500 Comments
User's avatar
François Hollandaise's avatar

So another political broiler with nazi ancestors. Geee what a surprise.

Expand full comment
Simplicius's avatar

You must have one of two primary qualifications to serve a high position in the Western cabal aka Ruse Based Ordure:

1. Nazi ancestors

2. Previous executive position in global banking empire (Rothschild, World Bank, ECB, Goldman Sachs, etc.)

Expand full comment
Herman's avatar

1. Inevitably, there are a lot of people in Europe, mainly in Germany and the occupied countries, who have a nazi-ancestor. They apparently are all evil individuals who are conspiring against Russia? They must all be massacred? Or what?

Shall we apply the same reasoning to the descendants of communists in Russia and Eastern Europe? They did lots of evil things too, the communists. Apparently, it is necessary to repeat that now and then, lest we forget. It would help to explain why nations like the Poles and the Balts are so afraid of the Russians. Just like you see the nazi in every German and Ukrainian, they see the communist in every Russian.

2. You forgot Blackrock.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 5
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Herman's avatar

Thank you for your reply. In my opinion:

-Nobody has the option to chose his or her grandfather.

-The British elite doesn't need help from outside to be belligerent and anti-Russian.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 6
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Herman's avatar

That the British government did this intentionally is indeed possible.

As for the Germans, that's another kettle of fish, since you will have trouble to find a German without a Nazi-ancestor. After all, the NSDAP was in charge of Germany. Everybody working for the German government in that time was a Nazi, if you want. At the end of the day, even a grandfather who fought as a Wehrmacht soldier can be considered a Nazi-ancestor.

Expand full comment
leonid breshnev's avatar

It's really comical of how political, ethnic and faith are getting into the giant label mixer. My observations in Germany are that the Greens in particular have turned Nazi Opressor Brown, Socialist returned to fight Nationalist like they did in 1924-1933 essential banning parties, throw and ban national candidates like now in Romania and Moldova and promote de-population by hailing LGBT and Gender Benders, Liberals ? They try to get on the Money Bandwagon but the Jews won't let them in unless they're circumcised. The bigger picture of how the manipulation works is that in almost every case of Revolution, Regime Change etc. there are Background Players that pulled the strings since a very, very long time and delivered us with Bolshevism, Freedom and Democracy by conquering us devide and expolit us in the process. Total Control is not only on Netanyahoo ' Agenda but the ones that bribe and support him so they can play Good Cop and Bad Cop on both sides of the Agenda.

Expand full comment
Oswald's avatar

It's hard to get the idea that the core of the Nazi Party was comprised of homosexual Jewish actors once it gets in there.

Expand full comment
Squeeth's avatar

Bimbo

Expand full comment
Peter Joy's avatar

Well, there was Erhard Milch, Ernst Heinkel and General Helmuth Wilberg, all of whom operated under the protection of Hermann Goering, a liberal. ‘Wer Jude ist, bestimm ich!’: that was his catchphrase.

Expand full comment
Squeeth's avatar

Who didn't have Goering's protection as the head of the Four-Year plan authority? Have a guess.

Expand full comment
Herman's avatar

It seems that there were many more of them. Almost the whole NSDAP leadership consisted of Germans with some Jewish blood in their veins, according to:

Dietrich Bronder. Bevor Hitler kam.

An absolutely enlightening - even for Germans - book about the history of the Jews in Germany is:

Fritz Stern. Gold and Iron: Bismarck, Bleichröder, and the Building of the German Empire.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

"I decide who is a jew."

Expand full comment
Brian Simpson's avatar

The night of long knives, when the SA officers were assassinated, many were in barracks with their teenage homosexual "boyfriends".

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Who told you this?

Your teenage boyfriend?

Expand full comment
Oswald's avatar

My favorite was the SA member rousted out of bed late by the SS, who like many, thought there was a SS coup against Hitler underway. Said member smartly stood naked at attention giving the Hitler salute and shouting "Sieg Heil" whereupon he was promptly shot.

It seems the SS had a predilection for stripping their victims naked just prior to execution. Admiral Canaris comes to mind.

Not to beat a dead horse, but there was the droll account of a German father who learned of the local SA office, his son had joined, introducing him into sodomy under their tutelage. Indignant, the father went to the office and loudly remonstrated the officer in charge. The SA office found this matter hilarious.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Goebbels - no.

Hitler - no.

Himmler - no.

Goering - no.

Doenitz - no..

Getting the picture yet?

Expand full comment
Oswald's avatar

You sure about Hitler's grandfather on his paternal side?

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

There is absolutely no connection, right? That's why there is a picture of Chrystia Freeland posing behind a Right sector banner with the AZOV Wolfsangel flying in the rear. Complete coincidence, right?

Expand full comment
Yoni Reinón's avatar

Ja Herman...

Expand full comment
Chip Worley's avatar

And what tribe were the communist Bolsheviks from? They were the communists. The rest of the country not so much... Chip

Expand full comment
Morfei's avatar

Not all Bolsheviks were Jews or agents of Western cabal. Stalin, for example, wasn't one of them.

Expand full comment
Klaus Hubbertz's avatar

🤔🤔🤔 ...

Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili (Russified as Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili) was born in Georgia and Jugha/Dzhuga means son of a JEW ...

🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
Peter Joy's avatar

Doh! And just after what I posted above.

Oh well, there you are. Hiding in plain sight.

Expand full comment
Peter Joy's avatar

Well done! That’s ONE who wasn’t.

He wasn’t Russian either, of course, but Georgian. Pro rata, very few of the Bolshevists were ethnic Russians.

Expand full comment
Squeeth's avatar

Atheists aren't Jews.

Expand full comment
Peter Joy's avatar

That’s not what the Nazis said, or Israel says. And there you get to the heart of it: is Judaism a religion or a race? Some, such as the saintly Rabbi Dov Weiss and other Jewish-anti-Zionists, insist the former; most, including the murderous neocons and the Bolshevists, say the opposite. In practical terms it is both and also an inherited culture or tradition. The three form a heavily overlapping Venn diagram that does not map well onto modern western nations’ legal preconceptions.

Expand full comment
A Woman Called Paddy's avatar

They’re not just people with nazi ancestors. They’re people with powerful players in Nazism. Big difference.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

so what ? will they name the jew problem or just do the bidding of the jew that runs the UK now...

Expand full comment
David Chere-Bolelwang's avatar

You must have missed VP's opinion months ago where he pointed out that problematic groupings like neo- Nazis, etc, exist even in Russia. The difference is that together with their practices and beliefs, they are not part of government. Where they are in government that is what is problematic, communists or neo-Nazis or even descendants of known Nazis.. The notion that there's still communists governing the RF and that Poles and the Brits have a reason to live in fear is laughable.. (from Johannesburg)

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

excellent point - simp needs to start naming the jew.

Expand full comment
Klaus Hubbertz's avatar

Any more substantial comments to be expected ??? ...

Expand full comment
Yukon Dave's avatar

agreed. I would also make the arguement that if you have a direct connection, like he is your dad or grandfather, you might take a closer look at the way that person thinks

Expand full comment
Tom Worley's avatar

Excellent comment Herman. Let's give this MI6 Q operative a chance to strut the true imperialist British waltz. Set one national enemy off on another, use judo to overthrow unfriendly governments. That's the British Way it has been since Queen Elizabeth I and her advisor Lord Walsingham established the British Secret Services. Both are revered and Lord Walsingham is much admired by those who understand his tactics and those of Machiavelli. Sun Tzu's love of spies also comes to mind when thinking about the British Secret Services and especially MI6.

I will say however that when I noticed she had been Q, and Starmer's hand-picked choice without a doubt, something clicked in my suspicious mind.

I thought Liz Truss actually had a chance to form a new Conservative government that might have brought some sanity to the British Empire. Wasn't it interesting that a technology failure on the part of the BSS caused her downfall when her phone conversation with Biden as she said, "It's done" was obtained by the SVR just after the destruction of the Nordstrom Pipeline? Being suspicious about such things I now wonder if it wasn't leaked deliberately by some technology operative in favor of Labor. Naturally, Biden himself might have leaked it or at least one of the raging socialist sympathizers so prevalent in his regime assisted the Torie's long downfall in favor of the socialist Labor party.

