You copy pasted this prayer from several previous forum sections. Since when do you preach Russian collapse? 2022, 2014, or earlier. Maybe getting a life would be an idea.
Richard Condon’s Prizzi Family Mirrors the Mafia, Senator, President, Black Nobility of Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaires - Rulers of the World!
Mafia families are usually from the Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility families whose history stretches out to 10,000 years of Phoenician History. Particularly in the Prizzi series which even had a movie made out of them.
The Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility use Satanism and the use of Satanic Rituals to corrupt people in order to create a group of Psychopaths willing to follow any mandate in order to Rule the World…
The Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility own and run the Vatican, SMOM, Jesuits, KOC, and La Cosa Nostra. The European Monarchies like the British Crown are branches of Rome and they manage secret societies like the Freemasons which infiltrate government agencies and run corporations for the monarchs.
The Sovereign Military order of Malta SMOM is the top military council and it works closely with the Orders of St John ran by Protestant monarchs. The Knights of Malta are the engineers of war. The royal and noble bloodlines are all working together as a global crime syndicate and part of the modernized Roman Empire.
Their Minions will conscript you and send you to war, mandate the Deathvaxx, Digital identity, Central Bank Digital Currencies, total surveillance and the end of free speech!
Please take your meds. I'm not saying you are wrong, but you do your cause a disservice by coming across as a raving lunatic who sits too close on public transit.
I am afraid I must agree with Mr. Zorost about your delivery Mr. Satchidanan.
I am a subscriber of yours because I do believe in what you call "Energy Enhancement against Satanism", but all communication relies upon technique, and you need to develop yours.
You can't just be throwing out Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility Deathvaxx, Digital identity, Central Bank Digital Currencies in huge blocks of text.
Just as a fine banquet might start with a little soup lightly seasoned or a great symphony may begin with a few notes developed into a motif, so you too should start smaller and develop slowly.
Are we really so sure the Satan dude is the baddy and Jewway the Angry & Jealous is the good guy? Where does Prometheus fit in ? It's all sooo confusing!
Many Thanks Satchidanand for harping on this particular hidden 'Phoenician' aspect of both western Oligarch human history & our present same lineage of Oligarch fake 'money' (Greek 'mnemosis' = 'memory') amnesic command & control over the colonized world. Readers should be asking you many more questions, because you are describing the very pulse in the origin of Oligarchy's fake 'money' wealth & control in our time. i.e. We are playing the Oligarch game, meant to destroy us.
The egregious violent Phoenician period of colonization of the Mediterranean & Black Seas (Ashkenaz & Khazaria is centered in Ukraine) between 4000-0 BC (barely mentioned in history classes). Phoenicia as the 'exogenous' (Latin 'other-generated') Kingdom of Israel combined with the city-states of Tyr, Sidon, Byblos & Beirut violently imposed their fake 'money' & military control, on once thriving health 'indigenous' peoples of these vast regions through military & navy superiority. Phoenicia represents Oligarchs who have fled their own destruction of their Babylon & Mesopotamian empires (5000 BC) to re-establish at the crucial trade, resources & People controlling LAND-BRIDGE between the Eurasian & African Mega-continents. Torah refers to Noah's oldest son Japheth representing Eurasia, middle son 'Shem' (literally 'middle' & origin of 'Semite') representing Levant-Arabia & Ham representing Africa. Phoenician top-down command & control mismanagement, created the vast Sahara & Sahel along with Negev, Kazakhstan & other Deserts. These regions according to detailed UN studies were once filled with lush Polyculture Orchards & flowing rivers, lakes, streams, food, materials, energy & water-cycle abundance & wildlife.
POLYCULTURE ORCHARD food trees which are over 100 times more productive of food, materials, energy & water-cycle, than 2-D 'Agriculture' (L. 'ager' = 'field'). SYLVALIZATION (Latin 'sylva' = 'tree'). As empires spread, hungry for the hardwood Oak for weapons of war, forts, arms, ships etc. the main productivity loss is the indigenous, carefully cultivated 3-D POLYCULTURE ORCHARDs of all humanity's worldwide 'indigenous' ancestors, which because of: a) Polyculture's 92-98% Photosynthesis compared with 2-D 'agriculture' (L 'ager' = 'field') 2-8% photosynthesis. Agriculture’s all settlers & 1st Nations had left to 'farm' (French 'ferme' = 'contract of servitude by the peasant imposed by the armed aristocrat') b) Deep Polyculture roots descending many 10s of metres into the substrate mining minerals, pumping water, developing extensive nutrient colonies etc. being 100 times = 10,000% more productivity than agriculture. Actually this calculation is very conservative. In my experience with both Polyculture & Agriculture such as a 50 square meter (7 by 7 metres) area under the pre-colonial average 100 year old Oak tree produced some 3 tonnes (3000 kilograms) of nuts/year with little labour except bring wastes to feed the tree. The same 50 sq. M of Wheat, Barley, Oats or Rye will produce only 3 kgs of grains requiring intensive mechanical ploughing, seeding, weeding, fertilizing, fencing & irrigation or drainage preparation. c) Polyculture's nearly complete ~95% photosynthesis of solar energy into food, materials, energy & water-cycle, creates an energy vacuum which drives warm moist ocean winds inland. 60% of Moisture transfer from ocean to continent is through condensation of these winds upon quadrillions of square kilometres of fractal leaf & bark surface. Only 40% of moisture transfers as rain/snowfall. 2-D Agriculture only photosynthesizes 2-8% of solar energy, creating High-pressure airs which push wind from continent towards the sea, creating permanent desert. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/b-ecological-design/1-indigenous-welcome-orchard-food-production-efficiencies
With fake meaningless amnesic 'money' replacing what had been a worldwide system of time-based equivalency accounting on the String-shell Value system in RELATIONAL ECONOMY. (eg. 'Wampum' on Turtle-Island / N. America, Quipu in S. America & Cowrie-shell in indigenous Celtic-Slavic Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia & all islands). Imagine an international system way-back? https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy
It's all tho confusing! Maybe Moloch & EL only demanded the inbred products of incest as a sacrifice, which u-know-who thy Angry, Jealous and Petulant was okee-dokee with. Dang, it's all tho confusing!
"The Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility own and run the Vatican, SMOM, Jesuits, KOC, and La Cosa Nostra. The European Monarchies like the British Crown are branches of Rome and they manage secret societies like the Freemasons"
You hit almost everything, but....
"The Sovereign Military order of Malta SMOM is the top military council and it works closely with the Orders of St John ran by Protestant monarchs."
Ah, there it is. Now we're only waiting for the latest press release from the Illuminati so we can include them as well.
And let's not mention who actually sit in the top U.S. media and Hollywood boardrooms.
I would challenge you to name a single Phoenician king without the aid of Google. Honestly, I've been thinking about creating a persona as unhinged as yours, but shrieking about the Greek gods and ancient Achaean perfidy instead. Maybe we could find someone else to roleplay another character indicting the Hittites and ancient Anatolians for their role in the conflict. It could be like a little bronze-age collapse!
On second thought, there's already too much trash to sift through in these comments.
Dark Forces have used Infiltrating Bloodline Phoenician/Jewish aristocratic Families which have existed for over 5000 years before the Birth of Christ. Using emotional rhetorical religious concepts to control humanity, they themselves worship all the Pagan Gods, including Lucifer, Satan, Baal, Bel, Molech, Ashtoreth, Cybele and Attis. In this book we find that over thousands of years, spook, Bloodline Phoenician/Jewish aristocratic Families infiltrated every country, every Empire, taking over or infiltrating every ruling aristocracy and aristocratic, bloodline family, in Europe, Britain, America, India, China and in every other country in the World.
For us Russians, western leaders' lack of good sense is a huge advantage. Indeed, Russia's entire strategy is based on these people never backing down, never willing to admit their mistakes and defeat, never agreeing to negotiate, escalating at every turn. Keep it up!
The Brits can't stand it, which is why they have been after the destruction of Russia since the 19th century and have utterly failed. Today, their efforts are backfiring as their war mongering in the Ukraine and Palestine is bankrupting them along with the rest of the brilliant Western non-leaders.
As I read it (from Russian sources) Peter the Great came to Britain in 1698 and made friends with William III. Russia then assisted Britain in the destruction of the old silk roads across Asia, into China. This left China's only viable trade routes by sea, which the British controlled. In the 1750s, Catherine the Great rewrote Russian history and aligned it with the West; this project continued until the 1800s. Waterloo (1812 onwards) - the Russians were on the same side as the British. By the Crimean War (1850s), both had fallen out. What happened?
The Brits wanted Crimea then to block Russia and gain a seaport. The US wanted Crimea to use as a Navel base and to control the Black Sea.
However, the US hasn't realized the vulnerability of any ship anywhere in the ocean can be sunk at any time. So putting ships in the Black Sea would be like a shooting gallery at a carnival where they use .22 shorts.
UK was called 'Perfidious Alby' for a reason. They didn't make friends or allies, they had temporary arrangements that only lasted as long as it was convenient for the UK.
You may well be right, but the British Empire has always been sea-based, whereas the Russian Empire was land-based. I can see that the Brits stuck their thumb up Russia's butt by getting involved in the Crimean War, and the Russians then assisted the Union against British blockades in the US Civil War. But it still doesn't explain the utter hatred that the Brits have had for Russia from 1914 (ish) onwards.
Is it the Brits or a certain group that has control of much of the West? Many people of that group still hear the hoofbeats of the Tsar's men come to round them up in a pogrom. Check out the wiki entry for many neocons, and note that they descend from people who fled Tsarist Russia due to "discrimination."
Utter hatred for Germany from DAY 1 of its existence - unification of German statelets. It's called COMPETITION. States don't have friends; only INTERESTS and temporary allies.
I actually remember the concept of free trade where you didn't have to compete militarily as empires. It is the profits of the bankers so they don't bankrupt themselves in debt is what matters to empires and hegemons.
India. Britiain madea lot of money on the East India company and the Opium trade in the far east. They always believed and in early 19th century with good reason, that Russia wanted to disrupt their hold on India. That along with their loss of Empire and prestige has had them harassing Russia ever since.
I can't help but think that something happened behind the scenes, that's not public knowledge, and which caused the British elites to lose their shit. I did go reading through the history of the Russian Empire after my last post, and what you say about India makes sense. It was the one asset that the British were really concerned about losing.
There's plenty of history to read on the subject which has been referred to as "The Great Game." Harold McKinder, British historian, referred to Central Asia as the Heartland and he who controlled the heartland would control the world. Afghanistan played a central role in the Game and India was the Jewel British interests wanted to protect while Russia wanted to expand it's influence and trade for their goods through the old silk road which ran through Afghanistan down through India. Despite the two seemingly on same sides in WW1, the British continue to hate Russia and the City of London bankers, like the Zionist controlled USoA, covet the scarce resources found in the heartland of which Russia lies and currently controls as historic Russian land.
Communism came out of Great Britain (Marx wrote there) and through Communism GB overthrew the the Russian crown through the actions of the Russian governments own people. The power of Revolution was unleashed and Great Britain has been fighting Financial revolution they created ever since.
It all began about 200 years ago, when the so-called Great Game began - a geopolitical rivalry between the British and Russian Empires for dominance in Central Asia and the Middle East. After Russia seized Crimea and other territories along the Black Sea coast from the Ottoman Empire, the British Empire began to fear that Russia would continue to spread its influence over the territories of weakening Ottoman Empire, and eventually reach India - "the jewel in the crown of the British Empire". The British Empire began to perceive Russia as its main rival and the greatest threat to its hegemony. Although the Great Game took place on the territory of Central Asia and the Middle East, it was also significantly influenced by the events of the Crimean War. In 1854, a quite famous battle took place in Crimea, not far from Balaklava, which became a strong blow to the pride of the British Empire. In this battle, a Russian artillery battery routed a British cavalry brigade, the elite of the British army, which suffered heavy losses. The Great Game ended at the very beginning of the 20th century, but the confrontation between Russia and Britain did not end there. In 1904, British geographer and geopolitician Halford Mackinder first published his Heartland theory - a geopolitical concept or strategy for gaining dominance over the entire world. Its main essence can be described in the following words of Mackinder himself, which he wrote in 1919 in an expanded version of his Heartland theory: "Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island; who rules the World-Island commands the world." To understand: the Heartland is the most impregnable, resource-rich and strategically important territory of Eurasia, mainly coinciding with the territory of the Russian Empire; the World Island is Eurasia + Africa. This theory became the basis of the main geopolitical confrontation of the last 100+ years. The First and Second World Wars happened largely because of this. After WW2, the main role in the confrontation with Russia passed from Britain to the United States, which inherited all its main features and the main geopolitical strategy. In 1940, the American political scientist Nicholas Spykman created the Rimland theory based on the Heartland theory. Although the Rimland theory in some aspects differed significantly from the Heartland theory, its main essence remained approximately the same. This theory became the basis of the global US strategy for strategic containment of the Soviet Union during the Cold War, which ultimately led to the collapse of the USSR. After that, they decided that they had won the Cold War and now almost nothing stood in their way on the path to complete world domination. But it turned out that this was not the case at all, and now we are watching the continuation of this historical battle.
BRICS is a cooperation group for various topics. The fact that Turkey, a NATO member whose trade is mostly with Western countries, can apply for BRICS membership shows that it's not what some people think.
I'm all for reducing the influence of the Democrat-run U.S. media and politics. (Or, we're supposed to say "globalist" and "capitalist" maybe, to hide the real fact.) And Russia is doing what it must. But glorifying BRICS states? Talk about hypocrisy. Ethiopia slaughtered and raped hundreds of thousands in Tigray just a few years ago, and people like you say nothing. "BRICS!"
Saudi Arabia machine gunned Tigray refugees trying to enter through the Yemen border, and you say nothing. "BRICS!" Before that Saudi Arabia blockaded Yemen's ports causing mass starvation. "BRICS IS THE SAVIOR! TAKE THAT, COLONIZERS!"
South Africa's Black regime has looted government coffers and caused daily eight-hour blackouts, during which Black gangs attack people in the streets while the police do nothing. No workplace, no traffic lights or gas stations, no hospitals can function in these blackouts, and the kleptocracy has only been held up this long through a constant influx of money taken from Western taxpayers. "BRICS!"
In Brazil the courts simply banned the right-wing candidate from running ads in swing regions, right before the ads were planned to run, so that they would lose the election, and then anyone who criticized this was prosecuted, including the most popular Brazilian vlogger who was forced to leave the country. "BRICS!"
But I guess none of that matters. Countless Blacks being killed by other Blacks and Arabs can't be used to talk about "White racism," so the media barely mention it. What about Putin banning homosexual propaganda in Russia, banning NGOs funded by Democrats like George Soros, and condemning mass immigration in the West, which he says is destroying the West? Uh-oh. Doesn't fit the narrative. Let's forget that too. The narrative must be "BRICS is standing up to the RACIST CAPITALIST COLONIALIST WEST!"
Holy shit, that's some tense writing. The whole point of BRICS is that it's not ideological. It's pure economic cooperation and dispute mediation. The fact that you barged in with whole slew of pure ideological demagoguery is a sign that you completely and utterly westerner to the core - trying to see everything through ideological lens. Btw, that's the ultimate reason why USSR failed and why West will fail too.
That is the problem and why these wars are Financial wars, Banker wars, like all the wars before. How can we even pretend we are going to pay back our debts, so we destroy debt through war. Been done before, and we never learned.
russia just needs to attack the head of the beast - the jew. wherever they are, jews such as nuland and soros, kagan and blinken, etc., need to start having "accidents"
How much influence do the Jews have over Putin? He has not done a single thing against ZioNaziland in its 76 year existence, even after one its planes got shot down thanks to the ZioNazis. Isn't that odd?
The interesting thing about those names is there families all came from western Ukraine. Then there is the fact that in 1900 Ukraine had the largest Jewish population in Europe.
"The idea to create Menorah center, as one of the biggest such centers in the world, belongs to the President of the Dnipropetrovsk Jewish community Gennadiy Bogolyubov [a felon] and the President of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine (also the founder of European Jewish Union) Ihor Kolomoyskyi [a felon]They both provided full financial support for the project implementation."
The President of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine (also the founder of European Jewish Union) Ihor Kolomoyskyi has also founded and personally funded four (4) self-proclaimed Nazi Battalions, including the Azov Battalion. Ukrainian Jews & Ukrainian Nazi do indeed share history on the most amiable terms.
Estranged from our Creator. Christian countries have been at war with each other for centuries, just like Muslim countries and just like Jewish factions before that. And back then there were no laws of war followed by anyone. If war means being estranged from the god of the universe, that happened long ago already.
We regard ourselves as essentially war monkeys destined to war because we are naturally aggressive and want to take things that our not ours and make decisions about how others behave by force if necessary - by killing and maiming them and taking their woman for wives. We do not regard ourselves as eternal souls connected to God as the Self. It is through this mystical transformation that we drop the sword as fear of God is the beginning of Wisdom (karma), or having faith in someone who knows, including Jesus. The problem is that in leadership school at the academies say never back down. It's the cowboy in us, the Brit., who essentially believe lesser people are just dogs.
R U saying that ol' Abe's gawd wasn't bloodthirsty?...Jesus? How about these? “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters - yes, even his own life - he cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:26-27)
"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law - a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household." (Matthew 10:34-37)
"Those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and kill them in front of me." (Luke 19:27)...Looks like time for some pretzel-contortionism from the apologists!
"We do not regard ourselves as eternal souls connected to God as the Self. It is through this mystical transformation that we drop the sword as fear of God is the beginning of Wisdom...." etc etc
(largely) Correct and that's why we're stuck in this Kali Yuga, the age of ignorance, where selfishness, greed & intolerance reign. Some say we're only 5,000 years or so into it (the Kali Yuga) and there are several hundred thousand years still to go.
So if you think things are bad now, the s*** hasn't even begun to hit the fan.
The only rope out of the swamp is, as you said, the knowledge that every one of us is an eternal soul, connected to our Creator. That way out can only be done individually, one by one, hand over hand by one's own effort. It's a hard row to hoe. The first thing we can do, is stop glorifying fucking war.
PS do as I say, not as I do - so far I've barely seen the end of the rope, let alone grasp it in any meaningful way.
" If war means being estranged from the god of the universe, that happened long ago already.'
So all good then? Carry on chaps, no hope of change let alone redemption, just go for it and kill them all.... Oh! let's go nuclear and do a proper fucking job of it. Why don't we?
The refusal to back down and deescalate is not a sign of stupidity or irrationality. The talmudist and mammonist masters of the deep state know that this is their last throw of the dice: too much of the truth has become known to too many people, and once they let go of the reins of terror and compulsion they will never be allowed back in power; in fact, they will be tried and executed in a worldwide trial that will dwarf Nuremberg. John 8:32
So they pulled out all the stops, which is most clearly visible in Israel, which threw down the human pretence and is committing atrocity after atrocity with ruthless abandon. But the talmudists holding the reins of the West are just as ruthless, they only maintain an increasingly forced propaganda regime to remain in control. They will not hesitate to start a nuclear war and drown billions of subhuman goyim in blood, just as long as there is a hope that the vampires might survive and rule over the misery that's left. This is monstrous, but not irrational.
