"I have been converting his videos into texts lately"
I've been doing the same thing. Someone also gave me pointers on how to copy/paste a transcript (say, from YouTube) into DeepSeek and have it generate a "detailed summary with timestamps".
Speaking of DeepSeek, that's the difference between Chinese AI and US AI. China does something useful. The US uses it to target its perceived enemies. The former is much easier to program and learns more rapidly. The later will turn on you like Skynet did in "The Terminator".
Sorry, don't recall who or where I heard this from.
Thanks for that FM. It made me wonder whether the Belgian - Russian trade had something to do with Diamonds, as Russia is a big producer of the raw product, whilst Belgium was or still is a substantial producer of the finished (cut & polished) product.
Yes. But these dogs come in many different breeds. Would not be surprised, seeing how afraid Belgium seems to be of Russia's reaction to VDL's "theft of the century" that it has been promised a very very special treatment. What can this be? Destroying Euroclear physically or through some cyber attack (note that Euroclear has a cyber hub employing 800 persons in Krakow, controlling most of the delicate IT infrastructure without which Europe capital markets would collapse - probably long infiltrated by the Russian security services)? Doing the same to the EU institutions - which would leave a nasty and perhaps radioactive hole in "Europe's capital" and also in the coffers of the Belgian state. The Grand Place is lovely but loosing the eurocrats would leave Belgium without much of its income and its last remaining raison d'être. Or, more prosaically, being exposed to some kompromat which would make the Becoming Brigitte story look like a kindergarden tale. Or a combination of all of the above.
"I have a team working day and night on it. It would be a great story: taking money from the wicked guy, Putin, and giving it to the good guy, Ukraine."
So those who destroyed Minsk agreements are good guys?
Blowing up Nordstream, built by Partners Germany and Russia, are good guys?
Those arming and paying Azov and Reich [sic] Sector, (despite or because of our neo-liberal/neocon credentials), are good guys?
If this is not pure and simple psychological projection name a better example!
Going to war for exaggerated reasons has long been the English way, to turn Russian's self defence into the cause of WW 3 will doom the enterprise.
At some point one just feels like saying ‘ok just fuggin do it already, and suffer the consequences. But you just know they wont because deluded as they might be…..
I’ve said this often but Ukraine is an expendable battering ram. It’s clear that the EU member states consider them undermenschen and barely pretend to care about their wellbeing. USAns are just so profoundly ignorant of history and geography to say nothing of recent events that they simply wave a flag and make “fight for freedom” mouth noises on occassion. But it makes sense. Since the end of WW2 western Ukraine, Galicia has been a jumping off point for espionage and given the region’s alignment with the fourth Reich and the SS it’s a good fit. Add to that the massive army with all the soviet era fixins Ukraine possessed before the SMO. So yeah, hired….bribed, or maybe even staged 2 coups in 10 years culminating in 2014’s civil war? Well it turns out that the plan has failed even more spectacularly than anyone could have imagined. The entire EU is going down in flames.
Belgium was allowed to come into existance in order to deny first France & later, Germany quick access to the channel coast best suited for invading England. That reason is looking to be less meaningful now, Belgium may not be a "nation state" forever. Or even next month, depending.
----------
Preventing a Strong Continental Power: After the Napoleonic Wars, the Congress of Vienna (1815) created the United Kingdom of the Netherlands (which included present-day Belgium) as a strong buffer against future French expansion.
Buffer State: When the Belgians revolted in 1830, the major powers negotiated a settlement. Britain insisted on the creation of an independent and neutral Belgium to serve as a buffer zone. The primary concern at the time was to prevent France from annexing the territory and gaining control of the valuable Channel ports and coastline.
Guaranteeing Neutrality: The 1839 Treaty of London, signed by Britain, France, Prussia (part of the later Germany), Austria, and Russia, formally recognized Belgian independence and bound the new nation to perpetual neutrality. Britain guaranteed this neutrality, seeing it as essential to its own security interests and preventing any single major power from dominating the Continent.
The West make a big deal about freedom, democracy and elections. Yet our leaders sell out. After being corrupted they get the 'such a deal I got for you' pitch. Take the deal or die. Rest assured the death will not be dignified.
So you raise a massive topic, with some nice imagery.
