment
David Niemeyer's avatar

Marketing/PR? Sure he did that, as well as building things, completing municipal projects that were over budget and under built before he took over. This says nothing to the fact he also Owned/s many buildings and marketing assets.

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

don't be surprised if getting rid of the Federal Reserve becomes a priority under a Trump administration. Stop the money printing.

Expand full comment
Sam Ursu's avatar

exactly. I think the most relevent comment from Trump was about how Zelensky is the "best businessman in town" because he goes home with $6 B in his pocket every time he visits. Pretty sure Trump didn't like that because he himself always wants to get the better "deal" not some beggar in a T-shirt.

Expand full comment
Randje's avatar

Trump knows most of that rubber-check money is making its way back to the ones who ok’d it. And he knows it’s gotta STOP.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

"The lodestar is that he will do what improves the economic welfare, safety and security of the American people. Anything else is a non-starter."

Sorry. I must disagree. I do agree that Trump will want to improve the "economic welfare, safety and security of the American people", but I disagree that such will be his highest priority which is to support the "economic welfare, safety and security" of the zionist regime in Occupied Palestine. He is an American patriot but above all a zionist patriot. He has made big promises to his Jewish supporters and is not just indebted to them, but honestly supports them with his heart. Though he does not want to pursue war, and I believe him on this issue, he will, in the end drive America into war in a fruitless pursuit of the "economic welfare, safety and security" of the zionist cancer growing in West Asia, abandoning America's interests. His full support for the zionist cause (and he is just a great a monster as the Occupier since he supports the genocide) and his contempt for Iran will be the motor that drives him to war with Iran - Bibi will see to that. And as a result of that war America will find its ultimate fall from hegemony and the final dissolution of the Western alliance.

Trump will not be able to fix the US Deep State. He has the right ideas but he will be redirected soon after taking taking office. IF he survives to take office, a scenario that must be considered - it could very well be the case that the zionists are setting him up for assassination (again planned by Bibi and friends) and blaming it on Iran which would cause an epic call for revenge on Iran and an immediate march to war - which America and the Western alliance will lose, if not militarily, most assuredly economically as their prime sources of oil will be destroyed.

In either case, the world will not be the same by the end of 2025.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

As an addendum to the above, I am truly concerned with the wellspring of unrestrained optimism rising up among the American populace after this election cycle. The impact on American society if and when the fall comes might well prove fatal to the country.

Expand full comment
grr's avatar

As I recall there was unrestrained optimism when bathhouse Barry the Bumboy became president too. How did that go for the plebs?

Expand full comment
Remsomm's avatar

Exceptionally.O'bomber was keen on repeating the unrivalled exceptionalism of the US of A and its priviliged class. Clearly it turned out just fine. By the sounds of it there is still a fair amount of influx on the southern border...:)

Expand full comment
Chris Young's avatar

And they voted for Trump in large numbers. Why? Because they are Catholics.

Expand full comment
David Niemeyer's avatar

Opposite sides of the coin...but we'll see if it's a same outcome.

Expand full comment
David Niemeyer's avatar

Sounds like "He'll do a lot of things I don't like because of Jews" to me. He did more to calm the middle east than any president in decades, and that was his first term.

Meanwhile every other country either provides weapons and support to stir up trouble or sits back and says "woe is me". Oh, and da jeewwws!

Expand full comment
Jessica's avatar

Not Jews- Zionism and Zionism is a psychotic supremacy force that stops at nothing to achieve it’s delusional aims

Expand full comment
rakyat kecil's avatar

Hey David, how is ordering the assignation of Suliemani calming the Middle East? That is a copybook of what the Zionazis do and look where it them got today.

Expand full comment
Remsomm's avatar

Not long now, and the US presence in the Middle East will be a thing of the past. The Middle East doesn't need America' The Land of the Free' to steal their oil, prop up whichever dictator kisses their backside, topple the ones that don't - and to just generally create chaos, by having military bases in places they are definitely not welcome in.

'Calm the ME' -is a typical entitled American viewpoint. The assasination of General of another country doesn't even feature...and that's the problem.

It's definitely time the rest of the world calms the USA down a bit - maybe accuse it of having WMD, too many oligarchs, a rigged undemocratic voting system, a crap culture that glorifies killing - sounds like more than enough reason to calm them down.

As for Israel...they also have to be calmed down. Someone has to tell them they're not as special as they have been led to believe. Otherwise they're going to walk themselves into HollowCause V.2, all by themselves.

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

"Highly successful businessman!"

Expand full comment
grr's avatar

Yeah, had me laughing too.

Expand full comment
David Niemeyer's avatar

while you both sit back and barely make your monthly bills? It's the scorpion telling the elephant how tough he is.

