450 Comments

It matters not anymore what the little green gremlin thinks as Russia commands the entire field of battle. Mission accomplished.

The sinister NEOs got Mike Tysoned. (one shot knock-out)

The NEOs and nutsy NATOs dug themselves so deep into the mineshaft there's no evacuation plan and no way out. Not only has NUTSO NATO and friends lost militarily but also they are a whole lot poorer because of it. Capturing the 4 Oblasts alone Russia will add many trillions in cash to its books over time, and the valuable repurposed land will add to its already geo-physical corpulence making it an even bigger biggest country in the world. lol One could say NATO paid the whole bill patriotically billed to us the taxpayers for every nickle spent on this conflict when it would have been so much cheaper and wiser just not to fuck with the Minsk Accord.

Mike, could you explain to the NEO-NUTSOs when you say everyone got a plan till you punch them in the face? Thanks, Big Mike.https://youtu.be/qSuMgOu8QPo?t=41

Expand full comment

whoop, whoop

Expand full comment

After War, another 4th Horsemen from the Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaires... Since 1976 with Cloud seeding with Silver iodide, with HAARP microwave heating of the upper atmosphere to create an atmospheric dome to manage the jet stream, to create an area of intolerable heat underneath. Doppler radar to steer hurricane systems. Trillion watt lasers to further steer weather systems from space. Nano Aluminium, Strontium, Barium sprays of hundreds of thousands of tons yearly from planes Worldwide to supposedly block off the heating of the sun to stop global warming but instead has the effect of destroying the ozone layer having exactly the opposite effect of increasing the heat of the planet! Nano Aluminium, Strontium, Barium sprays of hundreds of thousands of tons yearly from planes Worldwide is having the effect also of increasing the PH of the soil killing the trees, destroying the crowns, destroying their root systems, making trees fall over, destroying trees worldwide - Acid Rain…

Nano Aluminium, Strontium, Barium sprays of hundreds of thousands of tons yearly from planes Worldwide is having the effect also of attacking the respiration of people so that deaths from the lungs, asthma, lung cancer, difficulty in breathing is increasing.

Nano Aluminium, Strontium, Barium sprays of hundreds of thousands of tons yearly from planes Worldwide is having the effect also of killing the bees, killing insects killing pollination. 80% of all insects have died worldwide!

Nano Aluminium, Strontium, Barium sprays of hundreds of thousands of tons yearly from planes Worldwide is having the effect also of killing all vegetation, all flowers, killing the crops, decreasing their yield. Monsatan is creating aluminium resistant Frankenstein seeds which in future will be the only thing which grows.

Pathogens in the Sky: A Controversial Connection - We own an audio of him at geoengineeringwatch.org stating, in his words, what he did for the DoD, designed methods of spraying virus and biological pathogens into clouds to infect the populations below. Think about that. And now we have pathogens showing up in the case of CV-19. We had 85 countries infected in three days. That's indicative of an airborne dispersion. We have Italian scientists that say they have found CV-19 attached to airborne particulates. Do these dots connect? So the bottom line is, again, we can hide from forms of medical procedures that we don't want, the injections. We cannot hide from what they're spraying in our skies. And at any moment of their choosing, Because we have polymer fibers and graphene in our rain. That's in our lab tests.

https://satchidanand.substack.com/p/scientists-confirm-weather-weapons

Expand full comment

Meh - clearly an innumerate conspiracy theorist.

The world's entire annual production of Aluminum (70 million), Strontium (360K) and Barium (6 million) cannot support "hundreds of thousands of tons" dropped from planes.

For that matter, the entire world's air cargo capacity is only 102 million metric tons. Arguing that 3%? 5%? more? of all air cargo, anywhere, in an entire year is devoted to dropping aerosolized metals is ludicrous.

For that matter, where are the thousands of metal processing plants, storage warehouses and tanker trucks needed to mine, process, transport "hundreds of thousands of tons" of these metals? And to load them onto the planes? Surely you intrepid sleuths can find some actual physical evidence....were it to exist.

Expand full comment

She clearly ate way too many lead paint chips as a child.

Expand full comment

"gripped tight by his ‘piano hand’." Coffee through the nose. I should know better.

Expand full comment

Heeheehee

Expand full comment

Then a second time –

"compelling Zelensky .. like a fly prancing from one turd to another."

Expand full comment

In our language, this is much more colorfully expressed "Like when a fly flies from one piece of shit to another piece of shit!" :)

Expand full comment

Oh I just got it, haha! indeed .

Expand full comment

reference to Zelenskyyy's past career as a comedian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbmZrzN3WFE

Expand full comment

I don't get it and it seems google can't help me

Expand full comment

Send the mutt meat. The Russians can grind it and give it to the Chinese after it's properly tenderized.

Then send the US the bill in flag-draped coffins.

Expand full comment

Frankly I see the commitment of NATO personnel as a good thing because they will have a more difficult time covering up the losses, and there will be losses. Russia gets to track and eliminate the “officers” and further erode their assets. Of course there will be the usual behind the scenes retaliation as well.

So bring it on, because there is nothing quite like an expensive and vulnerable last ditch effort!

Expand full comment

Last sentence ( about Iran missing the retaliatory stike timing ) hopefully that's not the case... I agree.

Expand full comment

IMHO it’s laughable to think Israel could eliminate Iran’s ability to retaliate in one strike.

It would be the absolute best timing for Iran to strike as well though.

Expand full comment

agreed. And they have said it will be immediate and 10 times worse ( my calculation ) than the previous. I guess its the only way to get rid of Israel - which definitely has to happen - but this is a great interview - https://youtu.be/u7J2SA8U7Fk

Expand full comment

The time is right to wipe Nazi Talmudland off the map as it is weak, it Iron Dome = Iron Sieve (copied this from Simplicius himself), and the U.S. is weak.

As long as Nazi Talmudland exists, death and destruction will continue in the region and the world will be brought to the brink repeatedly, and will probably fall off the cliff one day, courtesy of the Talmudist Nazis.

Expand full comment

Painting with a rather broad brush.

There is evil amongst leaders of the western world but the people themselves are basically good if a bit too subservient.

Regardless… Bibi is hastening the end of his country.

Expand full comment

I wouldn't call them good. Their general world view is "So what if my neighbor is sacrificing his children to Moloch? How's that my business?"

Transgender lunacy took root in their societies in less than 10 years. That doesn't happen in grounded cultures.

Expand full comment

The woke madness is rife in my USA but it’s a very loud minority. I find the same everywhere; most people are good and generally tend to their own business. It’s the psychopaths in politics and their busybody acolytes that have f*cked everything and terrorized the world.

Ultimately that’s still the citizens fault due to blissful ignorance but that IS changing.

That’s why the politicos focus on narratives — to keep the people ignorant and distracted — but those are failing spectacularly nowadays.

Expand full comment

If/When they strikes Iran, it’s vital that the counter strike happen immediately and without warning. Make it hurt because the big Z and little z are not going to back down.

Expand full comment

The US and other countries are trying to convince Israel not to attack nuclear or oil facilities in Iran. Israel has recently said that when it attacks, Iran will not know what happened but will see the result. That little riddle tells me that the zionists will most likely hit Iran’s electric power generating systems. They won’t know what happened because the electricity will be off. But they will see the results because the lights are out.

Hopefully, Iran’s defence network runs off its own independent power generating sources not tied to the civilian grid. And hopefully, they then immediately wipe out the zionists’ infrastructure, giving them a taste of Gaza.

Expand full comment

Yeah that what I reckon too. Maybe some kinda 'non kinetic' attack on the power grid like what happend in Venuezala a few year back-Russia helped get it back up but it took a bit. Maybe communications too. Very clear that Iran is riddled with Mossad agents-look at all those scientists assassinated. Plus clear that Hezb is fucked now, totally riddled with spies. If Israel can ge the commanders they can get the arms bunkers and the HQ strike showed what they can do to Hezb's best bunker. Why is Hammas NOT tell Hezb in advance of thier pans for Oct 7? Cause they KNOW Hezb are riddled with spies and also that they are NOT a serious fighting force despite all the rah rah rah. In 12 month or so what did Hezb achieve? Didn't take out the fuel temrinals or storages despite 'all the sophisticated weapons' they are sia dot have...full of shit. Iran is using Hezb as a bargaining chip to get sanctions releif -Irans back off on Hezb support and Iran get relief. Only they fucked up on the calcuations-the Israel and US saw the 'mass attack' reprisal for what it was.Weakness on Irans part. Not serious about Palestine at all just using the 'cause for Irans benefit and Lebanse get bled out. I reckong Israel will fuck up Heb big time and then push the Leb people to rise up against the fuckers.

Expand full comment

I cannot imagine that Iran would be so foolish not to have backup power supplies to key defense infrastructure.

That said, one way or another, Israel will get the war it is seeking.

Expand full comment

"the close ties of the Persian Empire with Israel have never ceased. Even today, the Eilat-Ashkelon oil pipeline, built in 1968 with the Shah, is still operated by a company owned half by Israel and half by Iran. Any publication on the owners of this pipeline is punishable by 15 years in prison in Israel (“Israel and Iran collaborate to exploit the Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline”, Translation Anoosha Boralessa, Voltaire Network, 9 January 2018.) https://www.voltairenet.org/article221335.html

"The oil concession was coming to an end in 2018 and the Netanyahu government has discreetly authorized renewing it. However a new company called EAPC-B has replaced the former company, EAPC. The Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee of the Israeli Parliament has extended the military reporting ban to information on this new company." https://www.voltairenet.org/article199332.html

Expand full comment

War; when hate wins

Expand full comment

What does hate have to do with it…? Military necessity and survival are the factors at play.

Expand full comment

US sponsored psy-ops. Result Ukraine hates. Russia is indifferent, but forced to step up, again. Slav fighting Slav, all the Neocons clap and cheer.

Expand full comment

Splendid Simplicius!

Always a joy to read your reports. You wrote long ago that West would try to freeze the War on the ground if things got worse for Ukraine. And now we see the signs of such development. Biden is too tired to bother anymore and the biggest headache is Israel doing massacres each day.

But. I would say that IF West&Ukraine manage to freeze the ”conflict” as of now it would indeed be a victory for the them. I cant see any positives for Russia doing such a stupid thing and if they do you can be certain that the situation is also dire on the Russian side.

Ukraines stubbornness and the criminals minds of Zelensky&Yermak has cacthed the ukrainians AND the West in a cul de sac. But one can also say that Russia has fewer alternatives that one may think. If they agree to a ceasefire they would be seen as losers. If they instead continue the War, declining every ”peace offer”, and the advance goes as slow as now they will be seen as coldhearted warmongers. And if the front and Ukraines resistance suddenly collapse, and Russia storms the banks of Dnieper river, the scare will be whipped up in the West for the ”bloodthirsty imperialist Red Army”. I cant see Russia having any alternative other then take whole of Ukraine and then negotiating a West-Ukraine state with Lvov as a center.

I agree with the Swiss general. Perception of winning through losing is the only option for US as of now. But then we better hope for Kamala as president…

I am sure Trump will do something stupid if elected President.