Metreweli’s pedigree and career are both rather extraordinary and her swift rise reminds me of our own Victoria Nuland here in the colonies. So young and yet a British Minister. King Charles knows how the political winds blow, all the Windsor monarchs do. It's almost a certainty she will soon be a Dame of the Empire and addressed as Dame Blaise for the rest of her life. For now she is M which is a higher title. A high-class dame indeed. She has my hearty gratz!

God Bless Us All

Expand full comment
JustPlainBill's avatar

Although I see the point of the Simplicius post, I had the same thought as you express in your first point. JFK, in his 1963 American University address, made the relevant statement: "No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue."

Also, it is not necessarily overly damning to have a Nazi ancestor; there is no genetic law that determines our politics. One must admit, however, that the impression persists that such people seem disturbingly over-represented in modern Western "leadership" circles.

Expand full comment
Herman's avatar

Thank you. However, I think that there is another group of people far more disturbingly over-represented in modern Western "leadership" circles. Especially in the USA. I think that they are more powerful and more dangerous than those with nazi ancestors.

Expand full comment
Archie1954's avatar

Nazism is responsible for too many deaths to simply forget about it. All candidates for government offices should be investigated thoroughly for Nazi sympathies!

Expand full comment
YourUnclePedro's avatar

Nazis were pikers compared to communists, mein herr.

Expand full comment
Archie1954's avatar

Hardly! Communists suffered the most from the Nazi perversions. There were something like 26 million Soviet citizens killed by the Nazis during WWII!

Expand full comment
YourUnclePedro's avatar

We're not talking about war casualties, which include both military and civilian ones.

We're talking about which government killed more of its own people during peacetime.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

None of these people had "nazi ancesters," they had National Socialist ancestors.

Chalk and cheese.

"Nazi" is a word made up by jews to demonize the only ones who sought to and succeeded in overthrowing their usurious and destructive banking system.

If you want to know what actual nazis are - go look at what's going on in Gaza today.

Unrestrained and openly satanic nazism given its full expression.

You have been brainwashed.

Expand full comment
Herman's avatar

"You have been brainwashed."

With all respect, sir, I think that you are barking at the wrong tree.

Expand full comment
Luis Gómez de Aranda's avatar

I agree. As much as I abhor Western russophobia and grotesque anti Russian propaganda, I dislike the Russian attempt at using the Nazis to counter their opponents.

I do not see anything Nazi in Macron, Starmer or Merz. They are just globalists destroying Europe's future and servants of the financial oligarchy. That is bad enough.

Expand full comment
Herman's avatar

"That is bad enough." Absolutely.

Expand full comment
YourUnclePedro's avatar

The Rooskies have only ever mentioned the Nazi problem as being a Ukrainian one.

They have never accused the pathetic weasels Macron, Starmer, and Merz of being Nazis. They are just corrupt and incompetent screwups destroying their own countries.

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

Metreweli seems to have a family background in the strongly russophobic Georgian diaspora - https://sopio.substack.com/p/the-new-head-of-british-secret-intelligence

at the agency she's involved in "attracting Russian spies online", but how does that work, I wonder. it seems she speaks Arabic, but does she understand Russian?

Expand full comment
Squeeth's avatar

I wouldn't worry about Six recruiting Russians as spies, they'll be a counter-intelligence manoeuvre by the FSB

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

OL, like going shopping at amazon?

Expand full comment
Squeeth's avatar

Fnar!

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

that's just stupid. are you telling me that MI6’s new chief will name the jew ??

Expand full comment
Archie1954's avatar

I really don't believe religion has anything to do with it.

Expand full comment
DarkPool23's avatar

Seems like they will be highly overlapping Sets….

Expand full comment
Lindsey Reed's avatar

"Ruse Based Ordure" - LOL!

Expand full comment
Stephen Rowland's avatar

Any relationship with the World Economic Forum ?

Expand full comment
Brian Simpson's avatar

At the end of WWII, we declined to charge, and brought many nazi rocket engineers and scientists to the US. They had been working on an atom bomb, and were more advanced in their research on rocket engines and jet engines.

They had deployed the ME-262 jet fighter fTor which we had no response. Fortunately the war was all but over. Our P-51 Mustangs would take out the ME-262s when landing.

During the 1930s there was a lot of support for Nazism in our country.

Expand full comment
Politugal's avatar

There still is a lot of support for nazis in your country...You are in fac the biggest supporter of nazis in the world....

Expand full comment
Brian Simpson's avatar

We don't have an educated public. The nuances of comprehending facism, communism or straight up kleptocracy is not understood.

Our ruling class are simply greedy, self centered and devoid of moral conscious. And catastrophically incompetent.

The blueprint for regime changing is to use the existing political or ethnic stress points of whichever targeted country to create conflict.

In the case of Ukraine the Banderite nazis were ideal to place in power. Just as we supported radical Islam in Chechnya and Afghanistan to create chaos to weaken Russia.

Expand full comment
Haywood Jablome's avatar

Once again it is the Jews running things and trying to hide behind another group of people they selected to be the frontmen. Oh no, Nazi's are rising again. Eradicate the source of the problem and Nazism is a none factor.

Expand full comment
YourUnclePedro's avatar

Great name choice. I haven't seen that since high school back in the 1970s.

Expand full comment
Politugal's avatar

There's a 3rd reason too: being extremely dumb, evil and corrupt. Case in point, António Costa, the current european council president. Someone that revels in other people's suffering, that in fact mocks those suffering (fires of 2017 in Portugal), someone that will do and support whatever, as long as his pockets are filled with money...and that showed his geometry prowess much before Annalena Baerbock, when in 2020 he said "It's impossible to make predictions, when the world changed by 360º in two months"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAZEgRvtF1g

Expand full comment
malcolm parr's avatar

And the almost obligatory position of a seat on the Board of any Company in the City of London .

Expand full comment
eric's avatar

Vonderleyen as well

Expand full comment
IainW's avatar

Ursula Fonda' Lying and Thieving.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

ursula the jew puppet...

Ursula von der Leyen

@vonderleyen

We must keep telling the horrors of the Holocaust and never forget.

Europe wouldn’t be what it is today without Jewish culture, values and contributions to science.

We will co-finance a new section at

@yadvashem

on Jewish life in Europe before the Shoah.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

In a 2019 speech, Ursula von der Leyen, then President-elect of the European Commission, made the statement: "There would be no European culture without Jewish culture. And there would be no Europe without Jewish people. We will remain vigilant".

Expand full comment
leonid breshnev's avatar

Excuse me for a moment, i must vomit.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

Yes. The Jew is the problem.

Expand full comment
Santa's avatar

Hey dh. What's happening?

Shouldn't you be at the Goose Step dance party?

Expand full comment
MR HOWARD S MARKS's avatar

What they say for PR is one thing what they do another. Her family was rancid with Third Reich officers. While the other branch of her family had a slave plantation in the Carolinas.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 6
Comment removed
Expand full comment
MR HOWARD S MARKS's avatar

You are utter garbage not just what you write but the fact that you think that way makes you NAZI scum. The most anti-humanity degenerate filth that it is possible to be.

Expand full comment
Lux Aeterna's avatar

Don't forget Donald Tusk and Kaja Kallas!

Expand full comment
Farang's avatar

Also Christia Freeland and Gabrielius Landsbergis. I believe both had pretty prominent Nazi grandfathers.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

And Freeland was, as the Canadian deputy prime minister of Canada from 2019 to 2024, freely associating with the AZOV, Right Sector and other neo-Nazi militia. Now what would a representative of our government want with a group like that?

Expand full comment
Opport Knocks's avatar

If Freeland was a true "dyed in the wool" Nazi, would Canada have imported millions of new "Global South" immigrants during the last 10 years of Liberal governments? Of course not.

