Is this correct? “Some may recall this was my own common calling card since last year. I repeatedly wrote that Russia is suffering huge problems in this war, but they simply pale in comparison to those of Ukraine and the West—and in a race to the bottom, it is Ukraine that will unquestionably win.” — Do you mean Russia here? Just curious.
Is this correct? “Some may recall this was my own common calling card since last year. I repeatedly wrote that Russia is suffering huge problems in this war, but they simply pale in comparison to those of Ukraine and the West—and in a race to the bottom, it is Ukraine that will unquestionably win.” — Do you mean Russia here? Just curious.
Indeed! And it also, of course, presupposes the claim that the West is going to make that Ukraine simply prevailed, whatever happens, as Simplicius maintains. Yes, very clever formulation!
Is this correct? “Some may recall this was my own common calling card since last year. I repeatedly wrote that Russia is suffering huge problems in this war, but they simply pale in comparison to those of Ukraine and the West—and in a race to the bottom, it is Ukraine that will unquestionably win.” — Do you mean Russia here? Just curious.
Ukraine will win the race to the bottom, in other words they will lose.
AHA! Thank you.
It was clever phraseology, I suspect nearly all of us had to blink and think at it. :)
Indeed! And it also, of course, presupposes the claim that the West is going to make that Ukraine simply prevailed, whatever happens, as Simplicius maintains. Yes, very clever formulation!
the problem lies in using the word 'win', I suspect, instead of 'be first'.
Guerilla ontology is rarely wasted. It made people think, which is nearly always a good thing, especially in a good cause.
More like "ontological void", as my 5 year old cat knows what "winning a race to the bottom" means.
To be fair, cats are smarter than most people.
Ya got that right. For 60 years my various cat masters have played with me like a mouse.