158 Comments
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Go on spit it out and wail for the poor ZionaZi entity just defending itself.

Expand full comment

Wouldn’t it be nice if we had leaders who had enough sense to do whatever it takes to deescalate tensions and decrease nastiness?

Expand full comment

Richard Condon’s Prizzi Family Mirrors the Mafia, Senator, President, Black Nobility of Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaires - Rulers of the World!

Mafia families are usually from the Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility families whose history stretches out to 10,000 years of Phoenician History. Particularly in the Prizzi series which even had a movie made out of them.

The Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility use Satanism and the use of Satanic Rituals to corrupt people in order to create a group of Psychopaths willing to follow any mandate in order to Rule the World…

The Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility own and run the Vatican, SMOM, Jesuits, KOC, and La Cosa Nostra. The European Monarchies like the British Crown are branches of Rome and they manage secret societies like the Freemasons which infiltrate government agencies and run corporations for the monarchs.

The Sovereign Military order of Malta SMOM is the top military council and it works closely with the Orders of St John ran by Protestant monarchs. The Knights of Malta are the engineers of war. The royal and noble bloodlines are all working together as a global crime syndicate and part of the modernized Roman Empire.

Their Minions will conscript you and send you to war, mandate the Deathvaxx, Digital identity, Central Bank Digital Currencies, total surveillance and the end of free speech!

https://satchidanand.substack.com/p/richard-condons-prizzi-family-mirrors

Expand full comment

Please take your meds. I'm not saying you are wrong, but you do your cause a disservice by coming across as a raving lunatic who sits too close on public transit.

Expand full comment

I am afraid I must agree with Mr. Zorost about your delivery Mr. Satchidanan.

I am a subscriber of yours because I do believe in what you call "Energy Enhancement against Satanism", but all communication relies upon technique, and you need to develop yours.

You can't just be throwing out Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility Deathvaxx, Digital identity, Central Bank Digital Currencies in huge blocks of text.

Just as a fine banquet might start with a little soup lightly seasoned or a great symphony may begin with a few notes developed into a motif, so you too should start smaller and develop slowly.

Expand full comment

Many Thanks Satchidanand for harping on this particular hidden 'Phoenician' aspect of both western Oligarch human history & our present same lineage of Oligarch fake 'money' (Greek 'mnemosis' = 'memory') amnesic command & control over the colonized world. Readers should be asking you many more questions, because you are describing the very pulse in the origin of Oligarchy's fake 'money' wealth & control in our time. i.e. We are playing the Oligarch game, meant to destroy us.

The egregious violent Phoenician period of colonization of the Mediterranean & Black Seas (Ashkenaz & Khazaria is centered in Ukraine) between 4000-0 BC (barely mentioned in history classes). Phoenicia as the 'exogenous' (Latin 'other-generated') Kingdom of Israel combined with the city-states of Tyr, Sidon, Byblos & Beirut violently imposed their fake 'money' & military control, on once thriving health 'indigenous' peoples of these vast regions through military & navy superiority. Phoenicia represents Oligarchs who have fled their own destruction of their Babylon & Mesopotamian empires (5000 BC) to re-establish at the crucial trade, resources & People controlling LAND-BRIDGE between the Eurasian & African Mega-continents. Torah refers to Noah's oldest son Japheth representing Eurasia, middle son 'Shem' (literally 'middle' & origin of 'Semite') representing Levant-Arabia & Ham representing Africa. Phoenician top-down command & control mismanagement, created the vast Sahara & Sahel along with Negev, Kazakhstan & other Deserts. These regions according to detailed UN studies were once filled with lush Polyculture Orchards & flowing rivers, lakes, streams, food, materials, energy & water-cycle abundance & wildlife.