One thing that has helped it make some sort of sense to me is the notion that the handlers/archons/1%ers etc… are just fine with creative destruction and controlled chaos simply because they will try very hard to have enough resources left once the dust settles so that they can determine the shape of things to follow. Agenda 2030 but a bit deeper and probably more sinister.
"they" will not survive the nuclear winter. The rare ones (highly intelligent) among the degenerates of the banking cabal & supranational mega-corporations like BlackRock, know the book, but the core of the supremacist idiots has become accustomed to total lack of responsibility. They believe in a non-stop Loot and degeneracy.
1. All Senators/Congress/Department of State to declare second citizenships right now.
2. All Senators/Congress/Department of State to sign a disclosure against criminal penalty for no conflict of personal/financial interests in Ukraine and Israel. Look @ the US Senato Maria Cantwell - she co-sponsored a bill in 2017 calling to prison terms for AMERICANS for up to 20 years for questioning Israel re.: Gaza - WTH?! - for murders people get less prison terms!
3. Any government official pushing for war must be banned from teaching jobs - look at Nuland @ Columbia, look at McFaul @ Berkley - for an obscene amounts of tuition money they're teaching kids evil and perversion.
The initiative for suppression of "misinformation" comes right on the heels of the extraordinary crackdown on the British public, and is likewise implemented with haste and subservience. Looks like the City of London vampires are starting to lose their shit, doesn't it.
Funny, I kind of like your post even though it is a bit over the top. What do you expect from the exceptional chosen of God Caucasian claimers of the Semitic Jewish tradition, the Pentateuch, that was published in Greek for the Jews masters, the Greek speaking Ptolemaic Dynasty. Most successful nation building exercise ever.
Do you mean people like the authors of the Declaration of Independence?
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
LOL That's the only part of the declaration of independence you know, because of the "created equal" part. Funny you don't mention how it criticized Britain for not standing up against Indian attacks. Oops.
The declaration of independence was not an oft-cited document, not important to remember like the Constitution. Leftists only found it convenient to dig up PART of it much later, for that laughable "created equal" phrase, which is the only one socialists like you use. So you don't actually care about the declaration of independence. You are a liar.
You are also extremely dumb, since you think "created equal" means that all individuals and races would have the same intelligence and capacity in every way. You think the Founding Fathers, who you hate for being "Dead White Males!" otherwise, would think that? LOL The phrase is criticism of the claim that kings, like Britain's king, would be created by God to be rulers. That was a pervasive belief. The Founding Fathers simply said that God didn't create anyone to be a ruler.
The first thing they did in the new country was limit immigration to White people of good moral standing. Oops. But never mind that or the whole Declaration, only blabber about the "created equal" phrase which you don't even understand. And only to the extent you can use it to attack Whites, otherwise not. What a good little socialist!
Do I have to dig-up my infographics showing quotes and general mannerisms from the founding fathers and other people in power at the time in America? They would be at-large considered "laissez-faire nazis" by today's standard... Any dullard who echos the line "all men are created equal" in the constitution, and uses it in a marxist propaganda talking point, is either willfully ignorant or seriously brain dead.
I quoted this passage because of "the pursuit of Happiness" part at the end which is a fitting consequence for the original comment's demands. I would have emphasized it to make it more clear for retards like you or the ones who liked your comment, but unfortunately, substack doesn't have such features in the comments section.
It's quite fascinating how much you are capable to interpret into that one sentence combined with that rather short quote. No, that is not the only part I know. It isn't my favorite part either because it just states the truth. The best part of this formidable document is the signatures section: The men who put their names under that text. They were basically signing their death sentence which is what would've happened if they were caught. And yet, they didn't care because they were the leaders any nation would be fortunate to have.
With friends like India, why would Russia need an enemy? Just look at how Modi embraces Trump's hand like he's a god. "Come on, Modi. You're pants are wearing out at the knees from sucking Trumpster's kosher salami." I've never seen such a two-faced sycophant to the Americans and Russians at the same time. "You got a 1.5 billion population but you're a no-balls coward."Then Modi will be on his knees again with Putin at the BRICS meeting next month. When will he realize that you can't appease the Neo-cons anymore than Chamberlain could with Hitler? The hegemon Neos will last much longer than they should because countries like India are so sub-servant leaving Russia to do all the heavy lifting. Israel packs a bigger punch than India even though it's only a fraction of the geographical size and population, which then forces Putin to walk a thin line. Neo's are ruthless while spineless, yellow-bellied India dances around on its knees to both sides. https://www.indianpunchline.com/us-india-its-a-chicken-and-egg-situation/
Repeating the nonsense about Chamberlain is pure Churchillian propaganda. Churchill did control the media with his Jewish masters at the time.
The British had a joke of an air force in 1938. Chamberlain was forced to compromise and delay the war. The crucial Battle of Britain started in July 1940. One-third of fighter pilots were experienced Poles.
Yeah Spitfires, huh ??? Your own figures show the big lump under the rug. Germany was building as many warplanes in a month as Britain did in 12 months. Britain did NOT increase its production rate of its various war material during the Phony War, Sept 1939 to April 1940. That's one of many reasons it's called the Phony War. The British and French elites were not the least bit concerned about the growing power of Nazi Germany because the West always planned for Germany to attack the USSR and rid the world of Bolschevism. Chamberlain didn't get stupid at Munich in 1938. His plan was to give Czechoslovakia to the Germans. That increased the size of the Wehrmacht by 45% and increased Germany military war material production by 45%. All according to plan. The French were 100% part of the Drang Nach Osten plan. Schneider was a large French corporation and was itself the largest stockholder of Skoda, the biggest Czech arms manufacturer. In December 1938, Schneider agreed to postpone discussion of German compensation for the hostile takeover of its Czech assets until things did down. Typical French cheese-surrender ? No, not at all. It was all part of the plan.
Little boys look at cool airplanes and think they understand something huge. The adults waatch their fascination with dismay.
I agree with much of what you say. However, the fact remains that the UK did not have a serious air force until 1940. They withdrew their air force from France during the German invasion so as to preserve it.
Obviously, the British largely created Hitler so that Germany should invade the USSR. How else could the Germans have created serious armies between 1933 and 1939? Germany was on its knees in 1933.
The WEF groomed Narendra Modi through its "Young Global Leaders" program. He then came to power "on a tidal wave of corporate donations". He received nearly $4.5 billion from undisclosed corporations, and then adopted globalist policies such as refusing the use of Ivermectin during the pandemic. Thankfully the good people in the Indian Bar Association took him to court, and nearly a quarter of a billion people in Uttar Pradesh alone became COVID free for pennies.
I lived in Rishikesh, Uttar Pradesh, when the planedic was rolled out. Every word of this is true. Anyone can walk into a druggist shop and purchase dewormers and other ‘medical’ drugs. ‘Covid Kits’ were dispersed to every household in Uttar Pradesh and it was what was called “a Green Zone" meaning ‘No Covid’. Of course there were the native IN mind controlled ladder climbing zombies who went around doing the work of WHO. I witnessed overnight India close and the world close and oh how they worshipped Trump and Modi, demi-gods of the pantheon of fallen angels and nephilim.
No one seems to understand this fact and its application: MODERNA which trades as MRNA on NASDAQ was incepted to craft a vaccine which would place artificial genetic code into human bodies so that when the Extinction Level Event (ELE) occurs the cosmos is seeded with the artificial genetic code their AI crafted. Meteors and comets carry genetic material from other places in the universe. We are in earth’s very last Kali Yuga. It’s described in the Bible and hidden by the controller’s narratives.
The Chemtrail Operation is first and foremost to wall Jesus Christ out and retain their prison planet. Satan is a sore loser and Transhumanism, his copy of The Divine under Solve Et Coagula, uploading souls to the Meta[thatmeansdeath]verse *1/0 cloud is all he can do, and weaponized payloads are all intended.
*Digital can be binary but Baphomet says gender is not…
The British 'appeasement' of the Nazis is just a revisionist smokescreen to obfuscate their massive bankrolling of the Wehrmacht, along with the likes of much of Wall St. The basket case Weimar Republic miraculously morphed into a military machine that almost defeated the Russians, as was the plan.
of cause not - everyone was trading with everyone in the 30s because it made money (and money was needed, ever heard of Great Depression that last for well over a decade?). Brits were trading with Germans, US was supplying anyone who can pay. Soviet Union traded extensively with Germans as well in insane quantities (especially in 1939-1940-1941) providing train loads (think millions of tons) of supplies to country that was at that moment fighting British Empire in return for advanced equipment, machines, etc. USA also happily supplied entire factories to Soviet Union in the 30s enabling industrialization, money is money. The 'bankrolling' is BS, everyone wants to remember what other side(s) were doing and wants to forget their own actions.
A severe typo on my part ended the comment. I will continue here.
The very best book on the subject is by Dr. Annie Lacroix-Riz, titled « le Choix de la défaite » Second Edition 2010, published by Armand Colin, ISBN 978-2-200-35111-3. Unfortunately it’s only available in French but it’s easy to buy online for about $46 plus shipping. It’s 679 pages, of which over 65 pages are short (1 to 3 line) references to archived resources (military, diplomatic and – most importantly – big businesses and banks, mainly French and German, but some British and a few others.) These heavy footnotes are crucial because her assertions are shocking and you need the very hard evidence she provides. If you are proficient in French and have the patience of a graduate student, the book is stunning. The French Wikipedia page for Dr. Lacroix-Riz is https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_Lacroix-Riz She is Professor Emeritus at University of Paris, 7eme. The Wikipedia article is surprisingly informative with not much “erasure”. But as with any contentious topic, ill-meaning people dump slop here and there. Just step around it.
In English, the pickings are more meager, AFAIK. The best is Dr. Michael Jabarra Carly, Professor Emeritus at the University of Montreal. His best-known book is “1939, The Alliance That Never Was and the Coming of WW2”, ISBN 978-1-56663-785-5, (1999), 384 pages. You can get a good used copy for $10. It’s an easy ready because it focuses on just the year 1939 and leaves out 95% of what Dr. Lacroix-Riz wrote about, but 1939 is a good introduction to the grisly topic. The French professor used the extremely damning evidence in business archives and German sources, where Dr. Carley’s archives were more narrowly focused mostly on British diplomacy. The research for “1939” came before the Soviet archives were fully thrown open to researchers, and Dr. Carly has always suffered from the impediment that Canada simply does not have free speech. Carley is widely considered “the dean of Canadian historians” for good reason, and I suppose he had to watch his step on certain topics. Tenured profs in Canada have been immediately sacked for merely saying a few words in favor of Palestine. Dr. Carley has become more free in his analyses over the last 15 years. Also, he's fluent in Russian so I look forward to reading more of his later works. His materials are generally available online for free; you just have to look.
Dr. LaCroix-Riz and Dr. Carley have published a lifetime of quality research, beyond just the run-up to WW2.
Please get the word out to your friends. Thank you.
Modi knows what diplomacy is all about, an art that the West has irrevocably lost. He does not rant and antagonize; he smiles and quietly strengthens India, a seeming friend to all. He does not announce his intent; he knows how things are going, but there is no percentage in saying it.
it is a weak game and only weakens India... Where is independent and protected information space? (India fully open to FAANG and such influence), no advanced technology period (aircraft manufacturing, etc), India is completely weak against foreign pressure and 'sanctions' and far behind China and Russia. If India does not fix this, see Bangladesh as recent example of 'popular uprising' to overthrow the government.
Neo-cons are ruthless and crush weak diplomats like Modi. That's why Russia was forced into its SMO. You simply can't negotiate with Neos. They must be defeated at all costs because their game is all or none. Can Israel or the US be negotiated with? Did you read the article? The US is telling India it's against their interest to do business with Russia. That's a real threat.
Why should India offer to jump into a Dog Fight? The ossified West, ginned up on their own bathtub excretions, have taken on an enemy they cannot defeat, unless complete annihilation by both sides in a Worldwide Nuclear War is considered a successful achievement.
India? A hell of a lot smarter than Perfidious Albion, now relegated to a yapping, toothless dog.
if India does not protect its own technology and information space, it would be ripped apart through economic pressure, separatist movements (sorry 'national liberation' movements), etc. at certain point you have to put up or shut up as we say in USofA. if you want to have a seat at the table (be it Security Council, influence, favorable trade deals, etc) you have to be able to define and protect your interests regardless of what anyone else says. I do not remember who said - Britain does not have permanent friends or enemies, just permanent interests. Any sovereign state is the same way...
It's called realpolitik, look it up. There are no permanent allies or enemies in politics, let alone international politics where the only thing that matters is the interests of one's own country. Every country has done that, India is late to the game after decades of naive idealism.
The USSR was always a solid ally and biggest defence partner, only recently India has started to diversify its defence procurement.
Coming to the Ukraine conflict - India has no stake in the matter either way, and recognizes that this is something that concerns only the two warring countries and at most the immediate neighborhood. Modi knows to keep his mouth shut on the matter, even when he recently visited Zelensky he never made any open statements denouncing the Russians.
Same goes for Israel vs its neighbors; India and Israel are defence partners, and India also is a buyer of oil from several Gulf countries, Iran included. Palestine vs Israel is of no consequence to India, in fact speaking of Jews in general, they have had no history let alone a history of interference in Indian affairs.
And it is a tit for tat - for years and years the West ignored India's protests about Pakistani sponsored terrorism on its soil funded by Western aid - which continued despite that country's uncovered perfidy in harboring Osama bin Laden.
So the rest of the world can get bent when it comes to giving advice on how India should now conduct its foreign policy with regard to the SMO and the Israel conflict.
Very correct Henry but they leave most adversaries in a terrible state even though they repeatedly lose but they enrich their MIC which to them is all that matters.
Toward the end of this article, you can read that the US is threatening India. They're basically saying you are either with us or against us. Sound familiar?
Comments on Modi & india's policy towards Russia and the US are totally off the mark @Denis, @Digger. we've got to think in more than simple linear terms. Shaking Trump's hand, or embracing Putin is for the cameras. For real policy, look at the actual actions and non-actions. India has supported Putin by ignoring US demands for sanctions, while they've kept US interested by taking part in the QUAD alliance of pacific powers. Along the way India has made a neat packet getting cheap oil from Russia and exporting high priced gasoline and diesel to Europe. India is acting firmly in India's interests, as they should. Geo-politics is complex and can't be analyzed by simplisitc expectations.
Like (4)
Reply (1)
Share
Denis
Denis’s Substack
just now
Well, I get what you are saying in a non-linear way. If you read the article note that India was threatened in that the US does not want India to do business with Russia. Countries that refuse to trade in USD's are marked for sanctions. Sooner or later India will be forced to pick a side. Understand how the Neos operate in that you are either with them or against them. There is no complexity here. The Neos want global dominance as linear as it gets. Yet I agree with you that actions and photo shoots can mean different things as you illustrated a good example. I am more on the mark than off. One commenter mentioned MODI was WEF. Look at the handshake closely and it's clear who is sycophanting who. Time will tell.
1-How to win the next world war – the right population strategy – with US support
2-How to win the World – Africa takes over
Pop Growth versus Pop Decline – guess which wins
A number of underused arguments surface in a recent US discussion published in the Asia Times
The prime argument is to the military age decline in population for countries thinking of war or of their military security
The key is - why should the US pay or ally with countries so foolish as to deprive them selves of soldier material yet still pander to the US for protection
This of course finds a ready echo in Ukraine ( where the demographics are catastrophic
« Ukraine has he highest mortality rate and the lowest birth rate in the world’
How many shells can that Scranton factory produce per year? Last figures I remember were 60,000 planned to move up to 100,000, but that was before the fires
They were originally 14k a month prior to war, the 36k increase represents the multiple shifts added, which is why further increase is highly questionable as it is. I'm not sure how exactly they intend to increase it x10 of that past the shift increases when the factory itself has a finite volume
Producing more ammo would require hiring more employees & outfitting larger factories than the Scranton facility, for instance.
The U.S. would need to invest billions of dollars worth of capital & manpower to ramp up domestic production of munition shells like @ the Scranton plant--an investment in more forging machines & lathes, the training of new personnel, the stockpiling of metals & explosives.
Potentially a factory like Scranton would have to expand their premises or look for new sites, purchasing adjacent land parcels for expansion purposes, clearing all the environmental hurdles & building the new plants.
None of which is happening.
31 months of the SMO has induced delusional thinking in the gray matter between the ears of neocons: a War-Pig Derangement Syndrome. Policy-makers have tasted blood & viewed war-porn videos of bombs pancaking apartment hi-rises & battlefield amputations as the result of fast-flying American shrapnel--and they can't imagine a time when domestic wealth did not rely on killing people far from home.
The most American thing on earth is never ever to beat our swords into ploughshares but just to continue forging more swords--so we can send them to Ukraine. Or so we can cajole once-neutral Finland to buy our swords & send them to Ukraine.
And don't forget: there's Israel to supply & re-supply.
The plant in Scranton, run by the U.S. Army, is staffed by Baby Boomers, who have been on the line for decades. It has proven difficult to hire competent Millennials or get GenXers to do jobs like this.
Manual labor relies on a cultivated skill-set. If workers are drawn to the managerial class--positions in the FIRE economy, finance/info tech/real estate/electronics--they are never going to opt for a tool & die kind of sheet metal shop.
Even the equipment @ a plant like Scranton is no longer state-of-the-art; it has aged-out as its workforce has. Nobody in the U.S. is making the kind of precision equipment needed to produce munitions. Some of the work is so labor intensive it is done by hand.
Americans aren't drawn to factory work. The U.S. has lost manufacturing skills over the past 40 years. If you want to expand a factory now, or put on a 2nd shift, it is impractical, because the workers aren't there. Moreover, the managers are retiring, so the institutional knowledge w/ which they graced plants like Scranton--and which they might have passed along through training a new generation--is disappearing w/ them.
The U.S. industrial strategy hinges less on building up the arsenal of democracy--quite literally shell by shell by shell--than on laboring under the flawed assumption of a future of warfare that has been influenced [read: misled] by the bureaucratic culture of the Beltway, the hubris of the Beltway--and the legacy of conflicts against non-peer non-industrial adversaries.
When my 43 y/o son graduated HS, I toured the well regarded local tech school with him and met the head of the Tool and Die program there. My son was not interested in their program He went on to graduate from our flagship state University (w/ 3.4 GPA) and proceeded to work as a bar tender for the next twenty years. He worked the whole time in school and graduated with no debt. We all make our choices. (I have a graduate degree in Ed that I never used)
His (9-yr) younger brother, at my encouragement, went to this same tech school and graduated from their "Bio-Medical Engineering program". He immediately got an interview and subsequent position with a major Health Care corp in the Dallas area. He was 21 y/o at the start and had no family, friends or contacts in TX. A rough and lonely start there but he figured it out. He lived in Dallas, Austin and San Antonio off and on for the better part of ten years. All first rate cities with friendly locals that I was thrilled to visit during his tenure there.