Expand full comment
GM's avatar
Nov 9Edited

>Yep, Trump's absolute priorities are the US and its people, not Ukraine or any other war.

Did you seriously write this?

Trump's priorities are the oligarch ruling class, and in particular the faction of it that supported him in opposition to the faction that didn't. But the policies he implemented in his first term were all generally in their favor of both faction as a single class, not in favor of the regular people, and so it will be now.

The wealth of the likes of Musk was steadily growing during Trump's first term, then exploded in his last year during the pandemic and thanks to his mishandling of it.

Well, guess what -- every dollar that the billionaires gain is a dollar stolen from you, thus when they get richer, you get poorer, and if they are getting richer, then the policies in place are directed against you.

If you see a US president using established precedent to call MQ-9 Reaper drone strikes on billionaire mansions just because he felt like it (established legal precedent gives him that power; by doing so he will force the elites to either restore the rights people in this country no longer have after that precedent was established, or the president can just continue to deal with the problem that they are with direct kinetic action), or he starts throwing them in jail for decades for financial fraud (not a single one of them is not guilty of that on a massive scale), then you will know that he is on your side. Good luck waiting for Trump to do that.

Expand full comment
Chris Young's avatar

You mean those policies like prison reform, and trying to block all that cheap labor coming over the border, and tge $2k tax break middle class me remembers receiving?

Expand full comment
grr's avatar

"Trump is a highly successful businessman"

No he is not. He inherited a fortune from his slumlord father, had multiple bankruptcies and was bailed out by NYC Jew owned banks. The blackmailing homosexual Ray Cohn kept a close eye on him. He is totally a Zionist project.

Expand full comment
David Niemeyer's avatar

No matter how you repeat the tired tropes, your simplistic rationale of how Trump went from millions to billions will never be enough to explain that amount of success. I am however glad your view is comforting to the 'small brains'.

Expand full comment
grr's avatar

I'm glad you are glad. What a lad.

Expand full comment
Remsomm's avatar

True tired tropes

Millions to billions

Small brain comforts

Humpty Dumpty Trumpty

Is being set up

For a big fall

Please refrain from insulting others

Don't be rude

American

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Had Trump taken the money he borrowed from his father and sunk it into an S&P 500 index fund and reinvested the proceeds, he would be richer than he is today, and he would not have to do anything other than cash checks.

Expand full comment
David Niemeyer's avatar

what childish nonsense, made for tv viewers

Expand full comment
HBI's avatar
Nov 11Edited

S&P has an over time return of 10% or so, since 1928. This year, 28.35% so far, last I looked.

https://www.macrotrends.net/2324/sp-500-historical-chart-data

Back of the envelope says that $1m loan would be worth about $97 million today. So the answer to that is ...no, makes no sense.

His net worth today, $4.8 billion, would be approached in about 2067 if he lived that long, through that S&P 500 technique.

Expand full comment
Jamis6528's avatar

At the bottom of the market in early 2009 the S&P 500 hit 666. Today it's 6001. Nobody could have predicted it would go up so much. It's gone up mostly because of bad government policy. It will likely come back to fair value at some point, maybe even lower.

Expand full comment
rakyat kecil's avatar

G'day FF, no EFTs in those days but spot on. Love it

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

True, but the beauty of an index fund is that anyone can replicate it.

Expand full comment
PrinceMyshkin's avatar

I think its more that the deep state will infiltrate the Trump presidency, like they have with every other president since the 1940s. Like they did with the Trump presidency before. So it will be interesting, how that will play out. Could be a lot of compromises from the deep state and Trump too, remember, as Trump assassinated that Iranian General, all of a sudden all MSM praised him for the first time.

But it really doesn't matter that much regarding the Ukrainian war because that was over the moment Russia decided to start the SMO. Only uncertain outcome was the economic war of the West against Russia, I think not even the Russians thought it will go that good for them.

The Trump presidency will have a tough fight against the corrupt globohomo swamp. Its f.cking huuuuuge man. We are talking about millions of millions of people who are in the bureaucratic/technocratic swamp and profiteering off of the laaaaarge sums of money, billions of billions of taxpayers money. That will be a tough one, I think it will be interesting how he manages that, imho a almost impossible task. And they will try to off him again, guaranteed.

Expand full comment
occamsrazorback22's avatar

Correct. The media monkeys are already reporting "evidence" that Iran wants to "take out" Trump. Another Zionist false flag in the making with Iran featured as the contemporary Lee Oswald. The false flag factotums also report that the evil Putin is trying to blow up planes with a U$ destination. Oh! The horror! Like the Russians would have any interest in blowing up airplanes. Zero benefit to them and they're not stupid. You can't make this shit up.