POLYCULTURE ORCHARD food trees which are over 100 times more productive of food, materials, energy & water-cycle, than 2-D 'Agriculture' (L. 'ager' = 'field'). SYLVALIZATION (Latin 'sylva' = 'tree'). As empires spread, hungry for the hardwood Oak for weapons of war, forts, arms, ships etc. the main productivity loss is the indigenous, carefully cultivated 3-D POLYCULTURE ORCHARDs of all humanity's worldwide 'indigenous' ancestors, which because of: a) Polyculture's 92-98% Photosynthesis compared with 2-D 'agriculture' (L 'ager' = 'field') 2-8% photosynthesis. Agriculture’s all settlers & 1st Nations had left to 'farm' (French 'ferme' = 'contract of servitude by the peasant imposed by the armed aristocrat') b) Deep Polyculture roots descending many 10s of metres into the substrate mining minerals, pumping water, developing extensive nutrient colonies etc. being 100 times = 10,000% more productivity than agriculture. Actually this calculation is very conservative. In my experience with both Polyculture & Agriculture such as a 50 square meter (7 by 7 metres) area under the pre-colonial average 100 year old Oak tree produced some 3 tonnes (3000 kilograms) of nuts/year with little labour except bring wastes to feed the tree. The same 50 sq. M of Wheat, Barley, Oats or Rye will produce only 3 kgs of grains requiring intensive mechanical ploughing, seeding, weeding, fertilizing, fencing & irrigation or drainage preparation. c) Polyculture's nearly complete ~95% photosynthesis of solar energy into food, materials, energy & water-cycle, creates an energy vacuum which drives warm moist ocean winds inland. 60% of Moisture transfer from ocean to continent is through condensation of these winds upon quadrillions of square kilometres of fractal leaf & bark surface. Only 40% of moisture transfers as rain/snowfall. 2-D Agriculture only photosynthesizes 2-8% of solar energy, creating High-pressure airs which push wind from continent towards the sea, creating permanent desert. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/b-ecological-design/1-indigenous-welcome-orchard-food-production-efficiencies

With fake meaningless amnesic 'money' replacing what had been a worldwide system of time-based equivalency accounting on the String-shell Value system in RELATIONAL ECONOMY. (eg. 'Wampum' on Turtle-Island / N. America, Quipu in S. America & Cowrie-shell in indigenous Celtic-Slavic Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia & all islands). Imagine an international system way-back? https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy

Expand full comment

Classic Roman propaganda. Hannibal did nothing wrong, make Carthage great again. Cato the elder can suck it.

Expand full comment

Divus Claudius 25 mentions agitations by the "Jews" which led Claudius (Roman Emperor from AD 41 to 54) to expel them from Rome.

Expand full comment

For us Russians, western leaders' lack of good sense is a huge advantage. Indeed, Russia's entire strategy is based on these people never backing down, never willing to admit their mistakes and defeat, never agreeing to negotiate, escalating at every turn. Keep it up!

Expand full comment

The Brits can't stand it, which is why they have been after the destruction of Russia since the 19th century and have utterly failed. Today, their efforts are backfiring as their war mongering in the Ukraine and Palestine is bankrupting them along with the rest of the brilliant Western non-leaders.

Expand full comment

What caused Russia and Great Britain to fall out with each other? They seem to have been getting on just fine in the 18th century.

Expand full comment

Russia seen as a threat for domination on India and China

Expand full comment

russia just needs to attack the head of the beast - the jew. wherever they are, jews such as nuland and soros, kagan and blinken, etc., need to start having "accidents"

Expand full comment

"whatever it takes to deescalate tensions and decrease nastiness?"

Yes, I find the 'body count' offensive; like, 'look how many we've killed'.

We forget, these are human beings, just like us. With mothers, fathers, children, wives....

The dead and injured, for the most part, did not choose this war. The warmongering, satanic 'leaders' did. On both sides.

The 'semi- glorification' of the 'other' dead & injured sickens me to my stomach.

We are close to becoming sub-human, estranged from our Creator.

WTFU!

Expand full comment

Lack of sense and much pride. No guts to say, "we're wrong, let's look at other options."

Expand full comment

yes, destroying that jew state woudl solve most of the world's problems

Expand full comment

With friends like India, why would Russia need an enemy? Just look at how Modi embraces Trump's hand like he's a god. "Come on, Modi. You're pants are wearing out at the knees from sucking Trumpster's kosher salami." I've never seen such a two-faced sycophant to the Americans and Russians at the same time. "You got a 1.5 billion population but you're a no-balls coward."Then Modi will be on his knees again with Putin at the BRICS meeting next month. When will he realize that you can't appease the Neo-cons anymore than Chamberlain could with Hitler? The hegemon Neos will last much longer than they should because countries like India are so sub-servant leaving Russia to do all the heavy lifting. Israel packs a bigger punch than India even though it's only a fraction of the geographical size and population, which then forces Putin to walk a thin line. Neo's are ruthless while spineless, yellow-bellied India dances around on its knees to both sides. https://www.indianpunchline.com/us-india-its-a-chicken-and-egg-situation/

Expand full comment

There was no appeasement with Hitler because there was no need to appease him. It is Perfidious Albion that kept rejecting his peace overtures.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your input.