Expand full comment
Oct 11Edited

>But. I would say that IF West&Ukraine manage to freeze the ”conflict” as of now it would indeed be a victory for the them. I cant see any positives for Russia doing such a stupid thing and if they do you can be certain that the situation is also dire on the Russian side.

Simple question -- would Hitler have won if WWII was frozen in late 1941? Or even mid-1943? And then allowed to consolidate control with ethnic cleansing, brainwashing of the remaining population over many decades, etc. etc.

Most people would see it as a massive win.

Well, it is the exact same situation right now -- the literal descendants of the Nazis are in control of territory that is not that much different from where the front lines were in mid-1943.

Any Russian leader that does not see it that way has to be removed from office and immediately replaced by someone who does.

Balitsky is 100% correct in what he said.

But will he be listened to?

Remember that Stremousov, who was speaking in those same terms all the time, died on the day Kherson was surrendered and it is not at all clear it was the SBU/GUR's doing rather than an order from the Kremlin in order to keep overtly patriotic loudmouths like him in check...

Expand full comment

Could not have said it better.

Expand full comment

Given what we know about operation paperclip, I am uncertain the Nazi agenda did not, "consolidate control with ethnic cleansing, brainwashing of the remaining population over many decades, etc. etc." We literally have the entire EU demanding the protection of a sovereign Nazi Ukraine.

From memory Hoover sent his number 2 man to Germany in 37? He came back with high praise of all things Nazi. The fellas from paperclip did not languish on the shop floor.

Hitler may have been defeated but fascism is alive and kicking.

Expand full comment
Oct 12Edited

The US invested heavily in Germany in the 1930s, to the point that certain objects were off-limits for bombing during the war, and then ownership quickly resumed after it.

And vice versa - the Germans modeled their racial segregation practices on the US South and borrowed their racial superiority theories from the US and the UK.

People somehow never seem to realize that the US and the UK were really aligned with the Nazis all the way until 1939 for the latter and 1941 for the former (what happened in the late 1930s is presented today as "appeasement", but if you knew nothing about it a priori, you would see it as instigation) and then promptly became allies with them again even before the war was over. Plans for war with the USSR were laid down in the spring of 1945 and the renewal of the alliance with the Nazis began to take shape as early as the end of 1944.

By the late 1940s it wasn't even hidden anymore and "former" Nazis were openly integrated in the new Western political and military structures.

So basically the West has been Nazi and with Nazis against Russia all throughout except for that brief period in the 1940s.

Yet Russian elites have been trying very hard to ignore that objective reality, which doesn't at all speak well about the quality and loyalties of Russian elites...

"Burn it with fire" should be the approach to this problem, instead they want to be buddies with those who are out to destroy them. Which guarantees defeat in the long run.

Expand full comment

Yeah the theory that Hitler went off the plantation and started doing his own thing is interesting. So point him at Russia and that was always the goal. Have also read the only time you were totally safe flying around Europe is if you had a Rothschild emblem on you aircraft. Why let them escape at Dunkirk? Hell there are more than a few unanswered questions.

To replay so many of the nightmares for Russia is flagrant. Look at their annual memorials and tell me the wounds are not fresh. So lets invade Kursk? And the whole EU screams yeah get em? We used to pray that our leaders would be guided to make wise decisions, now we beg that one of them might be sane.

Expand full comment

Trump is weak, stupid and easily manipulated.

Even if he is elected, he only will be able to escalate. Call him "Putin puppet!" and he will fold, just as he folded on multiple occasions during his last term.

No, I am not voting for Harris, either.

Expand full comment

I do not envy American voters. That country really hit the fan. They have a Devils choice this time. I dont trust Trump - says one thing does another. Harris dont say a thing and does nothing- she only laughs. Then…dont underestimate Clownpeople. Look at the one in Kiev - destroyed millions of peoples future and lives.

Expand full comment

As long as you can still go to the mall or on Amazon and buy stuff and put it on your credit card, nobody cares.

Expand full comment

Look: USAns have been the recipients of several generations of social engineering a large part of which is massive amounts of sheer ignorance. Most of them are entrapped by the Red vs BLue bipolar model and will believe until the end that their team is the only goos one. No amount of proof that policy changes very little will awaken them. To be fair there is a segment of the population that sees that “they both suck” but they tend to be less vocal.

Expand full comment

They like to refer to it as left wing / right wing but I think more accurately would be left cheek / right cheek. Two sides of the same ass.

Expand full comment

“Not on the right side, not on the left side, in the groove, in the groove!”

Expand full comment

"Trump is weak, stupid and easily manipulated."

The only other possibility is that he never really quit the party of the potato and this whole maga thing is the greatest grift in history.

Expand full comment

“If Russia is defeated in Ukraine, European submission to the Americans will be prolonged for a century. If, as I believe, the United States is defeated, NATO will disintegrate and Europe will be left free. The psychological shock awaiting Europeans will be to realize that NATO does not exist to protect us but to control us,” so historian Emmanuel Todd told an interviewer w/ Italy’s Corriere di Bologna on 9 October.

Todd shed unique light on Germany’s historic r’ship w/ VVP: “During the Iraq war, Putin, Schröder and Chirac held joint press conferences. This terrified Washington. It seemed that America could be expelled from the European continent. Russia's separation from Germany thus became a priority for American strategists. Making the situation in Ukraine worse served this purpose. Forcing the Russians into war to prevent Ukraine's de facto integration into NATO was, initially, a major diplomatic success for Washington."

Todd described Germany's general paralysis in 2022 as the shock of the SMO set in, a period which "allowed the Americans, amid the general confusion in Europe, to blow up the NordStream pipeline, a symbol of the economic understanding between Germany and Russia."

In Todd's view, the war is in its second phase: that of American defeat.

"U.S. control over Europe will be pulverized," Todd told his interviewer. "Germany and Russia will meet again. This conflict is in a sense artificial. The natural thing, in a low-fertility Europe, with its aging population, is the complementarity between German industry and Russian energy and mineral resources.”

In all of Project Ukraine’s dimensions, Germany has paid the highest price for loser-ship status--from the loss of cheap natural gas to the neutering of its industrial might. It is undoubtedly a generational knee-capping.

Todd’s insights offer a fresh spin amid the increasingly archaic vitriol emanating from Brussels, via Mark Rutte, for instance, OTAN’s new chief, who said on 9 October: “If Putin gets his way in Ukraine, that would have serious security implications for all of us” in the Alliance.

I mean, can you find a more boilerplated & regressive statement than that--?!!?

"Putin" already got his way.

Russia's security matters. The critical importance of Russia's security will now of course involve OTAN massively, just not the way groupthink Rutte believes. Ukraine's capitulation will be OTAN's capitulation.

Moreover, since all wars are bankers' wars--a phrase I just coined--the money-launderers-in-chief, the kleptocrats in Brussels, want to legitimatize their theft & grift operation by going into the banking business.

Rutte et al want to set up an OTAN Bank—security funding specifically earmarked for financing Project Ukraine. OTAN'$ member states will pay money from subscriptions so they can fund the OTAN Bank; this is over & above the 2% already expected from member states to keep OTAN afloat.

Europe will soon be little more than the most touristy military spending place on earth: a Trevi Fountain w/ Tomahawk missiles.

Meanwhile, Ukrainians get used to losing a village every day.

Expand full comment

Well in reality Russian energy, commodities and food resources will probably now be coupled with Chinese industrial manufacturing and building Chinese infrastructure, well in reality possibly Asia as a whole. Why would the Russians be dumb enough to revive relations with a Europe that hates them to the point of many attempts to annihilate them as a people? From Napoleon's attempt to liberate Russia to Hitler's attempt to exterminate Russians needing resources and "liebenstraum". Why now would Russia subordinate itself to a hateful west when they can lead a grateful global majority?

Expand full comment

Curiously, the original BRICS nations form the geographic pillars of a multi-nodal order, anchoring the salient global regions:

Brazil keeps it real in the Americas,

India straddles the subcontinent,

South Africa presides over a sub-equatorial blossoming,

Russia & China--back to back--their shoulder blades touching, gaze upon Europe to the west & Asia to the east.

Expand full comment

If you look at geography the possible BRICS expansion will control every strategic choke point in global movement of goods. Russia controls the North sea route having the largest fleet of nuclear icre breakers; Egypt controls the Suez canal; Iran and Saudi Arabia control the straits of Hormuz; The Chinese pioneering over land routes with the BRI. Then going forward looking for Malaysia Indonesia and a possible invite to Singapore to control the Malacca strait; Thailand for their development of an alternate route bypassing Malacca; Then Yemen for the control of the Bab Al Manbab; Turkiye for control of the Basborous and the Dardanelles and Nicruagua in South America for the new canal being built by a "Chinese businessman". BRICS is basically a major paradigm shift in global geopolitics.

Expand full comment

And Palestine...from the river to the sea

Expand full comment

I think China's BRI/CMEC investment in Myanmar is to bypass the Malacca straits. You are right about Malaysia/Indonesia/Thailand and Vietnam entry being a game changer as these are the strongest ASEAN members.

Expand full comment

Berletic has piece on theat topic....

Expand full comment

They want to bypass the Malacca straits by ship, straight through South-Thailand.

Expand full comment

I can only hope they do invite Singapore, and that its government isn't stupid enough to remain shackled to the westoid order.

Expand full comment
Oct 11Edited

Here is an unpopular opinion -- Russia's resources, contrary to popular belief, are not infinite, and are therefore best kept inside the country, for the benefit of future Russian generations, rather than being sold for pennies on the dollar of their real worth, whether to Westerners or to Chinese.

Let the Westerners and the Chinese try to develop without resources, keep your resources to yourself, and invest in local development.

Makes sense, right?

Except that if you do that, the present arrangement according to which the current Russian oligarchy gets a percentage on the loot and that is the basis of its power falls apart. And that oligarchy largely controls the Kremlin. There are other forces pushing for an alternative path, but the internal conflict has not been resolved in their favor. Thus the SMO not-war format and all the other self-defeating (non)-actions that make absolutely no sense if one naively assumes that the people who rule Russia do so in Russia's interest rather their personal interest.

Expand full comment

Well it is your perspective, the only thing that would make it unpopular is what exactly clouds the lens through which you see the world. Yes, totally agree with the thought that Russian resources should belong to Russians and not be sold to Chinese or westerners for pennies. Yet I would think Russians would not want to be a hermit state totally isolated from international trade. I don't know how you discerned how finite Russian resources are to start hoarding their exports.

Well from lots of reading on the state of Russian leadership I conclude it is led by one man Vladimir Putin and a beuracracy of his creation, for the last 24 years. It is fair to consider him a "prisoner of power" with that said what possible self interest would the Russian president have at his age, money? The reality is money creates the illusion of power, so what value would it be to a man that encompass the definition of global power? Possibly his greatest ambition is to rule a great Russia and leave that as his legacy.

Expand full comment

"Here is an unpopular opinion ... rather than being sold for pennies on the dollar of their real worth, whether to Westerners or to Chinese."

Respectfully, that's not an "unpopular" opinion, it's just an inaccurate opinion. Your premise is false. Russian resources are *not* being sold for pennies on the dollar of their real worth, not to the Chinese, and not to anyone.