Then tone deaf Zionists at the Euro-soccer match...thinking that acting like assholes in Amsterdam would somehow redound to their credit. Morons. Monsters.

Expand full comment
kgbgb's avatar

I don't know what was involved in the decision-making over Amsterdam (though the Israeli press says Mossad was there "just in case"), but I think the actual Israeli ultras were mainly just enjoying themselves. It's reported that one of their chants was "We make war for fun!"

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

They already have. Pompeo and Haley are back in Trump’s good graces. Brian Hook is on the short list of nominees at State.

Expand full comment
Jos Backus's avatar

"But, but... This time will be different, Trump has LEARNED from the first time!" 🤡

Expand full comment
PrinceMyshkin's avatar

It seems the Trump camp posted a Tweet that both are not coming back into the administration. But we will see, I think he has to let some of the neocons in, some of them stayed loyal to him, like Lindsey Graham. And lets be real, are there that many people in the US in Politics or higher ups in the bureaucracy/technocracy who aren't hawkish in their foreign policies? And Trump was kind of hawkish against Iran for some reason in his first presidency.

Expand full comment
aDoozy's avatar

I agree with and support your advice about Ukraine and the US, Morgthorak.

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

What I hope Trump will do early on is to get rid of all the 4 stars that betray their oath to the Constitution withdraw from NATO. cut off all funding for foreign wars (including Zionist Israel) and start closing and withdrawing our troops from foreign countries, and do this with one big executive order.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Well, he won't.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

He’s already asked for their resignations. https://youtu.be/P_96WiziP_0

Expand full comment
GM's avatar

>My hope is that he and Putin can cut a deal and end the war.

There is no deal to be had for Russia that Trump could accept.

The minimal acceptable for Russia outcome of the war is complete end of Ukrainian statehood, occupation of the whole territory of the country by Russia, and then gradual erasure of the very concept of being Ukrainian over the subsequent generations. Yes, in Galicia too.

First, things have gone too far by this point, and leaving any sort of independent Ukraine guarantees it will be used as platform for long-range strikes into Russia forever. Because there can be no Ukraine that is not an anti-Russia, due to the fact that most Ukrainians are self-hating brainwashed Russians, who will revert to being Russians the moment you take away their hatred for Russia.

Second, western Ukraine has two nuclear power plants that can serve as source of fissile material. And that is assuming the US/UK/France/Israel don't give the warheads to them directly.

Note -- this is the minimal acceptable for Russia outcome.

"Minimal acceptable" because it does nothing to resolve the issues of US nukes in Finland, Poland, Romania, Germany, etc.

An acceptable outcome means the US taking all its nukes out of Europe altogether.

A real victory is total eviction of all US military infrastructure from Eurasia.

Read this again, then consider where freezing the conflict along something approximating the current line of contact fits in that context.

Also, remember where the Nazis were in the 1941, and where the Brest-Litovsk treay drew the borders prior to that.

Putin will be in effect signing a new Brest-Litovsk, but this time one that will stick, or he will be making most of the Nazi gains from the 1941 Operation Barbarossa push permanent.

If he agrees to that, he deserves to be shot and buried in an unmarked grave by angry patriots the way Nicholas II was by the Bolsheviks.

Expand full comment
ScipioAfricanus's avatar

Knowing Putin and how the elites under him are compradores, I wouldnt put it past him to "cut a deal" with Trump

I certainly hope I am wrong and he doesnt cut a deal, but I am not getting my hopes up considering Putins tendencies to cut cuckold deals and fear of escalating.

It seems to me Trump will continue supporting Ukraine - I believe that a conversation with Ze was had and guarentees were given - which is ironic given how Ze threw Trump under the bus during investigations against him.

Expand full comment
GM's avatar
Nov 9Edited

Of course,it will continue. This isn't Trump's decision to make to begin with. Other people pull the strings.

Expand full comment
Tell's avatar

Trump is no doubt hoping that the Russians will take Pokrovsk and move from there to Zaporozhye before he takes office. So he can say, it's over.

Trump knows that the Ukraine war and the Gaza holocaust are dead weights for a president. He saw what they did to Biden. He and Vance and others are no doubt thinking of how to end these while still pleasing the fanatic Jews in the media.

Expand full comment
Pxx's avatar
Nov 9Edited

Re Russia advancing before inauguration - I don't know if he's hoping that, but it would be a politically neat solution. Alas there's too much ground to cover in 2 months

Re Gaza/Lebanon slaughter - Trump admin is going to be the same blank check for Netanyahu that Biden was ... he literally campaigned on it

Expand full comment
David Niemeyer's avatar

I agree in regards to Russia, but the Israel status is that they have been largely successful and are seen in a favorable light (screaming street rats not withstanding).

