Apparently because this was the Cold War and America was messing around with nukes, every skyscraper had to have a demolition plan of like how to demolish it safely without damaging anything around it. The plans for the twin towers were to blow it with a subterranean nuke which will pulverise the lower floors and blow the upper with TNT.…
Apparently because this was the Cold War and America was messing around with nukes, every skyscraper had to have a demolition plan of like how to demolish it safely without damaging anything around it. The plans for the twin towers were to blow it with a subterranean nuke which will pulverise the lower floors and blow the upper with TNT. WTC7 was far shorter than the other two and hence there was basically nothing left. If you look closely at the collapse the roof was sagging inwards suggesting that the entire building, everyone and everything in it was turned into powder.
It is hard to imagine that the buildings were specifically designed and meticulously constructed only to be spectacularly and perfectly demolished 30 years later, with all additional wires deployed during construction, all pockets for explosives easily accessible by design, all calculations, all feasibility and simulations of collapse designed in the blue prints by the same team of architects who planned super safe building on one hand, and how to put it down on the other, drawing on blue prints exactly every hole and pocket and how to make it accessible when time comes. Ha, your theory is really insane, way too insane. Does it match with what you saw with your own eyes?
Below, you can see another 30 year ahead prediction of Ukraine having population of 20 mln. Hard to believe that Russia now is doing exactly what US officials wanted to achieve in the next 30 years.
- They would have had to service the rigging system for 30 years, with great discretion.
- Any architect, engineer or foreman who dealt with this particular additional peculiar option to the building of the towers would have had to be dealt with.
- The original conspirators could very well have died of old age by 2001, so either they had their last hurra, or passed the secret down to a new generation of subtle schemers.
- More easily, it could have been done by an organisation -> secret services. But then how to hide all the hugely criminal setup of this plan. All it takes would be one conscientious agent spilling out the truth...
I am not so sure. Do you know who killed JFK and what is on Zapruder film? There were (and probably still are) many people who actually knew exactly what happened that day. They saw it with their own eyes, they know who, how, what, everything. Literally, there were hundreds of them, if not more. Yet, the question is asked, again and again and truth is burried between theories. You really don't need to hide anything. You only need to put a lot of explanations, or expose some parts more than the other. You can make elephant disappear. Rewrite history. Project future.
Secret services + LBJ's patronage circle in Texas.
Why did you delete your above comment mocking ("Really?") that moron actually believing the official "the steel beam collapsed due to high temperatures that didn't need to be so high to cause steel to melt" explanation of why the Twin Towers collapsed.
The official version may have a few gaps but the alternative is insane. He excludes what is insane. Why mocking that? You noticed he adds a lot of confidence to each of his claim (often sounding arrogant)? This keeps him "on the right track". He values social standards and finds his role in society. Why ridicule that? I also prefer official version with gaps than the insane without'em.
See the pattern? Every soldier going to Vietnam knew Oswald would be shooting when car drove towards him, not when the limo turned and moved away. First shots missed badly, next was a perfect head shot. You see, the Warren Commission had one goal: to collect so overwhelming evidence of conspiracy that even perfectly sane people ignoring all gaps (as our "molten iron friend") could not ignore these. Then, they declared Oswald acted alone - against all evidence they collected. Same now, with Trump, Biden, Ukraine, don't you think?
There were radio active vapors arising from the underground and extreme underground heat months after 911, molten steal was running underground ike in a foundery (testimony firemen)
Earthquake's were registered and (falsely) attributed to impact planes and 'collapse' buildings.
The effects of deep underground nuclear explosison is entirely different, still many people die...
I don't know. A thermite-based, non-nuclear explosion? Planted a week before thanks to the electric shutdown inside the towers to "upgrade internet cables"?