Like many in the west, they are only interested in motivating and using the Eastern European neo-Nazi adherents as a weapon against Russia. You could say the same of the new MI-6 head.

Expand full comment
Zorost's avatar

They would if their 'nation' in nazi isn't Canada.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

Freeland, et al, are only nominally Canadian, like Zionists, their main interest lies, like all fifth columnists, elsewhere.

Expand full comment
Politugal's avatar

Incorrect. You confuse two different things. Importing "millions of immigrants" from the "global south", is the globalist plan for many decades now. Why ? To get cheap labor and increase their profits. That's all. The people in power being nazis, doesn't make them NOT want to make more money, by exploiting / enslaving cheap labor. Quite the contrary. Nazis revel in the exploitation of what they consider to be "inferiors" to themselves. The nazi leadership in Canada is no different.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

Nazism, like zionism, was created as a tool by the Jewish banking establishment to found the state of israel with the purpose of ultimately controlling Middle East oil & gas reserves.

The world's true enemy resides in the City of London, unseen by the public and hidden by controlled governments and the media.

Expand full comment
Marledonna's avatar

Will we ever know?

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

I think that truth is emerging today as their empire falters.

Expand full comment
billb's avatar

Ah yes -- the usual USian get out of goal card --

"T'was the Brits wot dun it"

Expand full comment
John Osman's avatar

Billb, you're not wrong, Fatty Nuland isn't one of ours after all.

But saying that, we can't just mind our own damn business when there's a chance to meddle.

Expand full comment
Norwegian's avatar

Nuland has Ukrainian ancestry. See the video by the late Gonzalo Lira about her. She came back and finished him for that.

Expand full comment
Kun Bela's avatar

Nuland family was registered anno in Ukrainia " Nudelman " .

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

NUland is a jew

Expand full comment
R. Baker's avatar

RIP Gonzalo Lira..

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

Metreweli has Georgian ancestry (Germanised spelling < orig. Metreveli). great read - https://sopio.substack.com/p/the-new-head-of-british-secret-intelligence

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

Yes, renaming the Department of defence to the Department of War was just removing the fig leaf, nothing has changed but the name.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

The uk is just a tool of the Jew.

Expand full comment
Sara Bellum's avatar

US as well...

Expand full comment
Fell Choice's avatar

I dunno, mate. Brits are mainly famous in the US for bad teeth, cute dialect, and hilariously awful military planning. Nobody I know thinks the British have done much lately, besides arrest Granny for hobbling to the protest.

Expand full comment
billb's avatar

Then maybe it's time to get your tanks off our lawn?

Expand full comment
Fell Choice's avatar

Sure, the day Starmer’s balls drop. Funny, I’ve been voting against banks and tanks for fifty years, and I’m still owned by gangsters. This democracy shit is overrated, bro.

Expand full comment
Peter Joy's avatar

Trouble is, the UKanian Deep State is absolutely desperate to maintain the US occupation garrisons in Britain and Europe, at literally ANY price, including abjectly selling out all national economic and true strategic interests. They: a. fear an independent Europe uniting against them (the main strategic fear of the British ruling elite since the 16th century) and;

b. believe - absurdly, but deeply and sincerely - that they can awe the Continentals with the mysterious world-spanning power of the (non-existent) US-UK Special Relationship. Hence all the pathetic, servile grovelling to Trump at Windsor Castle last month.

Expand full comment
Tom Worley's avatar

Public relations and especially with foreign heads of state is the primary function of the British Monarchy which has absolutely no political power. They do however have a reputation and nice list of titles which costs them nothing to award. People, especially parliamentarians, love those titles. It gives the Windsor's some though limited influence.

God Bless Us All

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

What are you gonna do about it? As it is, your political class has no priority other than The War On Russia and getting the Americans to go to war on europe's behalf.

Again..

They aren't going to do anything to brown their American Master off.

Expand full comment
billb's avatar

They don't have to anything about it. It will soon become obvious to most people that the US can't be trusted to finish what they started, and would rather go off and bully some smaller countries.

Expand full comment
Clyde Griffith's avatar

Oh, that's a dialect? Of what language? Lands in my ear like someone trying to talk with a mouth full of mush. Or haggis.

Expand full comment
Fell Choice's avatar

Whereas, I’m told, we Yanks sound like our voices are produced with rubber bands. Personally, I never tire of hearing Britons, Irish, and Scots speak, although a really thick burr like Neil Oliver’s poses some difficulty for my old deaf ears.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Nobody understands Glaswegians.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Next time I meet Monty, I must censure him for his battle at El Alamein.

Or Henry V for his similarly awful planning at Agincourt; and Edward, the Hammer of the Scots, for his signal disaster at Flodden Field.

Nelson, of course, being the worst of the lot.

And as for Wellington, certainly, it was a damned close-run thing.

Expand full comment
Tom Worley's avatar

The British are a great people down on their luck in my opinion. They have a great history of military ability though at the present time most of their military consists of ceremonial regiments at Buckingham Palace. The navy still has some teeth at least.

God Bless Us All

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

The British have always excelled in subterfuge, sabotage and covert operations, pitting nations against nation, people against people, etc. They are largely responsible for the vast international intelligence network put in place during and after WWII.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

The british are crap soldiers, as you pointed out, but they don't have to be good soldiers.

Rather, they are skilled at the arts of the courtier, at whispering campaigns, scheming, simpering, conniving and plotting, at pageantry and general fruityness, and bending the ears of senile leaders.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Yanks don't play soccer, do they?

Expand full comment
Fell Choice's avatar

Not enough dain brammage involved.

Expand full comment
a curious mind's avatar

Well, a ziggurat was constructed as an artificial mountain for worship, and served as a temple dedicated to the city's patron god. A stepped pyramid is a link between the gods and humans, and where priests conduct rituals.

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

Tower of Babel

Expand full comment
Luis Gómez de Aranda's avatar

In any case, that architect should have been taken to the Tower and decapitated for his aesthetic crimes.

Expand full comment
Squeeth's avatar

Bollocks was it, it was a petit-bourgeois reaction to modernity, especially the rise of an aristocracy of labour in the industrial countries.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

citation needed sir -

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Perfect, Victor.

We sing from the same hymnsheet.

Expand full comment
leonid breshnev's avatar

Good Point eventhough i doubt that Adolf Hiter was aware of this fact. Hitler was a Nationalist . He described the situation a hundred years ago which reads like a blueprint of where we are today ..... and Satanyahoo copied it for his extermination program. https://archive.org/details/mein-kampf-ford-translation_202303. Reading his book would get you in Prison until a few years ago.

Who else was a Nationalist ? Ho Chi Minh ! He sailed under the Communist flag but his aim was always to get Vietnam re-united and defeated the French and Americans. More than 2 Million Vietnamese lost their life for it.

So we have to think about what a Nazi is

Expand full comment
parameter9's avatar

In the context of this type of appointment it just means 'to use other people'. Nazis bravery was not that much on show last time.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

Agree. Hitler was not likely aware of that support, either financially or politically in bringing him to power. He was indeed a nationalist and had many good ideas that later got corrupted by his followers.

Expand full comment
Tom Worley's avatar

According to A. Hitler himself quoted on: https://www.conservapedia.com/National_Socialism

Before he was ousted from the Party, Hermann Rauschning, National Socialist President of the Danzig Senate in 1933-1934, recalled being told by Hitler that:

"Each activity and each need of the individual will thereby be regulated by the party as the representative of the general good. There will be no license, no free space, in which the individual belongs to himself. This is Socialism—not such trifles as the private possession of the means of production. Of what importance is that if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them then own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the party, is supreme over them, regardless whether they are owners or workers. All that, you see, is unessential. Our Socialism goes far deeper . . . ."