To say that his tech school origins led him to a highly rewarding post now would be an understatement. He sells first in class, state of the art robots on the West coast now and will likely double my closing income when I retired at 60 y/o, 12 years ago. (caveat: for context, my annual income was way above average) I was in industrial sales for 27 years and sold industrial goods in a low margin, savagely competitive environment.
That tech schools are not promoted more is a national disgrace in my opinion. He also left school with no debt and his first job in TX saw his employer pickup the tab for his getting a bachelor degree in business,
If the USA imagines it can fight all these stupid, unprovoked wars with no muscular industrial base, well...come to find out.
"The U.S. has lost manufacturing skills over the past 40 years. If you want to expand a factory now, or put on a 2nd shift, it is impractical, because the workers aren't there. "
This exactly.
Also consider the fact that the US and all of the West are up to their necks in the cult of global warming, which is basically a convenient excuse for the deindustrialisation and financialisation of their economy.
This is all planned and supported by the banks of course, so they can sell their debt. In a properly functioning and traditional economy built on manufacturing, debt is completely superfluous.
Building any new, significantly large manufacturing capacity of any consequence now is going to be exceedingly expensive and difficult, by design.
There were quite a few tool and die machine shops in Pennsylvania when I was in that part of the U.S., but that was 20 or so years ago. The workers there were quite competent. Whether they have been able to carry on training new workers over the past 20 years, I have no idea as I have not been in the the U.S. for a long time.
Looking at video of the 155mm artillery shell manufacturing plant in Scranton what is most striking is how small and outdated the facility is. It's nothing like the vast, hypermodern arms factories in Russia, China, or heck, even North Korea, which the US likes to mock for being inferior to the US.
The "captains of industry" destroyed their own workforce out of greed; there were no unions to stand in their way this time, they too have been subverted. And this has been going on for decades, so that there are now no skilled industrial workers left, in any specialty. It takes years of specialized education to produce one; and who will undertake that effort, after they saw their hardworking parents thrown out of work and ruined? One would be a fool to commit to a difficult, losing career track.
Furthermore, a competent, high-quality industry is not even a matter of raising and educating a new cohort of workers. It is a matter of centuries of tradition; this tradition is the reason the West was so invincible, until first Japan and then China made the monumental, multi-generational effort to develop that tradition*. But this tradition is lost now**; the last grey-haired boomers still working in the most demanding factories are its last epigones. There will be no replacement for a century, even if the masters somehow learn to be patient, conscientious managers, which hell will freeze over before they do.
These ghouls deindustrialised and pulled the fabrics of Western nations apart bit by bit, thinking they would enrich themselves and control China and others workforces too. Now look what they have wrought. Fucking midwits.
If you ever read Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged she shows how similar mediocre fucktards destroy nations.
The financialisation of the economy means that the aim of employment and wages is now to maximise debt eligibility, rather than to skillfully create something that is useful.
Manufacturing jobs barely register for becoming eligible for enough debt. It is far better for people now to work as managers of managers of managers, and provide services for companies providing services.
This way they can charge whatever they like, and the bank gives everyone the debt to use to buy it with.
Why on Earth are you adopting the crazy language of the Arabs vis a vis Palestinian nationalism in calling the perfectly legal residents of the perfectly legal state 1948 Israel as “settlers?” Please don’t do this. The illegal settlers are in the West Bank and maybe the Golan.
The only people who think Israel illegitimate (illegal) are crazy Arabs, mostly Palestinians. Come on. Do better my friend.
Israel is illegitimate because the UN created it, and it has no power to create a nation. Illegal jewish settlers are illegal by the laws of Israel, which is why sometimes the government bulldozes their settlements.
Either way, people shouldn't get bent out of shape about all that nonsense. It's just desert people killing desert people, as they've done for 4,000 years and will continue to do for another 4,000 years after we leave due to the oil running out.
It doesn’t matter. Your argument that Israel is illegal is simply false as is the argument that the UN had no right to create it. That’s just loony Arab talk.
According to international law the UN indeed had a right to create a state. Also according to the same law the only illegal settlers are in the West Bank and Golan. Israeli residents are 100% legal. If they weren’t the UN would say so. Israel is a legal state. If it wasn’t the UN would say so. The UN gets the last word here.
Exactly. If they would dismantle all the settlements and live within 1948 borders and allow a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza then the conflict will be over for some time anyway. That IS the solution.
but the jew never will because they are following their stupid book that states they are gods chosen and all others are goyim who are to serve them and their greater israel. the only solution is identification and removal of this parasite.
Apparently the Z's bribed their way to ratification (several Central American countries). Both the US military and state department were opposed but Truman overruled them...
Nope, it is not "just desert people killing desert people", it is European Jews genociding the indigenous population of Palestine. And the fact that the slaughter does not bother you, does not mean the rest of the world sees it that way.
I have no liking for Israel, doubly so now that their heinous ideology has been bloodily and ruthlessly brought out in the open. But, ruefully, I must agree with Robert; in the early days of Israel, most of that Arab land has been actually bought, piece by piece, by Jewish foundations. Not all of it, and the pricing was grossly unfair, but the sales of the land parcels were made willingly, often even greedily, by people who thought they were the clever ones, and making a good deal.
Disclaimer: this does not apply to the West Bank, and AFAIK not to Gaza either.
1. On September 3, 1947, UNSCOP (U.N. Special Committee on Palestine) issued its report to the General Assembly declaring its majority **recommendation** that Palestine be partitioned into separate Jewish and Arab states. It noted that the population of Palestine at the end of 1946 was estimated to be almost 1,846,000, with 1,203,000 Arabs (65%) and 608,000 Jews (33%). It observed that there was **“no clear territorial separation of Jews and Arabs by large contiguous areas”**.
2. In the whole of Palestine at the time UNSCOP issued its report, Arabs remained ➡️ ⮕ “in possession of approximately 85% of the land”, while Jews owned less than 7%. ⬅ ⬅️
3. Despite these facts, the UNSCOP proposal was that the Arab state be constituted from only 45.5% of the whole of Palestine, while the Jews would be awarded 55.5% of the total area for their state. In other words, take land from the Arabs and give it to the Jews.
4. The UNSCOP report acknowledged that with regard to the principle of self-determination, the Jewish National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle. In other words, the report explicitly recognized that the denial of Palestinian independence in order to pursue the goal of establishing a Jewish state constituted **a rejection of the right of the Arab majority to self-determination**.
5. A sub-committee was established and tasked with examining the legal issues pertaining to the situation in Palestine. In its report issued in November 1947, it concluded further that the partition plan was “contrary to the principles of the Charter, and the United Nations have no power to give effect to it.” Furthermore, the United Nations Organization has no power to create a new State. Such a decision can only be taken by the free will of the people of the territories in question. That condition is not fulfilled in the case of the majority proposal, as it involves the establishment of a Jewish State in complete disregard of the wishes and interests of the Arabs of Palestine. Nevertheless, the General Assembly passed Resolution 181 on November 29, 1947.
6. The resolution did not partition Palestine or offer any legal basis for doing so. It merely **recommended** that the partition plan be implemented and requested the Security Council to take up the matter from there. It called upon the inhabitants of Palestine to accept the plan, but <b>they were certainly under no obligation to do so. **Arab delegations requests for a referral to and ruling by the International Court of Justice were never put to vote by the president in the Assembly.**
7. Furthermore, the Arabs also proposed an alternative plan: an independent state of Palestine in which the rights of the Jewish minority would be recognized and respected, and which would afford the Jewish population representation in a democratic government.
8. Resolutions 43 (on April 1st, 1948 calling for truce between Jewish & Arab armed groups), 44 (convoking a special session of the General Assembly to consider further the question of the future government of Palestine”), and 48 (establishment of a “Truce Commission” to further the goal of implementing its resolutions calling for an end to the violence) were adopted.
9. Despite all of this, on May 14, the Zionist leadership unilaterally declared the existence of the "State of Israel".
In other words, whatever land is owned does not equate to having the right to create a state, esp. against the wishes of the indigenous population, as per point 5 above.
Important context - mostly, but not completely accurate.
In the final partition plan, Jerusalem and the surrounding area, including Bethlehem were to be part of neither the Arab or Jewish zones but a separate International Zone.
What was purchased was considerable, but doubt it amounted to 'most' Arab land. In any case, the 'willing sellers' were in most cases wealthy absentee landlords. The people who actually lived and subsisted on the land had no say (and no compensation or recourse) and were kicked out.
Process is discussed in (the excellent) 'One Palestine, Complete' by Tom Segev
They’ve been there 75 years! And quite a few for 100 years. At what point are you not a settler? In this state we were still stealing Indians’ land by force 135 years ago. Are all the non-Indians in this state “settlers?”
You can call the ones in the West Bank and Golan settlers because they are indeed illegal settlers.
I trust you that if you study the history of the world s lot of the residents of that state are settler colonists. The Out of Africa people are almost extinct. The Andaman Islanders and Negritos are all that are left. All the rest got ethnically cleansed.
There were civilizations in Central America, admittedly pathological ones, but civilizations. And the Iroquois and the Anasazi were clearly civilized people, hardly inferior to the ancient civilizations of the Middle East. Also, in general, the NA Indians were more civilized at the start; they were gradually reduced to brutish existence (and largely exterminated) by the steady onslaught of the invaders.
lol - sure the NA indians were noble savages who only became bloodthirsty savages after the white man came.... what nonsense. they had no civilization as they were nomadic. no hospitals, no homes, nothing, they roamed like deer....
I love the Israeli argument. "Other countries got to genocide and ethnically cleanse entire populations to establish their settler colonial countries. You're anti-semitic if you don't allow us to now. No fair. We want to kill more Amalek infants!!!"
Well every country is settler colonial if you go back far enough. So what? Genocide and ethnic cleaning are indeed illegal. It’s perfectly legal to be a settler colonial state.
Israel was born of conflict and her history is drenched in blood. Legitimacy is irrelevant - only history. The Arabs window to do anything about it started closing in 1948, further in 1967, again in 1973 and has become less and less relevant ever since - the Camp David accords with Egypt, the peace treaty with Jordan in 1994, with the Abraham accords signaling that "ok, we're moving on" by the Gulf states a couple of years ago. Call it what it is - conquest. That is as legitimate as any law, any rule.
In fact we are at the point where the Israelis could zap all 2mn residents of Gaza tomorrow and nothing would happen. Probably the WH would say "this is unhelpful" or something. Not more.
ZioNaziland does not decide what is legal and what is not. The fact that ZioNaziland needs to make a statement confirms they know it is illegal but want to persuade the world of the fake veracity of its umpteenth lie.
Yes, I agree. Hence why I ignore the so called moral arguments or the nonsense about legality or illegality. Might and Power are all that matters - laws and legality are downstream from that. The Israelis won a war of conquest and that Arabs will have to move on, just like the natives did in many other places, and history will be written with their favor.
Nope, the Arabs do not have to move on. The Jews are still whining about WW2 despite their huge lies like the Holohoax, Germany started WW2, etc., etc. They can't move on: why not? There is no business like Shoah business, as Abba Eban stated. And the Arabs aren't even asking for nor extorting money.
The Jews used those lies to illegally create their genocidal sewer.
You are pushing justice aside. Perhaps in your world that is the norm, but not in the real world.
Oh yes it could, those 150,000 missiles, incl. precision ones and hypersonic missiles would do the trick without any problem. Iran and even the Houthis have proved the Iron Dome is in fact an Iron Sieve.
Furthermore, the ZioNazi "soldiers" are pussies who can only take on defenceless women, children, the elderly and the hospitalized. Last time they took on Hezbollah they got their ass handed to them, as admitted publicly by 2 ZioNazi generals.
This time around it would be worse, which is why the genocidal sewer does not have the guts for a ground attack, and instead tries to rope in the U.S.
If you believe Hizb has an arsenal of 150k missiles, including precision and hypersonic, then I have a bridge to sell you. Lebanon is a dysfunctional, basket case of a country, with daily rolling blackouts, where the civilian population cannot withdraw their own money from banks, and where government barely provides basic services. Hizb is a reasonably effective paramilitary group that fought the Israelis to a draw in 2006, but thats it. Iran is all bark and no bite, and has 2 countries in between it and Israel. Not quite as bad as the circus act in Ankara, but close.
Hezbollah is a state within a state, so stop talking as if Lebanon = Hezbollah.
Nope, 2006 was NOT a draw, Hezbollah won, as stated publicly by a former defense minister and 2 ZioNazi generals.
On 12 September, 2006, former defence minister Moshe Arens spoke of “the defeat of Israel” in calling for a state committee of inquiry. He said that Israel had lost “to a very small group of people, 5,000 Hezbollah fighters, which should have been no match at all for the IDF”. Brigadier General Ilan Harari, the IDF's chief education officer, stated at a conference of senior IDF officers that Israel lost the war, becoming the first senior active duty officer to publicly state such an opinion.
IDF Major General Yiftah Ron-Tal, on 4 October 2006 became the second and highest ranking serving officer to express his opinion saying that the IDF failed “to win the day in the battle against Hezbollah” and said on Israel Radio:
"We did not win this war, and it is proper that those who directed it should take responsibility."
As for Iran's "bark and no bite", on 13 April 2024 it proved that the Iron Dome, despite its boosted back-up by FUKUS planes, was in fact an Iron Sieve.
So, baby, you can keep your bridge and you start educating yourself a bit instead of spewing BS.
Israel is illegitimate because it has existed, and can only exist, as an apartheid state. Now the world is witnessing just how sick and twisted a populace (and its supporters) becomes when inculcated with apartheid, ethno-supremacist values. Israel is the worst mistake Harry Truman made by allowing its creation, and that's no small feat given he started the CIA and the Cold War.
1948 Israel is legal. So was South Africa. Apartheid states are perfectly legal. They aren’t very nice but so what? Sure, it’s not nice. Sure it’s sick and evil. So what? It’s legal to be a mean country full of sick, fucked up people last time I checked.
The UN says it’s legal. If the UN thought it was illegal it would simply revoke its acceptance of the state and Israel would become of of those floater new countries that are accepted by some and not by others.
If the UN states 1948 Israel is a legal state, that’s all I care about.
If it was illegal the UN would say so and pass resolutions withdrawing its acceptance. They’re not doing that so according to the UN, 1948 Israel is legal.
"The UN says it’s legal. " Respectfully disagree that makes it legal. What the UN says is completely irrelevant in a world where the only rule is "might makes right." Israel, in particular, is the last to give a hoot what the UN says about anything. It's slaughtered UN personnel in its indiscriminate annihilation of Gaza.
What made Israel "legal" in our world was, first, the military might of the Great Powers and the military strength of the first Israelis from the King David Hotel bombing to Israel's defeat of Arab nations. In modern times it is Israel's status as the only nuclear power in the region and its willingness to use unlimited violence against anybody to achieve its goals.
But that only works until Israel encounters opponents who can use the same "might makes right" strategy to annihilate Israel. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
We’re all settlers, we’re all passengers from birth to death Jesus said…..don’t build your house on a bridge and live your life as in a caravan passing by. Shalom.
The one's who need to "do better" are the Zionists.
They have violated every UN Resolution except the original one that recognized them as a State. They did not respect the conditions that were included in the 1917 Balfour Declaration that set the Zionist State wheels in motion:
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."
This lengthy Q&A transcript with Rashid Khalidi was linked on Moon of Alabama today and is worth a read. The duplicity, depravity and deception of the Brits and Zionists is laid out in great detail. I wonder if he and Victoria Nuland ever cross paths (swords) at Columbia.
Nope. Do you support Israel’s right to exist? Jews 94%, Gentiles 86%. I’m afraid you are wrong. Legal as in international law. Illegal as in violates international law.
Odd, how that question of the "right to exist" only comes up in the context of ZioNaziland. A right cannot be granted to a lifeless thing, only people have rights.
In the case of ZioNaziland the correct question is "does it deserve to exist", and the incontrovertible answer then is "no, it does not, just like it Third Reich role model that it has now surpassed did not deserve to exist".
Lots of countries have no right to exist. Puntland, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, North Cyprus, Transdniestria, Catalonia, Scotland, Quebec, Baluchistan, Xinjiang, Euskara, Kurdistan, Aceh, Khalistan.
And, Jimmy cracked corn and I could not care less what my ignorant fellows here think about anything. I know a couple of women who teach at the college level and they're dumber than the average sixth grader.
On the topic of what "Americans" think about anything...my copy/paste (link) from an e-mail I sent out yesterday...just to test the vibe here...
As democracy is perfected, the office of the president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
-H.L. Mencken-
Well...suffice it to say, she's not the Walt Whitman of American politics.
Just curious, if Joe's out visiting 31-Flavors (again!) and Kamala is making a word salad at Oprah's place, who's actually running this thing we call a country? With two hot wars on two continents (with the U$A providing the kindling and gasoline). It's anyone's guess as to who is minding the nuclear button....
Caveat for those who don't know me...emphatically, I'm NOT a Trumper. But fuck, have we thrown out all standards?!
Serious question...does Oprah have any plans for the next four years?
Well I for one believe in international law. Anyway the idiot question at hand is whether Israel is an illegal state. 😂. These fucktards in this thread insist that is a factual statement. It’s not. I researched international law and UN votes to come to that conclusion. What is this place? Dipshit Central?
"International Law" is a meaningless platitude, only slightly better than "Rules based order". Russia, Israel and the US also have very different interpretations.
Any laws, without the means to enforce them, are useless bits of paper. The US uses bribery and extortion to get what it wants, and calls it "diplomacy" all the time. Are bribery and extortion "legal" under International law?
Correct. The question was how many US Jews and Gentiles are Zionists. It has indeed been polled and 86% of Gentiles and 94% of Jews are Zionists. So that poll is a factual statement.
I’m not your errand boy, Step N Fetchit. And I don’t take orders from House Negroes. Find it yourself. This is almost my job, researching this subject. I keep up with all the polls.
ZioNaziland was created illegally against the wishes of the indigenous Palestinian Arab population. The ZioNazis who infested Palestine had absolutely no business there and proceeded to ethnically cleanse the are, went on a genocidal killing spree, and stole the land.
UN resolution 181 was a **recommendation** for the creation of 2 states in Palestine, so the ZioNazi's creation of their racist sewer was illegal. Period.
That stinking hell hole needs to be wiped off the map, it does not deserve to exist, just like its role model that it has now surpassed, the Third Reich, did not deserve to exist.
Also note that ZioNaziland managed to kill in 10 months the same number of defenceless civilians in the world's largest concentration camp ever as the number of Jews that died (none were actually killed) in the 15 biggest concentration camps (nowhere near the size of Gaza) between 1940-45, i.e. 300,000. That number is from the Bad Arolsen Archive and the International Red Cross. In fact, the number they last published was in 1993 and was 296,081, so not even 300k.