Apparently because this was the Cold War and America was messing around with nukes, every skyscraper had to have a demolition plan of like how to demolish it safely without damaging anything around it. The plans for the twin towers were to blow it with a subterranean nuke which will pulverise the lower floors and blow the upper with TNT. WTC7 was far shorter than the other two and hence there was basically nothing left. If you look closely at the collapse the roof was sagging inwards suggesting that the entire building, everyone and everything in it was turned into powder.
if it were a nuclear blast, there would be radioactive residuals
a tremendous seismic wave would have been generated, a earthquake basically
and most importantly people in manhattan would have all died and the place would still be a no go zone by now, the way chernobyl north of kiev is
> Superconspiracy: maybe they were rigged
> when the towers were built in the 70s,
> for inscrutable purposes.
It is hard to imagine that the buildings were specifically designed and meticulously constructed only to be spectacularly and perfectly demolished 30 years later, with all additional wires deployed during construction, all pockets for explosives easily accessible by design, all calculations, all feasibility and simulations of collapse designed in the blue prints by the same team of architects who planned super safe building on one hand, and how to put it down on the other, drawing on blue prints exactly every hole and pocket and how to make it accessible when time comes. Ha, your theory is really insane, way too insane. Does it match with what you saw with your own eyes?
Below, you can see another 30 year ahead prediction of Ukraine having population of 20 mln. Hard to believe that Russia now is doing exactly what US officials wanted to achieve in the next 30 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-HkVtZsPvA
But ...
- They would have had to service the rigging system for 30 years, with great discretion.
- Any architect, engineer or foreman who dealt with this particular additional peculiar option to the building of the towers would have had to be dealt with.
- The original conspirators could very well have died of old age by 2001, so either they had their last hurra, or passed the secret down to a new generation of subtle schemers.
- More easily, it could have been done by an organisation -> secret services. But then how to hide all the hugely criminal setup of this plan. All it takes would be one conscientious agent spilling out the truth...
I am not so sure. Do you know who killed JFK and what is on Zapruder film? There were (and probably still are) many people who actually knew exactly what happened that day. They saw it with their own eyes, they know who, how, what, everything. Literally, there were hundreds of them, if not more. Yet, the question is asked, again and again and truth is burried between theories. You really don't need to hide anything. You only need to put a lot of explanations, or expose some parts more than the other. You can make elephant disappear. Rewrite history. Project future.
Secret services + LBJ's patronage circle in Texas.
Why did you delete your above comment mocking ("Really?") that moron actually believing the official "the steel beam collapsed due to high temperatures that didn't need to be so high to cause steel to melt" explanation of why the Twin Towers collapsed.
The official version may have a few gaps but the alternative is insane. He excludes what is insane. Why mocking that? You noticed he adds a lot of confidence to each of his claim (often sounding arrogant)? This keeps him "on the right track". He values social standards and finds his role in society. Why ridicule that? I also prefer official version with gaps than the insane without'em.
Once you reject Oswald, LBJ is the obvious first choice and most prominent candidate. Fit perfectly, right? That is a trap.
75% Americans believe Oswald was not acting alone. No surprise, the evidence is overwhelming. In fact, there are way too many evidence.
- JFK -> LBJ -> Vietnam
- Trump -> Biden -> Ukraine
See the pattern? Every soldier going to Vietnam knew Oswald would be shooting when car drove towards him, not when the limo turned and moved away. First shots missed badly, next was a perfect head shot. You see, the Warren Commission had one goal: to collect so overwhelming evidence of conspiracy that even perfectly sane people ignoring all gaps (as our "molten iron friend") could not ignore these. Then, they declared Oswald acted alone - against all evidence they collected. Same now, with Trump, Biden, Ukraine, don't you think?
There were radio active vapors arising from the underground and extreme underground heat months after 911, molten steal was running underground ike in a foundery (testimony firemen)
Earthquake's were registered and (falsely) attributed to impact planes and 'collapse' buildings.
The effects of deep underground nuclear explosison is entirely different, still many people die...
https://nypost.com/2021/08/21/as-20th-anniversary-of-9-11-nears-23000-ground-zero-cancer-cases-reported-and-1510-deaths/
I don't know. A thermite-based, non-nuclear explosion? Planted a week before thanks to the electric shutdown inside the towers to "upgrade internet cables"?