Expand full comment
Married With Bears's avatar

Reports of Trump putting Marco Rubio up for Secretary of State ring true enough. Rubio hates Trump and will do exactly the opposite of what Trump campaigned on, so he appears qualified to be in a Trump Cabinet. With Mike Pompeo green-lit for a new role (Secretary of Defense this time, maybe?), we're just waiting for news on what positions John Bolton, William Barr, Jared Kuschner, and Liz Cheney will be offered.

F*ck Trump. Better than Biden, but the whole make-believe of appointing his enemies who do exactly what the establishment would do (and everything Trump promised he wouldn't) is old at this point. It's as manipulative as just outright lying on the campaign trail, like Obama did about being a Peace President in 2008.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Yes, such appointments would certainly confirm that he hadn't learned a thing from his first term.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

It is obvious that Trump remains weak, stupid and easily manipulated.

Expand full comment
Gerald's avatar

I’m pretty sure I read that Pompeo is definitely out of the running for the Trump cabinet

Expand full comment
Paul L's avatar

I agree - until it comes from Trump, I would treat all MSM reports about his staff picks and policies as deep state lobbying. Remember the BS reported about who was going to be VP?

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

He's already appointed a neocon as head of his transition team.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Trump remains weak, stupid and easily manipulated.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

That looks like a good read on the situation, Morgthorak. I doubt the Artful Dealer telegraphed to Bartiromo his actual plan for Ukrainian peace or will ever propose a deal that risks making him look bad. I suspect whatever he says about it publicly is more like a feint or tease to feel out international reactions and keep expectations low. He’s more likely to leverage economies to get Russia and Ukraine to play nice—even if Ukraine gives up a chunk of real estate—than he is to expect anything from NATO. If in fact CIA bases on Russia’s border was Putin’s main beef, and considering four years of Pax Trumpana and four more of the neocon's disgraceful waste of personnel and materiel, whatever Trump settles for will almost certainly benefit the US. I hope.

Expand full comment
Randje's avatar

Just so. And unless I misjudge their former mutual respect & admiration, Trump will not try to dominate Vlad at all. That’s not going to work anyway, as Rootin-Tootin is many times over more experienced at international diplomacy than DJT…who surely knows who holds (at the moment) the upper hand.

Expand full comment
Richard Gusporta's avatar

Just do the right thing mr. Trump, call CIA to JFKed Zelensky, instal Zaluzhny, and let Putin take the whole Ukraine, you can still have EU to pet, more importantly make peace with Iran, end Israeli Aid. Of course it will not happen and we know that for sure, so WW3 is about a year away.

Expand full comment
David Niemeyer's avatar

I looked back a few hundred years..didn't you write the same thing in Columbus' ship Log?

Expand full comment
Ajax le Fol's avatar

Wait and not expect much, especially given the ugly names mentioned as possible cabinet members, is the only thing we and Moscow should do. Everything tastes better when you didn't expect a good surprise and yet received one, but it tastes just plain enough when you receive a "disappointment" instead.

Expand full comment
John Galtsky's avatar

"especially given the ugly names mentioned as possible cabinet members" Well said. Marco Rubio would be a return to Trump's first administration habit of appointing dangerous fools like Pompeo and Bolton.

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

The supposed Russian arming of the 'Houthis' and others is not going to happen

The RF does not support the 'Houthis' and confirms support for the UN backed 'Aden' government

Expand full comment
Sam Ursu's avatar

true, but sometimes long-range anti-ship missiles accidentally fall off the back of the truck don'tcha know ;)

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

It is widely said, no links, that it is NK which supplies AA with missiles, 'facilitated' by Iran

RF has no need to intervene

China is said to be very happy that such live testing by the NK and by the AA of missiles and drones against the US Navy should reveal all the many failures recorded

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Of course the RF isn't going to arm Ansar Allah. But they WILL be arming Iran...

dot, dot, dot...

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

If it is your suggestion that Iran will pass on RF missiles to the AA - you are mistaken

This would be to supply arms to the AA, which they will not do, nor, as explained above, will they or Iran need to do

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

They have been supplying weapons to AA since the Sauds/Western media dishonestly claimed that AA were an Iranian ancillary - they had nothing to lose after that.

But the Yemenis don't even need actual missiles - just the blueprints to build them themselves, and have the high-end electronics snuck in.