The key seems to be knowing we have been deceived for a very long time. We need to search the world for authority that has not been corrupted. Who have kept their word and their oaths. Back them!
Would you vote for a murderous, evil, psychopathic liar? Then why should we obey one when their rule is so obviously been corrupted!
To stop voting seems mutinous, but to support genocidal maniacs is not gonna save the world. Without the voters they have no mandate. It is not an individual problem we face it is systemic. Boycott.
It never really was a nation state. It’s high time for an enlightened Velvet Divorce, the Flems joining the Netherlands and the Walloons, France. Brussels can become a city-statelet, like San Marino.
Of course, when you turn the whole of the western EUSSR into a Molenbeek, where every pavement is rammed with stabby Moroccans and Eritrean sex pests, it hardly matters where anyone draws the ‘national’ lines - which is, of course, the very reason Brussels/ the WEF/ Soros have done that.
BTW the ideology of Fascism started to form after the International Financial Conference in 1920 in Brussels, where the wealthiest capitalists/bankers discussed what to do with the rise of socialist movements across Europe and emergence of Soviet Russia as an alternative system:
As a result of that Conference they came up with the set of policies called "Austerity" or, as they called it, "Pure economics" (now, doesn't that sound Fascist..) Simply speaking, "work hard, live hard, and save hard", higher taxes on everyday goods (like VAT) for the workers and lower taxes (like Income and wealth) for the rich. And, of course, Privatization of State assets.
In the 1930-40s, It was also supported by the Swiss so-called "Mont Perelin" Society headed by Friedrich Hayek, that gave Fascism the fancy name "Neoliberalism".
The SMO can be likened to a Russian tractor plowing a field. The process isn’t fast, but it is unstoppable. Once the ground has been plowed, it cannot be unplowed. The stubble, grasshoppers, and field mice don’t get a vote, the field will be plowed.
The field mice are in denial of reality, having been misled by a toothless syphilitic old bulldog across the creek. They hold meetings with the bulldog and the 27 sheep in the next paddock about plans to stop the tractor. The old bull across the lake offers to sell them gadgets to stop the tractor, if the sheep will pay for it. The words fly and a lot of money appears and then vanishes. The Russian farmer takes little notice of this nonsense and the tractor rolls on.
It is growing corruption and an empire in decline. The two go together like peanut butter and jelly.
No matter. Our lives go on. The prepared will thrive and the undisciplined will demand that the corrupt empire-in-decline save them from what they voted for.
To paraphrase deToqueville; "When the voters figure out they can vote to rob themselves, they will rob themselves."
You missed that the tractor is driven by a beautiful Russian woman, Masa, and while she is plowing, the Russian folk song "Poljushka Polje" is constantly playing from the tractor's loudspeaker to drown out the squeaking of the plowed mice ! :)
"a toothless syphilitic old bulldog across the creek" is the perfidious Albion.
Somehow, the UK has menaged to sequester almost all its honorable people and put the "toothless syphilitic" kind (Starmer, Johnson, Arbuthnots, Blairs, et al.) in charge.
Correct. Besides the English canine reference, the channel is not a wide body of water, fit people can swim across it. Also referred to in slang as 'the ditch', although stream sounds more attractive. As for toothless, their army could not fill a football stadium (and also English dentistry).
I don't think so. It is way more complicated. It is more like 2 teams of farmers used to plow a field together. Globalist farmers told them they were doing everything wrong. Only their corporate farmers are allowed to plow fields. So they convinced one of the farmer teams to join their corporate plow structure. This structure allows the corporation leaders to create a giant money stream stealing from all the farmers under their control to buy weapons to push the recalcitrinte farmers that didn't want to join their team off their fields. A few members of the new corporate team farmers get to siphon off some of the money stream getting wealthier and more powerful. The old members of the corporation farm get their take from the money stream as always. They get even wealthier and more powerful. The little farmers in the corporate countries get poorer and less powerful. The little farmers in the new corporate farm get sent to drive the recalcitrinte farmers they used to work with off the lands. The recalcitrinte farmers are pissed off and start kicking their asses. The corporate farmers scream it isn't fair and plot new ways to send more of the little farmers in the corporate farm structure to fight the recalcitrinte farmers. The most important thing is the grift must continue. If the recalcitrinte farmers prove too tough on these lands there is always Venezuela
Let's say they steal the $200B, or even $300B. Most likely the Russians will do nothing and this will be yet another empty threat, following the usual principle that past behavior (in this case cucking) is the best predictor of future behavior (more cucking).
