When Gooble and Gates want to revive ancient, dilapidated Nuclear Plants to generate electricity to collect more data and thoughts from click-bait slaves, you can be certain AI is just another tool to pluck your wallet for the churners and skimmers. Same old game of new pots for old.
When Gooble and Gates want to revive ancient, dilapidated Nuclear Plants to generate electricity to collect more data and thoughts from click-bait slaves, you can be certain AI is just another tool to pluck your wallet for the churners and skimmers. Same old game of new pots for old.
Who needs a steam car? Did you know that for a period in the 1830s, everyone thought that steam motor coaches would be the future of personal transportation? How's Zuckerberg's Metaverse coming along?
The victors write the history, and so you have a history of victories that appear inevitable in hindsight. This applies to the history of science and technology as well, which helps sustain the illusion that every new thing will "revolutionize" the world. For every "revolutionary" advance in technology, 100 pieces of junk are thrown into the dustbin of history, never to be reported on again. What makes you so sure that AI is any more "revolutionary" than the metaverse?
As I say, try ChatGPT or something similar. It gets used by many people many times a day. Sure it takes some imagination to make it really useful. And that leads to enlightened fans and frankly close minded disadvantages boo boys.
I have worked with ChatGPT. I don't use it for anything, and I refuse to edit anything that it produces. I have turned down $1000s in jobs to edit AI content, because it is impossible to edit. It just repeats itself multiple times with very awkward sentence structures and fills everything that it writes with jargon (often used incorrectly) and cliches. When tasked with research, it produces results that are superficial at best and outright lies at worst. No serious person would use it to produce anything of substance.
Try it 6 months later - hell 1 month later. It advances weekly. If a topic is well understood by the experts but poorly understood by you or I, not using AI to research is just tieing your hands behind your own back. Best has been Perplexity.ai, but Search ChatGPT may have caught up last week.
When Gooble and Gates want to revive ancient, dilapidated Nuclear Plants to generate electricity to collect more data and thoughts from click-bait slaves, you can be certain AI is just another tool to pluck your wallet for the churners and skimmers. Same old game of new pots for old.
who needs a motor car or a train.
What is writing all about.
You won't know if you refuse to use it.
Who needs a steam car? Did you know that for a period in the 1830s, everyone thought that steam motor coaches would be the future of personal transportation? How's Zuckerberg's Metaverse coming along?
The victors write the history, and so you have a history of victories that appear inevitable in hindsight. This applies to the history of science and technology as well, which helps sustain the illusion that every new thing will "revolutionize" the world. For every "revolutionary" advance in technology, 100 pieces of junk are thrown into the dustbin of history, never to be reported on again. What makes you so sure that AI is any more "revolutionary" than the metaverse?
As I say, try ChatGPT or something similar. It gets used by many people many times a day. Sure it takes some imagination to make it really useful. And that leads to enlightened fans and frankly close minded disadvantages boo boys.
Try it
I have worked with ChatGPT. I don't use it for anything, and I refuse to edit anything that it produces. I have turned down $1000s in jobs to edit AI content, because it is impossible to edit. It just repeats itself multiple times with very awkward sentence structures and fills everything that it writes with jargon (often used incorrectly) and cliches. When tasked with research, it produces results that are superficial at best and outright lies at worst. No serious person would use it to produce anything of substance.
Try it 6 months later - hell 1 month later. It advances weekly. If a topic is well understood by the experts but poorly understood by you or I, not using AI to research is just tieing your hands behind your own back. Best has been Perplexity.ai, but Search ChatGPT may have caught up last week.