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

'They' is who, who is supplying weapons to AA

Certainly not the RF - many pronouncements have been made to the contrary

C ertainly AA can stich together quite a lot, but they can have no deep industrial base and practice as possessed by NK to produce missiles of much sophistication

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Is English not your native tongue? You seem to have problems in expressing yourself clearly.

Those "Stitched together" missiles have penetrated a US carrier strike fleets defences on several occasions, and have even probably managed to hit a carrier itself.

I'd be happy to be able to "Stitch together" such high technology.

And what you are ultimately saying is that IRAN'S technology is so superior to the Americans own, even knock-offs in the hands of AA are superior to the West's.

They clearly do not need Russian missile tech. Indeed, in some areas Iran may well be ahead of Russia.

On that note recall that Israeli pilots noted an "Unknown" radar profile that locked onto their "Stealth" US-built jets.

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

No one is denying the success of the AA and of their homegrown m's

It is also thusly with many drones

But it is clear that advanced missile technology is the product of industrial structures which the AA lack

I am not and have not commented on Iran's missile tech

I have mentioned that AA receives advanced missiles from NK - this with the blind eye blessing of the China gvmt, and is to the advantage of Iran when they say, with apparent accuracy, that their relations with AA do not involve the provision of missiles

'Native' is a word I do not much use in the attribution of successful English, although I am happy to recognise the general use of a variety of English by the ynakas and others, I hardly regard their forms of english as particularly successful

Try Indian english for a more adequate form thereof

Expand full comment
Jack Dee's avatar

I disagree.

Anything that distracts or depletes the US militarily or financially is in Russia's interests now and the Houthis have given the US Navy their hottest engagements in 80 years.

Furthermore, both the Russians and Chinese have a strong interest in learning how to defeat American systems. There is no better testing ground than in real operations. They could both help the Houthis by supplying and trading information at essentially no cost to themselves and without any of their signatures appearing on any missiles. And they could do this without the diplomatic cost of withdrawing their recognition of the Aden government.

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

It may be in RF's interests to make sure they may defeat the US, here and there

But not at the expense of behaving like the US

The RF, vey generally, does not use proxies

And certainly not in this case - as they have expressed on many occasions, both Lavrov and Nebenzya at the UN have been quite definite

The Chinese, as I have suggested, as well as the NK are adequate to the task of 'facilitating' what ever missiles may be added to AA inventory better to test and defeat the US Navy in the Red Sea

To suggest that the RF could, in ciircumstances in which they might easily be discovered, lie about their actions, when their actions are rendered unnecessary or redundant by the actions of their allies, is absurd

One does not have to 'sign' a missile for it's provenance to be discovered by an analysis of the parts- if these are being fired at an enemy this enemy has every possibility of establishing this provenance

You appear to think that all nations behave as the US behaves - by definition this is not true

Expand full comment
John Galtsky's avatar

If the US goes "all in" on Ukraine, Russia will fight back through symmetric and asymmetric means. It won't be just arming Ansar Allah, it will be providing carrier-killing missiles to Iran and it will likely also strike US and NATO assets directly.

Keep in mind NATO's often wrongly quoted Article 5 has a flip side: "An attack by *any* NATO country is an attack by *all* NATO countries." Russia could strike low-hanging fruit in the Baltics, Poland, Germany, and other NATO countries. If the US wants to step that up to general war, Russia will be ready.

A fight with the US directly attacking Russia is a very different deal than a proxy war within the limits of the former "Ukraine." Russia will respond accordingly.

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

Even to accept a situation is which the US might go 'all in' would be very difficult, indeed un reasonable

If one is being un reasonable it would be more reasonable to speculate about the use nuclear arms by the US

Rather than avoiding any specific speculation by the use of a generalised phrase coming from poker - even by playing such games one can tell something about one's opponent as long as they are playing by the same rules, which in this case they are not

The Russians do not play poker - only the US does

To start with an unlikely premise, or very unlikely, in order to speculate about potential reaction is the least reasonable of methods

RF is nothing if not reasonable

Even so the RF would not use the US methods of war - has not will not can not

Expand full comment
occamsrazorback22's avatar

Putin and the Russians play chess. The Americans scratch their onions and respond..."you misspelled 'chest'.

Expand full comment
GM's avatar

Of course it is not going to happen.

First, if it ever was going to happen, it already would have. NATO strikes deep inside Russia have been ongoing for more than a year now. What is Putin waiting for?

Second, Putin is more loyal to Israel than to Russia, and he won't do anything that really pisses Netanyahu off.

Third, it is meaningless anyway. Given the West's egregious violations of all norms established back in the days during the Cold War, the only thing that will reestablish deterrence is direct strikes on Western elites (not the politicians, those are figureheads, though they deserve it too, but the people in the castles and skyscrapers). The Houthis can't do that all the way from Yemen.