But there are limits to everything, as Karaganov said a few weeks ago.
And there are limits to how far that money will go too. Between the double digit percentage that will be siphoned off through various schemes, the absurdly inflated costs of Western weapons, and what the Russians blow up, it will prolong the war, but not defeat Russia. And then we will be in the same situation but with no more Russian money to steal.
Then Europe will have to go in directly. And surely that must be understood if not in the EU part of Brussels, then certainly in the NATO HQ.
And then the nukes fly, and it's all over quickly, as Putin said.
Which also has to be well understood by everyone. These people may be corrupt and the public faces stupid too, but those behind the scenes who actually pull the strings are not stupid.
So again, what is the end game?
1) A bet on Russian elites selling out the country once again as they did in the 1980s, this time truly terminally? It has been a good bet so far, but the situation never came close to truly critical.
2) They have some military-technical plan in the works to neutralize Russian strategic weapons.
If the latter is the case, Russia has to strike now, before it is too late. If it's the first scenario, and the Western plan is to take things to the brink and bet on traitors in the Kremlin folding once again, then it again makes sense to strike first.
What absolutely does not make sense is negotiations with the Americans, unless those negotiations are for how the US will stay out of it. But the US cannot stay out of it, because Russia nuking Europe means the US loses the Middle East too...
Europe is not even dreaming of military confrontation with Russia. The peoples would not accept any such thing.
I don't know where are you from. I am European and know some big European countries decently well.
If someone would be stupid enough to try and send the troops against Russia, the answer would be a fallen government the day after. It would be one of the shortest wars in history.
France's resistance in 1939 would be an example of resilience in comparison.
They cannot stop talking about it. No, they cannot.
"If they believe what they say... " No, they do not.
Some generals are trying to display some bravado. Yes, they do. May be to impress their wives.
As to "fallen governments": what I suppose would happen.
1. Huge violent riots in European capitals. Many police forces siding with the people.
2. Masses of men and women trying to leave the warring countries into neutral ones. Several millions cars waiting to cross the Swiss or Hungarian border.
3. Million of non European inmigrants stating that this is not their war.
That France, for instance, may be at war with Russia, but Algeria is not. Millions declare to be Algerian and demand free passage to their country. Moroccans in France pretending to be Algerians and flee with them.
Millions of Turks in Germany waiting for instructions from Erdogan, etc.
4. Votes of no confidence in parliaments, with practically everyone voting against the governments. Macron has a acceptance index closer to 10% than to 20%.
Now, imagine that he starts a war and asks males born in the year XYZZ to present themselves in the nearest recruitment centre. A joke.
In a few words, one of the shortest wars in history.
I repeat my prognosis: French resistance in 1939
would be an example of heroic virtue compared to what would happen now.
Not much "Aryan Hingabe" in Germany's youth either.
European leaders know that.
They want tension to increase explain the increase of the military budgets, so that they can rob blank the taxpayers. They can also use "Russian disinformation" to introduce censorship and increase repression.
This is the nature of their game.
In one thing you are absolutely right. This brinkmanship game is very dangerous because even if no leader, Russian, American or European, wants a general war it might still happen.
One thing is not to start rioting in Paris or Rome, because the Palestinians are being slaughtered, and other, very different the reaction, when some young French or Italian receives a nice little letter announcing that he will be most probably killed a couple of months after finishing a short period of
training.
Unless refusal to be conscripted is punished by a court martial and an immediate shooting sentence, no Western European country could fight Russia for more than a month. Standing armies are to small and even prison sentences would not make people accept mobilisation.
Europe does not have the logistics to wage war on Russia for anything beyond a week or two . The call for war is coming from those who own Rheinmetall and military manufacturing assets or are funded by them . The rise in their valuations along with the AI bubble is pretty much all the action in the market. The world economy is fuelled by increasing debt and in the longer term that's disaster . Europe has no cheap energy or resources and that will force them to blow up or shut down . Events are speeding up and desperation is now becoming obvious .