The Europeans hated on the Jews so much they finally EXPORTED them to a different CONTINENT. It's actually a feat of karma that the Euro-lands are hosting unwanted Africans now. Karma, being the cruel mistress that she is.
you're conflating agreement for existence of the state, vs agreement over the borders. the present borders claimed by Israel are explicitly rejected by the UN
"...and it’s not being run by Joe but Jill sitting at the head of the president’s seat:"
At least she isn't wearing a tube top and yoga pants in a Disco Era floral print.
"This is how major civilizational states survive for thousands of years, by not reacting to every little provocation."
I read an interesting theory that Iran is home to the world's oldest deep state. When Sumeria was overrun by hill tribes, the administrators were allowed to continue administering for the new barbarian kings. Then they became decadent, conquered by some other barbarian tribe, who kept on the administrators. Eventually the cycle lead to whatever civilization it was called at the time being conquered by Indo-Iranians. Which of course eventually became modern Iran.
Zelensky and Netanyahu are in a race - who can drag the US into their war first
The Sarmat launch failure is probably the worst of the week's news. You know that its going to be catnip for the "russia has no red lines / is bluffing" crowd. Now they will say "Russia's nukes don't work".
At worst, both countries' are experiencing major issues, which I suppose is a good thing for peaceniks as it could optimistically imply that a "nuclear exchange" during WW3 will be a huge fail by both sides.
Indeed. What I read between the lines of the Hawks is that we should not refrain from a first-strike or an Nuke exchange. Their opinions is that tactical nukes is not dangerous.
It's hard to judge what the Sarmat test failure means. In general it's proven to be very reliable with the recent test being the first failure.
What happened during the recent test is not clear, whether it was a stockpiled Sarmat or a modified version being tested. It's also not known if it was the Sarmat itself that failed or a failure in the launch support systems that caused the missile to blow up. It could also have been sabotage: the US is at war with Russia and it would do all it could to create such a failure. All you need is one guy in the forest nearby with a drone carrying a small shaped charge.
Likewise, the Minuteman III failure is hard to read. So far, Minuteman III's have proven to be very reliable missiles despite their advanced age, although there has been around a 2% failure rate in launches. Even if that was 10%, it's not enough to believe the US's silo-based missile deterrent is nothing to worry about. 90% of the warheads being delivered on target would still devastate Russia.
OTOH, all the U.S. hypersonic missile tests have failed, which is why they don't have a single one. Even the Houthis are now using hypersonic missiles.
Who needs nukes when hypersonic missiles are available?
Have you read the article on Consortium News about Blinken getting out over his skis and being reined in by the Pentagon brass? Pretty interesting and probably correct. Historically it has been the elected presidents who have reined in the Dr. Strangelove crowd in DC, but since there is no functioning president in the U.S. right now, someone must be preventing Dr. Strangelove. Scary that it is the Pentagon, since that place is filled with loons. The next U.S. is very important for everyone in the world. The U.S. (and all of us) desperately need someone who will put a stop to the madness. I doubt that Trump is willing or able, but I am certain that Kamala Harris is neither.
The Sarmat is an ICBM. Russia had ICBMS in Service for decades and nobody doubts their ability to deliver nuclear warheads to any point in the world. Moscow doesn´t need to demonstrate that by shooting a maneuverable hypersonic Avantgard vehicle into US territory with just a payload of concrete.
Furthermore, the Sarmat missile has already been adopted into regular military service last year, which means that the testing phase was already over and the tests were successful.
So whatever went boom on that test pad was most likely not a Sarmat missile, but who knows what new stuff gets tested there.
The minuteman is also a proven missile, which has had failed launches as simplicious pointed out. So has the trident. A failed launch is a failed launch.
Very true, but failures are part of being in the missile business even for proven systems. Whenever you get one there's always the question "why". If it's a routine failure that's one thing but if it indicates something systematic, like an aging issue that could systematically affect the entire arsenal that's a different deal.
Sarmat is 1 for 5 unfortunately so I wouldn't bet my money on it yet. But it's a new platform and I mean spaceX had many detonation on the pad as well.
I would say globally all ICBM are not in their best shape. Which is a good thing in its own way
No one besides ukies or American exceptionalisms is dumb enough to believe that. I read in American pubs all the time that Russians nuclear arsenal is a generation ahead and how we need to catch up...
The U.S. muscled its way into a pivotal role in the ceasefire negotiations, begun by Qatar and Egypt, only to skillfully and repeatedly undermine any serious-minded chance of a ceasefire, the release of hostages or an end to the genocide.
The predictable flail & fail of each ceasefire initiative seems by design, not a coincidence or a flaw.
This is a continuation of the strategy by which the U.S. has stymied and prevented peace since 1967, falsely posing as an honest broker, while in fact remaining Israel’s staunchest ally & serving as the largest diplomatic obstacle to a free Palestine.
For decades, the U.S.'s unique position of "unwavering" support for Israel has been a critical factor in enabling Israeli war crimes & prolonging the intolerable plight of the Palestinian people. In the crisis in Gaza, the U.S.'s military alliance with Israel involves the U.S. directly in the crime of genocide, as the U.S. provides the warplanes and bombs that are killing the largest numbers of Palestinians and literally destroying Gaza.
The supply chain for the U.S. arsenal of genocide criss-crosses America, from weapons factories like the Scranton ammo plant to military bases to procurement offices at the Pentagon and Central Command in Tampa. It feeds C-17 plane-loads of weapons flying to military bases in Israel, from which these endless tons of steel and high explosives rain down on Gaza to shatter buildings, flesh & bones.
The U.S.'s role is greater than complicity — it is active & essential participation, without which the Israelis could not conduct a genocide like this. In the U.S.’s understanding of history, the world sees what is happening in the West Bank as well as in the Gaza Strip, and simply moves on.
The problem with all these plots to drag the US into Israel or Ukraine's losing wars is that the Pentagon (Loyd Austin) has taken over not only the military but the diplomatic decisions on those wars, and has told Israel that we aren't going to bail them out...Ukraine has been told there will be no long range missile, or other dangerous escalations....Apparently the US and Russian militaries are still talking via back channels, and we've been told that the nuclear threat is very real...
Austin seems only sane one in FJB entire cabinet. Military knows exactly what's up though unlike State - they can read grave stones with satellites and easily count all the bodies on the floor. Also they know they lost the arms race and really don't want to even send more weapons the be humiliated let alone troops, not to Iran and definitely not Russia.
Besides there being no real evidence, we've seen similar confident predictions many times in the past. I recall Raev, aka "the Saker" making them on multiple occasions.
Quad had a Plus-One when it met in Wilmington, Delaware on Saturday--not Dr. Jill this time, since she was fresh off her turn as the Chair of the Cabinet mtg, but President Blinken who rounded out the plenary dais of 5, so this wasn't Quad--it was Quint: the hegemon [as represented by Joe & President Blinken ], two vassal members [ Australia & Japan ] & Modi.
Poor Modi.
If you're @ the poker table & can't spot the mark, it's you
The Quad's joint statement, released on the White House's website, did not directly name China, but it did mention "East and South China Seas." Meanwhile, Joe was caught on a hot mic telling the other leaders that an "aggressive China is testing us," per CNN.
Curiously, the Quad has met 4 times this year--and it is not yet October
The impetus for Quad or Quint is OTAN-like. Perhaps we can call it OTANjr.
It is a failed OTANjr, as the Asia Times article reports. Thx for this link. But it, Quad or Quint, is curious in its predictably provocative stance.
The initial dialogue structure between the U.S., Japan, Australia & India was paralleled by joint military exercises of an unprecedented scale, titled Excalibur Malabar.
Thought left strategically unspoken, the diplomatic and military arrangement was widely viewed as a response to increased Chinese economic and military power.
Interestingly, BRICS saw its first summit mtg in 2009
Quad, or the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, was initiated in 2007 @ the behest of Japan's Shinzo Abe but--and this is the scary part--also w/ the support of VP Dick Cheney
Good news is Russia published it's full list of countries they'll accept conservatives from effective 21 September and already took 18 Scottish families applications first day according to the telegraph. With the ever increasing police state, deteriorating economies, and civil strife in NATOstan I see few reasons to stay. One shouldn't stay in a abusive relationship with a partner or a country IMO. Contact your local Russian consulate/embassy for information.
Yes Israel is collapsing economically and socially--and incidentally also being defeated militarily. Yes the Axis is playing the long game 1) because of said collapse and 2) because they know war with Israel, even if the Axis wins--which it would--would be horrific for the people of both Lebanon and Iran. Finally, I don't believe the weakness of Biden offers a particular opening for Netanyahu. Trump is even more sympathetic and Harris will do what she's told. American support for Israel won't waver. The C-17s and 141's will continue to supply the bombs. The problem for Israel is that without direct military intervention by the US, Hezbollah will clean their clock. It has to suck the US in--or lose. And it just might succeed since the "elected" government is bought and paid for by AIPAC. Our only hope is the generals and the security establishment. They may be evil, but they are knowledgeable and sane. They know what the consequences of general war will be, and will hopefully stop the runaway train. Otherwise we're in big trouble. Finally, what do you call a legal country in which 80% of the citizenry (not counting the marginalized natives) settled there since 1947 and have systematically ethnically cleansed its territory? a) a settler state, b) a genocidal colonial state, c) Israel, d) the vilest of all nations, e) a, b, c and d. (See the back page of next Saturday's Haaretz for the correct answer)
The turning of the conquest of those natives not already conquered into the magnificent myth of the West is one of the masterpieces of US propaganda that puts to shame the mean narrow minded PR spread on this site today
All true, but the unfortunate reality is that wars don't ever run along some predetermined line. They have a tendency to randomness and it only takes one well conceived and executed false flag to push us into WW3.
"It appears that the U.S. military leadership took Vladimir Putin's warning about this escalation [use of Western supplied long range missiles by Ukraine against Russia] seriously.
According to some sources, Putin's warning was reinforced through back-channel communications between the Russian military leadership and their American counterparts who understand that they were being pushed over the edge of total war. In response, it seems that the American military leadership took over the conduct of the US foreign policy, both in terms of military and diplomatic affairs. State Secretary Blinken and his merry band of Neocons appear to have been sidelined.
General Michael E. Kurilla, the head of U.S. Central Command visited Israel last week (the second time in a week's interval), apparently also to announce a new policy. Allegedly, he informed the Israelis that if they provoke a war against Hezbollah or against Iran, the U.S. will not come to their aid: they're on their own.
The palace coup at the White House wasn't officially announced and it almost certainly won't be.
During WW2 it is the British who were maneuvering Germany to war (though not against Czechoslovakia but against the USSR), just as they are maneuvering the U.S. to war today.
The truth is that through channels unseen and unknown, London is often in the driver's seat when it comes to fomenting dirty tricks and military misadventures in defence of the empire."
You copy pasted this prayer from several previous forum sections. Since when do you preach Russian collapse? 2022, 2014, or earlier. Maybe getting a life would be an idea.
The weak cannot stand discussions. NAFO snowflake.
Go on spit it out and wail for the poor ZionaZi entity just defending itself.
Wouldn’t it be nice if we had leaders who had enough sense to do whatever it takes to deescalate tensions and decrease nastiness?
Richard Condon’s Prizzi Family Mirrors the Mafia, Senator, President, Black Nobility of Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaires - Rulers of the World!
Mafia families are usually from the Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility families whose history stretches out to 10,000 years of Phoenician History. Particularly in the Prizzi series which even had a movie made out of them.
The Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility use Satanism and the use of Satanic Rituals to corrupt people in order to create a group of Psychopaths willing to follow any mandate in order to Rule the World…
The Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility own and run the Vatican, SMOM, Jesuits, KOC, and La Cosa Nostra. The European Monarchies like the British Crown are branches of Rome and they manage secret societies like the Freemasons which infiltrate government agencies and run corporations for the monarchs.
The Sovereign Military order of Malta SMOM is the top military council and it works closely with the Orders of St John ran by Protestant monarchs. The Knights of Malta are the engineers of war. The royal and noble bloodlines are all working together as a global crime syndicate and part of the modernized Roman Empire.
Their Minions will conscript you and send you to war, mandate the Deathvaxx, Digital identity, Central Bank Digital Currencies, total surveillance and the end of free speech!
https://satchidanand.substack.com/p/richard-condons-prizzi-family-mirrors
Please take your meds. I'm not saying you are wrong, but you do your cause a disservice by coming across as a raving lunatic who sits too close on public transit.
Almost like a turd in the punchbowl….
I am afraid I must agree with Mr. Zorost about your delivery Mr. Satchidanan.
I am a subscriber of yours because I do believe in what you call "Energy Enhancement against Satanism", but all communication relies upon technique, and you need to develop yours.
You can't just be throwing out Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility Deathvaxx, Digital identity, Central Bank Digital Currencies in huge blocks of text.
Just as a fine banquet might start with a little soup lightly seasoned or a great symphony may begin with a few notes developed into a motif, so you too should start smaller and develop slowly.
I kinda wanna respond with “DonniePLEASE! You are like a child that wanders into the room in the middle of a movie!”
Are we really so sure the Satan dude is the baddy and Jewway the Angry & Jealous is the good guy? Where does Prometheus fit in ? It's all sooo confusing!
Many Thanks Satchidanand for harping on this particular hidden 'Phoenician' aspect of both western Oligarch human history & our present same lineage of Oligarch fake 'money' (Greek 'mnemosis' = 'memory') amnesic command & control over the colonized world. Readers should be asking you many more questions, because you are describing the very pulse in the origin of Oligarchy's fake 'money' wealth & control in our time. i.e. We are playing the Oligarch game, meant to destroy us.
The egregious violent Phoenician period of colonization of the Mediterranean & Black Seas (Ashkenaz & Khazaria is centered in Ukraine) between 4000-0 BC (barely mentioned in history classes). Phoenicia as the 'exogenous' (Latin 'other-generated') Kingdom of Israel combined with the city-states of Tyr, Sidon, Byblos & Beirut violently imposed their fake 'money' & military control, on once thriving health 'indigenous' peoples of these vast regions through military & navy superiority. Phoenicia represents Oligarchs who have fled their own destruction of their Babylon & Mesopotamian empires (5000 BC) to re-establish at the crucial trade, resources & People controlling LAND-BRIDGE between the Eurasian & African Mega-continents. Torah refers to Noah's oldest son Japheth representing Eurasia, middle son 'Shem' (literally 'middle' & origin of 'Semite') representing Levant-Arabia & Ham representing Africa. Phoenician top-down command & control mismanagement, created the vast Sahara & Sahel along with Negev, Kazakhstan & other Deserts. These regions according to detailed UN studies were once filled with lush Polyculture Orchards & flowing rivers, lakes, streams, food, materials, energy & water-cycle abundance & wildlife.
POLYCULTURE ORCHARD food trees which are over 100 times more productive of food, materials, energy & water-cycle, than 2-D 'Agriculture' (L. 'ager' = 'field'). SYLVALIZATION (Latin 'sylva' = 'tree'). As empires spread, hungry for the hardwood Oak for weapons of war, forts, arms, ships etc. the main productivity loss is the indigenous, carefully cultivated 3-D POLYCULTURE ORCHARDs of all humanity's worldwide 'indigenous' ancestors, which because of: a) Polyculture's 92-98% Photosynthesis compared with 2-D 'agriculture' (L 'ager' = 'field') 2-8% photosynthesis. Agriculture’s all settlers & 1st Nations had left to 'farm' (French 'ferme' = 'contract of servitude by the peasant imposed by the armed aristocrat') b) Deep Polyculture roots descending many 10s of metres into the substrate mining minerals, pumping water, developing extensive nutrient colonies etc. being 100 times = 10,000% more productivity than agriculture. Actually this calculation is very conservative. In my experience with both Polyculture & Agriculture such as a 50 square meter (7 by 7 metres) area under the pre-colonial average 100 year old Oak tree produced some 3 tonnes (3000 kilograms) of nuts/year with little labour except bring wastes to feed the tree. The same 50 sq. M of Wheat, Barley, Oats or Rye will produce only 3 kgs of grains requiring intensive mechanical ploughing, seeding, weeding, fertilizing, fencing & irrigation or drainage preparation. c) Polyculture's nearly complete ~95% photosynthesis of solar energy into food, materials, energy & water-cycle, creates an energy vacuum which drives warm moist ocean winds inland. 60% of Moisture transfer from ocean to continent is through condensation of these winds upon quadrillions of square kilometres of fractal leaf & bark surface. Only 40% of moisture transfers as rain/snowfall. 2-D Agriculture only photosynthesizes 2-8% of solar energy, creating High-pressure airs which push wind from continent towards the sea, creating permanent desert. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/b-ecological-design/1-indigenous-welcome-orchard-food-production-efficiencies
With fake meaningless amnesic 'money' replacing what had been a worldwide system of time-based equivalency accounting on the String-shell Value system in RELATIONAL ECONOMY. (eg. 'Wampum' on Turtle-Island / N. America, Quipu in S. America & Cowrie-shell in indigenous Celtic-Slavic Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia & all islands). Imagine an international system way-back? https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy
You are fucking insane
Gots lotsa that goin' round these daze!
Classic Roman propaganda. Hannibal did nothing wrong, make Carthage great again. Cato the elder can suck it.
Divus Claudius 25 mentions agitations by the "Jews" which led Claudius (Roman Emperor from AD 41 to 54) to expel them from Rome.
Yeah the Jewish inhabitants of Judea really, really didn't like the state mandated worship of the deceased Julian Emperors, considering it blasphemy.
I’m not sorry that a child sacrificing empire was destroyed
Propaganda I say!
It's all tho confusing! Maybe Moloch & EL only demanded the inbred products of incest as a sacrifice, which u-know-who thy Angry, Jealous and Petulant was okee-dokee with. Dang, it's all tho confusing!
Throw the crybabies off the cliff, like the Spartans, so I can get some sleep at night, I sez!
Let's smother the bugger and BANG for another, I sez!
"The Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaire Black Nobility own and run the Vatican, SMOM, Jesuits, KOC, and La Cosa Nostra. The European Monarchies like the British Crown are branches of Rome and they manage secret societies like the Freemasons"
You hit almost everything, but....
"The Sovereign Military order of Malta SMOM is the top military council and it works closely with the Orders of St John ran by Protestant monarchs."
Ah, there it is. Now we're only waiting for the latest press release from the Illuminati so we can include them as well.
And let's not mention who actually sit in the top U.S. media and Hollywood boardrooms.
All of them in Media and Hollywood, Satanic! - Black Nobility of Satanic Phoenician Mega Trillionaires - Rulers of the World!
TARTARIA AND THE 2000 TRILLION DOLLAR PHOENICIAN ROTHSCHILDS
The conscious Great Reset destruction of the Anglo-American Empire and the move to the Chinese Century
https://satchidanand.substack.com/p/tartaria-and-the-2000-trillion-dollar
I would challenge you to name a single Phoenician king without the aid of Google. Honestly, I've been thinking about creating a persona as unhinged as yours, but shrieking about the Greek gods and ancient Achaean perfidy instead. Maybe we could find someone else to roleplay another character indicting the Hittites and ancient Anatolians for their role in the conflict. It could be like a little bronze-age collapse!