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

What 'of course it is not going to happen'?

Nuclear war?

Expand full comment
grr's avatar

"Putin is more loyal to Israel than to Russia, and he won't do anything that really pisses Netanyahu off."

Oh FFS!

Expand full comment
ScipioAfricanus's avatar

Well consider that Putin is Yeltsin man and protected him from investigations by Russias cheif prosecutor in the 90s for stealing elections, widespread corruption and treason.

Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

CS ---Comments please on how the Burns Caper in Qatar is confirmed as a CIA PR op

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

Qatar going all in on Burns is good news for us and for the 'Middle East' as he calls it- Burns and Qatar both will keep alive the flame of Democracy until the return of Biden and his merry crew in ....when's the next US Election?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

This is great news CS - to ship Democracy and it's true leaders to the 'Middle East' will open up the place to a new settler class - all those Dems and 4B's disgusted with Trump and men can re locate, and form new breeding grounds for a brighter future

This will re shape world geopolitics in a way few suspected the day before yesterday

How to turn defeat into a Victory for Mankind

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gerrard White's avatar

There are, you know, laws in the Middle East about cats and their care, about who touches a toilet seat and when and how, and whether women can or may drive cars

These and many other attractions, the rules as to who can meet or look at who, will serve to transform the Gulf and the Saudi A Hinterland into the blossoming and burgeoning full cradles of democracy

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

I like the way you spelled "Autocratic Imperialism" as "Democracy", that was clever.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

Hello Simplicius. Short article but said all that was needed. this quote - Bundestag deputy Anton Hofreiter leaked all the trumps. "In the eastern part of Ukraine, large reserves of lithium are concentrated and Germany is waging a war for them. " - I would have thought it was cheaper just to buy the lithium from the previous Ukraine than what Schollz did. What a horrible goblin he is.

Expand full comment
Rashmi's avatar

Colonial civilized powers don't believe in buying but grabbing for dirt cheap cost...which they thought it would be. How else would they make huge profits and become first world countries?

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

Hi Rashmi. But Germany has gone under with this miserable policy. And I don't believe that the German people would have chosen this. And its not civilized to do this. Maybe when all Europe was blood thirsty back in the neo dark ages ( 1400's ) but not today. This is whatever is guiding most politicians now. Is it zionism ? I have heard that asshole is chabad lubavitz. Maybe that's to blame for what he did to Germany and those graves in Ukraine. In fact its so similar to Gaza. Like they're just clearing the land of the inhabitants. I mean there are ( were ? ) alot of Ukrainians that were jerks. Nazi supporters. But only a fraction of the population And all those graves.

Expand full comment
John Galtsky's avatar

"Maybe when all Europe was blood thirsty back in the neo dark ages ( 1400's )"

Back in the 1400's? That's missing the early part of the 20th century (lot of blood thirst in action in WW1), just before the middle part (hard to beat the European blood thirst on display in WW2), just after the middle part (the French using poison gas on freedom-seeking Algerians, France's brutal actions before its defeat in Vietnam, the Netherlands using bombing, mass executions, and village destruction to kill as many as 500,000 people in Indonesia in attempt to keep Indonesia their colony, the UK's brutality against Kenyan freedom fighters seeking their freedom, and then the UK's brutality against Greek Cypriot nationalists (admittedly, only a few thousand slaughtered by those "civilized" Brits).

And then there's the latter part of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st, with European nations re-acquiring from the US a taste for slaughtering brown skinned people, for example, in the European bombing of Libya. Heck, they even went after their own whites, like the European bombing of Belgrade that killed over 30,000 civilians.

Most recently there's the EU blood thirst that's powering, along with the US, a war to the last Ukrainian that's already killed or maimed a million Ukrainian men. Nothing "civilized" about that.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

I was thinking this. Europe could have had all that lithium on the free market (And internal market to boot), all they had to do was NOT attempt/plan to genocide the Russian-speaking population in those areas, to deliberately cause a Russian invasion (To "Weaken Russia in the ensuing conflict").

The Empire showed its true colours though, it couldn't help itself.

Expand full comment
Anna Bee's avatar

I think we should all be clear that it is the financial-corporate empire. And perhaps it always was ...

Expand full comment
Mikey Johnson's avatar

It is uncertain what Scholtz actually ”did”. He was coerced and forced to react. And he let himself and that Rot-gelb-regierung be pushed around by warmonger Boris, Ursula and Macron. When US/UK/Norway/Sweden blew the Nordstream pipes it was fait compli and game over for a sovereign German stance.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

yes. But he's the leader of Germany. He can't be excused because he's a pussy

Expand full comment
Mikey Johnson's avatar

Of course. Whole Germany is domisticated. An election will show if there is any resistance left at all.