Expand full comment

the jew wanted germany destoryed so uncle A's peace offering were rejected multiple times.

What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933–1940

https://archive.org/details/wtwrh

Expand full comment
58 mins ago·edited 56 mins ago

Repeating the nonsense about Chamberlain is pure Churchillian propaganda. Churchill did control the media with his Jewish masters at the time.

The British had a joke of an air force in 1938. Chamberlain was forced to compromise and delay the war. The crucial Battle of Britain started in July 1940. One-third of fighter pilots were experienced Poles.

Here are the production figures for Hurricanes.

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘪𝘳 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘑𝘶𝘯𝘦 1936 𝘧𝘰𝘳 600 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 12, 1937.

𝘉𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘞𝘢𝘳 𝘐𝘐 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 1939, 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 550 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥, 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 18 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘴

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘔𝘬.𝘐, 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘋𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 1937 𝘵𝘰 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 1941, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 4,200 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵 𝘣𝘺 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘏𝘢𝘸𝘬𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘎𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘈𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺.

𝘍𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘔𝘬.𝘐𝘐𝘉 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘔𝘬.𝘐𝘐𝘊 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥, 𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘉𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 1944, 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 14,000 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴

And here are the production figures for Spitfires

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘙.𝘑. 𝘔𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘸 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩 1936. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘪𝘳 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 310 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘑𝘶𝘯𝘦 1936; 𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 1938

𝘍𝘶𝘭𝘭-𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘪𝘥-1938. 𝘉𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘞𝘢𝘳 𝘐𝘐 𝘪𝘯 1945, 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 20,351 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 2,406 𝘚𝘦𝘢𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘹𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 22,757 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵.

𝘛𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘶𝘯, 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘥, 𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴.

𝘍𝘶𝘭𝘭-𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘪𝘥-1938. 𝘉𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘞𝘢𝘳 𝘐𝘐 𝘪𝘯 1945, 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 20,351 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 2,406 𝘚𝘦𝘢𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘹𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 22,757 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵.

𝘛𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘶𝘯, 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘥, 𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴.

Expand full comment

How Ukraine lost the war (the west as well)

1-How to win the next world war – the right population strategy – with US support

2-How to win the World – Africa takes over

Pop Growth versus Pop Decline – guess which wins

A number of underused arguments surface in a recent US discussion published in the Asia Times

The prime argument is to the military age decline in population for countries thinking of war or of their military security

The key is - why should the US pay or ally with countries so foolish as to deprive them selves of soldier material yet still pander to the US for protection

This of course finds a ready echo in Ukraine ( where the demographics are catastrophic

« Ukraine has he highest mortality rate and the lowest birth rate in the world’

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/09/13/7474848/

Expand full comment

How many shells can that Scranton factory produce per year? Last figures I remember were 60,000 planned to move up to 100,000, but that was before the fires

3 days use, or 4?

If Z is visiting Scranton he's visiting Defeat

Expand full comment
author

Scranton is still at 36k a month, with "claims" they will hit 100k a month by next year, which is extremely unlikely.

Expand full comment

He should have visited the new Turk ish arms factory in Mesquite, even so

36k a month is three days use: as for next year....

Expand full comment

Is this likely from not having the staff to run multiple shifts? Aside from not having sufficient capital equipment.

Expand full comment
author

They were originally 14k a month prior to war, the 36k increase represents the multiple shifts added, which is why further increase is highly questionable as it is. I'm not sure how exactly they intend to increase it x10 of that past the shift increases when the factory itself has a finite volume

Expand full comment

Producing more ammo would require hiring more employees & outfitting larger factories than the Scranton facility, for instance.

The U.S. would need to invest billions of dollars worth of capital & manpower to ramp up domestic production of munition shells like @ the Scranton plant--an investment in more forging machines & lathes, the training of new personnel, the stockpiling of metals & explosives.

Potentially a factory like Scranton would have to expand their premises or look for new sites, purchasing adjacent land parcels for expansion purposes, clearing all the environmental hurdles & building the new plants.