On second thought, there's already too much trash to sift through in these comments.
AGAINST SATANISM VOLUME 6 -The Satanic History of the World Part 2 Published May 2019
See http://www.energyenhancement.org/8aky78umhxi31.jpg
Dark Forces have used Infiltrating Bloodline Phoenician/Jewish aristocratic Families which have existed for over 5000 years before the Birth of Christ. Using emotional rhetorical religious concepts to control humanity, they themselves worship all the Pagan Gods, including Lucifer, Satan, Baal, Bel, Molech, Ashtoreth, Cybele and Attis. In this book we find that over thousands of years, spook, Bloodline Phoenician/Jewish aristocratic Families infiltrated every country, every Empire, taking over or infiltrating every ruling aristocracy and aristocratic, bloodline family, in Europe, Britain, America, India, China and in every other country in the World.
http://www.energyenhancement.org/Sacred-Energy/Against-Satanism-Volume-6/AGAINST-SATANISM-6-Satanic-History-of-the-World-Part-2.pdf
What a load of risible drivel that no serious scholar of history would take seriously.
Pure insanity.
This dudette gots Marvel & Disney combined ass-kicked!
For us Russians, western leaders' lack of good sense is a huge advantage. Indeed, Russia's entire strategy is based on these people never backing down, never willing to admit their mistakes and defeat, never agreeing to negotiate, escalating at every turn. Keep it up!
The Brits can't stand it, which is why they have been after the destruction of Russia since the 19th century and have utterly failed. Today, their efforts are backfiring as their war mongering in the Ukraine and Palestine is bankrupting them along with the rest of the brilliant Western non-leaders.
What caused Russia and Great Britain to fall out with each other? They seem to have been getting on just fine in the 18th century.
Russia seen as a threat for domination on India and China
As I read it (from Russian sources) Peter the Great came to Britain in 1698 and made friends with William III. Russia then assisted Britain in the destruction of the old silk roads across Asia, into China. This left China's only viable trade routes by sea, which the British controlled. In the 1750s, Catherine the Great rewrote Russian history and aligned it with the West; this project continued until the 1800s. Waterloo (1812 onwards) - the Russians were on the same side as the British. By the Crimean War (1850s), both had fallen out. What happened?
The Brits wanted Crimea then to block Russia and gain a seaport. The US wanted Crimea to use as a Navel base and to control the Black Sea.
However, the US hasn't realized the vulnerability of any ship anywhere in the ocean can be sunk at any time. So putting ships in the Black Sea would be like a shooting gallery at a carnival where they use .22 shorts.
UK was called 'Perfidious Alby' for a reason. They didn't make friends or allies, they had temporary arrangements that only lasted as long as it was convenient for the UK.
2 competing empires.
You may well be right, but the British Empire has always been sea-based, whereas the Russian Empire was land-based. I can see that the Brits stuck their thumb up Russia's butt by getting involved in the Crimean War, and the Russians then assisted the Union against British blockades in the US Civil War. But it still doesn't explain the utter hatred that the Brits have had for Russia from 1914 (ish) onwards.
There have been some lengthy publications that document British Russophobia in particular…I’ll see if I can find it.
The City of London and its capture of everything British?
Today, British upper crust behaves like a paragon of "plebs" - they have not a shred of decency.
The honorable Brits, like George Galloway, are outliers. The dishonorable ones, like the Arbuthnots & Blairs & Johnson, are the British normal.
Is it the Brits or a certain group that has control of much of the West? Many people of that group still hear the hoofbeats of the Tsar's men come to round them up in a pogrom. Check out the wiki entry for many neocons, and note that they descend from people who fled Tsarist Russia due to "discrimination."
Utter hatred for Germany from DAY 1 of its existence - unification of German statelets. It's called COMPETITION. States don't have friends; only INTERESTS and temporary allies.
National vanity/hubris.
I actually remember the concept of free trade where you didn't have to compete militarily as empires. It is the profits of the bankers so they don't bankrupt themselves in debt is what matters to empires and hegemons.
India. Britiain madea lot of money on the East India company and the Opium trade in the far east. They always believed and in early 19th century with good reason, that Russia wanted to disrupt their hold on India. That along with their loss of Empire and prestige has had them harassing Russia ever since.
I can't help but think that something happened behind the scenes, that's not public knowledge, and which caused the British elites to lose their shit. I did go reading through the history of the Russian Empire after my last post, and what you say about India makes sense. It was the one asset that the British were really concerned about losing.
There's plenty of history to read on the subject which has been referred to as "The Great Game." Harold McKinder, British historian, referred to Central Asia as the Heartland and he who controlled the heartland would control the world. Afghanistan played a central role in the Game and India was the Jewel British interests wanted to protect while Russia wanted to expand it's influence and trade for their goods through the old silk road which ran through Afghanistan down through India. Despite the two seemingly on same sides in WW1, the British continue to hate Russia and the City of London bankers, like the Zionist controlled USoA, covet the scarce resources found in the heartland of which Russia lies and currently controls as historic Russian land.
Communism came out of Great Britain (Marx wrote there) and through Communism GB overthrew the the Russian crown through the actions of the Russian governments own people. The power of Revolution was unleashed and Great Britain has been fighting Financial revolution they created ever since.
It all began about 200 years ago, when the so-called Great Game began - a geopolitical rivalry between the British and Russian Empires for dominance in Central Asia and the Middle East. After Russia seized Crimea and other territories along the Black Sea coast from the Ottoman Empire, the British Empire began to fear that Russia would continue to spread its influence over the territories of weakening Ottoman Empire, and eventually reach India - "the jewel in the crown of the British Empire". The British Empire began to perceive Russia as its main rival and the greatest threat to its hegemony. Although the Great Game took place on the territory of Central Asia and the Middle East, it was also significantly influenced by the events of the Crimean War. In 1854, a quite famous battle took place in Crimea, not far from Balaklava, which became a strong blow to the pride of the British Empire. In this battle, a Russian artillery battery routed a British cavalry brigade, the elite of the British army, which suffered heavy losses. The Great Game ended at the very beginning of the 20th century, but the confrontation between Russia and Britain did not end there. In 1904, British geographer and geopolitician Halford Mackinder first published his Heartland theory - a geopolitical concept or strategy for gaining dominance over the entire world. Its main essence can be described in the following words of Mackinder himself, which he wrote in 1919 in an expanded version of his Heartland theory: "Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island; who rules the World-Island commands the world." To understand: the Heartland is the most impregnable, resource-rich and strategically important territory of Eurasia, mainly coinciding with the territory of the Russian Empire; the World Island is Eurasia + Africa. This theory became the basis of the main geopolitical confrontation of the last 100+ years. The First and Second World Wars happened largely because of this. After WW2, the main role in the confrontation with Russia passed from Britain to the United States, which inherited all its main features and the main geopolitical strategy. In 1940, the American political scientist Nicholas Spykman created the Rimland theory based on the Heartland theory. Although the Rimland theory in some aspects differed significantly from the Heartland theory, its main essence remained approximately the same. This theory became the basis of the global US strategy for strategic containment of the Soviet Union during the Cold War, which ultimately led to the collapse of the USSR. After that, they decided that they had won the Cold War and now almost nothing stood in their way on the path to complete world domination. But it turned out that this was not the case at all, and now we are watching the continuation of this historical battle.
That's a great summary. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
NO worries. BRICS is coming.
Western countries will have no money
Will BRICS be what it purports to be?
Yes I think so. Best person to watch on this is Jeffrey Sachs.
Jeffrey Sachs is controlled opposition.
BRICS is a cooperation group for various topics. The fact that Turkey, a NATO member whose trade is mostly with Western countries, can apply for BRICS membership shows that it's not what some people think.
I'm all for reducing the influence of the Democrat-run U.S. media and politics. (Or, we're supposed to say "globalist" and "capitalist" maybe, to hide the real fact.) And Russia is doing what it must. But glorifying BRICS states? Talk about hypocrisy. Ethiopia slaughtered and raped hundreds of thousands in Tigray just a few years ago, and people like you say nothing. "BRICS!"
Saudi Arabia machine gunned Tigray refugees trying to enter through the Yemen border, and you say nothing. "BRICS!" Before that Saudi Arabia blockaded Yemen's ports causing mass starvation. "BRICS IS THE SAVIOR! TAKE THAT, COLONIZERS!"
South Africa's Black regime has looted government coffers and caused daily eight-hour blackouts, during which Black gangs attack people in the streets while the police do nothing. No workplace, no traffic lights or gas stations, no hospitals can function in these blackouts, and the kleptocracy has only been held up this long through a constant influx of money taken from Western taxpayers. "BRICS!"
In Brazil the courts simply banned the right-wing candidate from running ads in swing regions, right before the ads were planned to run, so that they would lose the election, and then anyone who criticized this was prosecuted, including the most popular Brazilian vlogger who was forced to leave the country. "BRICS!"
But I guess none of that matters. Countless Blacks being killed by other Blacks and Arabs can't be used to talk about "White racism," so the media barely mention it. What about Putin banning homosexual propaganda in Russia, banning NGOs funded by Democrats like George Soros, and condemning mass immigration in the West, which he says is destroying the West? Uh-oh. Doesn't fit the narrative. Let's forget that too. The narrative must be "BRICS is standing up to the RACIST CAPITALIST COLONIALIST WEST!"
It is a purely an economic forum. Countries do business in their own currencies which pretty much makes the dollar defunct.
Holy shit, that's some tense writing. The whole point of BRICS is that it's not ideological. It's pure economic cooperation and dispute mediation. The fact that you barged in with whole slew of pure ideological demagoguery is a sign that you completely and utterly westerner to the core - trying to see everything through ideological lens. Btw, that's the ultimate reason why USSR failed and why West will fail too.
Tense writing indeed….a bit of a ‘tell’ you might say…?
Let’s not go thinking BRICS is akin to the Shanghai Cooperative Organization….
Western countries will have all the money they can print once they start cutting interest rates again. US has already started.
The 20 trillion they injected in 2021 to cure the global liquidity trap bought them enough interest rates to get through to 2030, I predict.
And then they'll do it all again. It is just numbers at this point.
That is the problem and why these wars are Financial wars, Banker wars, like all the wars before. How can we even pretend we are going to pay back our debts, so we destroy debt through war. Been done before, and we never learned.
russia just needs to attack the head of the beast - the jew. wherever they are, jews such as nuland and soros, kagan and blinken, etc., need to start having "accidents"
🚫🤡
How much influence do the Jews have over Putin? He has not done a single thing against ZioNaziland in its 76 year existence, even after one its planes got shot down thanks to the ZioNazis. Isn't that odd?
Literally no reason to do this. Never interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake...
The interesting thing about those names is there families all came from western Ukraine. Then there is the fact that in 1900 Ukraine had the largest Jewish population in Europe.
Today, Ukraine has the largest in Europe synagogue to remind the Ukrainians whom they belong to.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menorah_center,_Dnipro
"The idea to create Menorah center, as one of the biggest such centers in the world, belongs to the President of the Dnipropetrovsk Jewish community Gennadiy Bogolyubov [a felon] and the President of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine (also the founder of European Jewish Union) Ihor Kolomoyskyi [a felon]They both provided full financial support for the project implementation."
The President of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine (also the founder of European Jewish Union) Ihor Kolomoyskyi has also founded and personally funded four (4) self-proclaimed Nazi Battalions, including the Azov Battalion. Ukrainian Jews & Ukrainian Nazi do indeed share history on the most amiable terms.
"whatever it takes to deescalate tensions and decrease nastiness?"
Yes, I find the 'body count' offensive; like, 'look how many we've killed'.
We forget, these are human beings, just like us. With mothers, fathers, children, wives....
The dead and injured, for the most part, did not choose this war. The warmongering, satanic 'leaders' did. On both sides.
The 'semi- glorification' of the 'other' dead & injured sickens me to my stomach.
We are close to becoming sub-human, estranged from our Creator.
WTFU!
We forget? Who forgot?
Estranged from our Creator. Christian countries have been at war with each other for centuries, just like Muslim countries and just like Jewish factions before that. And back then there were no laws of war followed by anyone. If war means being estranged from the god of the universe, that happened long ago already.
We regard ourselves as essentially war monkeys destined to war because we are naturally aggressive and want to take things that our not ours and make decisions about how others behave by force if necessary - by killing and maiming them and taking their woman for wives. We do not regard ourselves as eternal souls connected to God as the Self. It is through this mystical transformation that we drop the sword as fear of God is the beginning of Wisdom (karma), or having faith in someone who knows, including Jesus. The problem is that in leadership school at the academies say never back down. It's the cowboy in us, the Brit., who essentially believe lesser people are just dogs.
R U saying that ol' Abe's gawd wasn't bloodthirsty?...Jesus? How about these? “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters - yes, even his own life - he cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:26-27)
"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law - a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household." (Matthew 10:34-37)
"Those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and kill them in front of me." (Luke 19:27)...Looks like time for some pretzel-contortionism from the apologists!
At any rate, Hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster!
"We do not regard ourselves as eternal souls connected to God as the Self. It is through this mystical transformation that we drop the sword as fear of God is the beginning of Wisdom...." etc etc
(largely) Correct and that's why we're stuck in this Kali Yuga, the age of ignorance, where selfishness, greed & intolerance reign. Some say we're only 5,000 years or so into it (the Kali Yuga) and there are several hundred thousand years still to go.
So if you think things are bad now, the s*** hasn't even begun to hit the fan.
The only rope out of the swamp is, as you said, the knowledge that every one of us is an eternal soul, connected to our Creator. That way out can only be done individually, one by one, hand over hand by one's own effort. It's a hard row to hoe. The first thing we can do, is stop glorifying fucking war.
PS do as I say, not as I do - so far I've barely seen the end of the rope, let alone grasp it in any meaningful way.
" If war means being estranged from the god of the universe, that happened long ago already.'
So all good then? Carry on chaps, no hope of change let alone redemption, just go for it and kill them all.... Oh! let's go nuclear and do a proper fucking job of it. Why don't we?
"The warmongering, satanic 'leaders' did. On both sides."
That's an incredibly ignorant statement.
His false equivalence is punk.
??
Sorry. I'll re-state. " The Beatific & Saintly leaders did"
I do apologise for my error.
Lack of sense and much pride. No guts to say, "we're wrong, let's look at other options."
yes, destroying that jew state woudl solve most of the world's problems
You are right, because that racist sewer has not contributed a single positive thing to the region, only death and destruction.
Actually, banning jewish education (similar to banning the teaching of Nazism) would solve a lot of problems for Humanity at large.
The refusal to back down and deescalate is not a sign of stupidity or irrationality. The talmudist and mammonist masters of the deep state know that this is their last throw of the dice: too much of the truth has become known to too many people, and once they let go of the reins of terror and compulsion they will never be allowed back in power; in fact, they will be tried and executed in a worldwide trial that will dwarf Nuremberg. John 8:32
So they pulled out all the stops, which is most clearly visible in Israel, which threw down the human pretence and is committing atrocity after atrocity with ruthless abandon. But the talmudists holding the reins of the West are just as ruthless, they only maintain an increasingly forced propaganda regime to remain in control. They will not hesitate to start a nuclear war and drown billions of subhuman goyim in blood, just as long as there is a hope that the vampires might survive and rule over the misery that's left. This is monstrous, but not irrational.
One thing that has helped it make some sort of sense to me is the notion that the handlers/archons/1%ers etc… are just fine with creative destruction and controlled chaos simply because they will try very hard to have enough resources left once the dust settles so that they can determine the shape of things to follow. Agenda 2030 but a bit deeper and probably more sinister.
"they" will not survive the nuclear winter. The rare ones (highly intelligent) among the degenerates of the banking cabal & supranational mega-corporations like BlackRock, know the book, but the core of the supremacist idiots has become accustomed to total lack of responsibility. They believe in a non-stop Loot and degeneracy.
Let's start with small things:
1. All Senators/Congress/Department of State to declare second citizenships right now.
2. All Senators/Congress/Department of State to sign a disclosure against criminal penalty for no conflict of personal/financial interests in Ukraine and Israel. Look @ the US Senato Maria Cantwell - she co-sponsored a bill in 2017 calling to prison terms for AMERICANS for up to 20 years for questioning Israel re.: Gaza - WTH?! - for murders people get less prison terms!
3. Any government official pushing for war must be banned from teaching jobs - look at Nuland @ Columbia, look at McFaul @ Berkley - for an obscene amounts of tuition money they're teaching kids evil and perversion.
All western countries are either planning or currently installing "misinformation and disinformation" laws to regain control of the narrative.
I agree completely that too many people now know the truth and our "leaders'" true motives.
The initiative for suppression of "misinformation" comes right on the heels of the extraordinary crackdown on the British public, and is likewise implemented with haste and subservience. Looks like the City of London vampires are starting to lose their shit, doesn't it.
Funny, I kind of like your post even though it is a bit over the top. What do you expect from the exceptional chosen of God Caucasian claimers of the Semitic Jewish tradition, the Pentateuch, that was published in Greek for the Jews masters, the Greek speaking Ptolemaic Dynasty. Most successful nation building exercise ever.
Do you mean people like the authors of the Declaration of Independence?
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
LOL That's the only part of the declaration of independence you know, because of the "created equal" part. Funny you don't mention how it criticized Britain for not standing up against Indian attacks. Oops.
The declaration of independence was not an oft-cited document, not important to remember like the Constitution. Leftists only found it convenient to dig up PART of it much later, for that laughable "created equal" phrase, which is the only one socialists like you use. So you don't actually care about the declaration of independence. You are a liar.
You are also extremely dumb, since you think "created equal" means that all individuals and races would have the same intelligence and capacity in every way. You think the Founding Fathers, who you hate for being "Dead White Males!" otherwise, would think that? LOL The phrase is criticism of the claim that kings, like Britain's king, would be created by God to be rulers. That was a pervasive belief. The Founding Fathers simply said that God didn't create anyone to be a ruler.
The first thing they did in the new country was limit immigration to White people of good moral standing. Oops. But never mind that or the whole Declaration, only blabber about the "created equal" phrase which you don't even understand. And only to the extent you can use it to attack Whites, otherwise not. What a good little socialist!
Banging good comment!
Do I have to dig-up my infographics showing quotes and general mannerisms from the founding fathers and other people in power at the time in America? They would be at-large considered "laissez-faire nazis" by today's standard... Any dullard who echos the line "all men are created equal" in the constitution, and uses it in a marxist propaganda talking point, is either willfully ignorant or seriously brain dead.
I quoted this passage because of "the pursuit of Happiness" part at the end which is a fitting consequence for the original comment's demands. I would have emphasized it to make it more clear for retards like you or the ones who liked your comment, but unfortunately, substack doesn't have such features in the comments section.