Expand full comment
PrinceMyshkin's avatar

Hm, I live in Germany and the population is massively brainwashed. They believe all the bs which is coming from the MSM, which are all getting money from the government. Aside from the state media which is getting also huge amounts of money (>12 billion per year). Still non establishment parties like AFD and the BSW are getting roughly 30%. Me personally I think Germans will only wake up, when they freeze and starve. And even then they maybe believe some stupid scapegoat story again, to conformist and obedient, no real critical thinkers right now in Germany. Something like Rogan or Trump are unthinkable at the moment in Germany.

I think Germany is f.cked and there is no way out.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

if all Germans except you were brainwashed we wouldn't see those huge protests. And yeah - populations definitely can be brainwashed but Sahra Wegenachts ( sp? ) party is awesome and she is awesome and maybe the elections are rigged but probably the EU has succeeded in silencing dissent on the internet. That's the only reason why the US got out of Democrats - was podcasts on alternative media - its ZIONISM its not the population that is the problem. I hope they don't freeze. Germans are brilliant people actually but whether its the education system that has dumbed them down I don't know

Expand full comment
Anna Bee's avatar

Totally agree ... Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) has been very public for years, so people do hear solid oppositional views. Why so few take them to heart is a mystery to me.

I personally think there has been a general dumbing down since neo-liberalism became the dominant approach to everything - schooling for corporations, universities working for profit, etc. Not to mention social media accustoming people to logics made up of arbitrary clicks.

Expand full comment
PrinceMyshkin's avatar

Nah, I said AFD and BSW have roughly 30%, so no, not all are brainwashed, but the majority is. And I don't say I am the epitome of wisdom and intelligence either. Trust me, I know that very well.

I highly doubt the majority of the population will come around. I am happy to be false though, I even would love to be false on that regard. But I talk to to many people, like Drs, self employed people, department leaders, really intelligent people, people with influence in my community, and I just see unbelievable naivety and they are believing everything they have been told by the MSM.

As I said, there is only MSM in Germany, they censored and shut down other media and are in the process of doing so, in the name of 'democracy' and 'freedom of speech' of course. Its a little bit like in the cave allegory by Plato, if you just have people like that around, everyone gets his 'news' from state media and the 'free' other MSM, then its basically over.

I think the 30% come more from living standard going down, more unemployment (of course rigged unemployment numbers from the state for decades, we have roughly 3 times more unemployed people), high energy costs, etc.. Not really from the reality which slowly comes in into Germany. When the leader of the opposition the CDU, Friedrich Merz, without any irony talks in the Parliament about threatening Putin to give Ukraine the Taurus missiles, which have basically no chance of changing the direction of the war at all (they are bunker missiles, specifically built for that), you feel just defeated. The people in the ministries seem to be just dumb and without a clue at all.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Europeans like being slaves.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

racist comment basically. Germans are as diverse as any other peoples. Zionism is ultra strong in France and Germany as well as England and the US.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

I dunno man. Like, if the UK PM came out of a meeting with the POTUS, and to the media the POTUS said he'd "Stop the Channel Tunnel if the French got sniffy about AUKUS", I'd AT LEAST expect a raised eyebrow, and maybe even a request for clarification - if not an outright "...Uh, actually that's vital infrastructure that cost us many £Bns, and we'd strongly prefer it if you didn't actually.".

Sholtz stood there like a dummy, and crucially, *was not surprised at all*.

When the true cost of the loss of Nordstream becomes well known, if he retires in Germany, he's gonna need 24/7 security.

Expand full comment
Pxx's avatar
Nov 9Edited

Sounds like BS honestly. German industry doesn't need Lithium - it's just for EV cars and for that purpose it is already cheaper to import from China than EU would ever make it. To be competitive, they do need cheap electricity, natural gas, and a Chinese export market that is friendly to them (eg sell 5MM cars in China, produce 10MM sets of components, send half to the factories at home).

This is the more profound cost of maxing out on the Atlanticist programme. China can see where it is going, and is quite mercilessly closing its doors on the full range of mid-tier EU tech and industrial goods

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

sounds about right

Expand full comment
Marledonna's avatar

The last person actually said that the Russians are fighting over the control of the lithium resources, which is utter BS as Russia never had the intention to annex these regions: feb 2014 agreement on peaceful transition, minsk 1&2, istanbul peace talks/agreement.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

yeah - and Russia actually was trying to help Ukraine by buying their stuff and selliing them really cheap energy.