None of which is happening.

31 months of the SMO has induced delusional thinking in the gray matter between the ears of neocons: a War-Pig Derangement Syndrome. Policy-makers have tasted blood & viewed war-porn videos of bombs pancaking apartment hi-rises & battlefield amputations as the result of fast-flying American shrapnel--and they can't imagine a time when domestic wealth did not rely on killing people far from home.

The most American thing on earth is never ever to beat our swords into ploughshares but just to continue forging more swords--so we can send them to Ukraine. Or so we can cajole once-neutral Finland to buy our swords & send them to Ukraine.

And don't forget: there's Israel to supply & re-supply.

Expand full comment

The plant in Scranton, run by the U.S. Army, is staffed by Baby Boomers, who have been on the line for decades. It has proven difficult to hire competent Millennials or get GenXers to do jobs like this.

Manual labor relies on a cultivated skill-set. If workers are drawn to the managerial class--positions in the FIRE economy, finance/info tech/real estate/electronics--they are never going to opt for a tool & die kind of sheet metal shop.

Even the equipment @ a plant like Scranton is no longer state-of-the-art; it has aged-out as its workforce has. Nobody in the U.S. is making the kind of precision equipment needed to produce munitions. Some of the work is so labor intensive it is done by hand.

Americans aren't drawn to factory work. The U.S. has lost manufacturing skills over the past 40 years. If you want to expand a factory now, or put on a 2nd shift, it is impractical, because the workers aren't there. Moreover, the managers are retiring, so the institutional knowledge w/ which they graced plants like Scranton--and which they might have passed along through training a new generation--is disappearing w/ them.

Expand full comment

The U.S. industrial strategy hinges less on building up the arsenal of democracy--quite literally shell by shell by shell--than on laboring under the flawed assumption of a future of warfare that has been influenced [read: misled] by the bureaucratic culture of the Beltway, the hubris of the Beltway--and the legacy of conflicts against non-peer non-industrial adversaries.

Expand full comment

"diversity is your strength" LOL DEI (diversity equity and isreal) is the death of the USA. good riddance...

Expand full comment

shaniqua and her long nails and low IQ will never out produce russia...

Expand full comment

This.

“… in waging another genocide to cover for the first one in a sort of genocide-Ponzi scheme.”

Expand full comment

Why on Earth are you adopting the crazy language of the Arabs vis a vis Palestinian nationalism in calling the perfectly legal residents of the perfectly legal state 1948 Israel as “settlers?” Please don’t do this. The illegal settlers are in the West Bank and maybe the Golan.

The only people who think Israel illegitimate (illegal) are crazy Arabs, mostly Palestinians. Come on. Do better my friend.

Expand full comment

Israel is illegitimate because the UN created it, and it has no power to create a nation. Illegal jewish settlers are illegal by the laws of Israel, which is why sometimes the government bulldozes their settlements.

Either way, people shouldn't get bent out of shape about all that nonsense. It's just desert people killing desert people, as they've done for 4,000 years and will continue to do for another 4,000 years after we leave due to the oil running out.

Expand full comment

It doesn’t matter. Your argument that Israel is illegal is simply false as is the argument that the UN had no right to create it. That’s just loony Arab talk.

According to international law the UN indeed had a right to create a state. Also according to the same law the only illegal settlers are in the West Bank and Golan. Israeli residents are 100% legal. If they weren’t the UN would say so. Israel is a legal state. If it wasn’t the UN would say so. The UN gets the last word here.

Expand full comment

So the jew needs to return to its 1948 borders then?

Expand full comment

No most of those illegal settlements have been legalized the state or were legal from day one.

Agree with the rest.

Expand full comment

An illegal state cannot legalize illegal settlements.

Expand full comment

It’s not an illegal state. The UN says 1948 Israel is 100% legal.

Expand full comment

Nope, it is not "just desert people killing desert people", it is European Jews genociding the indigenous population of Palestine. And the fact that the slaughter does not bother you, does not mean the rest of the world sees it that way.

Expand full comment

You are correct - in English they are better called neo settlers

Expand full comment

They’ve been there 75 years! And quite a few for 100 years. At what point are you not a settler? In this state we were still stealing Indians’ land by force 135 years ago. Are all the non-Indians in this state “settlers?”

You can call the ones in the West Bank and Golan settlers because they are indeed illegal settlers.