On the contrary, Russia is getting top dollar for its resources, and it's doing so as a matter of very wise investment. It's selling resources it cannot at present use as a means of funding development that will allow Russia to grow even faster. It would be intensely stupid for Russia not to take advantage of resources that help Russia develop.

"that oligarchy largely controls the Kremlin" Ad-hominem labels don't explain reality: they obfuscate reality. In every developed country in the world elites control the government. It's been that way in human societies for thousands of years. The only question is how the interests of such elites align to the interests of the society at large.

Russians today have become fervent believers in capitalism because Russia's abandonment of communism and socialism in favor of a switch to capitalism has led to the creative and entrepreneurial energies of the Russian population being unleashed, with dramatically increased living standards, longer life expectancies, reduced infant mortality and dramatically increased personal freedoms. Today's "oligarchs" (that is, wealthy people and business leaders) have morphed from the opportunistic looters of the 90's into genuine entrepreneurs, like Russia's richest woman, Tanya Kim, the founder of Wildberries, a hugely successful Russian Internet shopping platform, akin to Amazon.

Russians tend to *like* the idea that business leaders and entrepreneurs have influence in government. They much prefer that to bureaucrats and socialist party apparatchiks controlling government. They know that entrepreneurs like Tanya Kim want to see Russia expand and everybody making more money because then their businesses will make more money too.

"if one naively assumes that the people who rule Russia do so in Russia's interest rather their personal interest." On the contrary, what's naive is believing socialist propaganda for morons that being interested in success is a zero sum proposition. It never fails to amuse how Communists have a huge blind spot in their belief that Communism is best because deep down inside people will nobly work for nothing to support others, but when confronted with the reality that people really do want something for themselves they say capitalism can't possibly work because deep down inside people are evil and think only about themselves.

In reality, people are social animals and have the intrinsic social skill to understand that it is in their own best interest to live in successful communities, and that putting their own interests forward is most successfully done by fair trading that benefits others as well. The most successful businesspeople in the long term are those who love their customers and who thrive because they build win-win propositions for their customers.

The people who rule Russia do so in Russia's interest as well as in their own personal interest because their personal interests are aligned with Russia's interests. A strong, successful, prosperous Russia is very much in the interests of the intellectual, political, and business elites that run Russia. It's intensely naive to believe otherwise.

Expand full comment

wow thats a lot of bullshit.

you are drinking your own koolaid my guy, you know nothing of former communist countries, you are just projecting your stupid views.

Expand full comment

> wow thats a lot of bullshit.

Saying so doesn't make it so 😉

Expand full comment

yeah, for sure someone who lives by ayn rand`s retarded bullshit is right :)))

Expand full comment

Actually, I live in Russia and I've spent a lot of time in many of the other former communist countries. I've been an eye witness to how Russia has evolved from the pathetic end of communism into an economic powerhouse.

But I see you have nothing intelligent to add, since you're just mouthing off with insults. I suppose you avoid getting into anything specific because the more you do that, the more it's clear that what I wrote was explicitly, literally true.

Expand full comment

gtfo of here :)))

all the infrastructure, all of the factories, all of the universities are build before `90s.

the post 90 regime is like a mushroom eating a grate fallen tree.

u`re probably a westerner who came here in the 90s-00s with a handfull of dollars who took advantage of a collapsing society. you`re time will come make no mistake :))

Expand full comment

Excellent retort. At least we in the bleacher seats can see the truth in this!

Expand full comment

you are right and GM is a known 'doom and gloom' character/personality. I have seen years now of sky is falling, things are horrible, RU is about to lose from him/her. Even when Russia is clearly winning and getting better every day, things are always bad to them, 'oligarch control Kremlin', etc. just a personality type I guess.

Expand full comment

Chosen language indicates the point of view of the speaker. Russian elites are 'oligarchs'. Putin is represented as a 'despot', 'strongman', etc. China sets up a 'great firewall' but the corresponding efforts by US entities, such as all the Echelon data taps, are nonthreatening. Of course.

It's all in your point of view, of course. But the point of view of most of the West is warped by hegemonic propaganda.

Expand full comment

No, you don't make any sense.

VVP spent more than a decade taming, jailing, 404ing or exiling Russia's oligarchs.

Russia isn't going to stand for either Ukraine or Georgia to be aligned or friendly with NATO. That is in Russia's best interest.

Expand full comment

Russians like Italian fashion, German beer, and French cheeses.

That’s the main reason.

Expand full comment

All that is true. But, going beyond a pleasantly funny remark, there's real depth in that as well. Why? Because to get what they like in Italian fashion, German beer, and French cheeses Russians no longer need to do business with Italy, Germany or France.

Let's take French cheeses first. Over the years I've spent a lot of time in France and I really like French cheeses. In fact, one of the annoying things about living in the US for me before I moved overseas was the toxic combination of US bans on French cheese (the best of which are unpasteurized and thus not importable into the US) plus complete incompetence of Americans at duplicating French cheeses. Seriously, except for very rare cases if you bought "blue cheese" in the US you'd get something that tastes like chemical rubber, and forget about getting a decently ripe Camembert.

Russia used to be that way too, and even worse. At least you could buy good French cheeses imported here, but the local knock-offs were terrible. All that started changing about ten years ago, primarily as a result of increasing wealth in Russia coupled with the fanatic Russian habit of traveling abroad and taking hold as cultural touchstones the best of what they found abroad. People started making really decent artisanal cheeses in Russia that were, astoundingly, as good as the better French cheeses.

That happened, of course, because the French have a big cheese industry and they were perfectly happy selling consulting expertise on setting up cheese production together with everything you could possibly need, such as cultures, machinery, equipment, in-house French experts to teach your staff over the course of years, specific breeds of milk-producing cattle, and so on.

When the Ukraine conflict started Russia sanctioned French cheeses and that opened the market up to local production, including continuing production by French brands like President that continued doing business as Russian companies. So now you can go down to your local superstore and get a wide range of "French" cheeses that are as good as or better as you can get in French supermarkets. I think it is somewhat easier to get the very best artisanal French cheeses in France than in Russia, but if you hunt around you can find them here, and they'll be so good that in a blind taste test (I've arranged them, with friends, just for fun) even if you have a lot of experience with fine French cheeses you'll only have about a 50-50 chance of picking the French originals from Russian production.

Beer is now the most popular alcoholic beverage in Russia. Vodka and other hard liquor consumption is way down. There are tens of thousands of brands of craft beer made in Russia, with thousands of brands of German-style beers. I personally prefer the local Russian beers largely because the mass market German brands like Spaten and such seem too commercial and uninteresting. But if you like that sort of thing there are mass market Russian brands as well, including German producers who have been producing in Russia for 20 years and continue to do so. Anyway, if you like German style beers there's no need to buy them from Germany.

As for Italian fashion, well, you got me there. Wealthy Russians do like Italian suits for men and Italian fashions for women and the local Russian fashion industry doesn't match those. That's good for rich people because Italians continue to sell tons of goods in Russia - they're against sanctions when it comes to selling their fashions into Russia.

But I think that's a niche effect because most people in Russia don't dress in Italian high fashion. They're more influenced by more casual US styles, as much of Europe has been influenced, and there's tons of that going on in Russia. It's more an urban Canada Goose look for most people. But there as well with the decline in quality from vendors like Canada Goose, a reaction I suppose to increased costs of materials and labor in the US, Canada, and the EU, there's been a lot of market share taken by Russian vendors.

For years I used to wear Canada Goose in the wintertime but last year I switched to a parka for winter wear and a slightly lighter jacket for late autumn and early spring from a Russian vendor and the only thing I feel about those is wondering why I didn't switch earlier. They're superior on all fronts compared to my Canada Goose. The zippers and velcro are better quality, the material is better quality, and the cut is a bit longer so it's more comfortable in higher wind. The pockets are much better designed (if you've ever worn a classic Canada Goose expedition parka you know what I mean). The fur trimming the hood is better quality too. Ah, and the price is less than1/5th of what Canada Goose charges.

Just saying, it was nice in past years to get the better parts of what Europe had to offer, but now with their economies under stress and their quality declining it's nice to be able to buy as good as or better locally, and at a fraction of the price. That goes for so many things, like fine wine and other gourmet foods, that I still marvel at that sometimes, like today at lunch where I found myself thinking, "this is a *really* good Camembert...".

Heck, I think after writing this I'll pour a glass of truly super Krasnostop (a local grape often blended with Cabernet Sauvignon or Cabernet Franc) from a bottle I opened yesterday. Life is good.

Expand full comment

When I used to drink, I preferred Bulgarian rakia to any cognac. Still, one is associated with prestige and status, and the other is not.

Expand full comment

I moved to Moscow around 2010 and the beer selection mostly sucked. There were like two pubs that had some good Belgian Trappist ales and then a couple of Irish pubs serving Guinness.

I watched the transformation that happened quite rapidly. Especially after 2014, all of a sudden craft beer pubs sprang up all over the cities and Russian breweries made some good attempts at IPAs. They couldn’t do ales for shit, but even established breweries in the U.S. can’t match the Belgians.

It soon to spread to other locations. My wife comes from a decently large city in the south of Russia and even they had craft beer and better grocery selection by 2015.

Definitely was a renaissance in Russians producing some pretty good domestic food and drink luxuries.

I left Moscow in early 2018 and we still miss the city.

Expand full comment

I'm disappointed that Russia hasn't managed to entirely reverse the 'poorly cut suits' trope from the USSR days. But otherwise pleased to hear things are well with other products there. Russians deserve to have the full fruits of the modern age finally.

I found the desire for (frankly not that great) Western mass produced goods to be a disappointing thing to be undermining the SU. Courtesy of the same economic warfare that is currently being tried against Russia again. I see a consistent thread in this behavior running back to 1918.

Expand full comment

"I'm disappointed that Russia hasn't managed to entirely reverse the 'poorly cut suits' trope from the USSR days." They have, now. If you're a billionaire you're still going to have your suits made for you in Italy, I suppose, but there's no reason now in Russia to buy Western clothes.

I used to do that out of inertia. I'd visit the US a few times a year and stock up on jeans and such from Nordstroms or whatever. And then one day for a birthday present somebody gave me a gift certificate for a local men's store, some no-name brand (at least to me, it was a name brand to Russians...) so I went there to try stuff on. I would have never otherwise entered the place.

Well, was I surprised. It wasn't the collection of tasteless, poorly made and ill fitting clothes I expected. On the contrary it was all very well made stuff that I liked a lot. In the West, for example, jeans were trending to low rise skinny jeans that may be great for 18 year olds but look ridiculous on men in their late 40's or early 50's. But here in the men's store were all sorts of "classic" jeans that were comfortable, with just a couple percent of elastic fiber in them so they had some give to them. I guess they're called "Dad" jeans in the US.

They had a wide range of suit jackets, suits, shirts, cardigans, vests, and all sorts of other things. I was astonished. And it was all really well made, and well made in Russia too, not just imported from Turkey or China or other places. And it was all about a third of the price I'd pay in the US or EU for lesser quality.

It's true that Russian tastes to this day often run to vulgar, but that's no longer the dominant theme. Now there's plenty of tasteful and classic stuff to pick from. Since my visit to that men's store I've been buying all my clothes in Russia.