Expand full comment
Wim Roffel's avatar

Hofreiter talking about lithium sounds to me like Trump talking about the Syrian oil as an argument to stay there. The Deep State makes the decisions and then people like Hofreiter and Trump try to sell it (also to themselves) with arguments like these.

Expand full comment
Kenneth's avatar

If you really want to drain the swamp, shut down the feed trough that is Ukraine that the Biden, Pelosi, Kerry-Heinz, Romney, Murphy, Klobuchar, McCain, Blumenthal - you get the idea - gang have been feeding from. This goes back to the days of the Dulles brothers.

This has been the plan all along. Ukraine is the keystone of the globohomo arch. Ask Soros. IMO Putin is in on the kabuki theater. Global reset incoming.

Expand full comment
SmallStepForMan's avatar

Regarding Trumps plan for Ukraine, its too early to tell and rumours are worth as much as pre-pandemic toilet paper, and controversial rumours bring eyeballs to commercial media, so other than our sanity, everyone benefits from these time sinks.

Trump cares about business, and Ukraine war is good business for US. Depleted NATO stocks - good business. Expensive fuel for European manufactures - good business. Fear of Russia - good business. You get the point. Doing the right moral and ethical thing - only if it is profitable. So expect more of the same policy, until the last Ukrainian, or until Europe is bled dry, whatever comes first.

The debt keeps growing, the interest on the debt is greater than the budget, manufacturing is shrinking, immigrants keep pouring in, christians keep shrinking, cultral gap keeps widening, left ideas are more insane, the western world is imploding.

China keeps growing, already more than a 3/4 of its trade is with global south, making them sanction proof. Brics is expanding, dollar collapsing. This isnt good for American business. And here is where Trump will go all-in on retaining China. He’s been talking about China for over a decade. But sadly for Trump (and great for Brics), the poker hand is weak and its only a bluff, and Brics will ante up and expose the naked empire.

Then the fun starts ….

(Disclaimer - after covid I immigrated away from a western country, seeing the writing on the horizon, moving my family to potentially greener pastured. Not green yet, but has potential).

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

I stepped over several Christians on my way to the keyboard, they were only knee-high already and still shrinking. Soon they will match their intellectual size, around big enough to bite at ankles of people who don't believe carefully produced fairy tales, but follow actual religions thousands of years older and wiser.

Apart from that, pretty good post and analysis.

Expand full comment
John Galtsky's avatar

"but follow actual religions thousands of years older and wiser." As if adding on years makes carefully produced fairy tales any more real.

I cannot resist adding, given that Christianity is 2,000 years old, what "actual religions" did you have in mind that people follow today which are "thousands of years older" than Christianity?

"Thousands" means at least 2,000 years older than Christianity, that is, more than 4,000 years old. There don't seem to be any "actual religions" still followed that are that old. For example, Hinduism as it is practiced today goes back only as far as the Vedic period, which was at most 3500 years ago. Judaism goes back only about 3300 years. Zoroastrianism is at most 3200 years old, Jainism only 2600 years old, and Shinto a mere 2500 years old.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

The Paganism from which they all sprang.

"Xians" have a head start - as they follow the Pagan festival calendar already, and not the Jewish calendar, as they would if their fairy tales were the remotest true.

Xianity will fall on its own, it is already doing so, and this will accelerate in the Internet Age, as EVERYONE can step out of their bubble and see everyone else laughing at them.

The next Aeon is upon us already, and Jesus (bless him) died 2000 years ago. It's time and past for the edifice allegedly built upon his name to die also. With all of its atrocious ideas and memetic bollox.

Expand full comment
Boris Petrov's avatar

I didn’t understand your comment - to convoluted for me

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Smallstepforman said: "The debt keeps growing, the interest on the debt is greater than the budget, manufacturing is shrinking, immigrants keep pouring in, ***christians keep shrinking***, cultral gap keeps widening, left ideas are more insane, the western world is imploding."

I took him at his word. ;)

Expand full comment
Boris Petrov's avatar

Thank you -- you are eloquent and witty..

Expand full comment
PrinceMyshkin's avatar

Very good point that China has now moved on to trading with the rest of the world more and that the west is only 1/4 of its trade. I've heard that point in the Duran podcast. Its basically over for the West, the dream of hegemony was just that, a dream. Its gonna be interesting if they understand that, I doubt Trump has understood that, Russia and China don't need the West anymore.

Expand full comment
Steel's avatar

True true true. True true true. The only thing I will add is that the U.S.A. is a population gathering machine. We'll probably wake up tomorrow and find it has a billion people. And we'll probably wake up next year and find there are two billion Merkins. It's one of the laws of thermodynamics isn't it? >>>Inexorably, all humans will move to the U.S.A.<<<

Expand full comment