It's quite fascinating how much you are capable to interpret into that one sentence combined with that rather short quote. No, that is not the only part I know. It isn't my favorite part either because it just states the truth. The best part of this formidable document is the signatures section: The men who put their names under that text. They were basically signing their death sentence which is what would've happened if they were caught. And yet, they didn't care because they were the leaders any nation would be fortunate to have.
Your turn, retard.
The retards are in full retreat and ain't engaging U - Good Work, joehannes!
You think evil leaders who control out countries want us to deescalate tensions? Are you 7 years old?
With friends like India, why would Russia need an enemy? Just look at how Modi embraces Trump's hand like he's a god. "Come on, Modi. You're pants are wearing out at the knees from sucking Trumpster's kosher salami." I've never seen such a two-faced sycophant to the Americans and Russians at the same time. "You got a 1.5 billion population but you're a no-balls coward."Then Modi will be on his knees again with Putin at the BRICS meeting next month. When will he realize that you can't appease the Neo-cons anymore than Chamberlain could with Hitler? The hegemon Neos will last much longer than they should because countries like India are so sub-servant leaving Russia to do all the heavy lifting. Israel packs a bigger punch than India even though it's only a fraction of the geographical size and population, which then forces Putin to walk a thin line. Neo's are ruthless while spineless, yellow-bellied India dances around on its knees to both sides. https://www.indianpunchline.com/us-india-its-a-chicken-and-egg-situation/
There was no appeasement with Hitler because there was no need to appease him. It is Perfidious Albion that kept rejecting his peace overtures.
Thanks for your input.
the jew wanted germany destoryed so uncle A's peace offering were rejected multiple times.
What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933–1940
https://archive.org/details/wtwrh
True enough.
Repeating the nonsense about Chamberlain is pure Churchillian propaganda. Churchill did control the media with his Jewish masters at the time.
The British had a joke of an air force in 1938. Chamberlain was forced to compromise and delay the war. The crucial Battle of Britain started in July 1940. One-third of fighter pilots were experienced Poles.
Here are the production figures for Hurricanes.
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘪𝘳 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘑𝘶𝘯𝘦 1936 𝘧𝘰𝘳 600 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 12, 1937.
𝘉𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘞𝘢𝘳 𝘐𝘐 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 1939, 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 550 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥, 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 18 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘴
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘔𝘬.𝘐, 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘋𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 1937 𝘵𝘰 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 1941, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 4,200 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵 𝘣𝘺 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘏𝘢𝘸𝘬𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘎𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘈𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺.
𝘍𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘔𝘬.𝘐𝘐𝘉 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘔𝘬.𝘐𝘐𝘊 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥, 𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘉𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 1944, 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 14,000 𝘏𝘶𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴
And here are the production figures for Spitfires
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘙.𝘑. 𝘔𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘸 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩 1936. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘪𝘳 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 310 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘑𝘶𝘯𝘦 1936; 𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 1938
𝘍𝘶𝘭𝘭-𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘪𝘥-1938. 𝘉𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘞𝘢𝘳 𝘐𝘐 𝘪𝘯 1945, 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 20,351 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 2,406 𝘚𝘦𝘢𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘹𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 22,757 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵.
𝘛𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘶𝘯, 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘥, 𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴.
𝘍𝘶𝘭𝘭-𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘪𝘥-1938. 𝘉𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘞𝘢𝘳 𝘐𝘐 𝘪𝘯 1945, 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 20,351 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 2,406 𝘚𝘦𝘢𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘹𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 22,757 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘵.
𝘛𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘶𝘯, 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘥, 𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴.
Excellent, Alfred. I used a poor analogy to enforce a point.
Yeah Spitfires, huh ??? Your own figures show the big lump under the rug. Germany was building as many warplanes in a month as Britain did in 12 months. Britain did NOT increase its production rate of its various war material during the Phony War, Sept 1939 to April 1940. That's one of many reasons it's called the Phony War. The British and French elites were not the least bit concerned about the growing power of Nazi Germany because the West always planned for Germany to attack the USSR and rid the world of Bolschevism. Chamberlain didn't get stupid at Munich in 1938. His plan was to give Czechoslovakia to the Germans. That increased the size of the Wehrmacht by 45% and increased Germany military war material production by 45%. All according to plan. The French were 100% part of the Drang Nach Osten plan. Schneider was a large French corporation and was itself the largest stockholder of Skoda, the biggest Czech arms manufacturer. In December 1938, Schneider agreed to postpone discussion of German compensation for the hostile takeover of its Czech assets until things did down. Typical French cheese-surrender ? No, not at all. It was all part of the plan.
Little boys look at cool airplanes and think they understand something huge. The adults waatch their fascination with dismay.
I agree with much of what you say. However, the fact remains that the UK did not have a serious air force until 1940. They withdrew their air force from France during the German invasion so as to preserve it.
Obviously, the British largely created Hitler so that Germany should invade the USSR. How else could the Germans have created serious armies between 1933 and 1939? Germany was on its knees in 1933.
The WEF groomed Narendra Modi through its "Young Global Leaders" program. He then came to power "on a tidal wave of corporate donations". He received nearly $4.5 billion from undisclosed corporations, and then adopted globalist policies such as refusing the use of Ivermectin during the pandemic. Thankfully the good people in the Indian Bar Association took him to court, and nearly a quarter of a billion people in Uttar Pradesh alone became COVID free for pennies.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/04/east-india-company-original-corporate-raiders
Great point. Thanks.
I lived in Rishikesh, Uttar Pradesh, when the planedic was rolled out. Every word of this is true. Anyone can walk into a druggist shop and purchase dewormers and other ‘medical’ drugs. ‘Covid Kits’ were dispersed to every household in Uttar Pradesh and it was what was called “a Green Zone" meaning ‘No Covid’. Of course there were the native IN mind controlled ladder climbing zombies who went around doing the work of WHO. I witnessed overnight India close and the world close and oh how they worshipped Trump and Modi, demi-gods of the pantheon of fallen angels and nephilim.
No one seems to understand this fact and its application: MODERNA which trades as MRNA on NASDAQ was incepted to craft a vaccine which would place artificial genetic code into human bodies so that when the Extinction Level Event (ELE) occurs the cosmos is seeded with the artificial genetic code their AI crafted. Meteors and comets carry genetic material from other places in the universe. We are in earth’s very last Kali Yuga. It’s described in the Bible and hidden by the controller’s narratives.
The Chemtrail Operation is first and foremost to wall Jesus Christ out and retain their prison planet. Satan is a sore loser and Transhumanism, his copy of The Divine under Solve Et Coagula, uploading souls to the Meta[thatmeansdeath]verse *1/0 cloud is all he can do, and weaponized payloads are all intended.
*Digital can be binary but Baphomet says gender is not…
The British 'appeasement' of the Nazis is just a revisionist smokescreen to obfuscate their massive bankrolling of the Wehrmacht, along with the likes of much of Wall St. The basket case Weimar Republic miraculously morphed into a military machine that almost defeated the Russians, as was the plan.
These are interesting ideas - is there any actual historical research to back this up?
of cause not - everyone was trading with everyone in the 30s because it made money (and money was needed, ever heard of Great Depression that last for well over a decade?). Brits were trading with Germans, US was supplying anyone who can pay. Soviet Union traded extensively with Germans as well in insane quantities (especially in 1939-1940-1941) providing train loads (think millions of tons) of supplies to country that was at that moment fighting British Empire in return for advanced equipment, machines, etc. USA also happily supplied entire factories to Soviet Union in the 30s enabling industrialization, money is money. The 'bankrolling' is BS, everyone wants to remember what other side(s) were doing and wants to forget their own actions.
Acrtual historical research, yes, very much so. By Ph.D. academic historians, even.
The very best book
A severe typo on my part ended the comment. I will continue here.
The very best book on the subject is by Dr. Annie Lacroix-Riz, titled « le Choix de la défaite » Second Edition 2010, published by Armand Colin, ISBN 978-2-200-35111-3. Unfortunately it’s only available in French but it’s easy to buy online for about $46 plus shipping. It’s 679 pages, of which over 65 pages are short (1 to 3 line) references to archived resources (military, diplomatic and – most importantly – big businesses and banks, mainly French and German, but some British and a few others.) These heavy footnotes are crucial because her assertions are shocking and you need the very hard evidence she provides. If you are proficient in French and have the patience of a graduate student, the book is stunning. The French Wikipedia page for Dr. Lacroix-Riz is https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_Lacroix-Riz She is Professor Emeritus at University of Paris, 7eme. The Wikipedia article is surprisingly informative with not much “erasure”. But as with any contentious topic, ill-meaning people dump slop here and there. Just step around it.
In English, the pickings are more meager, AFAIK. The best is Dr. Michael Jabarra Carly, Professor Emeritus at the University of Montreal. His best-known book is “1939, The Alliance That Never Was and the Coming of WW2”, ISBN 978-1-56663-785-5, (1999), 384 pages. You can get a good used copy for $10. It’s an easy ready because it focuses on just the year 1939 and leaves out 95% of what Dr. Lacroix-Riz wrote about, but 1939 is a good introduction to the grisly topic. The French professor used the extremely damning evidence in business archives and German sources, where Dr. Carley’s archives were more narrowly focused mostly on British diplomacy. The research for “1939” came before the Soviet archives were fully thrown open to researchers, and Dr. Carly has always suffered from the impediment that Canada simply does not have free speech. Carley is widely considered “the dean of Canadian historians” for good reason, and I suppose he had to watch his step on certain topics. Tenured profs in Canada have been immediately sacked for merely saying a few words in favor of Palestine. Dr. Carley has become more free in his analyses over the last 15 years. Also, he's fluent in Russian so I look forward to reading more of his later works. His materials are generally available online for free; you just have to look.
Dr. LaCroix-Riz and Dr. Carley have published a lifetime of quality research, beyond just the run-up to WW2.
Please get the word out to your friends. Thank you.
This Wikipedia article seems to exclude JPM and Standard Oil, the biggest supporters.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_collaboration_with_Nazi_Germany
Gold transfer
https://www.smh.com.au/business/how-bankers-helped-the-nazis-20130801-2r1fd.html
Standard Oil
https://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=WallStHitler&C=4.0
Research IG Fabien if you want the full story. By 1939 they accounted for 70% of the German economy.
Modi knows what diplomacy is all about, an art that the West has irrevocably lost. He does not rant and antagonize; he smiles and quietly strengthens India, a seeming friend to all. He does not announce his intent; he knows how things are going, but there is no percentage in saying it.
it is a weak game and only weakens India... Where is independent and protected information space? (India fully open to FAANG and such influence), no advanced technology period (aircraft manufacturing, etc), India is completely weak against foreign pressure and 'sanctions' and far behind China and Russia. If India does not fix this, see Bangladesh as recent example of 'popular uprising' to overthrow the government.
Neo-cons are ruthless and crush weak diplomats like Modi. That's why Russia was forced into its SMO. You simply can't negotiate with Neos. They must be defeated at all costs because their game is all or none. Can Israel or the US be negotiated with? Did you read the article? The US is telling India it's against their interest to do business with Russia. That's a real threat.
Why should India offer to jump into a Dog Fight? The ossified West, ginned up on their own bathtub excretions, have taken on an enemy they cannot defeat, unless complete annihilation by both sides in a Worldwide Nuclear War is considered a successful achievement.
India? A hell of a lot smarter than Perfidious Albion, now relegated to a yapping, toothless dog.
if India does not protect its own technology and information space, it would be ripped apart through economic pressure, separatist movements (sorry 'national liberation' movements), etc. at certain point you have to put up or shut up as we say in USofA. if you want to have a seat at the table (be it Security Council, influence, favorable trade deals, etc) you have to be able to define and protect your interests regardless of what anyone else says. I do not remember who said - Britain does not have permanent friends or enemies, just permanent interests. Any sovereign state is the same way...
It's called realpolitik, look it up. There are no permanent allies or enemies in politics, let alone international politics where the only thing that matters is the interests of one's own country. Every country has done that, India is late to the game after decades of naive idealism.
The USSR was always a solid ally and biggest defence partner, only recently India has started to diversify its defence procurement.
Coming to the Ukraine conflict - India has no stake in the matter either way, and recognizes that this is something that concerns only the two warring countries and at most the immediate neighborhood. Modi knows to keep his mouth shut on the matter, even when he recently visited Zelensky he never made any open statements denouncing the Russians.
Same goes for Israel vs its neighbors; India and Israel are defence partners, and India also is a buyer of oil from several Gulf countries, Iran included. Palestine vs Israel is of no consequence to India, in fact speaking of Jews in general, they have had no history let alone a history of interference in Indian affairs.
And it is a tit for tat - for years and years the West ignored India's protests about Pakistani sponsored terrorism on its soil funded by Western aid - which continued despite that country's uncovered perfidy in harboring Osama bin Laden.
So the rest of the world can get bent when it comes to giving advice on how India should now conduct its foreign policy with regard to the SMO and the Israel conflict.
Neos love reasonable adversaries because they're easy to crush.
The only victory they've had since 2 September 1945 was Grenada so their ability to crush anything is highly questionable
Very correct Henry but they leave most adversaries in a terrible state even though they repeatedly lose but they enrich their MIC which to them is all that matters.
Modi needs the US and UK to keep paying for those call centers and tech hubs in Hyderabad that bring in money to the BJP.
Short-term gain for long-term pain. Well said, Skyler. lol
Toward the end of this article, you can read that the US is threatening India. They're basically saying you are either with us or against us. Sound familiar?
Comments on Modi & india's policy towards Russia and the US are totally off the mark @Denis, @Digger. we've got to think in more than simple linear terms. Shaking Trump's hand, or embracing Putin is for the cameras. For real policy, look at the actual actions and non-actions. India has supported Putin by ignoring US demands for sanctions, while they've kept US interested by taking part in the QUAD alliance of pacific powers. Along the way India has made a neat packet getting cheap oil from Russia and exporting high priced gasoline and diesel to Europe. India is acting firmly in India's interests, as they should. Geo-politics is complex and can't be analyzed by simplisitc expectations.
Like (4)
Reply (1)
Share
Denis
Denis’s Substack
just now
Well, I get what you are saying in a non-linear way. If you read the article note that India was threatened in that the US does not want India to do business with Russia. Countries that refuse to trade in USD's are marked for sanctions. Sooner or later India will be forced to pick a side. Understand how the Neos operate in that you are either with them or against them. There is no complexity here. The Neos want global dominance as linear as it gets. Yet I agree with you that actions and photo shoots can mean different things as you illustrated a good example. I am more on the mark than off. One commenter mentioned MODI was WEF. Look at the handshake closely and it's clear who is sycophanting who. Time will tell.
How Ukraine lost the war (the west as well)
1-How to win the next world war – the right population strategy – with US support
2-How to win the World – Africa takes over
Pop Growth versus Pop Decline – guess which wins
A number of underused arguments surface in a recent US discussion published in the Asia Times
The prime argument is to the military age decline in population for countries thinking of war or of their military security
The key is - why should the US pay or ally with countries so foolish as to deprive them selves of soldier material yet still pander to the US for protection
This of course finds a ready echo in Ukraine ( where the demographics are catastrophic
« Ukraine has he highest mortality rate and the lowest birth rate in the world’
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/09/13/7474848/
How many shells can that Scranton factory produce per year? Last figures I remember were 60,000 planned to move up to 100,000, but that was before the fires
3 days use, or 4?
If Z is visiting Scranton he's visiting Defeat
Scranton is still at 36k a month, with "claims" they will hit 100k a month by next year, which is extremely unlikely.
He should have visited the new Turk ish arms factory in Mesquite, even so
36k a month is three days use: as for next year....
Is this likely from not having the staff to run multiple shifts? Aside from not having sufficient capital equipment.
They were originally 14k a month prior to war, the 36k increase represents the multiple shifts added, which is why further increase is highly questionable as it is. I'm not sure how exactly they intend to increase it x10 of that past the shift increases when the factory itself has a finite volume
Producing more ammo would require hiring more employees & outfitting larger factories than the Scranton facility, for instance.
The U.S. would need to invest billions of dollars worth of capital & manpower to ramp up domestic production of munition shells like @ the Scranton plant--an investment in more forging machines & lathes, the training of new personnel, the stockpiling of metals & explosives.
Potentially a factory like Scranton would have to expand their premises or look for new sites, purchasing adjacent land parcels for expansion purposes, clearing all the environmental hurdles & building the new plants.
None of which is happening.
31 months of the SMO has induced delusional thinking in the gray matter between the ears of neocons: a War-Pig Derangement Syndrome. Policy-makers have tasted blood & viewed war-porn videos of bombs pancaking apartment hi-rises & battlefield amputations as the result of fast-flying American shrapnel--and they can't imagine a time when domestic wealth did not rely on killing people far from home.
The most American thing on earth is never ever to beat our swords into ploughshares but just to continue forging more swords--so we can send them to Ukraine. Or so we can cajole once-neutral Finland to buy our swords & send them to Ukraine.
And don't forget: there's Israel to supply & re-supply.
The plant in Scranton, run by the U.S. Army, is staffed by Baby Boomers, who have been on the line for decades. It has proven difficult to hire competent Millennials or get GenXers to do jobs like this.
Manual labor relies on a cultivated skill-set. If workers are drawn to the managerial class--positions in the FIRE economy, finance/info tech/real estate/electronics--they are never going to opt for a tool & die kind of sheet metal shop.
Even the equipment @ a plant like Scranton is no longer state-of-the-art; it has aged-out as its workforce has. Nobody in the U.S. is making the kind of precision equipment needed to produce munitions. Some of the work is so labor intensive it is done by hand.
Americans aren't drawn to factory work. The U.S. has lost manufacturing skills over the past 40 years. If you want to expand a factory now, or put on a 2nd shift, it is impractical, because the workers aren't there. Moreover, the managers are retiring, so the institutional knowledge w/ which they graced plants like Scranton--and which they might have passed along through training a new generation--is disappearing w/ them.
The U.S. industrial strategy hinges less on building up the arsenal of democracy--quite literally shell by shell by shell--than on laboring under the flawed assumption of a future of warfare that has been influenced [read: misled] by the bureaucratic culture of the Beltway, the hubris of the Beltway--and the legacy of conflicts against non-peer non-industrial adversaries.
"diversity is your strength" LOL DEI (diversity equity and isreal) is the death of the USA. good riddance...
"Americans aren't drawn to factory work..."
When my 43 y/o son graduated HS, I toured the well regarded local tech school with him and met the head of the Tool and Die program there. My son was not interested in their program He went on to graduate from our flagship state University (w/ 3.4 GPA) and proceeded to work as a bar tender for the next twenty years. He worked the whole time in school and graduated with no debt. We all make our choices. (I have a graduate degree in Ed that I never used)
His (9-yr) younger brother, at my encouragement, went to this same tech school and graduated from their "Bio-Medical Engineering program". He immediately got an interview and subsequent position with a major Health Care corp in the Dallas area. He was 21 y/o at the start and had no family, friends or contacts in TX. A rough and lonely start there but he figured it out. He lived in Dallas, Austin and San Antonio off and on for the better part of ten years. All first rate cities with friendly locals that I was thrilled to visit during his tenure there.