"[T]he people about us are unaware of what is really happening to them. They gaze fascinated at one or two familiar superficialities, such as possessions and income and rank and other outworn conceptions. As long as these are kept intact, they are quite satisfied. But in the meantime they have entered a new relation; a powerful social force has caught them up. They themselves are changed. What are ownership and income to that? Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings." (Peikoff, p. 231)

Hitler regarded socialism in the context of controlling people not things and the difference is very powerful. Because he controlled people Hitler owned the people of Nazi Germany, not their less important things, and in the end many millions of others besides in many nations. At least until the Russians knocked on his door and demanded he account for himself.

Socialization or the exercise of control and ownership (slavery) is also the primary tool of the Malthusian Progressive Humanists (Ernst Rohm style Nazis) who were just kicked unceremoniously out of the White House. However the Uniparty remains and will always be tempted to have another go at completely owning the people of America and the rest of the world as well. Semantics can be a powerful tool: beware lest it become the collar around your neck or the noose on the gallows.

God Bless Us All

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

If you check the history of Zionism, it is really a largely British construct that goes back well before Herzl in the late 1800s.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

Early 1800s - Herzl organised it. Britain has been in the hands of a few Jewish banking families for hundreds of years, centred in the City of London. Though these families did not "create" zionism, they early recognised it as a future tool to spread their power, just as they in later years recognised and supported the possibilities inherent in Hitler's National Socialists and supported them as well. Since WWII, the West has taken in many of the leaders of nazism and has taken on their behavioural characteristics over time, but discarding their nationalistic leanings. The Nazis worked closely with the Zionists to rid Germany of Jews, offering them sanctuary in Palestine in which large portions of land were purchased by the Rothschild family for this future purpose. the Jews refusing to go to Palestine or to leave Germany were considered sacrifices in the cause of zionism producing strong public support for the Jewish cause.

Expand full comment
Timster's avatar

Do you have confirmed refs for the Nazi ancestry of all these elites mentioned? Also Von der Leyen? They tend to be scrubbed from the web

Expand full comment
Politugal's avatar

It's really not that difficult to find, but indeed the nazis in power want to censor everything...although I'd wager most europeans simply don't really care if they have nazis in power...

Ursula's father, Ernst Albrecht, was a known sympathizer of nazis and authoritarian. Ursula basically follows EXACTLY what nazis / authoritarians support: Censorship, persecution of those that go against her, centralization of power, subversion of any and all democratic institutions, etc

Expand full comment
Godfree Roberts's avatar

What twaddle! Why, only last night Colonel Douglas Macgregor said the Ukraine war is ethnic cleansing for “greater Israel”.

Ukraine was a front-runner to become the New Zion in the 1930s and has always been in contention as the next bolt-hole if the crazies are driven out of Palestine.

Anti-semitism is much, much stronger in Central Europe than in the West....

Expand full comment
Jeanne McSherry's avatar

Makes a lot of sense

Expand full comment
Fledr Maus's avatar

Would you share the link with Douglas? Things he is saying lately coincide with "Heavenly Jerusalem" "conspiracy theory" project.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

While I agree with Macgregor on a lot, his thing about Muslim hordes and evil immigrants misses the fact that those people that emigrated did so mostly because we, the West, destroyed their country whether directly by wars or by economic or literal colonialism and sanctions.

Expand full comment
Fledr Maus's avatar

Yes, people do not think about cause and effect and context. And usually when I try to remind my interlocutors about this, then convos become awkward.

I haven't seen him talking about Muslim hordes, usually when I watch him he talks about illegal immigration in general. But, I mostly watch him on Daniel Davis' show. Sometimes on Judge Nap (when I am mentally strong enough to tolerate Judge).

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

Macgregor hasn't used the words, 'Muslim hordes', per se, but the connotation is there in that he says they are taking over, it's just semantics.

Expand full comment
Fledr Maus's avatar

I see it differently, as if he is mostly referring to Latinos from all over LA. Sometimes he would mention potential Hezbollah cells, or Iranian cells. I think it is legit.

I wonder what happened with Chevron refinery in Cali.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

I guess I should have given the context of his statements, he was referring to the Muslims taking over Europe.

The Chevron refinery in California, probably a Russian drone! :-)

Expand full comment
Luis Gómez de Aranda's avatar

I think it is very rational to protect one's own country from being submerged by aliens.

I personally would not accept that my descendants become a minority in the country of my ancestors for hundreds of years, because Lord Balfour did this or that or Bush bombed this or that.

Res inter alios acta.

Get them out. MacGregor

is right.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

And the indigenous Americans could justifiably say the same about you/us, when we stop destroying other countries and start to recognize that those people moving in are no different than our ancestors, the world will be a much better place.

Expand full comment
Persephone's avatar

What twaddle isn't much of a rebut. Would you like say what you think is actually incorrect about the article?

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

Central Europeans obviously have some sense.

MacGregor however isn’t the greatest judge of anything(unfortunately) and has been proven wrong more often than not , which he never acknowledges.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

"has been proven wrong more often than not"

Aren't we all?

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

Yes, but we don’t all claim to be “expert” and “specialists” in our area of knowledge.

If I was as frequently wrong in my specialist area, as he is I would have been out of a job.

But being wrong in social media clown world has no consequences and so there is no accountability or quality. Just count the clicks.

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

I honestly don't know any of the "experts" who are always right. Even experts can be proven wrong, esp when it comes to geopolitics where all of us reside in the dark and guess our way through the fog. I think MacGregor is a fine and wise commentator, but I also recognise that being wrong is part of the job.

Expand full comment
Chris Keating's avatar

Brian Berletic comes pretty close to an expert that rarely gets it wrong. I can't think of anything he has got wrong in the 3 or so years I have paid attention.

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

Agree , he has a certain cynicism and hence restraint. Macgregor and especially Ritter lack his objectivity and humour (never a good sign)

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

Berletic is excellent - boring and sometimes almost arrogant but excellent. And you are correct - his views are consistent and usually based on documented fact, a refreshing relief.

Expand full comment
Clyde Griffith's avatar

This daft item from Simplicius is next-to-last straw: Last weekend spent 16 hours on the road to attend a Judge Napolitano event. Shoulda stayed home. He and others read -- read! -- the same script he's recorded on his site. I'd hoped for some audience interaction, but there was no time for that, the speakers were more involved with celebrating each the other's specialness & selling their books.

Always a downer when feet of clay come into view.

Expand full comment
Sara Bellum's avatar

First mistake is giving 16 hours to someone like the judge, you will never get back.

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

There is the Military Industrial Complex, the Medical Industrial Complex and the Social Media Industrial Complex, the later of which consists of “experts” blowing their self important, sanctimonious crap out of their arses 24/7 for clickbait revenue.

Only slightly less toxic than the first 2.

Analysis Paralysis on a global scale, few are worth more than a glance and even those become very repetitive very quickly.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future. ~an old Danish proverb/Niels Bohr

Expand full comment
Marledonna's avatar

If I was frequently wrong… then you are not a manager😀

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

I was, and wrong sometimes of course , but frequently, no , that only applies to bad managers, i do remember a few of those.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

Frankly, as experts go, he has a helluva lot better record than 99% of the other 'experts', and that's mostly because he has practical, on the ground experience. Why would anyone take anything Kellog, Hegseth, Vance, Patreus or even Trump say seriously, and look at the air time they get? Macgregor is competing with amateurs.

Expand full comment
A Woman Called Paddy's avatar

He’s also obsessed with Israel

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

And that's a flaw? Who can not be actively criticizing an apartheid country that is committing a genocide, has attacked at least 7 countries in 2 or three months and currently has nuclear missiles loaded on a submarine while planning a continuation of their attack on Iran, a country that hasn't invaded another country in two centuries?

Expand full comment
A Woman Called Paddy's avatar

Israel is a U.S. tool for destroying Iran. It will also destroy Israel. All of these wars are U.S. wars. Israel is a sacrifice. So is Gaza.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

I'm not sure who is using whom, especially when you consider that there are pro-Israel Zionists twisting laws in most countries, but then there are US 'NGOs' everywhere as well and they have an even worse track record.