"I found the desire for (frankly not that great) Western mass produced goods to be a disappointing thing to be undermining the SU. " Agree. It was embarrassingly demeaning I think to Russians when they slobbered over utter Western junk. Thank God that's pretty much all gone.

That's been another growth experience for me as well, as I've been shifting from listening only to Western rock and pop music (when I don't listen to classical...) to mixing in more and more Russian rock and pop. I couldn't listen to a lot of Russian rock music from the early 1990's because it was all such awful rehashes of Western stuff, just trying to imitate the West. I was reminded of that recently when my AI played a few tracks from "Gorky Park," a 90s group that sang in English. Everything was totally derivative, from the guitar licks to their vocal stylings, like they aspired to be a third rate Aerosmith tribute band.

I compared that to my recent explorations of Би-2's (B-2's) "Luna Park" album, especially the first CD, which is really interesting and original music, or the sound track to the Брат 2 (Brother 2) movie, from 2000, which also is all original, just musicians being themselves without trying to imitate something in the West. It's an outstanding album.

Expand full comment

I don't know anyone that wears Canada Goose here in Canada. I think it is an overpriced brand that probably more folks in cities like Toronto wear then in rural Canada.

Expand full comment

"Why would the Russians be dumb enough to revive relations with a Europe that hates them to the point of many attempts to annihilate them as a people?"

Because prestige and status. Because they want to be allowed to join The Club.

Same reason Ukrainians embraced the nationalist ideology, turned on their brothers and their own parents. Because that was the price of admission to The Club.

Expand full comment

I think by now the Russians have probably gotten the message, they are not welcomed in the club. The Russian oligarchs who had their assets siezed and were treated like fugitives in 2022 surely realize they cannot even buy their way into the club. Who knows Russians seem to have short memories, it seems and eventually they may prove themselves to be as stupid as the club articulate them to be.

Expand full comment

I hope you are correct, but the fact that Russia is still ready to do a Minsk-3 (apparently this is why the Kursk incursion took Russia by such surprise) shows otherwise, even though Minsk and Minsk-2 were shams obvious to everyone but the Russian leadership.

For that matter, how many times have the Americans sold the Kurds down the river? Six times, is it, or seven? I lose count. Anyway, it does not matter, as the Kurds keep on coming back for more.

Expand full comment

Welll I remember maybe more than a year ago, it was announced that Russia would make a very reasonable offer to Ukraine and it's western backers. The expectations was that the offer would be refused, as it was. The strange thing about the timing of the Russian offer, is that before it was made Vasily Nebenzya Russia's permanent representative to the UN stated "The world should get used to the thought of unconditional surrender in Ukraine". So the offer in my opinion was very disingenuous on the part of the Russian leadership. The Ukrainians were just not sophisticated enough to accept the offer and throw off the Russian strategy. So now they face the consequences of their actions.

The fact that Russia got an opportunity to isolate and destroy Ukraine's strategic reserves, the best Ukraine had, in Kursk appears in my opinion to have been a trap. Now the Russians can advance unimpeded as they no longer need to worry about a surprise counter offensive from Ukraine.

Just possibilities, though I am more a believer in human incompetence as success or defeat are sometimes a matter of chance.

Expand full comment

From the perspective of the Ukrainian politics business class, the continuation of the war is an unmitigated blessing. The worst thing that could happen to them is for the war to end.

Expand full comment

"even though Minsk and Minsk-2 were shams obvious to everyone but the Russian leadership." Nonsense. Don't pat yourself on the back for seeing what everyone else missed, because you didn't see it either. Absolutely *nobody* thought that Germany, France, and the US had so dramatically lost touch with the responsibilities that kept them from annihilation that they would deliberately lie about such grave matters to a nuclear power.

Everyone thought that people like Merkel were wise enough not to burn their bridges forever by destroying diplomacy as a tool they needed, by lying to Russia. There's no way to fix that short of many decades without having that tool.

" the fact that Russia is still ready to do a Minsk-3 (apparently this is why the Kursk incursion took Russia by such surprise) "

Russia was never willing to do a Minsk-3 nor is any such fake willingness the reason why the Kursk incursion occurred. The Kursk incursion didn't take Russia by surprise: Russia planned for such things. It knew such things were extremely low probability events so it allocated the resources to handle them accordingly.

Russia knew that Kiev doing a Kursk attack would be a one-way ticket for Kiev to oblivion, a suicidal move. Kiev could only mount such an attack by pulling resources desperately needed to prevent collapses elsewhere on the front, and it could only try such an attack at the cost of having elite, reserve forces killed that it also desperately needed to plug holes elsewhere.

Russia knew there was a very low probability of Kiev attempting a nation-state level terrorist act in Kursk as a means of baiting Russia into general war with the US, but Russia also knew that the military outcome of such a terrorist attack would virtually guarantee defeat of Kiev and the West in Ukraine. That's exactly how Kiev's terrorist act in Kursk has played out. Every rational observer, and even some of the delusional ones such as the Pentagon, were wondering from the first day of the Kursk action why Kiev would try such an obviously doomed tactic.

Kiev has now had 22,000 men killed in Kiev, including brutal losses to Kiev's most elite brigades that it cannot afford. It has lost thousands of military assets such as tanks, armored personnel carriers, artillery, and air defense units it cannot replace. Russia has surged ahead along the entire front, taking advantage of weaknesses caused by Kiev's sending of needed manpower off to die in Kursk.

At the same time, attitudes have hardened in Russia to where it appears Russia will not settle for anything other than unconditional defeat of all of nazi-occupied Ukraine.

Expand full comment

I am hardly patting myself on the back for seeing what everyone else saw, including leadership of the LNR and DNR, who had to be pressured into signing.

Expand full comment

You would think it has become clear to them….Oh well, Perhaps Russia will again be able to make gobs of money off their cranky and uninclusive European brethren..

Expand full comment

"Because prestige and status. Because they want to be allowed to join The Club."

I see you didn't get the memo that the 90's want their stereotypes back. Russians have become far more worldly than in the early 90's. Russians don't give a shit about the EU or EU clubs. They've travelled all over the world and they know Europe decades ago entered a down and out phase.

A good example is the lousy food in Paris. Americans are so badly travelled they don't realize it when they're served food that was made in a food factory in Ireland, shipped refrigerated or frozen to Paris, kept in cold storage in the back of a bistro, and then just reheated to be plated and served to tourists. But something like 70% of the food sold in cafes and bistros in central Paris is like that. The high cost of labor and carrying the burden of the French social welfare state, coupled with extreme financial incompetence by the French government, has made it too expensive for most French restaurants in Paris to prepare food from scratch in real kitchens. It's the same way in many big cities in Italy, too.

Heck, that even extends to French baguettes. Almost all French baguettes now sold are made in food factories, par-baked and then frozen. They're popped into ovens for a few minutes to finish the baking process and then sold in bakeries and supermarkets. Handmade baguettes actually made on premises from flour have become so rare that the French have a name for them, "traditional" baguettes.

Russians aren't cretins so they know all that. They also know lousy service when they see it, and after the tenth visit to Paris or other tourist spots they're ready to move on.

They also know there's no prestige or status in being cretins like EU governments. Russians are repelled by the woke idiocy, the perversion, and the absolute stupidity of EU countries. It's like having a club for low-IQ, impoverished, incompetent perverts. Nobody with an IQ over 40 wants to be "allowed to join" such a club.

Russia, in contrast, has a lot of admiration for China. That's the club Russia wants to join, and in fact that's the club Russia helped create: BRICS. It's a much more interesting club than a bunch of vicious, failed colonialists on their way down.

Ukrainians, by the way, didn't "embrace the nationalist ideology." They were slaughtered by a nazi minority that took power, which arrested and killed 15,000 Ukrainians who opposed the nazi junta in the territories the nazis captured. The nazis knew from their WW2 experience (it was the same parties, with some of the same people who committed atrocities in WW2 still alive to provide "hands on" expertise) that if you kill anybody who opposes you the only narrative that young people hear is the narrative you tell them. Eight long years followed by two more of truly intense killing of opponents enabled the nazis to brainwash a much higher percentage of young people than would have ever gone along with them.

Expand full comment

"Fuck Donetsk. I want my oysters." - some airhead from the Russian bon ton

None of your essay explains why Ukrainians went to Maidan in the first place, what they thought they were getting.

Expand full comment

"Ukrainians" didn't go to Maidan. A few thousand people out of 52 million went to Maidan. Thinking that is a movement of "Ukrainians" is a profound failure of common sense.

In any country the application of a few billion US dollars can turn out a few thousand people to do pretty much whatever the paymasters want. In the case of Ukraine the US used the same playbook it has used in poor countries around the world for much of the past century: throw dollars at impoverished locals and buy however many goons the US wants. It's a cheap and very effective tactic.

Expand full comment

The Ukrainian people I know who went were not paid. Trying to tell them that membership in The Club was not on offer was like trying to tell a toddler that some toy wasn't all it was promised in the TV show and commercials.

Moreover, since Maidan, those people have only continued to double down

Foolish? Yes, but there they are.

Expand full comment

OMG Cheeso! You actual can write great comments!

Agree fully with you. Emmanuel Todd is a peculiar guy that I will call genius. He forecasted the fall of USSR as young and his Apres lémpire (After the Empire)he forecasted the demise of US. His latest book Defeat of the West (La Défaite de l’Occident) is a gem. Read it with pleasure. In my country he is non-grata and seen as an extremist but all he says is true and noteworthy.

As for the new rotten head of NATO I only expect evilness. And we 850 million people in Europe is keeping our mouths shut when non-elected Rutte talk about Europes future?

Was not NATO a defense coalition - not a geopolitical movement with its own agenda?

And we let von der Leyen speak for all countries in Europe without having any mandate what so ever of conducting each sovereign Nations foregin policy. The silence in Europe is the most frightening I have experienced. People letting those powergrabbers doing crimes each day by letting EU-money leaving EU to a non-EU state in War!

Thx C for the Todd input. Simplicius readers should get deeper into his books.

Expand full comment

Yeah, but what really can we do? I talk of Europeans who are conscientious of the lies and bs our Elites spread? Reality is, if I talk of von Der Lying as the lying, corrupt fraud she is, I would be probably criminally charged, and I would definitely loose my job (I work in some capacity for the state). So many say nothing, many others believe the bs and lies, because they sleep mostly, and many simply don't care.

I think we are in the cycle of downfall, its always the same, the first generation builds up its wealth, the second generation retains it and the third generation wastes it. And we are in the 3rd cycle, the waste cycle.

There is not much we can do, I said it here a couple of times, the Politicians like Von der Leyen, Rutte, Schröder, Starmer, Johnson, etc. etc., are just a small portion of the smear theater we are witnessing, behind them are hundreds of thousands of second and third rate Politicians, Administrator, NGOs, Think Tanks, Technocrats, small/middle/big corporations, state media, private media (they get money all the time from the Pentagon, state funds, etc.) who benefit of all the corruption and lies. Its like a sewage plant, you see the piles of shite at the top at the sewage sea (Elite Politicians), you don't see the countless little pieces of shite below it...

Expand full comment

Not much really. It is a downfall. But crying wolf can perhaps save a few.

Expand full comment

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it."

-Sinclair

Expand full comment

Thanks for the recommendation, I definitely will take a read.