To say that his tech school origins led him to a highly rewarding post now would be an understatement. He sells first in class, state of the art robots on the West coast now and will likely double my closing income when I retired at 60 y/o, 12 years ago. (caveat: for context, my annual income was way above average) I was in industrial sales for 27 years and sold industrial goods in a low margin, savagely competitive environment.
That tech schools are not promoted more is a national disgrace in my opinion. He also left school with no debt and his first job in TX saw his employer pickup the tab for his getting a bachelor degree in business,
If the USA imagines it can fight all these stupid, unprovoked wars with no muscular industrial base, well...come to find out.
Don't worry.
There're plenty of Haitians clamoring for work in Pennsylvania!
"The U.S. has lost manufacturing skills over the past 40 years. If you want to expand a factory now, or put on a 2nd shift, it is impractical, because the workers aren't there. "
This exactly.
Also consider the fact that the US and all of the West are up to their necks in the cult of global warming, which is basically a convenient excuse for the deindustrialisation and financialisation of their economy.
This is all planned and supported by the banks of course, so they can sell their debt. In a properly functioning and traditional economy built on manufacturing, debt is completely superfluous.
Building any new, significantly large manufacturing capacity of any consequence now is going to be exceedingly expensive and difficult, by design.
There were quite a few tool and die machine shops in Pennsylvania when I was in that part of the U.S., but that was 20 or so years ago. The workers there were quite competent. Whether they have been able to carry on training new workers over the past 20 years, I have no idea as I have not been in the the U.S. for a long time.
The "I" in "FIRE" is Insurance. We should add another"I" for "Info", though. I'll let the pseudo-science moron economists know every chance I get.
shaniqua and her long nails and low IQ will never out produce russia...
Looking at video of the 155mm artillery shell manufacturing plant in Scranton what is most striking is how small and outdated the facility is. It's nothing like the vast, hypermodern arms factories in Russia, China, or heck, even North Korea, which the US likes to mock for being inferior to the US.
It's a wreck, they said they were going to clean it up and 'invest'......as if
They only got the Turks to build the Mesquite plant by blackmailing them on the promise of a F something plane deal
Who knows how long before the Turks pull out and the US back to a few shells a year
same for rdx zero production because
Amusing the US had to find foreigners to build an arms plant in the US.
They have to find foreigners to build everything of adbanced value, Chip Fabs, Ships, steel, electric cars
The "captains of industry" destroyed their own workforce out of greed; there were no unions to stand in their way this time, they too have been subverted. And this has been going on for decades, so that there are now no skilled industrial workers left, in any specialty. It takes years of specialized education to produce one; and who will undertake that effort, after they saw their hardworking parents thrown out of work and ruined? One would be a fool to commit to a difficult, losing career track.
Furthermore, a competent, high-quality industry is not even a matter of raising and educating a new cohort of workers. It is a matter of centuries of tradition; this tradition is the reason the West was so invincible, until first Japan and then China made the monumental, multi-generational effort to develop that tradition*. But this tradition is lost now**; the last grey-haired boomers still working in the most demanding factories are its last epigones. There will be no replacement for a century, even if the masters somehow learn to be patient, conscientious managers, which hell will freeze over before they do.
_______________________________________________________
*India is almost there by now
**Except for Russia and the former Soviet sphere
Well put.
These ghouls deindustrialised and pulled the fabrics of Western nations apart bit by bit, thinking they would enrich themselves and control China and others workforces too. Now look what they have wrought. Fucking midwits.
If you ever read Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged she shows how similar mediocre fucktards destroy nations.
The financialisation of the economy means that the aim of employment and wages is now to maximise debt eligibility, rather than to skillfully create something that is useful.
Manufacturing jobs barely register for becoming eligible for enough debt. It is far better for people now to work as managers of managers of managers, and provide services for companies providing services.
This way they can charge whatever they like, and the bank gives everyone the debt to use to buy it with.
This.
“… in waging another genocide to cover for the first one in a sort of genocide-Ponzi scheme.”
Why on Earth are you adopting the crazy language of the Arabs vis a vis Palestinian nationalism in calling the perfectly legal residents of the perfectly legal state 1948 Israel as “settlers?” Please don’t do this. The illegal settlers are in the West Bank and maybe the Golan.
The only people who think Israel illegitimate (illegal) are crazy Arabs, mostly Palestinians. Come on. Do better my friend.
Israel is illegitimate because the UN created it, and it has no power to create a nation. Illegal jewish settlers are illegal by the laws of Israel, which is why sometimes the government bulldozes their settlements.
Either way, people shouldn't get bent out of shape about all that nonsense. It's just desert people killing desert people, as they've done for 4,000 years and will continue to do for another 4,000 years after we leave due to the oil running out.
It doesn’t matter. Your argument that Israel is illegal is simply false as is the argument that the UN had no right to create it. That’s just loony Arab talk.
According to international law the UN indeed had a right to create a state. Also according to the same law the only illegal settlers are in the West Bank and Golan. Israeli residents are 100% legal. If they weren’t the UN would say so. Israel is a legal state. If it wasn’t the UN would say so. The UN gets the last word here.
So the jew needs to return to its 1948 borders then?
Exactly. If they would dismantle all the settlements and live within 1948 borders and allow a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza then the conflict will be over for some time anyway. That IS the solution.
but the jew never will because they are following their stupid book that states they are gods chosen and all others are goyim who are to serve them and their greater israel. the only solution is identification and removal of this parasite.
"According to international law the UN..."
You're a comedian, right? Funny stuff...
I’m correct. If it was illegal to ratify Israel as a nation, they would voted it down. They didn’t so it’s legal.
Apparently the Z's bribed their way to ratification (several Central American countries). Both the US military and state department were opposed but Truman overruled them...
Yes I think so, something like that.
Truman was raised on the Schofield Reference Bible: so there is that.
No most of those illegal settlements have been legalized the state or were legal from day one.
Agree with the rest.
An illegal state cannot legalize illegal settlements.
It’s not an illegal state. The UN says 1948 Israel is 100% legal.
The UN never made such a statement, except in your dream world.
The UN voted to ratify its status as a legal nation in 1948. In other words the UN said and is saying it is legal.
Nope, it is not "just desert people killing desert people", it is European Jews genociding the indigenous population of Palestine. And the fact that the slaughter does not bother you, does not mean the rest of the world sees it that way.
I have no liking for Israel, doubly so now that their heinous ideology has been bloodily and ruthlessly brought out in the open. But, ruefully, I must agree with Robert; in the early days of Israel, most of that Arab land has been actually bought, piece by piece, by Jewish foundations. Not all of it, and the pricing was grossly unfair, but the sales of the land parcels were made willingly, often even greedily, by people who thought they were the clever ones, and making a good deal.
Disclaimer: this does not apply to the West Bank, and AFAIK not to Gaza either.
Here are the facts.
1. On September 3, 1947, UNSCOP (U.N. Special Committee on Palestine) issued its report to the General Assembly declaring its majority **recommendation** that Palestine be partitioned into separate Jewish and Arab states. It noted that the population of Palestine at the end of 1946 was estimated to be almost 1,846,000, with 1,203,000 Arabs (65%) and 608,000 Jews (33%). It observed that there was **“no clear territorial separation of Jews and Arabs by large contiguous areas”**.
2. In the whole of Palestine at the time UNSCOP issued its report, Arabs remained ➡️ ⮕ “in possession of approximately 85% of the land”, while Jews owned less than 7%. ⬅ ⬅️
3. Despite these facts, the UNSCOP proposal was that the Arab state be constituted from only 45.5% of the whole of Palestine, while the Jews would be awarded 55.5% of the total area for their state. In other words, take land from the Arabs and give it to the Jews.
4. The UNSCOP report acknowledged that with regard to the principle of self-determination, the Jewish National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle. In other words, the report explicitly recognized that the denial of Palestinian independence in order to pursue the goal of establishing a Jewish state constituted **a rejection of the right of the Arab majority to self-determination**.
5. A sub-committee was established and tasked with examining the legal issues pertaining to the situation in Palestine. In its report issued in November 1947, it concluded further that the partition plan was “contrary to the principles of the Charter, and the United Nations have no power to give effect to it.” Furthermore, the United Nations Organization has no power to create a new State. Such a decision can only be taken by the free will of the people of the territories in question. That condition is not fulfilled in the case of the majority proposal, as it involves the establishment of a Jewish State in complete disregard of the wishes and interests of the Arabs of Palestine. Nevertheless, the General Assembly passed Resolution 181 on November 29, 1947.
6. The resolution did not partition Palestine or offer any legal basis for doing so. It merely **recommended** that the partition plan be implemented and requested the Security Council to take up the matter from there. It called upon the inhabitants of Palestine to accept the plan, but <b>they were certainly under no obligation to do so. **Arab delegations requests for a referral to and ruling by the International Court of Justice were never put to vote by the president in the Assembly.**
7. Furthermore, the Arabs also proposed an alternative plan: an independent state of Palestine in which the rights of the Jewish minority would be recognized and respected, and which would afford the Jewish population representation in a democratic government.
8. Resolutions 43 (on April 1st, 1948 calling for truce between Jewish & Arab armed groups), 44 (convoking a special session of the General Assembly to consider further the question of the future government of Palestine”), and 48 (establishment of a “Truce Commission” to further the goal of implementing its resolutions calling for an end to the violence) were adopted.
9. Despite all of this, on May 14, the Zionist leadership unilaterally declared the existence of the "State of Israel".
In other words, whatever land is owned does not equate to having the right to create a state, esp. against the wishes of the indigenous population, as per point 5 above.
Important context - mostly, but not completely accurate.
In the final partition plan, Jerusalem and the surrounding area, including Bethlehem were to be part of neither the Arab or Jewish zones but a separate International Zone.
Good point, though I made not mention of Jerusalem.
What was purchased was considerable, but doubt it amounted to 'most' Arab land. In any case, the 'willing sellers' were in most cases wealthy absentee landlords. The people who actually lived and subsisted on the land had no say (and no compensation or recourse) and were kicked out.
Process is discussed in (the excellent) 'One Palestine, Complete' by Tom Segev
You are correct - in English they are better called neo settlers
They’ve been there 75 years! And quite a few for 100 years. At what point are you not a settler? In this state we were still stealing Indians’ land by force 135 years ago. Are all the non-Indians in this state “settlers?”
You can call the ones in the West Bank and Golan settlers because they are indeed illegal settlers.
Yes yes
The US is still a settler society as always it was
You believe the orginal Brit invasion back in the Mayflower day was 'legal'
Every bit of land on Earth was conquered by settlers not too long ago. Do Americans have to pack up and go home? Get out.
You should know a little before saying foolish er and foolish erer
Humans were invented in Africa and spread through out the world, including into America - there were then no other humans to conquer
In America Lot later came invaders from Europe: no legal there, they just proclaimed possession and killed the natives
you who go on about legal suddenly every one is illegal
Make up your mind :is it to be 'legal' or 'illegal who cares'
I trust you that if you study the history of the world s lot of the residents of that state are settler colonists. The Out of Africa people are almost extinct. The Andaman Islanders and Negritos are all that are left. All the rest got ethnically cleansed.
Darwinist bull shit
there was no coivilixation in N America when the white man arrived. unlike the civilization in Plaestine that the jew stole.
There is still no civilisation in N America
There were civilizations in Central America, admittedly pathological ones, but civilizations. And the Iroquois and the Anasazi were clearly civilized people, hardly inferior to the ancient civilizations of the Middle East. Also, in general, the NA Indians were more civilized at the start; they were gradually reduced to brutish existence (and largely exterminated) by the steady onslaught of the invaders.
lol - sure the NA indians were noble savages who only became bloodthirsty savages after the white man came.... what nonsense. they had no civilization as they were nomadic. no hospitals, no homes, nothing, they roamed like deer....
Thats not true. Maybe you could stop naziing long enough to read a book
I love the Israeli argument. "Other countries got to genocide and ethnically cleanse entire populations to establish their settler colonial countries. You're anti-semitic if you don't allow us to now. No fair. We want to kill more Amalek infants!!!"
Well every country is settler colonial if you go back far enough. So what? Genocide and ethnic cleaning are indeed illegal. It’s perfectly legal to be a settler colonial state.
I don't know what you're setting out to prove, but what you're revealing about yourself is repugnant.
Fine I’m a terrible person!
Israel was born of conflict and her history is drenched in blood. Legitimacy is irrelevant - only history. The Arabs window to do anything about it started closing in 1948, further in 1967, again in 1973 and has become less and less relevant ever since - the Camp David accords with Egypt, the peace treaty with Jordan in 1994, with the Abraham accords signaling that "ok, we're moving on" by the Gulf states a couple of years ago. Call it what it is - conquest. That is as legitimate as any law, any rule.
In fact we are at the point where the Israelis could zap all 2mn residents of Gaza tomorrow and nothing would happen. Probably the WH would say "this is unhelpful" or something. Not more.
All countries are born in conflict and drenched in blood if you back far enough. It’s called nation building.
That did not give the Khazars the right to steal land and create an illegal genocidal sewer there.
ZioNaziland does not decide what is legal and what is not. The fact that ZioNaziland needs to make a statement confirms they know it is illegal but want to persuade the world of the fake veracity of its umpteenth lie.
Also, they’re not Khazars.
The invading scum were.
Yes, I agree. Hence why I ignore the so called moral arguments or the nonsense about legality or illegality. Might and Power are all that matters - laws and legality are downstream from that. The Israelis won a war of conquest and that Arabs will have to move on, just like the natives did in many other places, and history will be written with their favor.
Nope, the Arabs do not have to move on. The Jews are still whining about WW2 despite their huge lies like the Holohoax, Germany started WW2, etc., etc. They can't move on: why not? There is no business like Shoah business, as Abba Eban stated. And the Arabs aren't even asking for nor extorting money.
The Jews used those lies to illegally create their genocidal sewer.
You are pushing justice aside. Perhaps in your world that is the norm, but not in the real world.
Even Hezbollah on its own could zap all of ZioNaziland.
No, it couldn't. Not even close.
Oh yes it could, those 150,000 missiles, incl. precision ones and hypersonic missiles would do the trick without any problem. Iran and even the Houthis have proved the Iron Dome is in fact an Iron Sieve.
Furthermore, the ZioNazi "soldiers" are pussies who can only take on defenceless women, children, the elderly and the hospitalized. Last time they took on Hezbollah they got their ass handed to them, as admitted publicly by 2 ZioNazi generals.
This time around it would be worse, which is why the genocidal sewer does not have the guts for a ground attack, and instead tries to rope in the U.S.
If you believe Hizb has an arsenal of 150k missiles, including precision and hypersonic, then I have a bridge to sell you. Lebanon is a dysfunctional, basket case of a country, with daily rolling blackouts, where the civilian population cannot withdraw their own money from banks, and where government barely provides basic services. Hizb is a reasonably effective paramilitary group that fought the Israelis to a draw in 2006, but thats it. Iran is all bark and no bite, and has 2 countries in between it and Israel. Not quite as bad as the circus act in Ankara, but close.
Actually it is 200,000. And I have two sources close to the group.
150K is in the upper range of what Doug Macgregor and Scott Ritter estimated they had (including drones, dumb rockets, precision-guided missiles).
Even with what they've expended and Israel has manage to destroy they very likely have a whole lot left.
Probably enough to over-saturate Israel's AD - which is imperfect and anyway only works until it runs out of 'ammo'.
Hezbollah is a state within a state, so stop talking as if Lebanon = Hezbollah.
Nope, 2006 was NOT a draw, Hezbollah won, as stated publicly by a former defense minister and 2 ZioNazi generals.
On 12 September, 2006, former defence minister Moshe Arens spoke of “the defeat of Israel” in calling for a state committee of inquiry. He said that Israel had lost “to a very small group of people, 5,000 Hezbollah fighters, which should have been no match at all for the IDF”. Brigadier General Ilan Harari, the IDF's chief education officer, stated at a conference of senior IDF officers that Israel lost the war, becoming the first senior active duty officer to publicly state such an opinion.
IDF Major General Yiftah Ron-Tal, on 4 October 2006 became the second and highest ranking serving officer to express his opinion saying that the IDF failed “to win the day in the battle against Hezbollah” and said on Israel Radio:
"We did not win this war, and it is proper that those who directed it should take responsibility."
As for Iran's "bark and no bite", on 13 April 2024 it proved that the Iron Dome, despite its boosted back-up by FUKUS planes, was in fact an Iron Sieve.
So, baby, you can keep your bridge and you start educating yourself a bit instead of spewing BS.
No one knows if Hezbollah has hypersonic missiles.
The Houthis have them, so what is the chance that Hezbollah have them?
Hey, what about your contacts there? Can't they inform you or are they as lost as you are?
So, what is Hezbollah waiting for?
Israel is illegitimate because it has existed, and can only exist, as an apartheid state. Now the world is witnessing just how sick and twisted a populace (and its supporters) becomes when inculcated with apartheid, ethno-supremacist values. Israel is the worst mistake Harry Truman made by allowing its creation, and that's no small feat given he started the CIA and the Cold War.
1948 Israel is legal. So was South Africa. Apartheid states are perfectly legal. They aren’t very nice but so what? Sure, it’s not nice. Sure it’s sick and evil. So what? It’s legal to be a mean country full of sick, fucked up people last time I checked.
It is not legal. Pull your head out of the hasbara pile of steaming bullshit.
The 1948 'agreement' needed both parties to agree, the locals did not.
The UN says it’s legal. If the UN thought it was illegal it would simply revoke its acceptance of the state and Israel would become of of those floater new countries that are accepted by some and not by others.
If the UN states 1948 Israel is a legal state, that’s all I care about.
Nope, the UN did not state it was legal. It accepted the sewer on condition it abide by resolution 242, which said sewer never did.
If it was illegal the UN would say so and pass resolutions withdrawing its acceptance. They’re not doing that so according to the UN, 1948 Israel is legal.
"The UN says it’s legal. " Respectfully disagree that makes it legal. What the UN says is completely irrelevant in a world where the only rule is "might makes right." Israel, in particular, is the last to give a hoot what the UN says about anything. It's slaughtered UN personnel in its indiscriminate annihilation of Gaza.
What made Israel "legal" in our world was, first, the military might of the Great Powers and the military strength of the first Israelis from the King David Hotel bombing to Israel's defeat of Arab nations. In modern times it is Israel's status as the only nuclear power in the region and its willingness to use unlimited violence against anybody to achieve its goals.
But that only works until Israel encounters opponents who can use the same "might makes right" strategy to annihilate Israel. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
The UN is the administrative branch (and church) of the western imperial powers, post WW2.
We’re all settlers, we’re all passengers from birth to death Jesus said…..don’t build your house on a bridge and live your life as in a caravan passing by. Shalom.
Sorry, Shlomo, but Jesus wasn't pro-genocide. You people are shameless.
ZioNaziland is not legal, it cannot be by definition because it was created illegally in the 1st place.