Expand full comment
JQP's avatar

... not without a reason.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

what ? Zelensky is jewish IOF are nazis. where's the twaddle ? The Israeli jews aren't semitic I mean obviously - they're all in Ukraine right now for some weird festival

Expand full comment
Godfree Roberts's avatar

Go to Israel. The European Zionist 'jews' treat the local, semitic Jews like shit.

Expand full comment
ann watson's avatar

okay - I guess I didn't follow your first comment - and what part of the essay was it referring to ? I mean to use the words Anti-semitic your own way and not the way the Ashke-nazis use it is sort of confusing

Expand full comment
Peter Joy's avatar

True. The Ashkenazi look down on the Sephardi, the Sephardi look down on the Misrahi and the Misrahi look down on the Falashas - who, I suppose, at least get to look down on the Arabs. The Sephardi and Misrahi are, to look at, absolutely indistinguishable from the Arabs. The Gazans and Lebanese look more European than they do.

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

I worked with a jew about 10 years ago. He loved telling the story of how he ripped off one of his own relatives who fell on hard times and was forced to sell his house to him for much less than it’s real worth. Boasted about it and how the guy was a “schmuk”.

No normal human compassion for a relative, just an opportunity to profit at his expense. They are purely transactional, when the Zionist experiment collapses, they will turn on each other. No Doubt.

Expand full comment
ChatterX's avatar

Israel Is Arming Ukraine's Blatantly Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, 2018:

youtube.com/watch?v=0txqZUjAp3s

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

So to get this right, Macgregor is saying that the jews are ethnically cleansing Ukraine by provoking the Russians to kill the Ukrainians ( with Zelensky’s help) with support by the Eurocucks to ensure they keep fighting and getting killed.

It’s a cunning plan to be sure ( to quote Blackadder) , but what happens if the Russians win? And spare me the Substack conspiracy crap about Putin being a jewish pawn.

Expand full comment
Peter Joy's avatar

Like the Fuehrer, they hadn’t reckoned on the Russians winning. Like most of the ‘experts’ in the west, they seem to have bought into the same old ignorant myth of Russian inferiority: ‘We have only to kick in the front door and the whole rotten house will fall down.'

Expand full comment
Anna's avatar
Oct 4Edited

The “rotten house” turned out to be the exhausted collective west (eaten out by banking dynasties / mega corporations), which had no energy and desire left for the “kick”.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

It isn't a theory that Putin's early life was marked by being brought up by jews - it's a fact.

"Give me a child until he is five, and I will give you the man."

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Hitler knew exactly what he was up against - three Five Year Plans devoted entirely to militarizing the Soviet Union, and preparing it for the assault which it planned on the European continent.

One million trained paratroopers have nothing whatsoever to do with a defensive mindset.

So Hitler's hand was forced.

Expand full comment
Tom Worley's avatar

:):) A true philosopher is Mr. Bean.

God Bless Us All

Expand full comment
Natalia's avatar

MacGregregor is not only an 'effin racist "twaddling" on about "immigrants" (somehow he forgot he is one and the 'mericans did the same thing Israel is doing to make America "indigenous free") he knows diddly-squat about WWII and Russia!! Just ask Andrei Martyanov. His 'effing "Our Country, Our Choice" makes me want to throw up because my own ancestors were genocided to make it now "his" country. Those "immigrants" all worked in the field getting cancer from pesticides to put food on his table for "his" country that used to be ours. Makes me so angry I spit every time he comes out with his "twaddle"!! 😡

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Who were these ancestors?

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

Absolutely. I stopped watching MacGregor because of his immigration shit.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

hey retard Natalia - Americans were white colonist that tamed an huge empty land - the jew is stealing lands of the Palestinians (arab and Christian) that go back thousands of years.

there is a also a huge different between white settlers and the non-white subhumans being imported to Europe as a biological weapon by the jew...

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

That's bullshit, get your head out of your ass and read some history, it was NOT an empty land until the white colonizers made it that way and yes, the [white colonists] did steal the lands of the [indigenous people of the Americas] that go back [millennia], latest research confirms human presence in the Americas at least 23,000 years ago.

FWIW, I'm white, just not ignorant.

Expand full comment
Felix Steiner's avatar

The English were just one of many tribes that fought over land. Your indigenous people are Mongolian Americans. You have to consider the Solutrean hypothesis if you are into the who was here first stuff. I find it irrelevant. Indian Nations fought over land constantly. So who stole it from whom. Were they Lakota lands? Were they Creek lands? By Indian standards it is English land by right of conquest. This gets so tiresome trying to undo the propagandizing of popular Jewish culture otherwise known as public school education. The noble savage, Boasian cultural equality, and all that other bullshit.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

There is virtually zero evidence supporting the Solutrean hypothesis, one stone point that looks like it _might_ have Solutrean connections, so that goes in the bullshit file, while the overwhelming evidence points to the population of the Americas by individuals who came across the Pacific. Regardless of how they got here r when, they were here before we came, they had advanced cultures, some that we are finally starting to understand and appreciate, and in many ways, were far more 'civilized' than we were when we arrived.

No matter how you want to twist it, there were others here before we came, learn to live with it!

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

Lol. A few stone Age subhumans fauna is not a civilization. No towns no hospitals no nothing but hunter gatherer subhumans Compare that to Palestine who still have deeds to their land stolen by the Jew.

Break your plebeian Jew programming.

Expand full comment
Santa's avatar

Hey dh. You haven't use the word "Jew" enough in your posts.

You'll have to march around the scrotum pole at recess.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

Thank you for exposing your vulgar idiocy Jew.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

Whether they had deeds to the land or not and whether they were stone age or not is irrelevant, they were here before we were and the comment about them being 'subhuman fauna' is as racist and bigoted as you can get, I hope, but seriously doubt, that you are just trying to get a response from rational, empathetic, moral and ethical people. If not, that puts you at the opposite end of the scale.

Just so you know, one of my best friends, as a young man, was an indigenous person and two of my extended family are partly indigenous and they are, from your post, much better people than you are.

Expand full comment
Dhdh's avatar

Keep backtracking. Glad you admit they are Stone Age subhuman fauna who built nothing g and grazed the land line deer.

Whats wrong with racism ? It is fundamental logic to classify groups. You must be a plebeian fool who buys the Jew propaganda about ‘individualism’. Go put a rattlesnake in with your baby - it might be a ‘good one’ that does nothing to the baby.

But but but but my friend is an Indian. Who cares. Did he die from drinking shampoo ?

Expand full comment
werner hillinger's avatar

I live in Central Europe. In all my lifetime, anti-semitism was widly unknown to the population, but by importing all these migrants from the Near East, it is better for Jews not to show any signs of their religion.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

Could it be because those 'migrants from the Near East' have a history of being oppressed by the Ashkenazi Zionists? For every action, there's a reaction or there's always 'blowback' from oppressive policies.

Expand full comment
Peter Joy's avatar

There’s no particular reason it couldn’t be both. One explanation does not preclude the other. Political creeds can adapt to changed times and realities. Himmler was quite happy to make use of Jabotinsky and his Beitarist blackshirts and Stern Gang terrorists back in the 1940s.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

And the Zionists had no problem collaborating with the Nazis to achieve their goals either, that's because they were they were the same kind of people, racists and fascists, each with their own goals.

It's a lot like the Jewish Zionists and the Christian Zionists collaborations, both are using the other to obtain their goals which incidentally, don't work out well for the other side of the partnership.

Expand full comment
Morfei's avatar

Douglas Macgregor is not very smart. Much of his knowledge of history is heavily influenced by Cold War western propaganda.

Expand full comment
Jeanne McSherry's avatar

Grest article, even though the subject matter is chilling with chilling implications for the UK and further afield

Expand full comment
James Preston's avatar

A small group of vile and dangerous 'people ' are dragging European people to destruction

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

And very possibly the world.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar
Oct 4Edited

These people are the ones that Hitler threw out of Germany - to its immediate and dramatic benefit.

Scripture would characterize them as being many shades of "vile and dangerous," but in essence, they stem from a man - Cain - who was the son of Lucifer and Eve; Christ referred to them, as did John the Baptist, as being "a generation of vipers," and vipers, as you know, are a variant on the word "serpent."