Expand full comment

I must read a bit of his writings (Todd, not Cheetos).

Expand full comment

I can't remember the reference, but an interesting interview stated that Europe would try to double down on NATO, in the event of a defeat. The rational being that relying on the US military frees European countries from dealing with each other. If Germany rearms for defensive purposes, then Denmark, Belgium, France, Poland, etc will need to, as defensive weapons can be used offensively.

Expand full comment

Fuck Europe, let them get their soft pink hands dirty without my tax dollars.

Expand full comment

Russia and China are not natural allies (in the sense that each has what the other wants and can best get through cooperation) so much as Russia and Germany are natural allies. (Russia and China have much to offer one another, but largely they have been forced together as a result of American aggression.)

Russia has resources, skilled workers and markets. Russia wants to sell resources and attractinvestment to keep Russian workers busy and obtain technology transfer.

Germany has capital, products and know-how. Germany wants resources to fuel German factories, markets for German goods, investment opportunities for German capital and workers in German-owned or factories that won't actually move to Germany.

It has been United States policy to prevent this natural alliance from coming to fruitition. Luckily for Washington, europeans like being slaves.

Expand full comment

Keep the US in, Germany down and Russia out?

Up until 5 minutes ago the largest two trading partners of Russia and Germany were Russia and Germany.

Did the last 5 or 6 Czars even speak Russian?

Expand full comment

The Czars spoke Russian, but if you wa t to cheeze off a certain type of Russian nationalist, ask who the last ethnically Russian Czar was.

We don't know who Pavel's father was, but we do know that it assuredly wasn't Peter III Feodorovich.

Expand full comment

Well stated. And with a bit of sarcastic humor added.

I don't think NATO Europe is going to go along with UVdL and the US Big Plans. Welfare states and militaries are expensive.

"You can have butter or you can have guns"

-Göring

Yes, that one.

Expand full comment

The Politico assessment is actually on a 1 to 5 scale ("evaluations are given on a five-point scale (maximum 5 points)"). So "In the article "Five Questions Zelensky Is Asking in His European Tour (and the Likelihood He'll Get Them)" (there are actually 6 questions there) Politico's assessment is that 4 questions are straight out cloud cuckoo land, deserving a full 1 out of 5 mark... Some people are having trouble with maths today.

Expand full comment

In every peace talk the enemy also gets a say - and the Russians are going to say nyet to anything that’s left of Ukraine from joining NATO. That was their chief complaint before this Donnybrook got started.

The only possible terms that Russia is going to accept is the unconditional surrender of Kiev. The only choice Kiev has is if it will be de jore or d facto.

Expand full comment

1000 Russian casualties a day?

WTH did they get that number? Reached into and pulled it out from their a$$?

BTW, this is not really an "American" defeat, it's not about the US, it's about the UK imperialists -globalist oligarchs and bankers- who took over the polity of the US after WWII.

An "American defeat" is actually a defeat of the UK based colonialists. Something good for us in the US, actually, and the whole World.

I used to wonder why the UK was so involved in Ukraine? It seemed like they were the tail wagging the dog... but nooo, instead they are the loud chihuahua making noises. Time to get rid of them.

Hopefully we can also get rid of AIPAC.

Expand full comment

Blame shift into the UK you loony.

Expand full comment

The war has caused by the USA and the USA alone.

Expand full comment

Wrong. The British military/"security" services/and political are in it equally. And the EU poodles to a lesser extent.

Expand full comment

The Western Polities are ALL controlled by the money men in London.

They are the colonialists that renamed the British Empire into the American Empire... primarily for their own benefit and using the US Taxpayers to foot their frickin' bill.

Even the English politicos are controlled by them.

If you read carefully what I write -that goes for Alec Green- you will notice that I don't blame "the UK" per se, I blame the globalist oligarchs and bankers, which for 400 years have been based in London.

Expand full comment

TonyE.

We're absolute dicks and our political establishment has an absurd opinion of its own importance, but we aren't running the show.

Our influence on Ukraine has been a disaster, but we're only following orders. And those orders come from the State Dept.

Expand full comment

Nope, you do run it. See Great Game. Moreover, your boys are prepping the next show already by cruising Central Asian republics and establishing routes of migration of their least wanted islamists to Russia. Last time a UK spy was kicked out, FSB reported his ties to Russian Muslim community and immigration lobby. He was planting a bomb that is scheduled to blow in several decades. That's the level UK operates at.

Expand full comment

One of the motives of conspiracy retards to is to blame shift onto another group.

Really cowardly motivation right there.

"MUH UK CONTROLS MUH COUNTRY< WE DIDN'T DO NUFFTEN!"

Expand full comment

As a "money man" in London I can absolutely say that that is complete and utter horseshit pushed by tinfoil hat wearing loons. The money men behind the Federal Reserve are the ones who currently are pulling all the levers.

Expand full comment

I'm sure that the solvency of European banks without Fed money printing has nothing to do with European and British support for whatever the neoziocons in the U.S. decide. (That is sarcasm, BTW).

Expand full comment

American conspiracy nut cases always seek to blame shift from their own country, onto someone else, cowardly behaviour.

Expand full comment

The only tail wagging the U.S. dog is Israel. In fact, I would go so far to argue that this entire Ukraine fiasco is the direct result of Russian intervention in Syria, which prevented the Neoziocons from effecting their regime change there. The usual crew of the Kagan clan, Kristol, and their gentile sycophants like Bolton and Pompeo decided that to finish implementing the plan that Kagan, Kristol, and the other Neoziocons laid out in the 90s for remaking the Middle East Russia would have to be either 1) regimed changed 2) broken apart 3) tied up in a long-term conflict such that it could not offer any support to its regional allies in the Middle East. Hence, Maidan and all that followed.

Expand full comment

With this in mind, one can see that Nov. 7th 2023 and all that ensued in its wake is directly related to Ukraine. It became apparent to the Kristols and Kagans that option 3 from above was the only viable option and that Israel had to act quickly, because "long-term" was beginning to look like no more than a couple of years.

Expand full comment

Now someone blame shifts onto Israel, and the USA is just an innocent mislead bewitched victim.

LOLOL coward.

Expand full comment

I have no dog in this hunt. I don't live in the U.S., UK, Russia, Ukraine, or Israel. I just call them like I see them.

Look... I am well-aware of the history of U.S. foreign policy. U.S. history was a minor field for my candidacy exams many years ago. I know about the Dole Fruit Company, Sullivan and Cromwell and their manipulations of South American governments to benefit multinationals, the Dulles' brothers merger of Wall Street, the CIA, and the State Department, and so forth. I know about the bankruptcy of the U.S. in 1972, owing to the carry trade in gold reserves, and the alliance with Saudi Arabia to replace oil with gold as the commodity backing the USD.

I get all that, but nothing that the U.S. has done in the past 30 years makes any sense from a purely "rational actor" in its own best interests perspective on geostrategy. Prior to the emergence of the neoziocons, absolutely, one can see many elements of a "rational actor, self-interest" model for U.S. foreign policy. If Kagan, Kristol, and their ilk (which includes Nuland who is married to the clan) did not "hijack" U.S. foreign policy, you explain to me what happened. Please include in your explanation how these same group of people manage to appear in every U.S. executive branch from Clinton forward, including Trump and Obama.

Expand full comment

I do find it interesting that no one connects Maidan 2014 with Russian support for Syria in 2012. Syria was on 'the list' to be dismembered after Libya and Iraq, but Russia needed it for the security of its Med bases, and so backed Assad. Then lo and behold, Maidan, the coup, and the Ukraine conflict begins. IMHO there is a direct connection to Russian policy in Syria and US policy in Ukraine.

Expand full comment

I very much DID notice that. It appeared to be an “Oh YEAH?! Try THAT will you!!”

Expand full comment

"this entire Ukraine fiasco is the direct result of Russian intervention in Syria" The feeling in Russia is that the seismic rupture between a post-1991 capitalist Russia under Yeltsin that was doing its best to be a vassal of the US and an independent Russia that crazed US Cold Warriors still in power decided had to be destroyed was in March, 1999.

The US pivot from treating Russia as a slobbering lackey to an enemy that had to be destroyed was caused by Putin's unambiguous opposition to the US bombing of Belgrade and the US attack on Yugoslavia. US intelligence intercepts showed Russia was ready to go to war with the US to defend Yugoslavia but decided it did not have either the economic strength or conventional military strength to avoid stopping the US without general nuclear war ensuing.

That shook up the US, as a country could not be tolerated which dared to think about acting to prevent the US from destroying whatever country it wanted based on whatever fake premise was dreamed up in Washington. That was especially true for Russia, which under Putin from 2000 onward had clearly lifted itself up by the bootstraps from the economic catastrophe of the 90's.

Looking at what Swamp creatures were writing for each other from 2000 onward in the wake of Russia's resistance to the US destruction of Yugoslavia, there emerged a consensus that the way to contain and then weaken and tear apart any possibly resurgent Russia was by fomenting chaos and war in the former Soviet states on its border. The plan was to destroy Russia by dragging it into vicious wars on its borders.

In 2004 the US replaced the first government of Ukraine with an anti Russian coalition. In 2008 the US pushed its Georgian puppet into an invasion of South Ossetia that it knew Russia was obliged to defend under a UN Security Council resolution the US itself helped draft. When in 2010 Ukrainians ousted the extraordinarily corrupt government the US had installed in 2004, the US set into motion a plan to overthrow the democratically elected government of Ukraine and to replace it with an unelected puppet junta dominated by hard core nazis. The US then helped that junta kill 14,000 Russian people in Donbass to ensure Russia would intervene in Ukraine.

The Ukraine war started because a US establishment that had mastered the art of dodging failures, like Korea and Vietnam, felt itself so invincible in the wake of the collapse of the USSR that it believed it could apply its standard playbook of overthrowing any government it didn't like even to a nuclear power like Russia. It didn't bother to notice that a Russia which steadily grew in economic strength under Putin might develop by 2022 the ability to defeat the US in conventional economic and military war.

Expand full comment

"The Western Polities are ALL controlled by the money men in London."

Nope, pure conspiracy theory.

Expand full comment

Shut up jew Alec Green.

Expand full comment

Is it possible to block users on substack? I thought this boring bastard Dhdh had been banned but unfortunately he's back to derail yet another comment section.

Expand full comment

Right on cue.

Expand full comment

got a nice long foreskin, blue eyes, blond hair, not really Jewish.

Expand full comment

Does the name Rothschild mean anything to you?

https://risingtidefoundation.substack.com/p/sugar-and-spice-and-everything-vice

Expand full comment

you mean the fact the family name is linked to debunked conspiracy theories?

Expand full comment

The USA is the number 1 imperialist capitalist country in the world, and is in charge. All other countries are the followers. Stop scapegoating. Your country is not a mislead, or hijacked nation.

Expand full comment

Well... there is the issue of Kagan, Kristol, and all their friends (who now have an iron hold on U.S. foreign policy). They have hijacked U.S. foreign policy. I am certain that the average American, whether from New York City or Sioux City, could not find Ukraine on a map and could care less what happens there.

Expand full comment

Hijacked US foreign policy, you mean the imperialist aggressive Foreign policy that is over a century old?