Expand full comment

Yes yes

The US is still a settler society as always it was

You believe the orginal Brit invasion back in the Mayflower day was 'legal'

Expand full comment

Every bit of land on Earth was conquered by settlers not too long ago. Do Americans have to pack up and go home? Get out.

Expand full comment

You should know a little before saying foolish er and foolish erer

Humans were invented in Africa and spread through out the world, including into America - there were then no other humans to conquer

In America Lot later came invaders from Europe: no legal there, they just proclaimed possession and killed the natives

you who go on about legal suddenly every one is illegal

Make up your mind :is it to be 'legal' or 'illegal who cares'

Expand full comment

I trust you that if you study the history of the world s lot of the residents of that state are settler colonists. The Out of Africa people are almost extinct. The Andaman Islanders and Negritos are all that are left. All the rest got ethnically cleansed.

Expand full comment

there was no coivilixation in N America when the white man arrived. unlike the civilization in Plaestine that the jew stole.

Expand full comment

I love the Israeli argument. "Other countries got to genocide and ethnically cleanse entire populations to establish their settler colonial countries. You're anti-semitic if you don't allow us to now. No fair. We want to kill more Amalek infants!!!"

Expand full comment

Well every country is settler colonial if you go back far enough. So what? Genocide and ethnic cleaning are indeed illegal. It’s perfectly legal to be a settler colonial state.

Expand full comment

I don't know what you're setting out to prove, but what you're revealing about yourself is repugnant.

Expand full comment

Fine I’m a terrible person!

Expand full comment

Israel was born of conflict and her history is drenched in blood. Legitimacy is irrelevant - only history. The Arabs window to do anything about it started closing in 1948, further in 1967, again in 1973 and has become less and less relevant ever since - the Camp David accords with Egypt, the peace treaty with Jordan in 1994, with the Abraham accords signaling that "ok, we're moving on" by the Gulf states a couple of years ago. Call it what it is - conquest. That is as legitimate as any law, any rule.

In fact we are at the point where the Israelis could zap all 2mn residents of Gaza tomorrow and nothing would happen. Probably the WH would say "this is unhelpful" or something. Not more.

Expand full comment

All countries are born in conflict and drenched in blood if you back far enough. It’s called nation building.

Expand full comment

That did not give the Khazars the right to steal land and create an illegal genocidal sewer there.

Expand full comment

It’s not illegal. Israel says it’s 100% legal.

Expand full comment

Yes, I agree. Hence why I ignore the so called moral arguments or the nonsense about legality or illegality. Might and Power are all that matters - laws and legality are downstream from that. The Israelis won a war of conquest and that Arabs will have to move on, just like the natives did in many other places, and history will be written with their favor.

Expand full comment

Even Hezbollah on its own could zap all of ZioNaziland.

Expand full comment

No, it couldn't. Not even close.

Expand full comment

Israel is illegitimate because it has existed, and can only exist, as an apartheid state. Now the world is witnessing just how sick and twisted a populace (and its supporters) becomes when inculcated with apartheid, ethno-supremacist values. Israel is the worst mistake Harry Truman made by allowing its creation, and that's no small feat given he started the CIA and the Cold War.

Expand full comment

1948 Israel is legal. So was South Africa. Apartheid states are perfectly legal. They aren’t very nice but so what? Sure, it’s not nice. Sure it’s sick and evil. So what? It’s legal to be a mean country full of sick, fucked up people last time I checked.

Expand full comment

It is not legal. Pull your head out of the hasbara pile of steaming bullshit.

The 1948 'agreement' needed both parties to agree, the locals did not.

Expand full comment

The UN says it’s legal. If the UN thought it was illegal it would simply revoke its acceptance of the state and Israel would become of of those floater new countries that are accepted by some and not by others.

If the UN states 1948 Israel is a legal state, that’s all I care about.

Expand full comment

Nope, the UN did not state it was legal. It accepted the sewer on condition it abide by resolution 194, which said sewer never did.

Expand full comment

If it was illegal the UN would say so and pass resolutions withdrawing its acceptance. They’re not doing that so according to the UN, 1948 Israel is legal.

Expand full comment

We’re all settlers, we’re all passengers from birth to death Jesus said…..don’t build your house on a bridge and live your life as in a caravan passing by. Shalom.