We are living in the time of the two seeds, ( Genesis 3, 15 ) and of the tares and the wheat living alongside each other, but soon to be eternally separated.

All of these things were prophesied "from the beginning," yet most are blithely unaware of the prophecies of old, which must surely come to pass.

Expand full comment
TRD4Run's avatar

the way it has been since the beginning

Expand full comment
Xavier Narutowicz's avatar

A novel twist.

Expand full comment
K Seimei's avatar

Her eyes resembles Kaja Kallas in some ways. But it is inevitable, the west does adore nazis and their descendants. They just say otherwise on the surface for PR purposes.

Expand full comment
Xavier Narutowicz's avatar

We don’t take Nazis as seriously as Russians. Russians saved us from it with their blood.

Expand full comment
Marledonna's avatar

They survived and have a big hatred for the Russians because Russia saved us back then (but not enough and only temporarily).

Expand full comment
Felix Steiner's avatar

Saved us? I am old enough to remember the air raid drills in elementary school. Was it Canada? Mexico? that was going to bomb us? This idea that we fought WW2 to save us from the Nazi's is patently ridicuolous. National Socialism vs International socialism anyone? I would rather deal with the former than the later.

Expand full comment
Anna's avatar

The idea to nuke Russia was promoted by the US/UK brass - after the country was bled dry by the hordes of Germans, Romanians, Hungarians, at all. The drunkard Churchill and his superiors (handlers) at the City were keen on waging WWII. Why don’t you show some interest towards facts and such a straightforward explanation as Butler’s “War is a Racket?”

Expand full comment
The Grant Rant's avatar

Churchill wanted, after WW2, to nuke many Russian cities, before Russia itself, built an atomic bomb, as well as invading Russia, using German PoW's alongside Allied soldiers - Operation Unthinkable.

Expand full comment
Norwegian's avatar

Marshal Zhukov: “We freed them, and they will never forgive us for it”

Expand full comment
Luis Gómez de Aranda's avatar

The Russians know they are trolling with those stories about nazis in every NATO country.

Expand full comment
Jeanne McSherry's avatar

Ukraine is being planned for, as the location for controlling Europe, by Zionist entities

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

Actually, that honour goes to those-who-cannot-be-named controlling the City of London.

Expand full comment
Jeanne McSherry's avatar

Zionists one and all, also, regardless of any religious affiliations, all conjoined by the same appalling agenda

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

Empire. great read by ss author and photographer Peter Duke on how our perception is being manipulated, subtly, yet with some 'conjoined' (indeed) constants - https://thedukereport.substack.com/p/tucker-carlson-and-epiwar

Expand full comment
Jeanne McSherry's avatar

Thank you Mary-Lou, just had a glance at it now, it is essential reading for anyone who wants to find a way through webs of words and actions, spun to deceive and distract

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

Jewish Zionists and the Christian Zionists collaborate, both are using the other to obtain their goals which incidentally, don't work out well for the other side of the partnership, unbelievably, I've heard that there are also Muslim Zionists.

Expand full comment
Jeanne McSherry's avatar

Thanks LaVerne, have been listening to the recommendation of George Kim who kindly sent me a link to Tudor Alexander on YT whom I understand is also on Substack, a true scholar. His podcast is called ‘The Dance of Life’ on YT, his work is extremely enlightening. My only query is that, I had presumed to understand that a Zionist meant that one did not have to be associated with a particular religion, that it was an ideology of imperialist supremacy rooted in considering oneself as being part of an elite that justified colonialism and dehumanization/genocide of other peoples whom one regarded as being inferior therefore expendable by any means. Am going through it again, there is so much info to take in

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

The Ashkenazi Zionism is political and atheistic but they have attracted the Christian and Jewish Zionists, the idea of a great battle at the end times is common to the Abrahamic religions, how the results play out is different.

Expand full comment
Anna's avatar

Chabad Lubavich. A pernicious cult that openly proclaims that non-Jews have no souls. Hence, Zionism and Chabad are orders worse than Nazism.

If only the ongoing SMO ‘naturally’ uprooted the anti-human cult in Ukraine…

Expand full comment
Jeanne McSherry's avatar

You’re right there - it’s unconscionable

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

I’ll take nazis over commies any day

Russias gotta get over this the west is communism of a new sort racial redistributionist global homo

The nazis we’re way more right than wrong seriously who do you think they would support and not support in the current shitshow?

Expand full comment
MaryJane's avatar

What does Russia have to do with communism? It was imported to Russia by bankers but later transformed into something different than intended. And I assume you like nazis because you do not think you will be the one in labor concentration camp or killed when sick and feeble?

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

Bankers? lol you mean Jews

And it wasn’t transformed it did what it was designed by Jews to do- destroy Europeans. Ever notice how Jew capitalists and Jew communists never worry about each other or attack each other? Or is this the latest no true communist laugh?

I like that NAZIS stood up for their people culture and homelands and saw through the Jews triangulating, I like that they understood you can’t transcend reality with faggotry that if you let imbeciles breed soon you have the human capital of New Guinea. I could go on they had a lot of good ideas and they had some stupid ones and did some stupid things. But they are not the worst thing history produced communism was order of magnitude worse and nazism wouldn’t have done any damage at all if not for the Jew controlled anglo saxons USA Brit’s

But that’s all beside the point the ukronazis are idiots and certainly russias enemy for what they are doing to ethnic Russians but this war is Jew caused. And Russia has as big a Jew problem as Ukraine or United States

They need to get over ww2 they were about to attack Germany and partnered w the Nazis on Poland etc

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

It looks like at least one imbecile was allowed to breed!

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

Said the person literally drowning in 80 IQ immigrants he pays to breed with bad checks drawn on his children’s accounts

You’re brilliant tell me what’s the next step to utopia?

Expand full comment
Santa's avatar

Gee Mike, the next step to utopia would probably be something along the lines of you sticking a lit sparkler into your pee hole while singing "Die Fahne hoch".

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

The worst thing is, English is actually your first - and probably only - language.

I suppose it has crossed your mind at times that you prefer Nazis to "Commies" because you are, well, a Nazi?

And do you understand that one of Russia's conditions for the war in Ukraine is to, to use the Kremlin's phrase, "Denazify" Ukraine?

If you like the company of Nazis so much, have you considered going to Ukraine to join the Azov?

They need fresh cannon-fodder... is that now "drone-fodder"?

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

I support Russia over jewkraine because i support ethnic euro chauvinism and Russia is a major player in the European cultural legacy and Ukraine is a Jew controlled shithole with fake neo Nazis

Expand full comment
Yoni Reinón's avatar

true neo nazis as much better 😄... for you

Expand full comment
Morfei's avatar

But Russia is not supporting nazis like you.

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

You misunderstand the author and Russians generally have a ridiculous resentment about Nazis when their real problem is Jews there’s been no such thing as Nazis for 80 years Jews on the other hand are who they are fighting not the silly neo Nazis that want whatever they want it’s Jew control of USA and Europe Jew globalism Jew hatred of Russia

Expand full comment
John Osman's avatar

Ryan, tis a fine Irish name sure enough.

You do know Hitler included the Irish as Untermenschen don't you Michael?

1942 when he saw his arse and decided Brits weren't all Aryans after all.

So it'd be agricultural servitude for you, my lad.

Still think you'd prefer it?

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

Yes leftist over communism progressivism any day

What my fellow cousin celts and Norse couldn’t do in 800 years the Jews have done in a few decades

BTW the old hey irishman you should join us bc they think you’re a nigger routine is tiresome has been since the 60s

Expand full comment
PFC Billy's avatar

Yes, since the 1660s.