Never forget how "Civilized" European Oligarchy threw millions of their own working Class citizens into the WW1,2 meat grinders, and this is exactly how the term "Cannon fodder" was coined.
Jean Paul Sartre lived in Paris under German occupation and had quite comfortable relations with the Wehrmacht's command. He was a pocket communist and had to say things like that.
But you are right. It is not an original idea of yours.
It is just not accurate.
I repeat. Even sons of millionaires like JF Kennedy and Bush senior fought in the war, not to speak of the German and British aristocracies.
It’s fine for these gilded technocrats to beat the drums of war for the younger generation to dance to, but it becomes challenging to actualize when there is not actual army of any meaningful size of capability to do the fuggin fighting.
Europeans are world class wimps. Europeans, however, are confident that the United States will again ride to the rescue rather than leave europe hanging out to dry.
Sabre rattling only. We couldn't put enough troops in to the field to be more than a speed bump to the Russian army. We have no experience of fighting a drone war and we're too arrogant to ask the Ukrainians.
Our airforces aren't equipped for attritional warfare, or facing top level AAA.
And we can't afford to build a defence industry that could threaten Russia conventionally.
Even if we could, can you imagine how inept an EU army would be? 27 chiefs and direction by Kallas and Von Der Leyen.
I think end game is China Russia and USA partner up and ditch psycho Europeans. At least under Trump. US needs Russia and China to save it's ass financially and they are more than happy to placate the monkey with hand grenade (nukes) from failing.
Well neocons will just have to come to their senses and go multipolar. There is no sense in nuclear holocaust. There is sense in exploiting the arctic with Russia and China investing in America. I remain an optimist. Anything else is too depressing.
Unfortunately the US is run by lunatics and racists who will never agree to taking a back seat to what they firmly believe are "lesser" beings. On the other hand Canada has much more Arctic territory with more useful resources, and would probably be a better bet.
Many if not most of the elites believe Western European whites are inherently superior to Asians, Africans, Native Americans, Aborigines, Arabs, Slavs, and any other group you can name because they're somehow the "chosen people". It means nothing to them that there is no evidence, they (currently) have the money and the power so that makes them correct in their minds.
ziocons will never come to their senses -- that would be against their deeply-ingrained indoctrination in supremacist lunacy and sadistic hatred of "others."
First, the US made sure euroslaves have no energy to power their industry by destroying the Nordstream pipeline, and now.. they will sell them their LNG and weapons x6 the price..
FWIW: "Israel" is suppose to have a plan to decamp to Argentina. While far-fetched, recall that the Coleone family left NYC for Las Vegas. There are now dozens of pundits who have declared that Israeli society is falling apart. Sachs was reporting on such events just this morning. (12/5/25) I want to be clear, he was not talking about Argentina, merely that Israel is about to consume itself.
So, no Israel, no need to stay in Europe.
There are other even more fantasmic possibilities. Unfortunately, none seem to offer hope of destruction of the "Anglo-American Oligarchy/Deep State/Jewish Mob". Rather it seems predicted to become even more entrenched.
A "partnership between Russia, China and the USA"? No way.
Argentina has little oil and controls no trade routes.
Israel was put where it is because the Middle East is where the oil is while sitting on the intersection of Europe, Africa and Asia.
P.S. There is a reasonable argument to be made that ancient Canaanites spawned what later became Jews to a large degree because of that crossroads between everyone factor.
The best propagandists always post a significant percentage of facts and truths that are agreeable to the majority, to give themselves an aura of objectivity and respectability. If every single thing they said was provably false garbage, they wouldn't be able to get any "upvote" respect whatsoever.
Argentina had the largest jewish pimping organization that prospered for almost a century. They do not teach about Zvi Migdal at their whining holo-museums.
“Zvi Migdal was a large powerful prostitution cartel established and owned by Jewish immigrants from Poland. ... it was one of the largest networks in the South America, with branches and connections in Shanghai, Johannesburg, Rio de Janeiro, and many other places. At the peak of their activity they had tens of thousands of women working for them, some 2,000 brothels...