Expand full comment

Sorry, Shlomo, but Jesus wasn't pro-genocide. You people are shameless.

Expand full comment

ZioNaziland is not legal, it cannot be by definition because it was created illegally in the 1st place.

As for you last time check, you did not check well enough.

Expand full comment
3 hrs ago·edited 3 hrs ago

The one's who need to "do better" are the Zionists.

They have violated every UN Resolution except the original one that recognized them as a State. They did not respect the conditions that were included in the 1917 Balfour Declaration that set the Zionist State wheels in motion:

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

This lengthy Q&A transcript with Rashid Khalidi was linked on Moon of Alabama today and is worth a read. The duplicity, depravity and deception of the Brits and Zionists is laid out in great detail. I wonder if he and Victoria Nuland ever cross paths (swords) at Columbia.

https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii147/articles/the-neck-and-the-sword

Expand full comment

Yes they’re nice not very nice but that’s legal. It’s not legal to violate all those UN resolutions. You realize 88% of Americans are Zionists, right?

Expand full comment

Legal as in "Anything goes as long as I can get away with it legal"?

The 88% stat must be from a Hasbara polling firm. Even 88% of Jews are not Zionists.

Expand full comment

Nope. Do you support Israel’s right to exist? Jews 94%, Gentiles 86%. I’m afraid you are wrong. Legal as in international law. Illegal as in violates international law.

Expand full comment

Odd. Searching for a poll with that exact question returns zero results. Perhaps you can provide a link.

Expand full comment

ZioNaziland was created illegally against the wishes of the indigenous Palestinian Arab population. The ZioNazis who infested Palestine had absolutely no business there and proceeded to ethnically cleanse the are, went on a genocidal killing spree, and stole the land.

UN resolution 181 was a **recommendation** for the creation of 2 states in Palestine, so the ZioNazi's creation of their racist sewer was illegal. Period.

That stinking hell hole needs to be wiped off the map, it does not deserve to exist, just like its role model that it has now surpassed, the Third Reich, did not deserve to exist.

Also note that ZioNaziland managed to kill in 10 months the same number of defenceless civilians in the world's largest concentration camp ever as the number of Jews that died (none were actually killed) in the 15 biggest concentration camps (nowhere near the size of Gaza) between 1940-45, i.e. 300,000. That number is from the Bad Arolsen Archive and the International Red Cross. In fact, the number they last published was in 1993 and was 296,081, so not even 300k.

Expand full comment

The UN had a vote and voted to admit Israel as a legal state. 1948 Israel is legal.

Expand full comment

the jew state is illegal - always has been as it is stolen land. Why are you shilling for these genocidal in-bred sin merchants?

Expand full comment

"...and it’s not being run by Joe but Jill sitting at the head of the president’s seat:"

At least she isn't wearing a tube top and yoga pants in a Disco Era floral print.

"This is how major civilizational states survive for thousands of years, by not reacting to every little provocation."

I read an interesting theory that Iran is home to the world's oldest deep state. When Sumeria was overrun by hill tribes, the administrators were allowed to continue administering for the new barbarian kings. Then they became decadent, conquered by some other barbarian tribe, who kept on the administrators. Eventually the cycle lead to whatever civilization it was called at the time being conquered by Indo-Iranians. Which of course eventually became modern Iran.

Expand full comment

Zelensky and Netanyahu are in a race - who can drag the US into their war first

The Sarmat launch failure is probably the worst of the week's news. You know that its going to be catnip for the "russia has no red lines / is bluffing" crowd. Now they will say "Russia's nukes don't work".

Expand full comment
author

The problem is, the US' very last nuclear ICBM Minuteman "test" was also a failure, as was their previous one.

https://www.rt.com/news/586386-us-missile-test-fail/

At worst, both countries' are experiencing major issues, which I suppose is a good thing for peaceniks as it could optimistically imply that a "nuclear exchange" during WW3 will be a huge fail by both sides.

Expand full comment

You know that the decision makers don't know any of that - or care

Expand full comment

The US gvmt doe not know or care that their nuclear missiles do not work

You can say they are dumb, but that dumb? Like the lights don't come on but who cares dumb

Expand full comment

Is the Sarmat launch vehicle new, or is it an iteration of a current design?