So hijacked in the sense that it is exactly t he same as before? Make it make sense. There is no hijacking at play, it is just how the imperialist capitalist USA is. One based on colonialization and aggression since the foundation.

Expand full comment

The current "imperialism" is different than it was before WWII.

Before WWII, it was meant to create exports FOR American jobs and to spread the wealth among many.

After WWII it was meant to export American jobs and to create wealth for the very few.

Get it?

Expand full comment

Let’s just say they gave it a New American Century flavor shall we?

Expand full comment

because the JewSA is a colony of the Jew.

Expand full comment

Nope.

Jewish Zionists do have too much political influence though I do agree with that.

Expand full comment

One thing is clear –

"It's a big club, and you and I ain't in it."

Expand full comment

Nope the UK is a subordinate nation to the USA. They are willing lackies, but without the USA, they wouldn't dare do anything.

Expand full comment

And the UK is probably even more Jew conttolled than the JewSA. the UK is just useless to the jew now as it is a joke in the military realm.

Expand full comment

everything is about the Jews with you isn't it?

Expand full comment

Alec green just admit you are a Jew covering for your sin merchant chicken swinging tribe. .

Expand full comment

you are a mental defect, legit anti semites are scum.

Expand full comment

Alec, I'm gonna write this once more.... on the assumption that you read posts.

It's not the UK that is in charge, it's a small group of extremely rich people who have The Money.

They control the Western Polity.... ( for you, that's the political classes of the Western Nations ).

They are based in London, have been for 400 years.

Expand full comment

Yes the rich in the USA are in charge, not the rich in the UK.

you are spewing far right slave morality resent based dribble.

Expand full comment

Forget it, you are hopeless.

Expand full comment

No USA involvement, the UK wouldn't dare do shit.

Expand full comment

Don't argue, the overwhelming majority of both countries the UK and the US have nothing to with that shiteshow! And the Elites in those countries work together, they see themselves as an international Elite which couldn't give a rat's a$$ about the people in the US, UK or Ukraine!

Expand full comment

I thought UK war mongering was a consequence of BREXIT. The UK needs to prove they are more European than the EU, trying to earn brownie points for a future reintegration into the EU again.

Expand full comment

"I used to wonder why the UK was so involved in Ukraine? " The UK have been Russophobes since the end of the 18th century. They didn't like the idea of a new empire appearing on the world stage that could threaten the British Empire. Russia's defeat of Napoleon really shook them up, so ever since then the UK has sought to tear the Russian Empire apart. They still haven't adapted to the idea that it's foolish for a former Empire now reduced to Chihuahua status to bite a Russia that has become stronger and more powerful than ever.

With half the world's population depending on Russian food or food-growing resources for their food security, with every first world or would-be first world country except the US depending on Russian energy and resources to maintain first world status, and with the world's most industrially productive country counting on an expanding Russian economy as a key offset to unreliable other partners, perhaps for the first time in world history Russia may well have the most durable economy on earth. Add Russia's extraordinarily combat-capable military and all that really annoys the UK Chihuahua.

Expand full comment

I'd actually challenge you on that 18th century part because I can relatively easily trace it to 16th and Richard Chancellor's landing. UK is the primary seed of discord on this planet, particularly regarding Russia which it will forever try to destroy for the same reason it destroyed Imperial China with opium - there can be no independent self-reliable nation on Earth because it will inevitably outtrade the Brits.

Expand full comment

But the Brit ‘empire is non existent Now. Churchill destroyed it in his service to his Jew masters (the focus group )

Expand full comment

Core elites are still there, and through their education system and selective admission to higher echelons of society they're breeding narrative in other nations elites that will work in their favor in the future. They keep seeding dragon teeth and they're far from done with Russia. Only when Old Money of Europe die it will be over.

Expand full comment

The Sixth Coalition was an opportunistic Brit creation to destroy Napoleon. The inclusion of Prussia and Austria was engineered by Brit money (and self-interest on the part of the nations above) and not because of any love of Russia. The vast majority of the soldiers that swamped Napoleon at Leipzig and later in the 1814 campaign were provided by Austria, with contributions from Prussia and Sweden. There was Russian representation to be sure, but if it were left only to Russia, Napoleon would have survived in Western Europe.

I'd also point out that Russian complicity in the Continental System after Tilsit/Erfurt was a proximate cause of war between Britain and Russia. So we must be clear-eyed about what the relationship was like during the Napoleonic Wars.

I do believe that after France became a Brit partner under the Bourbons and later under Napoleon III, the anti-Russian bias was very pronounced. But this is very much along the lines of the Brit animosity towards whomever is the greatest continental power in Europe, regardless of name. France was during the Napoleonic era and many times before. Russia was until the Germans started building a navy, and the Soviets were later on at least two occasions, with the Nazi interlude in between. Russia is today.

Expand full comment

"I used to wonder why the UK was so involved in Ukraine? "

I can tell you why. Because the UK has a vested interest in stirring up strife so that the United States gets involved and then the UK can show who the loyalest little lackey is, standing shoulder to shoulder with its American Master looking all stirring and brave!

Poland plays a similar role, albeit on a more local scale.

Those of you who are familiar with the "Looney Tunes" canon may recall the little yappy dog who follows Spike The Bulldog around, singing Spike's praises, getting slapped around by Spike and getting the big dog into fights with black panthers and suchlike.

The UK is that little yappy dog.

Expand full comment

Have you not yet realized that what Western MSM says is most often just projection?

So just replace the word "Russian" with "Ukrainian", and it all makes perfect sense.

Expand full comment

You mean the Western Corporate Propaganda Machine?

What's interesting is how the Deep State and The Money Men got side swiped by the Internet.... they had to control it... so they funded Facebook, Twitter, etc.. You don't think those huge data warehouses the NSA was building in the 00s were to store info about foreigners, do you?

No, the NSA was building those big data warehouses to collect the data for Facebook, Twitter, etc... it costs tens of billions of dollars to run such massive disinformation and spying on people. And so many idiots bought into the "Free Social Media" to satisfy their own narcissism... while they were suckered into the World's Largest Spying Operation... willingly.

Nothing is ever free, you see?

I must admit, I admire the chutzpah of the Deep State at getting away with this. They even massively stole the US presidential election in '20.

OK, "almost" getting away with it. Elon Musk sort of threw a monkey wrench into it.

We're entering an interesting phase of civilization... as masks are falling off and the power of the corporate propaganda machine is falling off.

I fear, I hope for, a Civil War in the US that will get rid of the power of the globalists, foreign bankers and AIPAC Zionists over the US... and the West.

Expand full comment

Your understanding of the timelines is incorrect.

There is Deep State money in Google - there is not Deep State money in Facebook and Twitter. And they don't need to - those companies are more than happy to roll over and give the government what it wants, so long as they get something back. And that something back is implicit/explicit support for their monopoly dominance of their respective spheres.

As for "stealing" the election: it is certainly possible but the main reason the 2020 election was won by Biden is Trump's failure to execute on basic electoral overwatch at the state level, plus his vax stance, plus the noise over Russiagate and more. Or in other words, his margin of possible victory was much lower than the margin of fraud.

This time around, it is different. It is not just RFK Jr and Tulsi joining up with him representing the merger of right and left populists; Gallup has conducted a survey of voters for about 25 years. For 2020 and earlier, the average lean among independent voters was +4 Democrat. In 2016, it was +2.5 Democrat.

For 2024, it is +5 Republican. First time ever in Gallup's recorded history.

Independent voters are 50% of the voting populations; the registered Rs and Ds are 25% each.

The gaslighting going on now in the US is that this election is close - it is not in the least. The polls comprising the RCP average were off by 5%+ in both 2016 and 2020 - there is no reason whatsoever to think they are more accurate now.

I fully expect Trump to get at least 300 electoral votes, and there's a 50%+ chance he wins the popular vote outright. Trump's team is furthermore built out with RFK Jr and Tulsi and their supporters joining Trump ones, and he has Vance as his VP. They are not going to be able to fix everything in 4 years, but I beleive they are going to try, and they are going to build a base from which future work will build on.

That's the best anyone can hope for, at this time.

Expand full comment

It’s easy to colonize and conquer civilizations when you’re the only one who has guns.

When the other guy has the same weapons, not so easy to conquer lol

Expand full comment

Even the proxies have proxies now: Ukraine’s military intelligence service has been sharing drone warfare techniques with Tuareg rebels in Mali to help them kill Russian security contractors fighting for the African country’s military-led government, per French newspaper Le Monde. Andrey Yusov, the chief of Ukraine’s HUR, its military intel wing, confirmed the r’ship, acknowledged it as a diplomatic error but said simply “there’s no going back.” The Ukrainian agency is committed to hunting down Wagnerians “wherever they are.” Next up for Ukraine-trained rebels: Sudan.

Mali has accused the U.S. of being behind the Ukrainian support for the Tuareg rebels, as have Niger and Burkina Faso. Illustrating the long arm of Ukraine—and its longterm usefulness—the U.S. has found a side-hustle for the scrappy little determined proxy, an escapade in Africa which will maintain its fighters in a permanent state of war. Punching above its weight, Ukraine first tried to weaken Russia, and then, emboldened by the sheer moxie of such derring-do, has branched out to destabilize the Sahel.

Expand full comment

It's a 'don't look here where Ukraine is being wiped out'- but over there where plucky Ukrainians are fighting a brave fight for the glorious west. Expect more of this, especially since the ME projection of western power is not going so well (to put it mildly). It is another device for threatening the global south with local wars coming to you guys if you do not back us.... blah. The antidote is BRICS.The only solution is to turn western dollars to dust. And then watch it all implode.

Expand full comment

This is the ISIS-ization of the West. They stared so long into the abyss that, as in an act of osmosis, the mass of what lay torpid in those depths wicked itself upward & found reanimation within them.

Expand full comment

Ukraine flattered Macron by claiming it could be his attack dog in Africa. Macron liked the idea, especially since he had no home grown troops who wanted to do anything other than fight him. But Ukraine is wreaking such havoc out there it is destroying whatever last vestige of credibility the west continued to enjoy. The global south has sat back with the popcorn, on the principle that you do not interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake.

Expand full comment

So wait, are you saying The Abyss stared back?!

Expand full comment

I think we can expect a lot more of that from various Ukrainian groups, even after a ceasefire/armistice.

the Neo-Nazi Banderites types will have no place in a nation at peace and no place at all in the eastern provinces. Due to their ideology, a life as soldiers of fortune seems likely. Bandera himself never stopped and there were ex-SS men fighting in Indo-China as late as the 60s and 70s.

On a slightly related note, how do you think Bandera REALLY died?

Expand full comment

Dunno about the Bandera question, but Gladio-2 can now be fully staffed with “blue-eyed Al-cia-Da”!

Expand full comment

You're probably correct.

Gladio shows us how smoothly secret underground societies, criminal mafias and intelligences agencies can work together. In fact I am not stretching the truth at all to say that intelligence agencies ARE underground secret societies.

As for the details of the death of Stephan Bander, I was trying to dig into the particulars of his story with the very thin third and fourth hand materials available online. I feel the official account of his death to be grossly implausible.