The cartel had an original marketing tactic: every once in a while a polite Jewish gentleman used to come to the Jewish communities in Eastern Europe and spread ads calling “Jewish girls from good homes” offering either jobs at homes of rich Jews in Buenos Aires, or marriage.
While still on the ship to Argentina, the girls were locked, beaten, raped and starved, which the Jewish pimps referred to as their “re-education”. Landing in Buenos Aires they were herded to a house where they had to undress and be inspected by pimps, who sold them in auctions as sex slaves."
"The number one weapon of 20th century imperialism is Zionist dollarism, and one of the main bases for this weapon is Zionist Israel. The ever-scheming European Imperialists wisely placed Israel where she could geographically divide the Arab world, infiltrate and sow the seed of dissension among African leaders and also divide the Africans against the Asians."
-Malcolm X, after visiting Gaza in 1964
***
One should think of Israel as the biggest of 800+ overseas U.S. military bases, "Unsinkable ? carrier", created to control (bomb) this whole oil-rich region.
Especially the Suez Canal and the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil transit chokepoint.
Oy veh… Lucky Argentinians: they’d better start arming themselves, getting organised and digging bomb-shelters. As soon as they have a foothold in Buenos Aires, I expect Herzog, Ben Gvir and Meilkowsky will demand the Falkland Islands and South Georgia (having found a previously undiscovered book of the Talmud that promised them to the Children of Israel); and ‘Sir' Queer Starmer and ‘Lord’ Hermer will be only to happy to hand them over, plus £80bn or so in compensation for not having done so earlier.
No. The nomadic tribe can't help itself but preach supremacist lunacy and tribal cohesion. Think of their dishonorable teachings (Kol Nidre) and celebrations of sadism and genocide (purim).
Only a ban on the judaic education, zionism in particular, can alleviate the problem.
Voltaire about jews: they are "ignorant and barbarous people united by the most sordid avarice with the most detestable superstition and the most invincible hatred for every people by whom they are tolerated and enriched. ... I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race."
There was a little war that Israel ran that the Euros refused US to fly through their air space..... hint it was followed by a big oil embargo for those too young to remember.
Add to that that the Americans are demonstrably incapable of dealing with other countries in good faith, and there's no way the US could be involved in a multi-state cooperative effort.
And Euros apparently enjoy being vassals. That way they can avoid any responsibility for agency. "We can't do nuthin', we're just vassals of that big bad guy across the Pond".
The US is certainly not gonna squeeze anything out of moribund Europe, they have little in the way of natural resources, their industries are in the toilet, and they're fiscally close to bankrupt. The UK, France, and Germany are in a race to the bottom to see which can be first to achieve third world status, if they can't right the ship, they're citizens will start finding Moldova more attractive.
<<<<<Most likely the Russians will do nothing and this will be yet another empty threat, <<<<<
Russia doesn't have to *do* anything. They will simply take their clearly winning case to a court somewhere (Singapore?) and get a judgement against the E.U. steal operation. If the E.U. ignores the judgement (and Ursula is bringing in legislation to make it possible to ignore international judgements they don't like) then the holders of the forty four *trillion* dollars on deposit with Euroclear and central banks that backstop the E.U.'s role in the global financial system will be pulled out of Europe as depositors act to save themselves.
The entire E.U. financial system that supports their economy will collapse and the E.U. enterprise will disappear for all eternity. (taking small countries heavily dependent on the participation in the E.U. financial system with it)
It ain't going to happen no matter how hard Ursula and Kallas try to get around existing unanimous consent provisions protecting individual countries in the E.U. from blatant reckless disregard of international law.
The rest of your comment is just your usual thirsting for all out nuclear war.
The very notion of an international court is laughable when it comes to conflict on this level.
Because there is no eforcement mechanism
It's the same story with US debt -- who is going to collect on it and how? The West collects on itts debts by bombing countries, which is ultimately the only way to force a non-compliant debtor to pay. Who is going to do the same to them?
Actually there are enforcement measures. Plenty of them. Europe has assets all over the world that could be seized to settle any judgement.
But aside from that, Europe can't walk away from the Western global financial system like Russia did. They aren't self sufficient and in possession of all manner of things that much of the world depends on as is the case with Russia.
Russia can and, according to the Europeans, is disrupting the entire world. What can Europe do except talk about how every one should watch what they will be able to do in about ten years or so?
