Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sam Ursu's avatar

Thank you for another comprehensive analysis.

If I may, I'd like to talk about steel production for a moment.

Basically, there are no kinds of ways to fabricate steel, one called an (electric) arc furnace and the other a blast furnace (which is coal powered). The EU's insane rules on carbon emissions means that they can only operate arc furnaces, and even Britain just closed its last blast furnace this month due to similar rules.

The problem is that arc furnaces can only RECYCLE metal, aka "scrap" metal, to make steel. And this steel is, as you might suspect, of lower quality. It's fine for making stuff like forks and spoons but it sucks for the important stuff like car engines and bridge support spans.

Blast furnaces are the only type which can make "raw" or pure steel of a guaranteed high quality. And so what the EU has been doing until lately is relying heavily on Ukraininan made raw steel for all the stuff it needs (you know, like making cars). That's why all the crying and gnashing of the teeth right now about this topic.

For the record, blast furnaces require coke, which is purified coal (essentially, you cook it to remove the impurities, the solid components of which are called slag). Coal, as we all know, is also abundant in (Eastern) Ukraine. Furthermore, coal mines, coking plants and the slag (waste) heaps that come along with them have played an important role in the fighting during this war.

Long story short, Ukraine losing both its (blast) steel mills and coal supplies isn't just bad for Ukraine's export economy (and bringing in hard currency to shore up the UAH) but is rapidly contributing further to the deindustrialization of Europe as a whole. Just take a look at steel imports to the EU and you'll see what I mean.

Denis's avatar

Russia will decide what New Ukraine will look like politically and geographically. NATO is in disarray, there is no plan, there is no unity of purpose among its members, and there is no will to escalate the conflict by entering Ukraine because it simply is not ready. Nato is nuts and incompetent but not suicidal. There are too many cushy jobs in NATO which offer good pay, status, and paid expenses for them to launch a kamikaze attack to support AFU and risk ruining a good thing. Furthermore, their uniforms are dust-averse.

The next geo-political big plays are what will BRICS announce at its next meeting later this month and what will be the outcome of the US elections. I saw the report from TAAS and others suggesting BRICS could be announcing a new currency called the Unit backed by 40% gold and 60% currencies. Again, I take this with a grain of salt but it will be interesting to see what BRICS ideates at its next meeting.

The US election stands at T minus 21 days. It's a circus-staged act of tomfooleries with extreme repercussions, particularly if Camel Toe wins. Could there be another rigged outcome? I'm no fan of Trump and his theatrics but he's the lesser bad choice of the two candidates running for President. The entire US political apparatus is in ruins and should Kamala win we'll have far bigger problems at home in the US and Canada than what's going on in Ukraine. I have decided to learn to speak Russian from my instructor, Lidija, as stress relief from the shit show the world has become which I am compelled to witness.

https://youtu.be/5Ig5HIF7TcY

300 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?