Expand full comment
Yoni Reinón's avatar

ridiculous resentment for nazis... 😄

Expand full comment
Leonardo Fin's avatar

The "ridiculous resentment" you hold when one slaughters 27 milion of your people and had in his plans to eliminate 70 milion more (Generalplan Ost) and only didnt do it cause he got defeated. I knew nazi arent famous for being smart but dude yu make the average Dunning Krueger look like the peak of galactic intelligence. LOL

Expand full comment
Angelina's avatar

@ MichaelRyan - Please don’t talk about things you know nothing about

Expand full comment
Jullianne's avatar

Looks like the Nazis' most immediate problem is the quality of their support.

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

There’s no such thing as Nazis in 80 years

Expand full comment
Jullianne's avatar

No indeed, just the wannabes, Michael.

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

As I said I would choose Nazis over commies any day

But since some have interpreted that to mean II support the jewkraine of Russia that is not what I meant.

Jews control Ukraine not the handful of neo Nazis larders Jews hate Russia almost destroyed it from 1917-90 and are the ones trying to destroy it now. The Jew loves to see slav kill Slav as they enjoyed the world wars, but russias cause is just.

Expand full comment
abcdefg's avatar

Who cares?

Expand full comment
Leonardo Fin's avatar

"The Jew loves to see slav kill Slav " THE NAZI LITERALLY WANTED TO EXTERMINATE ETHNIC SLAVS.

Generalplan Ost

Ethnic group /

Nationality targeted Percentage of ethnic group to be removed

by Nazi Germany from future settlement areas[21][35][36]

Russians[37][38] 70–80 million

Estonians[36][39] almost 50%

Latvians[36] 50%

Czechs[35] 50%

Ukrainians[35][40] 65% to be deported from Western Ukraine,

35% to be Germanized

Belarusians[35] 75%

Poles[35] 20 million, or 80–85%

Lithuanians[36] 85%

Latgalians[36] 100%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost?fbclid=IwY2xjawNOLcRleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzeE9TSUV5M3c5b1BLY1JKAR7OGExaHvEY7doGYSnUvWB41doB-EhZByGSx61R47hVQBE23k_sUdb97t1Apw_aem_33MMTmDDbbBXGspjSjkjrw

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

I never said I supported everything nazis did or thought only that I’d take them over the commie Jews any day. You do realize commies are responsible for an order of magnitude more deaths?

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

the name of their leadership may have changed, but the thugs are still among us. different label, same aggressive violence.

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

Women really shouldn’t even be talking you’re genetically incapable of understanding the world as it is and acting accordingly. Nature ordains all life is in existential struggle against all to some extent. Nature doesn’t care which life whose life only that life continuously sharpens itself against each other and the environment. We though are programmed also by nature or creator to favor our own life and as sexually reproducing species our groups life. To not not feel this is a mental illness and to not understand it is stupidity. Women’s role is to bear children and nurture them through toddlerhood have you done your bit.

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

WHUHAHAHAHAAAA, good one!!

Expand full comment
Leonardo Fin's avatar

MY eyes! LOOL please never change do not become a sane person it would deprive us of very high quality mocking material.

Love the "toddlerhood" bit lol, I guess for such uh archaic male warrior like yourself as soon as one is not a "toddler", like at 2 years old or somethin he should go to hunt deer by himself to survive lmao Thinkin abt it in ancient Macedonia the young prince Alexander (future Alexander the Great) learned, like others of his age, to hunt lions at 16(who still werent yet exint there at the time), i guess old makedons were just woke pussies after all lmao

Please keep writing these gems we need more insane shit like this lol

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

Well yes Alexander was a faggot

But until the Victorian era it was well understood women were not suited for the education of boys beyond about 6. Poor children went to work rich children had male tutors. You mind is occupied by long house Jew jizz. Go suck on one of your EU shield maidens tits little boy

Expand full comment
Jürgen Räche's avatar

Define Nazis... You madman, you're confusing something with fascism...

A Nazi, on the other hand, will throw you in the dirt if you've become useless. A Nazi only has use for you as long as you're useful to him. A Nazi, you stupid person, would never consider YOU one of his equals, unless you're his buddy or you're higher in rank than he is. And that's what a 78-year-old man who has experienced socialism and communism himself, but also capitalism, is saying to you.

And by experienced, I mean LIVED in it, with responsibility for family and children!

Question: What experience do you have with which forms of society, you "smart guy," what education do you have, or is your "education" the same as every chatterbox has, IMAGINATION?

Comunists are dangerous and brutal, almost always unpredictable...Nazis are all of that too, plus the fact that they consider themselves superior, and my friend, they'll let you feel that.

Communism lets you into the system if you agree with it. Nationalism first checks your race, then tests whether you can and will kill in its name...but even then, as a newcomer, you're always a candidate for the cliff. For example, as an Englishman, you would NEVER be recognized by a Nazi—you should know that if you know anything about history.

Oh yeah, define Nazi and stand in front of a mirror while you do it.

Expand full comment
Anthony Dunn's avatar

Well put.

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

"räche". thnx

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

First of all getting too literal we all this is silly at this point in time both idea failed and though communism is still rampant it’s radically changed

To the extent there’s a tiny remnant in reaction to neocommunism ( leftism woke progressivism socialism etc) this remnant is fractured in a million varieties very few are like me willing to shrug off the propaganda and judge nazis dispassionately and say they had some good and bad and the commie threat that brought them to power is again on the march

Communism convinces you you’re worthless and if you don’t join them in mass murder you will be murdered by the productive class

It’s telling you use the word nationalism in place of communism I too am old enough to remember when nationalism was not a pejorative rather a euphanism for patriotism also now frowned upon. The Jew in America destroyed those concepts virtues because the Jew doesn’t want to do the hard work of building maintaining a nation prefers to live parasitically off others work. So after being thrown out of Europe they set up shop in America and set about deconstructing all the ties that bound European Americans children against parents women against men capital against labor and subverted and degenerated our culture through lawfare media academia corrupted our own elites through bribes blackmail bullying

So I’m not actually a nazi I face the same problem as Germans faced and Germans were quite smart so naturally a lot of their answers will be pretty good

Getting jews out is step one they literally work incessantly to keep you seeing reality.

Expand full comment
Yoni Reinón's avatar

another example of the west nazi soul

Expand full comment
Michael ryan's avatar

Nazi soul? Well if European peoples having homelands for their own people and culture is nazi soul then fine

This is what Putin is fighting and when he refers to the vampires ball we all know who he’s talking about when he talks of denazifying Ukraine he has judo the Jew talk

Expand full comment
Grasshopper Kaplan's avatar

She makes an evil looking man, ready to cut off yer nuts.

What wrong with these dammm freaky fascist English Nazies, maybe Russia needs to turn off the lights in England with the new blue light plasma ?

Better yet, let them that hate Russia so much go fight in Ukraine and make the soil richer. Decaying in it...

Expand full comment
Victor's avatar

I heard that it was actually a large electrical grid transformer that blew giving off typically bluish white light.

Expand full comment
Chip Worley's avatar

Graphite bomb that causes arching of transformers and electrical gear to such extent that it trips the whole system like a giant ground fault breaker... Chip

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

Georgian diaspora: russophobic per definition.

Expand full comment
Anna's avatar

Blaise is no Georgian.

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

her family is originally from Georgia. the name Metreweli is German spelling (orig. Metreveli) - https://sopio.substack.com/p/the-new-head-of-british-secret-intelligence

Expand full comment
Givenroom's avatar

Zieg heil…Kämpfen…Uber Allen…Leistingen..Sturmbahnführer…Lösungen…NO not again! Looks like Euro and Ukr. Cabal need them to do the dirty job and yes they learned their lessons also in the vernichtungslager…Arbeit Macht Frei.

Expand full comment
Morrigan Johnson's avatar

Yep

Expand full comment
Violante of Naxos's avatar

Thats not a coincidence. Soros, Schwab, Gates.. they all have Nazi or Eugenics family backgrounds. It’s Not a Coincidence! Hydra is real.

Expand full comment
ChatterX's avatar

How Britain and U.S. Inspired Nazi Eugenics:

youtube.com/watch?v=7Dyyt2kVOEg

***

Did you know that Churchill was the honorary Vice President of the Eugenics education Society?

youtu.be/7Dyyt2kVOEg?t=159

Expand full comment
Violante of Naxos's avatar

Not surprised

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

The West has ALWAYS been fucking Nazi.