The official story is that he was assassinated in West Germany in 1959 at the age of 50 by a KGB operative using a super-secret heart attack causing cyanide poison gas/dust/pellet gun. A weapon which has never been seen, either then or in the 65 years since. The only evidence presented was the testimony of the purported assassin himself, who defected, testified, got 4 years in prison and then was presumably given a new identity and resettled in the west with a pension.

Time maybe our best weapon against propaganda, it's interesting to see what a story looks like after 65 years.

Expand full comment

A handful of Ukrainians in the sahel are just PR window dressing. The French and US run the "moderate" rebels there

Expand full comment

This story is stupid on so many levels.

Let's start with: Ukraine losing on its home territory. How does killing Wagner mercenaries benefit Ukraine?

Answer: it does not. The actual trainers are CIA or MI6 operatives who first trained Ukrainian operators, but are now training African ones. Some of them might actually be Ukrainian, but the controlling authority is "western intel agency".

Expand full comment

Yeah it seems like a simple case of ‘See? We can still mess shit up despite the undeniable reality of getting rolled over at home’. In the end, just another annoying cope…

Expand full comment

Quoting from my original comment above: "Mali has accused the U.S. of being behind the Ukrainian support for the Tuareg rebels, as have Niger and Burkina Faso."

Note: Western intel agencies have, to quote from my comment above, "found a side-hustle for the scrappy little determined proxy."

Nothing about fighting Tuareg rebels in Mali helps Ukraine win on the actual LOC in Ukraine, of course.

That is not the point.

The point is the longterm usefulness to which the U.S. can put Ukraine in far-flung conflict zones. Exportable chaos, if you will.

It could well be that this excursion in July was a dress rehearsal for the scrappy little proxy, a Heat Check--like opening in New Rochelle before hitting Broadway's main stage.

Expand full comment

I understand what you are saying, but understand what I am saying: no one with half a brain would believe anything about this nonsense story - Ukraine fighting Russia in Mali.

This is typical dumbfuck Yalie CIA or dumbfuck Eton MI6 idiocy.

Maybe it worked 50 years ago, before the internet.

Expand full comment

Thank you for yet another extremely comprehensive and thorough analysis.

Just two comments:

1) Handwritten on those Russian bombs are the words "For the children of Crimea" (closest one to camera) and "terrorists will not be taken prisoner."

2) So far, October has been balmy in Ukraine, but all that changes tomorrow (Oct 12) as the autumn cold and rains are set to sock in for at least a week. Today or tomorrow (for the easternmost regions) will be the last day of the year for wearing T-shirts in the afternoon, although it'll be a while yet before any risk of snow. But yah, the MUD IS COMING.

Expand full comment

https://www.bluegreenatlas.com/climate/ukraine_climate.html

Designing some WW2 East Front wargames some time back, a key feature is obviously weather. I recall (confirmed by this link) that certainly the South is almost maritime in climate terms, getting more and more "typical Russian steppe" as you head north. In games design you need to try to model the impact of weather on operations. And as you say mud is coming, but I dare say will have a bigger impact the further north than in the south, and in fighting/operations outside built up areas. This might point to where we might see fighting intensify during the Raputitsa. Of course both the Russians and Ukraine militaries developed training, equipment and doctrine for bad weather including mud, but it is certain that it slows things down. It is also certain that western equipment is not designed for these conditions, particularly areospace and electronic stuff - and it is arguable that western "advisors" might not fully appreciate the impact on conditions. However given that the UAF now seems to be turning into a scratch light infantry force with limited heavy weapons, this might not have such an impact. However having older unfit and untrained conscripts sitting in a cold trench full of water will not do much for morale.

Expand full comment

Terrain movement costs doubled and action points reduced?

Expand full comment

Agreed.

And the Russian Air Force doesn't concern themselves with mud.

Expand full comment

Thanks again Simplicius for the real granular detail which only you can make so interesting. Hubby is Dutch and mostly a normie and believes the anti Russian propaganda. I predicted when the SMO started that Russia would win easily and he laughed heartily, explaining how small their GDP was and how they would be crippled by sanctions and Putin had terminal rabies, you know the catchlines. I said, what nonsense, they are a superpower and have a massive nuclear arsenal and I gave a caveat that only a world war by the west could perhaps beat the bear. It’s fascinating how this SMO has become a world war from almost the start/before the start and STILL Russia is winning, is flourishing, is proud and is fighting as humanely as possible. Honestly I could see myself leaving the prison island down under and fleeing to mother Russia. St Michael defend us in battle against the evil ones⚔️⚔️

Expand full comment

Hi Laura, no disrespect intended towards hubbie, but I have a question? How can you tolerate having an ignorant spouse?

If me, I wouldn't want that as it would be a trigger point for arguments.

Expand full comment

I hear you, it can be infuriating at times. I don’t know what makes him so gullible about Europe and The West in particular but he always loved the idea of the EU. He is an optimist and thinks most people are good, I am a pessimist and believe all of us are fallen without Jesus’ love and forgiveness. We are both believing Catholics though and he can recognise that Russia is much more sane in its anti woke, pro family policies. Essentially he believes that people/ media tell the truth in spite of all the examples of gross lies and horrible atrocities

Expand full comment

The first thing to do is to break their trust in the media.

Israel is helping. Lean on that.

Expand full comment

We’ll stick around, and I might be able to learn something… We’ve taken to just not even bringing anything up, which works in a way but is less than ideal. I much prefer to engage in wild collaborative speculation and information assembly, but hey y’caint have it all…

Expand full comment

No spouse is perfect. One must remind oneself of their other qualities and simply draw a line around topics that quickly become inflammatory. That is, if you want to have an otherwise happy marriage.

Expand full comment

That is good advice Scott

Expand full comment

It’s not so much ignorance as it is being under mind control. Life is and has been generally characterized by spiritual warfare, but these days increasingly it’s manifesting as psychological warfare. Tptb know more about psychology than anybody else, and on top of that they’re organized, have a huge operating budget, and are very determined, in addition to being demonically energized, of course.

Expand full comment

I was almost evicted from a family wedding recently in Texas, for my Putin loving ways!!

Expand full comment

Gal, take a victory lap. You know you're over the target when they're taking shots. Stay strong.

Expand full comment

Ta cheetosSpring! I will stay strong and I do keep peppering my loved ones with redpilling Substack articles.

Expand full comment

from North Central Texas, hang in there. I do the same thing with my family.

Expand full comment

Brace yourself. Thanksgiving is just around the corner. You'll be the only one at the table who isn't less ignorant than the turkey being carved.

I've gotten used to an Iron Curtain of delusion being dropped by my Western acquaintances and family. By the way, the term "Iron Curtain" wasn't coined by Winston Churchill in a speech he gave in the US. It was coined decades earlier, in the 1920's I believe, by a Western visitor to a Russia in the throes of a Bolshevik takeover who was commenting on the total propaganda and lies *from Western media and governments* about what was going on in Russia.

I don't say Western "friends" because I can't say I have any of those anymore. They've all been so marinated in 24/7 lies that when I tell the truth about what I see in Russia (I'm an American living here in Russia) they claim I've been turned into a Putin bot.

Expand full comment

On the subject of carved pumpkins, may I propose hammer and sickle design? That usually does the trick.

Expand full comment

Hah, that would just get you a second helping of turkey in socialist heartlands like Ann Arbor or Vermont.

When Russians threw out their communists and switched to capitalism it seemed like all the old commies moved to the US.

Expand full comment

Dammit, how dare they mock me so. I'll have to fall back to the IRS pumpkin - now that should do it.

Expand full comment

Don't let the children see it. They'll have nightmares...

Expand full comment

That’s guaranteed to please nobody.

Expand full comment
Oct 11Edited

And a lot became livery cab drivers in NYC. I used to get taken home after the trains stopped running by many, and got some interesting stories out of them of life in the USSR.

If you never got there, Duluth, MN is another socialist hotbed. There's a place there called Fitger's, like a brew pub but decorated all with hammers and sickles, people hugging drill presses and the like. It was refreshing. To this day the Democrat party in Minnesota is called the Democratic Farmer Labor party or DFL. A hearkening back to those times.

Expand full comment

Oh but no. Ain’t ya’heard? The lefties in The States have been engineered into hateful intolerant covidian Russophobes who delight in the idea of force being used against those with whom the disagree…so long as they dont have to do the heavy lifting.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I have the same problem here in Denmark wrt people being marinated in Anti Russia and pro mRNA vaccine propaganda. It does help just shutting up and share other stuff, knowing we will never truly be close again.

It was also interesting the company just hired an Iranian. So now we are two who does not like the Jewish slaughter. Unsurprising and funny how immigration had turned against the western state leaders now the Zionists have gone to war.

Expand full comment

It’s truly something to behold, how those two things you mentioned above have inserted a wedge in so many relationships. I suppose an upside is that it’s quite a bit more clear who I’ll accept in my foxhole and who wont be allowed to get close….

Expand full comment

The most pathetic part of The Iron Curtain of Delusion is your western "friends" could open a book now and then.

Take a look at the comments on Newsweek Ukraine war porn. Too funny!

Expand full comment

And to think that Texas is basically America's Russia. Shame on them.

Expand full comment

Retards who wears masks in their cars and watch CNN are beyond help. Your family are retarded or geou-wish. Hating Putin is a geou thing

Expand full comment

Funny you should mention that. I was asking an LLM about the Khazars and the history they were embroiled in. It didnt offer much detail, but it became clear why they would have deep seated hatred for all things Russian. Given that most of the neocons are descendants of them, it makes sense that poking the bear year-round is a sport four them. I think this time they might find that the bear has horns…..

Expand full comment

Yeah I just dont say much these days. The covidian narrative separated the wheat from the chaff and the Ukraine war just confirms it. All I care to do is interject the occasional strategically placed factoid now and again. “The USA sponsor two coups in ten years, so let’s start there….” That sort of thing.

Expand full comment

Laura, I hope he's a good father and a kind man, because hubbie surely isn't the brightest bulb in the pack, is he?

Expand full comment

Thanks John, he is a loving hubby and father and a really intelligent cardiologist. Very dedicated to his patients. I don’t think IQ is part of the equation at all. It’s some kind of inherent scepticism, maybe a previous bad experience with the machine, something I can’t quite put my finger on…that allows those of us to see through the propaganda

Expand full comment

We each of us hang on to our comfort blanket of delusion, until finally for whatever reason or reasons we're ready to see its lack of utility.

Expand full comment

Hi Laura. It's strange isn't it. I also know intelligent and kind people who are entirely disinterested in politics. 🤔

Anyway glad your husband is a "Keeper".

Expand full comment

I mean, Ben Carson is indisputably a brilliant neurosurgeon, but he has some absolutely kooky views on things like history, economics, and civic engineering.😂

Expand full comment

Some people have small, frail souls. They simply can't see humanity as a gestalt. They are rooted in materialism.

Expand full comment

Nobody even said it would be easy being surrounded by feeble minded cowards….

Not everyone mind you, but damn a huge swath of the populace got HAD.

…and yes I am referring to the injection campaign…

Expand full comment

It was such an easy test, though... All these people who were shrieking about the Mark of the Beast for the last 40 years, and they lined up for a needle full of God knows what? I'm convinced that slavery shouldn't have been banned. I believe that about 40 % of mankind needs to be enslaved, as they are incapable of ensuring even their own health, let alone a family's. That's why the Bible never denounced it as wrong, it just said to treat your slaves well.

