- They would have had to service the rigging system for 30 years, with great discretion.
- Any architect, engineer or foreman who dealt with this particular additional peculiar option to the building of the towers would have had to be dealt with.
- The original conspirators could very well have died of old age by 2001, so either the…
- They would have had to service the rigging system for 30 years, with great discretion.
- Any architect, engineer or foreman who dealt with this particular additional peculiar option to the building of the towers would have had to be dealt with.
- The original conspirators could very well have died of old age by 2001, so either they had their last hurra, or passed the secret down to a new generation of subtle schemers.
- More easily, it could have been done by an organisation -> secret services. But then how to hide all the hugely criminal setup of this plan. All it takes would be one conscientious agent spilling out the truth...
I am not so sure. Do you know who killed JFK and what is on Zapruder film? There were (and probably still are) many people who actually knew exactly what happened that day. They saw it with their own eyes, they know who, how, what, everything. Literally, there were hundreds of them, if not more. Yet, the question is asked, again and again and truth is burried between theories. You really don't need to hide anything. You only need to put a lot of explanations, or expose some parts more than the other. You can make elephant disappear. Rewrite history. Project future.
Secret services + LBJ's patronage circle in Texas.
Why did you delete your above comment mocking ("Really?") that moron actually believing the official "the steel beam collapsed due to high temperatures that didn't need to be so high to cause steel to melt" explanation of why the Twin Towers collapsed.
The official version may have a few gaps but the alternative is insane. He excludes what is insane. Why mocking that? You noticed he adds a lot of confidence to each of his claim (often sounding arrogant)? This keeps him "on the right track". He values social standards and finds his role in society. Why ridicule that? I also prefer official version with gaps than the insane without'em.
He is extremely conceited about subjects he doesn't much about.
I can tell because I am more than acquainted with turbomachinery.
He claims to design circuits, but does not have intuition for Newtonian physics: what with kinetic energy "from the plane" damaging the tower steel beams, more than the aeroplane fuselage? An electronic engineer should have taken a foundation class on Physics.
Makes me ponder what's the point of picking arguments on an internet message board, about stuff you don't much about, hence you probably don't care too much. Wonders of narcissism.
See the pattern? Every soldier going to Vietnam knew Oswald would be shooting when car drove towards him, not when the limo turned and moved away. First shots missed badly, next was a perfect head shot. You see, the Warren Commission had one goal: to collect so overwhelming evidence of conspiracy that even perfectly sane people ignoring all gaps (as our "molten iron friend") could not ignore these. Then, they declared Oswald acted alone - against all evidence they collected. Same now, with Trump, Biden, Ukraine, don't you think?
LBJ tenure vis-a-vis the Kennedy assassination, the insane degree of hypocrisy in dealing with the widow, the faked mourning in front of the nation makes him the most filthy, disgusting figure in American politics ever.
Regardless if he was part of the gang of JE Hoover or just one of their tools
But ...
- They would have had to service the rigging system for 30 years, with great discretion.
- Any architect, engineer or foreman who dealt with this particular additional peculiar option to the building of the towers would have had to be dealt with.
- The original conspirators could very well have died of old age by 2001, so either they had their last hurra, or passed the secret down to a new generation of subtle schemers.
- More easily, it could have been done by an organisation -> secret services. But then how to hide all the hugely criminal setup of this plan. All it takes would be one conscientious agent spilling out the truth...
I am not so sure. Do you know who killed JFK and what is on Zapruder film? There were (and probably still are) many people who actually knew exactly what happened that day. They saw it with their own eyes, they know who, how, what, everything. Literally, there were hundreds of them, if not more. Yet, the question is asked, again and again and truth is burried between theories. You really don't need to hide anything. You only need to put a lot of explanations, or expose some parts more than the other. You can make elephant disappear. Rewrite history. Project future.
Secret services + LBJ's patronage circle in Texas.
Why did you delete your above comment mocking ("Really?") that moron actually believing the official "the steel beam collapsed due to high temperatures that didn't need to be so high to cause steel to melt" explanation of why the Twin Towers collapsed.
The official version may have a few gaps but the alternative is insane. He excludes what is insane. Why mocking that? You noticed he adds a lot of confidence to each of his claim (often sounding arrogant)? This keeps him "on the right track". He values social standards and finds his role in society. Why ridicule that? I also prefer official version with gaps than the insane without'em.
He is extremely conceited about subjects he doesn't much about.
I can tell because I am more than acquainted with turbomachinery.
He claims to design circuits, but does not have intuition for Newtonian physics: what with kinetic energy "from the plane" damaging the tower steel beams, more than the aeroplane fuselage? An electronic engineer should have taken a foundation class on Physics.
Makes me ponder what's the point of picking arguments on an internet message board, about stuff you don't much about, hence you probably don't care too much. Wonders of narcissism.
Once you reject Oswald, LBJ is the obvious first choice and most prominent candidate. Fit perfectly, right? That is a trap.
75% Americans believe Oswald was not acting alone. No surprise, the evidence is overwhelming. In fact, there are way too many evidence.
You talk in riddles.
I am braver, I dogwhistle: I cited secret services, but did not specify of which country
- JFK -> LBJ -> Vietnam
- Trump -> Biden -> Ukraine
See the pattern? Every soldier going to Vietnam knew Oswald would be shooting when car drove towards him, not when the limo turned and moved away. First shots missed badly, next was a perfect head shot. You see, the Warren Commission had one goal: to collect so overwhelming evidence of conspiracy that even perfectly sane people ignoring all gaps (as our "molten iron friend") could not ignore these. Then, they declared Oswald acted alone - against all evidence they collected. Same now, with Trump, Biden, Ukraine, don't you think?
that's a very insightful comparison between similar consequences stemming out of White House turnovers, indeed
What is wrong in the famous Jack Ruby scene?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6PcVCqg3tg
Look at the fourtht photo's top right corner.
https://eastoncourier.news/2021/11/27/the-last-sunday-in-november/
Now, watch the film again:)
LBJ tenure vis-a-vis the Kennedy assassination, the insane degree of hypocrisy in dealing with the widow, the faked mourning in front of the nation makes him the most filthy, disgusting figure in American politics ever.
Regardless if he was part of the gang of JE Hoover or just one of their tools