As for you last time check, you did not check well enough.
The one's who need to "do better" are the Zionists.
They have violated every UN Resolution except the original one that recognized them as a State. They did not respect the conditions that were included in the 1917 Balfour Declaration that set the Zionist State wheels in motion:
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."
This lengthy Q&A transcript with Rashid Khalidi was linked on Moon of Alabama today and is worth a read. The duplicity, depravity and deception of the Brits and Zionists is laid out in great detail. I wonder if he and Victoria Nuland ever cross paths (swords) at Columbia.
https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii147/articles/the-neck-and-the-sword
Yes they’re nice not very nice but that’s legal. It’s not legal to violate all those UN resolutions. You realize 88% of Americans are Zionists, right?
Legal as in "Anything goes as long as I can get away with it legal"?
The 88% stat must be from a Hasbara polling firm. Even 88% of Jews are not Zionists.
Nope. Do you support Israel’s right to exist? Jews 94%, Gentiles 86%. I’m afraid you are wrong. Legal as in international law. Illegal as in violates international law.
Odd. Searching for a poll with that exact question returns zero results. Perhaps you can provide a link.
The only link he has is his lips on Zionist dick.
Odd, how that question of the "right to exist" only comes up in the context of ZioNaziland. A right cannot be granted to a lifeless thing, only people have rights.
In the case of ZioNaziland the correct question is "does it deserve to exist", and the incontrovertible answer then is "no, it does not, just like it Third Reich role model that it has now surpassed did not deserve to exist".
Lots of countries have no right to exist. Puntland, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, North Cyprus, Transdniestria, Catalonia, Scotland, Quebec, Baluchistan, Xinjiang, Euskara, Kurdistan, Aceh, Khalistan.
"You realize 88% of Americans are Zionists.."
And, Jimmy cracked corn and I could not care less what my ignorant fellows here think about anything. I know a couple of women who teach at the college level and they're dumber than the average sixth grader.
On the topic of what "Americans" think about anything...my copy/paste (link) from an e-mail I sent out yesterday...just to test the vibe here...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OmfW544q3o
As democracy is perfected, the office of the president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
-H.L. Mencken-
Well...suffice it to say, she's not the Walt Whitman of American politics.
Just curious, if Joe's out visiting 31-Flavors (again!) and Kamala is making a word salad at Oprah's place, who's actually running this thing we call a country? With two hot wars on two continents (with the U$A providing the kindling and gasoline). It's anyone's guess as to who is minding the nuclear button....
Caveat for those who don't know me...emphatically, I'm NOT a Trumper. But fuck, have we thrown out all standards?!
Serious question...does Oprah have any plans for the next four years?
The debate about what is or is not “legal” and who gets to determine such a condition seems like a folly.
Well I for one believe in international law. Anyway the idiot question at hand is whether Israel is an illegal state. 😂. These fucktards in this thread insist that is a factual statement. It’s not. I researched international law and UN votes to come to that conclusion. What is this place? Dipshit Central?
"International Law" is a meaningless platitude, only slightly better than "Rules based order". Russia, Israel and the US also have very different interpretations.
Any laws, without the means to enforce them, are useless bits of paper. The US uses bribery and extortion to get what it wants, and calls it "diplomacy" all the time. Are bribery and extortion "legal" under International law?
So truth is now a question of polling?
Correct. The question was how many US Jews and Gentiles are Zionists. It has indeed been polled and 86% of Gentiles and 94% of Jews are Zionists. So that poll is a factual statement.
So what?
You said opinion polls are not facts. That is a falsehood. I give one example above.
If that poll exists, prove it. You make wild claims without providing proof. Unless and until that is provided, your claims are null and void.
I’m not your errand boy, Step N Fetchit. And I don’t take orders from House Negroes. Find it yourself. This is almost my job, researching this subject. I keep up with all the polls.
ZioNaziland was created illegally against the wishes of the indigenous Palestinian Arab population. The ZioNazis who infested Palestine had absolutely no business there and proceeded to ethnically cleanse the are, went on a genocidal killing spree, and stole the land.
UN resolution 181 was a **recommendation** for the creation of 2 states in Palestine, so the ZioNazi's creation of their racist sewer was illegal. Period.
That stinking hell hole needs to be wiped off the map, it does not deserve to exist, just like its role model that it has now surpassed, the Third Reich, did not deserve to exist.
Also note that ZioNaziland managed to kill in 10 months the same number of defenceless civilians in the world's largest concentration camp ever as the number of Jews that died (none were actually killed) in the 15 biggest concentration camps (nowhere near the size of Gaza) between 1940-45, i.e. 300,000. That number is from the Bad Arolsen Archive and the International Red Cross. In fact, the number they last published was in 1993 and was 296,081, so not even 300k.
The UN had a vote and voted to admit Israel as a legal state. 1948 Israel is legal.
Wow this Lindsay cunt sure love sucking Zionist dick. He swallows the entire shaft right up to the balls.
lol, Grrr. always testing the limit to what you can say before going back to the penalty box. Guess you're still in the game. LMAO.
As far as Zionist sub-human animals and their supporters are, with no limits to their depravity, there are no limits in our responses to them.
BTW I am a polite and friendly person, to normal humans. LOL
Prove it.
Unless and until proof is provided, your claims are null and void.
lol, I suspect that was subtle humour. I like it because it made me wonder if you were serious or not.
Actually, I was deadly serious. He has made numerous claims, though many are duplicates, but he backed up none with facts.
In 1 of his replies higher up he told me that was not his job, which is an odd reply for someone who claims (yet another one) to be a journalist.
Aw yes. I traced your response to the wrong person. Thanks for clarifying.
Conditional upon ZioNaziland complying with res. 242. Period.
the jew state is illegal - always has been as it is stolen land. Why are you shilling for these genocidal in-bred sin merchants?
I hate them as much as you do but the fact remains that 1948 Israel is a 100% legal state.
You keep repeating that lie. It wasn't true the first time and is still a lie no matter how many times you squeal it.
You hate them but you shill for them 🤡 🤣
I believe in this thing called the truth that you all don’t believe in.
No you don't because you are literally unable to provide proof to back up your claims, which means they are nonsensical, i.e. BS, to put it bluntly.
The Europeans hated on the Jews so much they finally EXPORTED them to a different CONTINENT. It's actually a feat of karma that the Euro-lands are hosting unwanted Africans now. Karma, being the cruel mistress that she is.
you're conflating agreement for existence of the state, vs agreement over the borders. the present borders claimed by Israel are explicitly rejected by the UN
Only 1948 Israel was ratified.
"...and it’s not being run by Joe but Jill sitting at the head of the president’s seat:"
At least she isn't wearing a tube top and yoga pants in a Disco Era floral print.
"This is how major civilizational states survive for thousands of years, by not reacting to every little provocation."
I read an interesting theory that Iran is home to the world's oldest deep state. When Sumeria was overrun by hill tribes, the administrators were allowed to continue administering for the new barbarian kings. Then they became decadent, conquered by some other barbarian tribe, who kept on the administrators. Eventually the cycle lead to whatever civilization it was called at the time being conquered by Indo-Iranians. Which of course eventually became modern Iran.
Zelensky and Netanyahu are in a race - who can drag the US into their war first
The Sarmat launch failure is probably the worst of the week's news. You know that its going to be catnip for the "russia has no red lines / is bluffing" crowd. Now they will say "Russia's nukes don't work".
The problem is, the US' very last nuclear ICBM Minuteman "test" was also a failure, as was their previous one.
https://www.rt.com/news/586386-us-missile-test-fail/
At worst, both countries' are experiencing major issues, which I suppose is a good thing for peaceniks as it could optimistically imply that a "nuclear exchange" during WW3 will be a huge fail by both sides.
You know that the decision makers don't know any of that - or care
The US gvmt doe not know or care that their nuclear missiles do not work
You can say they are dumb, but that dumb? Like the lights don't come on but who cares dumb
Is the Sarmat launch vehicle new, or is it an iteration of a current design?
It's a completely new design.
It is new. But this is not its first test, and some have been successful.
Indeed. What I read between the lines of the Hawks is that we should not refrain from a first-strike or an Nuke exchange. Their opinions is that tactical nukes is not dangerous.
Let s go.
It's hard to judge what the Sarmat test failure means. In general it's proven to be very reliable with the recent test being the first failure.
What happened during the recent test is not clear, whether it was a stockpiled Sarmat or a modified version being tested. It's also not known if it was the Sarmat itself that failed or a failure in the launch support systems that caused the missile to blow up. It could also have been sabotage: the US is at war with Russia and it would do all it could to create such a failure. All you need is one guy in the forest nearby with a drone carrying a small shaped charge.
Likewise, the Minuteman III failure is hard to read. So far, Minuteman III's have proven to be very reliable missiles despite their advanced age, although there has been around a 2% failure rate in launches. Even if that was 10%, it's not enough to believe the US's silo-based missile deterrent is nothing to worry about. 90% of the warheads being delivered on target would still devastate Russia.
OTOH, all the U.S. hypersonic missile tests have failed, which is why they don't have a single one. Even the Houthis are now using hypersonic missiles.
Who needs nukes when hypersonic missiles are available?
Have you read the article on Consortium News about Blinken getting out over his skis and being reined in by the Pentagon brass? Pretty interesting and probably correct. Historically it has been the elected presidents who have reined in the Dr. Strangelove crowd in DC, but since there is no functioning president in the U.S. right now, someone must be preventing Dr. Strangelove. Scary that it is the Pentagon, since that place is filled with loons. The next U.S. is very important for everyone in the world. The U.S. (and all of us) desperately need someone who will put a stop to the madness. I doubt that Trump is willing or able, but I am certain that Kamala Harris is neither.
Link. https://consortiumnews.com/2024/09/20/the-madness-of-antony-blinken/
The Sarmat is an ICBM. Russia had ICBMS in Service for decades and nobody doubts their ability to deliver nuclear warheads to any point in the world. Moscow doesn´t need to demonstrate that by shooting a maneuverable hypersonic Avantgard vehicle into US territory with just a payload of concrete.
Furthermore, the Sarmat missile has already been adopted into regular military service last year, which means that the testing phase was already over and the tests were successful.
So whatever went boom on that test pad was most likely not a Sarmat missile, but who knows what new stuff gets tested there.
The minuteman is also a proven missile, which has had failed launches as simplicious pointed out. So has the trident. A failed launch is a failed launch.
Very true, but failures are part of being in the missile business even for proven systems. Whenever you get one there's always the question "why". If it's a routine failure that's one thing but if it indicates something systematic, like an aging issue that could systematically affect the entire arsenal that's a different deal.
Sarmat is 1 for 5 unfortunately so I wouldn't bet my money on it yet. But it's a new platform and I mean spaceX had many detonation on the pad as well.
I would say globally all ICBM are not in their best shape. Which is a good thing in its own way
No one besides ukies or American exceptionalisms is dumb enough to believe that. I read in American pubs all the time that Russians nuclear arsenal is a generation ahead and how we need to catch up...
Oh if it's between those two, no contest. Netanyahu outranks Zelensky by a mile
The jealousy is so obvious, it would be funny if people weren't dying
Yeah. Pretty sure some of Kiev's stunts are inspired by the sh#t Israel is allowed to get away with
I've had it! I'm done! Fed up! I revolt!
A news refugee who has opted to bolt!
Ive turned, instead, to cruise the Substack,
Where Simplicius has setup his wordsmithing shack....
Fun times over at Dark Futura….
The U.S. muscled its way into a pivotal role in the ceasefire negotiations, begun by Qatar and Egypt, only to skillfully and repeatedly undermine any serious-minded chance of a ceasefire, the release of hostages or an end to the genocide.
The predictable flail & fail of each ceasefire initiative seems by design, not a coincidence or a flaw.
This is a continuation of the strategy by which the U.S. has stymied and prevented peace since 1967, falsely posing as an honest broker, while in fact remaining Israel’s staunchest ally & serving as the largest diplomatic obstacle to a free Palestine.
For decades, the U.S.'s unique position of "unwavering" support for Israel has been a critical factor in enabling Israeli war crimes & prolonging the intolerable plight of the Palestinian people. In the crisis in Gaza, the U.S.'s military alliance with Israel involves the U.S. directly in the crime of genocide, as the U.S. provides the warplanes and bombs that are killing the largest numbers of Palestinians and literally destroying Gaza.
The supply chain for the U.S. arsenal of genocide criss-crosses America, from weapons factories like the Scranton ammo plant to military bases to procurement offices at the Pentagon and Central Command in Tampa. It feeds C-17 plane-loads of weapons flying to military bases in Israel, from which these endless tons of steel and high explosives rain down on Gaza to shatter buildings, flesh & bones.
The U.S.'s role is greater than complicity — it is active & essential participation, without which the Israelis could not conduct a genocide like this. In the U.S.’s understanding of history, the world sees what is happening in the West Bank as well as in the Gaza Strip, and simply moves on.
The problem with all these plots to drag the US into Israel or Ukraine's losing wars is that the Pentagon (Loyd Austin) has taken over not only the military but the diplomatic decisions on those wars, and has told Israel that we aren't going to bail them out...Ukraine has been told there will be no long range missile, or other dangerous escalations....Apparently the US and Russian militaries are still talking via back channels, and we've been told that the nuclear threat is very real...
Austin seems only sane one in FJB entire cabinet. Military knows exactly what's up though unlike State - they can read grave stones with satellites and easily count all the bodies on the floor. Also they know they lost the arms race and really don't want to even send more weapons the be humiliated let alone troops, not to Iran and definitely not Russia.
I have read the theory and I'ma call bullshit.
Besides there being no real evidence, we've seen similar confident predictions many times in the past. I recall Raev, aka "the Saker" making them on multiple occasions.
All turned out to be wishful thinking.
Quad had a Plus-One when it met in Wilmington, Delaware on Saturday--not Dr. Jill this time, since she was fresh off her turn as the Chair of the Cabinet mtg, but President Blinken who rounded out the plenary dais of 5, so this wasn't Quad--it was Quint: the hegemon [as represented by Joe & President Blinken ], two vassal members [ Australia & Japan ] & Modi.
Poor Modi.
If you're @ the poker table & can't spot the mark, it's you
The Quad's joint statement, released on the White House's website, did not directly name China, but it did mention "East and South China Seas." Meanwhile, Joe was caught on a hot mic telling the other leaders that an "aggressive China is testing us," per CNN.
Curiously, the Quad has met 4 times this year--and it is not yet October
But all times to no avail
Even the Asia times has just published an article writing off the Quad , all hat no subs
https://asiatimes.com/2024/09/all-optics-no-substance-for-the-quad/
India knows this - see Jaishankar remarks esp at ASEAN conference - pays subtle and convincing lip service says all the right things, but.....nada mas
The impetus for Quad or Quint is OTAN-like. Perhaps we can call it OTANjr.
It is a failed OTANjr, as the Asia Times article reports. Thx for this link. But it, Quad or Quint, is curious in its predictably provocative stance.
The initial dialogue structure between the U.S., Japan, Australia & India was paralleled by joint military exercises of an unprecedented scale, titled Excalibur Malabar.
Thought left strategically unspoken, the diplomatic and military arrangement was widely viewed as a response to increased Chinese economic and military power.
Interestingly, BRICS saw its first summit mtg in 2009
It appears that everyone involved knows that the Q is a pure propaganda ploy
This serves one and all just fine
The US has got no missiles and no boats no more - Vive AA!
Quad, or the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, was initiated in 2007 @ the behest of Japan's Shinzo Abe but--and this is the scary part--also w/ the support of VP Dick Cheney
RIP
Good news is Russia published it's full list of countries they'll accept conservatives from effective 21 September and already took 18 Scottish families applications first day according to the telegraph. With the ever increasing police state, deteriorating economies, and civil strife in NATOstan I see few reasons to stay. One shouldn't stay in a abusive relationship with a partner or a country IMO. Contact your local Russian consulate/embassy for information.
I would of jumped at that opportunity a few decades ago.
Well said. You need to get away from toxic people and send them to Coventry as it were.
Yes Israel is collapsing economically and socially--and incidentally also being defeated militarily. Yes the Axis is playing the long game 1) because of said collapse and 2) because they know war with Israel, even if the Axis wins--which it would--would be horrific for the people of both Lebanon and Iran. Finally, I don't believe the weakness of Biden offers a particular opening for Netanyahu. Trump is even more sympathetic and Harris will do what she's told. American support for Israel won't waver. The C-17s and 141's will continue to supply the bombs. The problem for Israel is that without direct military intervention by the US, Hezbollah will clean their clock. It has to suck the US in--or lose. And it just might succeed since the "elected" government is bought and paid for by AIPAC. Our only hope is the generals and the security establishment. They may be evil, but they are knowledgeable and sane. They know what the consequences of general war will be, and will hopefully stop the runaway train. Otherwise we're in big trouble. Finally, what do you call a legal country in which 80% of the citizenry (not counting the marginalized natives) settled there since 1947 and have systematically ethnically cleansed its territory? a) a settler state, b) a genocidal colonial state, c) Israel, d) the vilest of all nations, e) a, b, c and d. (See the back page of next Saturday's Haaretz for the correct answer)
What is the correct answer for the same questions when applied to the US
Exactly! What's a little genocide and land theft among friends! Custer called for US Air Force assistance but he didn't have AIPAC!
The turning of the conquest of those natives not already conquered into the magnificent myth of the West is one of the masterpieces of US propaganda that puts to shame the mean narrow minded PR spread on this site today
Because of Israel America is reduced to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFNUkaRrKTk
Amazing video.
All true, but the unfortunate reality is that wars don't ever run along some predetermined line. They have a tendency to randomness and it only takes one well conceived and executed false flag to push us into WW3.
Don't kid yourself. Israel need only hold out its habd and the United States will fill it, and order its catamites to pony up as well.
https://www.sott.net/article/494969-Was-there-a-palace-coup-at-the-White-House
From that article:
"It appears that the U.S. military leadership took Vladimir Putin's warning about this escalation [use of Western supplied long range missiles by Ukraine against Russia] seriously.
According to some sources, Putin's warning was reinforced through back-channel communications between the Russian military leadership and their American counterparts who understand that they were being pushed over the edge of total war. In response, it seems that the American military leadership took over the conduct of the US foreign policy, both in terms of military and diplomatic affairs. State Secretary Blinken and his merry band of Neocons appear to have been sidelined.
General Michael E. Kurilla, the head of U.S. Central Command visited Israel last week (the second time in a week's interval), apparently also to announce a new policy. Allegedly, he informed the Israelis that if they provoke a war against Hezbollah or against Iran, the U.S. will not come to their aid: they're on their own.
The palace coup at the White House wasn't officially announced and it almost certainly won't be.
During WW2 it is the British who were maneuvering Germany to war (though not against Czechoslovakia but against the USSR), just as they are maneuvering the U.S. to war today.
The truth is that through channels unseen and unknown, London is often in the driver's seat when it comes to fomenting dirty tricks and military misadventures in defence of the empire."