Expand full comment

Indeed. What I read between the lines of the Hawks is that we should not refrain from a first-strike or an Nuke exchange. Their opinions is that tactical nukes is not dangerous.

Let s go.

Expand full comment

The Sarmat is an ICBM. Russia had ICBMS in Service for decades and nobody doubts their ability to deliver nuclear warheads to any point in the world. Moscow doesn´t need to demonstrate that by shooting a maneuverable hypersonic Avantgard vehicle into US territory with just a payload of concrete.

Furthermore, the Sarmat missile has already been adopted into regular military service last year, which means that the testing phase was already over and the tests were successful.

So whatever went boom on that test pad was most likely not a Sarmat missile, but who knows what new stuff gets tested there.

Expand full comment

The minuteman is also a proven missile, which has had failed launches as simplicious pointed out. So has the trident. A failed launch is a failed launch.

Expand full comment

No one besides ukies or American exceptionalisms is dumb enough to believe that. I read in American pubs all the time that Russians nuclear arsenal is a generation ahead and how we need to catch up...

Expand full comment
4 hrs agoLiked by Simplicius

I've had it! I'm done! Fed up! I revolt!

A news refugee who has opted to bolt!

Ive turned, instead, to cruise the Substack,

Where Simplicius has setup his wordsmithing shack....

Expand full comment

The U.S. muscled its way into a pivotal role in the ceasefire negotiations, begun by Qatar and Egypt, only to skillfully and repeatedly undermine any serious-minded chance of a ceasefire, the release of hostages or an end to the genocide. 

The predictable flail & fail of each ceasefire initiative seems by design, not a coincidence or a flaw.

This is a continuation of the strategy by which the U.S. has stymied and prevented peace since 1967, falsely posing as an honest broker, while in fact remaining Israel’s staunchest ally & serving as the largest diplomatic obstacle to a free Palestine.

For decades, the U.S.'s unique position of "unwavering" support for Israel has been a critical factor in enabling Israeli war crimes & prolonging the intolerable plight of the Palestinian people. In the crisis in Gaza, the U.S.'s military alliance with Israel involves the U.S. directly in the crime of genocide, as the U.S. provides the warplanes and bombs that are killing the largest numbers of Palestinians and literally destroying Gaza. 

The supply chain for the U.S. arsenal of genocide criss-crosses America, from weapons factories like the Scranton ammo plant to military bases to procurement offices at the Pentagon and Central Command in Tampa. It feeds C-17 plane-loads of weapons flying to military bases in Israel, from which these endless tons of steel and high explosives rain down on Gaza to shatter buildings, flesh & bones. 

The U.S.'s role is greater than complicity — it is active & essential participation, without which the Israelis could not conduct a genocide like this. In the U.S.’s understanding of history, the world sees what is happening in the West Bank as well as in the Gaza Strip, and simply moves on.

Expand full comment

The problem with all these plots to drag the US into Israel or Ukraine's losing wars is that the Pentagon (Loyd Austin) has taken over not only the military but the diplomatic decisions on those wars, and has told Israel that we aren't going to bail them out...Ukraine has been told there will be no long range missile, or other dangerous escalations....Apparently the US and Russian militaries are still talking via back channels, and we've been told that the nuclear threat is very real...

Expand full comment

Austin seems only sane one in FJB entire cabinet. Military knows exactly what's up though unlike State - they can read grave stones with satellites and easily count all the bodies on the floor. Also they know they lost the arms race and really don't want to even send more weapons the be humiliated let alone troops, not to Iran and definitely not Russia.

Expand full comment

Quad had a Plus-One when it met in Wilmington, Delaware on Saturday--not Dr. Jill this time, since she was fresh off her turn as the Chair of the Cabinet mtg, but President Blinken who rounded out the plenary dais of 5, so this wasn't Quad--it was Quint: the hegemon [as represented by Joe & President Blinken ], two vassal members [ Australia & Japan ] & Modi.

Poor Modi.

If you're @ the poker table & can't spot the mark, it's you

Expand full comment

The Quad's joint statement, released on the White House's website, did not directly name China, but it did mention "East and South China Seas." Meanwhile, Joe was caught on a hot mic telling the other leaders that an "aggressive China is testing us," per CNN.