Seriously, what would you call "Colonialism" except Lebensraum in a less German-sounding package?

What about the genocides across the globe, with Britain alone estimated to have had 190,000,000 victims to its name, 120m in India alone?

The built-in racism (Now on obvious display in Gaza), the expansionism, the militarism?

Saying that the West is "Nazi" should not be considered provocative - saying it ISN'T is something that needs backing up.

"but, but, but, Liberal gay rights! Mass immigration!" some bleat. As though Nazis are always against gay rights, and would never cram "Untemensch" from different races together in their mad schemes.

Expand full comment
Elena's avatar

I would "like" this if the site would let me like things. I particularly think the link between colonialism and nazism should be more widely discussed and considered.

Expand full comment
werner hillinger's avatar

There are different phases. You cannot compare the Portuguese helping out with their modern military power in Abyssinia with the Spanish invaders in Central and South America, searching for gold and silver. And you cannot compare a German- or French-run colony with the things happening along the Congo. And how to interpret the multiple occupations of the pirate bases in North Africa by Portugal, Spain, and then France. But all these different forms of colonialism never ever tried to wipe out the natives, because there is only one nation that has done this: England. And by the way, the Nazis never wanted to kill the locals; they wanted them as second-class humans, as serfs. Again, only under English rule do we find a planned and well-organized killing of locals in North America, Australia, and New Zealand.

Expand full comment
A Woman Called Paddy's avatar

And the USA?

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

well, you can, actually: landing on foreign shores carrying guns, a canon and a flag didn't give the indigenous populations a great advantage. European colonialism finished off the original cultures it encountered, everywhere.

Expand full comment
werner hillinger's avatar

Sorry, but this is so beyond any reality, so a very easy question: which culture was finished? But please, do not come with this cracy idea, that preventing the natives from developing modern ways of life is bad.

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

when foreign lands thus conquered, the indigenous population(s) did not have a choice: be "cultured" or annihilated. American Indians, Australia's Aboriginees, Japan's indigenous tribes, NZ Maori, what's happening in Papua New Guinea and, indeed, Palestine.... the list is endless and shameful.

Expand full comment
werner hillinger's avatar

You mix up three different types of events. One is migration; whenever a region becomes overpopulated (maybe because the local climate changes), then some parts of society will try to find a new land, often leading to very brutal change for those being conquered. Look at the Chinese expansion and where the peoples of Southeast Asia are located nowadays. The second is the end of a conflict, like Japan after the Mongols or Spain after the Reconquista; you see a lot of fighters/warriors without a job. To get rid of these people, the government allows them to go abroad. And last, we have the planful occupation of territory to get resources or project power, like Caesar's Gallic War or Jermak's expansion to the East. And for the population on the receiving end, it makes a huge difference what kind of invader is at your doorstep.

Expand full comment
Tom Worley's avatar

Aztec

Expand full comment
werner hillinger's avatar

Wrong! First, they could only be conquered by the conquistadors because the Aztecs were very cruel, dominating the area, so all the other tribes just waited for an opportunity. And all the killing that followed the victory was done by other native tribes in revenge.

Expand full comment
MaryJane's avatar

Disagree about Nazi - they definitely DID want to kill the locals to the east of them - they needed their land and resources, lebensraum and all. And were quite successful, by the way.

Expand full comment
Elena's avatar

You are considering the American genocide of the indigenous, and the current Israeli genocide of the Palestinians as "under English rule?"

My use of the word "link" was perhaps unfortunate. I don't mean to say I think the English or anybody else were ideologically nazis. That was a cultural moment. I meant more along the lines of similarities. Hitler thought he was part of a tradition, you might say, and I'm agreeing with that. I would also say that the American elite are now following that tradition regarding the current non-elite inhabitants of the country. You could call it commodification - using people if that's profitable, eliminating them when it isn't.

Expand full comment
LaVerne Karras's avatar

I agree with quite a bit of what you said about colonialism, but the Nazis definitely DID want to kill the locals, they had plans to kill all the Jews and 'Untermenschen', that even included physically or mentally handicapped Germans

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Completely agree. The peoples before WW2 I think understood that link, yet in the post-war period Nazi Germany was used psychologically as a "scapegoat", and all the ills of European empires were dumped upon them.

Btw, why can't you like posts? It's extremely unlikely the site would let you post but not 'like'. Do you have a security setting/app installed that prevents it? I know there's a firefox security app that blocks out all 'like' buttons everywhere (They can be used for tracking, apparently), do you have that enabled perhaps?

Expand full comment
Elena's avatar

No idea why I can’t like from someone else’s post. No doubt it’s a security setting somewhere. I’ve looked for it without finding it. I can definitely post and just as definitely not like. :)

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

You could try turning off the security/ad-block apps (I have several, I HATE adverts beyond all reason) while on the page one by one, refreshing after each one, until the option reappears again. Then at least you know which app is causing the problem. :)

So many options on everything, and we have little idea how it's going to affect everything later!

And so tedious finding where the problem comes from too.

Expand full comment
Elena's avatar

I’ll check at some point. Thanks for the tip.

Expand full comment
ChatterX's avatar

It's funny that Nazi Germany started the WW2 with the USSR for "Lebensraum" (Living space, i.e. Land grab), and nowadays, the great European "Übermensch" don't wanna have children sufficient to fill in their own "European Garden", so they're forced to import immigrants from ex-European colonies they once destroyed.. The irony is Thick..

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

The Brit loons whose vast knowledge of the spying game(based entirely on the latter Bond films, with Judy Dench as “M”) have obviously decided that in the interests of female equality , their keystone cops outfit must be run by a woman , Nazi descendant or not.

Makes one nostalgic for the good ole days when it was chockers with fag Cambridge commies all working for Russia and not a woman in sight apart from Lady Penelope , or whatever M’s secretary was called.(Blonde and obviously a Russian Honeypot).

Doubtless the new head will be found to be a double agent after a respectable period of time has elapsed. It’s the British way.

Expand full comment
John Wren's avatar

M's secretary was I think, Miss Moneypenny 🙂

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

Ah yes I had thought it was Miss Hushmoney, but of course she is the current chief justice. Hard getting old.

Expand full comment
John Osman's avatar

Spot on Hussein. Britain is mint, but our Establishment sucks Donkey's balls.

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

I think that practice has been renamed from bestiality (offensive to their distinguished lordships apparently) to “Equus attracted” . (Latin is good for obfuscation purposes)

Probably explains why Starmer appears permanently cross eyed.

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

LOL (beware the thought police).

Expand full comment
PFC Billy's avatar

@Hussein Hopper

Lady Penelope = Thunderbirds, in Super Marionette-Vision!

Expand full comment
Hussein Hopper's avatar

I never trusted “lady penelope” as she styled herself ,she had that aloof ice blonde sexuality much favoured by Russian KGB for the their female agents. Combine that with cutting edge technology featured in The Thunderbirds and it it is obvious she was stealing western technological secrets and sending them back to her nefarious Russian handlers.

Almost certainly a puppet of the KGB.

Expand full comment
Jullianne's avatar

Putting on costumes and mouthing slogans in the hope that a veneer will somehow root in the dark stuff, does not cut it. There is more to the dark arts than dressing up and saying stuff as poor old Crowley learned and admitted in his later ignominious years, and the Nazis discovered when they tried to extend their apparent power beyond the western european fops. Russia is the real deal. Tartaria stood behind Sumeria not in opposition to it. Babylon was not the source but a front. Still, the west is where real power goes to die, and it never goes quietly, thrashing away as it tips into the abyss.

Expand full comment
Charlie Reed's avatar

Anyone hazard a guess at their end game?

Expand full comment
abcdefg's avatar

Keep the Eurasians fighting, try and monopolise critical resources and pray for a solution to the debt death spiral they are in.

Expand full comment