Precisely 10 civilians killed is a tragedy be it in Ukraine or Russia, but this number is not much above the number of people killed in traffic accidents. Something to be regretted, but not a rational motive to alter the conduit of the war.
I am not one in the ranks of those who are in favour of the destruction of the Ukrainian State, hoping that peace and reconciliation are still possible.
If not, the fact is that the US is now clearly begging Moscow to please stop advancing.
Threats of secondary sanctions have produced the recent visit of Putin to India and counter sanctions by China.
A completely different situation from the one that existed in 2022, when the Western talk was about the imminent collapse of the Russian economy, the omnipotent
economic and military weapons of the West and how the 2023 Ukrainian offensive would
I think that even if they don't go to court somewhere - countries will start to withdraw their cash from European banks if they steal the Russian money. I'm sure they can find other places for their money somewhere.
Is it going to stop the drones and missiles from flying deep into Russia?
One of the skyscrapers in Grozny just had a 9/11-type accdient a couple hours ago. But these aren't the firecracker drones that flew into Moscow City buildings in 2023, they carry 50-100 kg explosives, i.e. they are proper cruise missiles now. And the results is that you have a lot of the previously shiny brand new building in very bad state now.
Which is starting to become a bit of a problem, because the Chechens are the type of people who only respect strength and power, and Russian rule there rests on the perception of such established after the Second Chechen War, thus pathetic displays of humiliating weakness such as not allowing such strikes all the way to Grozny will not be accepted without much of a fuss there the same way it is by the regular Russians, beaten into submission by four decades of Perestroika.
And that is precisely why this strike was carried out. More will follow.
Again, how is Euroclear going bust going to stop such strikes? And how is Euroclear even going to go bust if everyone diligently gets in line after Russia has been destroyed?
This what you idiots don't understand -- money does not matter in the real world, it's just symbols on screens. Real physical power does. Money comes secondary.
And that’s why even if they steal the money it will not stop the war or change its trajectory in any way. Are the Chechens are going to rebel against Russia because Ukraine is bombing their high rises? What kind of leader do you think they will install if they were to depose Putin?
Uhhh.....did you catch the part where the money is being stolen for the purpose of funding those missiles, drones etc. that you refer to? (as well as pay the soldiers) Not that your tiny number of such strikes make much difference anyway.
No stolen money equals no money for anything except cheap, short range drones and then not enough of them to compete with the Russians.
Ron, don't waste your time on the troll. It has had explanations laid out to it repeatedly over the years. An intelligent person would have understood. But never will a troll. It's here to clog the discussion and spread FUD.
" You idiots don't understand this " Really ? Then teach us Master ! :) Since part of your tirade is about Chechens, I would like to ask, have you ever seen a living Chechen in your life? Or rather, have you seen a bearded, funny man in some Hollywood movie who was quite afraid even of the mafia ! I especially like the way you talk about the Russians, as if you were someone who had lived in Russia for fifty years and who perfectly understood the soul of the Russian people ! :) Well, I would like to note that when it comes to the Russians, I rather keep in mind the opinions of people who were not like you, an anonymous GM logo nobody, but like Messrs. Metternich, Bismarck and Talleyrand, whose opinions were unanimously the same, it's better not to mess with the Russians, because it always ended in a Russian occupation ! As for the recurring powerful oligarchs in the Kremlin living in your fantasy, who you think have such power that they can remove Putin from his throne at any time, well, dream on, princess ! :) As if you forgot the nuanced detail that Putin was an active KGB officer (was and is and will be !), who is not a living dead autopen president, not a real estate swindler whose talent is exhausted in trickery, but a fluent speaker of several languages ( I think this is a concept largely unknown in the USA :) ) and when he speaks, it contains remarkable facts, legally supported, and if he promises something, it will be kept at a fair price !
It will weaken the economies of countries who have declared themselves Russia's enemies thereby reducing their ability to purchase armaments to threaten Russia. QED.
In my case towards China led projects, Asia in any case generally. Maybe some into Africa based endeavors but then there is India with promising prospects. Relative big players like European pensionfonds are already using small steps to sneak away from Black Rock bubbles since concentrating capital on that scale produces a conflict of interests especially with the tendency to monopolizing and looting the rest - unhealthy and unsustainable.