I don't know. Maybe I'm just in an extraordinarily contrarian mood right now.

Expand full comment

IT’s almost as though there is a rebel gene that causes the user to constantly question the status quo and dig around all the usurpations we have been handed. Turns out, quite a lot of them have turned out to be false.

“Oh hunnie, that’s just fairy tale people tell themselves so their Reality Tunnel wont cave in around them”

Expand full comment

I had a similar argument with my sister, who insisted the Russian economy was smaller than the Italian. Recently I pointed out Russia has a larger economy measured by GDP PPP according to the World Bank. She didn't blink, making me wonder whether she still remembers her earlier argument. Sometimes, I feel like Winston in 1984, wondering whether people can remember the past, or just agree with the latest MSM stories.

Expand full comment

She probably didn’t blink because what you said went straight over her head and didn’t land at all. The delulu is so strong that it cannot be countered by reason

Expand full comment

Like for the use of "delulu". Had to look it up. Nearly a real word, classified as "internet slang". :)

Expand full comment

I had not heard that one…it fits though.

Expand full comment

I made the mistake of reading some comments from some main-stream media publication the other day about Ukraine. The level of ignorance was staggering. Even the blue-haired male-hating heifers in the U.S. have a better grasp on reality.

Expand full comment

GDP PPP is a good indicator, but real sector in general is where it's at. Having a million dog barbers doesn't equal to having a single power plant, even though they might outmatch one another on paper. When push comes to shove, it only matters who has food, energy, weapons and expertise to run all of it continuously. Which is Russia.

Expand full comment

A million dog barbers!!! Love that so much💜

Expand full comment

"There are more than 300,000 pet groomers in the US. Professional dog groomers earn an average of $50,000 per annum. 86% of pet groomers in the US are female."

From a dog barber industry site. Not a million, but not a small number either.

Expand full comment

They will do a bang up job staffing all those refurbished ammo factories

Expand full comment

“But look at our cooked books and balance sheet! They are fuggin huge!!”

“Sir, there is some sort of spectre at the gate demanding payment of debt somewhere in the trillions…”

Expand full comment

So you are claiming that economically, my daily trip to Chick-fil-A is not the same as ... I don't know ... an engineer working at SpaceX?

Yes, the Russian Federation autarky.

Expand full comment

I made enemies with all my friends and family 22 years ago when Bush invaded Iraq. Now almost all Americans regards the Iraq War as a "mistake"? Nobody came back acknowledging their mistake

Expand full comment

Yes an Orchestrated Mistake .

Expand full comment

I get badgered now and again about my “world-view” and what I want to say is: You have no fuggin idea what my so called world view is because every time i say something that deviates from the MSM narrative collage in your head you shriek “conspiracy theorist” and slam the door! So yeah, people seem to be very averse to creating their own dynamic models in their cognitive networks and rely solely on mockingbird media. What astounds me is that they think they are so smart for doing it….

Expand full comment

Laura, thanks for sharing. I have a similar thing with my Dutch in-laws. Especially my father-in-law, who used to be full on 'Crimea will be returned' deluded, and still mentions to me about how Putin is poisoning the rivers, etc, etc. I do not have the energy to get deep into the topic with an elderly person, so I usually just express doubt about what the newspapers report and advise that they will accuse Russians of anything; and we kind of end the discussion there.

What has amazed me in the past couple of years, is that none of my Dutch family/acquaintances have ever asked me for my opinion about the Ukraine conflict. One time my wife read out the news headline 'Russia bombs Europe!' when that Ukrainian missile killed the Polish farmer, but I just expressed doubt and advised her to wait until next morning for more details to emerge. And a couple hours later there was a different headline. Now, I am known to my family/friends as being someone with 'radical political views' - i.e. someone who has always hated the American & 'my own' British empire, and they are always happy to ask for my opinions about Scottish independence or Dutch politics or the latest American presidential election. But they NEVER dare to talk about Russia/Putin with me. It's so odd. Like they're scared of being forced to face up to the likely fact that I'm on Russia's side.

Expand full comment

I hear you Neil, it’s bizarre how readily Europeans are to believe the Russophobia when Russia saved Europe with their blood in WW2

Expand full comment

Europeans, as a rule, are all about The Done Thing.

Expand full comment

Yes, they have been assimilated by the Borg. The EU was really an early example of globalism and the benefits lured Europe into steadily and slowly losing their independence and voice and now control of borders

Expand full comment

Europeans like being slaves.

Expand full comment

Germany apparently likes being a BDSM slave in a dungeon with distinct lack of hydrocarbons at its disposal….

Expand full comment

A frigid cold dungeon

Expand full comment

Well, no need to tell the hubby, "I told ya so".

I remember when Americans were moving to Australia because the nation was considered "free", authentically liberal. Now, I run into Europeans, Zeelanders and Aussies that moved here and are regretting the choice.

The two largest nationalalities leaving our western Satanic lands for Russia are German and American.

Expand full comment

So we are back to western trainers being sent in. It is as if we have a constellation of narratives that orbit this theatre of war on their own trajectories, an air display designed to take public attention away from the brutal fact of defeat on the ground.

Russia has a simple battle plan. If the west crosses certain lines that have now been well drawn Ukraine will take such a devastating nationwide punch that western Europe will collapse under the weight of refugees. Russia does not have to threaten nuclear weapons or a strike on Berlin. This human tide will be enough to bring chaos to the west and the downfall of those governments who connived for this war. So they are between a rock and a hard place and the US has taken its profit and lost interest. Probably best to just allow Russia make all the moves while western talking heads talk themselves to a standstill. Wind down media coverage and allow the denouement to take place away from western public gaze.

Expand full comment

The U.S. will maintain prestige by demonstrating the degree to which it can palm off on Europe the management & maintenance of Project Ukraine. Just. Like. That.

In delegating the upkeep & aftercare of Ukraine to Europe, the U.S. can sit back, like a boss, patting itself on the back for a job well done, footloose & fancy free--and begin surveying the prospects for chaos in China.

The U.S.'s status increases in direct proportion to the degree it can get its vassals to turn on a dime.

Tom Sawyer got the other boys to whitewash the fence, after all, while he sat back back jiggling his foot.

One of the most foundational aims of the U.S.'s Founding Fathers was to be members of the landed gentry, able to hire others to do the work.

Expand full comment

Excellent allusion. Meanwhile Tom was also kind, brave and resourceful, none of which the globalist freaks are.

Expand full comment

White Ukrainians. Refugees would not be a problem. The problem is the African invasion facilitated by Hebrew immigrant aid society. Maybe the Ukrainians would clean uo the African problem.

Expand full comment

Let’s you and him fight?

Expand full comment

"If Iran cannot prevent this strike, then it must launch a simultaneous counter-retaliatory strike at the moment when Israeli and US aircraft take off en masse. If Iran misses this strike, it may no longer have the opportunity to launch a retaliatory strike." A broadcast from another planet? Here's a different take on such a strike and Iran's capacity to respond from Andrei Martyanov and Scott Ritter. Wanders afield now and again but delightfully thorough and in-depth. A treat from two experts. Ritter launches into a wonderful history lesson at about 11:30. Tomorrow? We can only hope. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8v5rX22qzM&t=3592s

Expand full comment

Ritter has gone of the deep end - he sees Uncle A under his bed and thinks all germans are the SA.

Expand full comment

Both Moscow and Tehran announced that VVP and Pezeshkian are visiting Ashgabat, Turkmenistan on 11 October to attend a ceremony marking the 300th birth anniversary of the Turkmen poet and thinker Magtymguly Pyragy.

Moscow and Tehran may want to bring forward the formal inking of the Russian-Iranian defense pact, which was originally scheduled to take place in Kazan in two weeks. If 16 American tankers are simultaneously taking off from the Qatar airstrip as VVP and Pezeshkian confab in Ashgabat, then I hope both presidents will hasten their praise about the poet Pyragy and have pens in hand, ready to sign.

The Kremlin is making it clear to Washington and Tel Aviv that Moscow is irrevocably aligned with Tehran and will help the latter no matter what it takes. The “Murmansk-BN” system, which Russia has reportedly supplied to Iran, epitomizes this commitment.

The Murmansk-BN is a powerful EW system, which can jam and intercept enemy radio signals, GPS, communications, satellites, and other electronic systems up to 5,000 kms away and neutralize “smart” munitions and drone systems — and it is capable of disrupting high-frequency satellite communication systems owned by the US and OTAN.

Iran's gonna give it a Crazy Workout shortly.

Expand full comment

Commentators/analysts often forget that Iranians are no slouches when it comes to EW. The arms embargo probably helped a lot with that as well. In any case, US drones should be advised to stay at home, unless they're ready to switch sides 😂

Expand full comment

>The Murmansk-BN is a powerful EW system, which can jam and intercept enemy radio signals, GPS, communications, satellites, and other electronic systems up to 5,000 kms away and neutralize “smart” munitions and drone systems — and it is capable of disrupting high-frequency satellite communication systems owned by the US and OTAN.

Which sounds amazing on paper, but where is that system in action in the SMO?

Because NATO satellites and Ukrainian drones and missiles are doing whatever and going wherever they want. What is Murmansk-BN doing to stop it, and why is it not stopping it?

Expand full comment

Clearly you don't understand what ECM does.

ECM does not shoot down satellites.

It does not shoot down NATO drones over NATO territory.

It interferes with the operations dependent on signals from these. Russian ECM are why Excalibur shells never worked very well and clearly don't do diddly squat now. Ditto for HIMARS, Storm Shadow, <insert Wunderwaffe here>

Nor is GPS that hard to subvert. If you monitor the actual GPS signals in a city, for example, you can see just how shite the system really is. The signals are weak, there are no usable technological fixes for multi-path interference, the locations and trajectories of satellites in many parts of the world are bad, the list goes on and on and on.

Furthermore, ECM has the same structural limitations as any form of radio signal - strength declines over distance. The power requirements to cover all of Russia with a battlefield strength ECM net would require some significant percentage of world power generation.

Expand full comment

And you'd design around such a system. The battlefield systems can be reconfigured rapidly and are harder to counter. I can also tell you developing such systems is a pain in the ass. Imagine you have a bunch of devs and such used to having cell coverage and you keep on knocking them out with tests of ECM. You end up with PhD RF guys hunting for the leaky connectors.

I always knew when the patrols were coming back in Iraq because the wireless network would go to hell because they'd never turn the damn thing off before they came into the compound.

Expand full comment

Indeed, whack a mole.

Go out with cell signal suppressors, they change to CB band.

Add CB band suppression, they change to household RF.

Change to household, they convert to shortwave radio. Ensuing various flavors of radio.

The result is a gigantic multi-ton ECM vehicle which then gets taken out with a wired or pressure sensor mine, or runs out of fuel for its massive diesel generators after about an hour.

I am not and have never been in any kind of combat electronics - use or design - but I am trained in electric engineering - electromagnetics version.

Expand full comment

You get the point though. Portable, effective and resilent are always a balancing act.

Expand full comment