Curiously, the Quad has met 4 times this year--and it is not yet October

Expand full comment

But all times to no avail

Even the Asia times has just published an article writing off the Quad , all hat no subs

Expand full comment

India knows this - see Jaishankar remarks esp at ASEAN conference - pays subtle and convincing lip service says all the right things, but.....nada mas

Expand full comment

The impetus for Quad or Quint is OTAN-like. Perhaps we can call it OTANjr.

It is a failed OTANjr, as the Asia Times article reports. Thx for this link. But it, Quad or Quint, is curious in its predictably provocative stance.

The initial dialogue structure between the U.S., Japan, Australia & India was paralleled by joint military exercises of an unprecedented scale, titled Excalibur Malabar.

Thought left strategically unspoken, the diplomatic and military arrangement was widely viewed as a response to increased Chinese economic and military power.

Interestingly, BRICS saw its first summit mtg in 2009

Expand full comment

It appears that everyone involved knows that the Q is a pure propaganda ploy

This serves one and all just fine

The US has got no missiles and no boats no more - Vive AA!

Expand full comment

Quad, or the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, was initiated in 2007 @ the behest of Japan's Shinzo Abe but--and this is the scary part--also w/ the support of VP Dick Cheney

Expand full comment

RIP

Expand full comment

Good news is Russia published it's full list of countries they'll accept conservatives from effective 21 September and already took 18 Scottish families applications first day according to the telegraph. With the ever increasing police state, deteriorating economies, and civil strife in NATOstan I see few reasons to stay. One shouldn't stay in a abusive relationship with a partner or a country IMO. Contact your local Russian consulate/embassy for information.

Expand full comment

Yes Israel is collapsing economically and socially--and incidentally also being defeated militarily. Yes the Axis is playing the long game 1) because of said collapse and 2) because they know war with Israel, even if the Axis wins--which it would--would be horrific for the people of both Lebanon and Iran. Finally, I don't believe the weakness of Biden offers a particular opening for Netanyahu. Trump is even more sympathetic and Harris will do what she's told. American support for Israel won't waver. The C-17s and 141's will continue to supply the bombs. The problem for Israel is that without direct military intervention by the US, Hezbollah will clean their clock. It has to suck the US in--or lose. And it just might succeed since the "elected" government is bought and paid for by AIPAC. Our only hope is the generals and the security establishment. They may be evil, but they are knowledgeable and sane. They know what the consequences of general war will be, and will hopefully stop the runaway train. Otherwise we're in big trouble. Finally, what do you call a legal country in which 80% of the citizenry (not counting the marginalized natives) settled there since 1947 and have systematically ethnically cleansed its territory? a) a settler state, b) a genocidal colonial state, c) Israel, d) the vilest of all nations, e) a, b, c and d. (See the back page of next Saturday's Haaretz for the correct answer)

Expand full comment

What is the correct answer for the same questions when applied to the US

Expand full comment

Exactly! What's a little genocide and land theft among friends! Custer called for US Air Force assistance but he didn't have AIPAC!

Expand full comment

The turning of the conquest of those natives not already conquered into the magnificent myth of the West is one of the masterpieces of US propaganda that puts to shame the mean narrow minded PR spread on this site today

Expand full comment

Because of Israel America is reduced to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFNUkaRrKTk

Expand full comment

Amazing video.

Expand full comment

When it comes to Russia, here is my sincere advice to the US:

Take the L and move on.

Nothing good will come from denying it and lots of good will come from making peace with reality and taking a hard look at what and WHO brought here. Change your ways and maybe - just maybe - you can have a better future as part of the human family and not as a pariah nation hated by all of mankind.

It is the right thing to do.

As for Europe, the first thing you need to do is cutoff the UK. For over a century they have manipulated you and brought on horrible catastrophes on your lands and people (mind you with your cooperation). At this stage it will be a relief. Germany - you need to make peace with Russia. Your future is with her. The future of your people, industry, and independence comes from being friends with her, and ruin and subservience away from her. Wake up before it’s too late.

Europe is just a part of Russia as Russia is a part of Europe. With Russia turning away each and every nation loses so much more than you can imagine. Throw off the yoke of NATO, free yourself from the crushing weight of the corrupt EU and return your sovereignty.

Save yourselves.

Expand full comment

This is the best comment. Support it 100%.

Expand full comment

Bismarcks letzte Warnung: „Haltet Frieden mit Russland!“

Expand full comment