If the cake is not growing with the tempo that your claimed piece is growing, you ask for trouble economically since there is a certain wisdom in Henry Ford's words: 'cars are not buying cars'
The drones hitting Russia are mosquitos in the grand scheme of things. Totally meaningless as they attack soft targets which do nothing to slow the progress of the war. They are for PR only and the more they do hurt the civilian population the more recruitment numbers increase. What war has ever been won by terrorism?
1) Physical prevention -- he nukes Europe and all US bases in Eurasia, so that there is nobody and nowhere to launch stuff from. Then he finishes Ukraine at his leusire
2) Direct deterrence enforcement -- he starts an extermination campaign against the Western oligarchy with conventional precision strikes so that they back off, on a reciprocal-plus basis, i.e. for every Russian civilian casualty, two members of the Western elite die the next day. That means drones and missiles at the oligarchy's residences, i.e. the key billionaires, including and especially those that most people have not even heard of, but pull the strings from behind the scenes. Perhaps some small tactical nukes at some remote mansions and bunkers will be needed too, because they are large/difficult objects and can't be taken out with single 500-kg warheads.
P.S. Putin did in fact promise to do something like 2), on the very day he launched the SMO. He promises strikes on "decision-making centers" if they interfere. Well, they interfered, he did nothing. Which is why he repeated that phrase a couple more times in 2022, then stopped mentioning it at all.
Those may have been acts of terror but they were strategic and devastating. Bombing an apartment building or an oil refinery does nothing to slow the war’s inevitable progression so it cannot be strategic. Putin knows that the public must not waver in its support for the achievement of the defeat of the anglozionist proxy. These pinpricks further that goal. We are talking about the existence of their culture and civilization. Collateral damage in defending that is unfortunately acceptable… And how exactly will Russia stop these pinpricks launched from within Russia? The sleeper cells are already there and equipped. Even if Russia nuked Ukraine into total oblivion the terrorist attacks will continue for a while. These are improvised drones not storm shadows. They are directed by the west anyway and short of total capitulation by Russia (which will never happen) the west will continue to terrorize. They have no other option. They have already been defeated morally. The rest of the process of total defeat inevitably follows.
"It boggles the mind that people on this forum who recognize how insane Russia would be to send drones into Miami see nothing wrong with the US doing that to Russia."
It is not that we see nothing wrong. The US has plausible deniability - very few in the west believe the US is directly attacking Russia. Any response by Russia directly against the west would, I think, swing public opinion in the West very strongly towards all out war. Exactly what the nut-jobs in power are desperate for.
I am sure the people wounded and killed in those strikes share your dismissive attitude and are immensley thankful to Putin for being wise and restrained and not having put an immedaite permanent stop to such attacks, which he can do within an hour of finding the courage and integrity to issue the relevant orders.
So your solution is to escalate the war against a nuclear-armed irrational enemy who is in the midst of a civilizational suicide? Right that will definitely reduce the number of Russians killed by the west.
You wipe out everything east of Lille (i.e. you don't touch France and the UK, unless you are sure you can disable them completely, in which case you do wipe them out too), you move in with ground forces, finish off the survivors, that territory becomes Russia from here on permanently, NATO has been pushed back 2,000 km, and nothing will be flying into Russia proper anymore.
And nobody will dare fire a single shot back because nobody will sacrifice Boston, NYC, DC, LA and SF just to retaliate over what no longer exists.
They are doing it to themselves. Russia doesn’t have to bomb them, these morons have already sent all their munitions and tanks to Ukraine to be destroyed. Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake.
I’m not sure that’s the way things work when two opponents face each other. The national resentment built up over such attacks tends, I think, toward eventual massive retaliation. At some point the retaliation will be nuclear (as GM has correctly pointed out here).
That’s a fair point. Using the British Army violently to enforce the Khedive’s gigantic debt to the Rothschilds is how London ended up controlling Egypt, the Suez Canal, the Gulf, Aden and the Sudan.
The enforcement mechanism has already been noted: " the holders of the forty four *trillion* dollars on deposit with Euroclear and central banks that backstop the E.U.'s role in the global financial system will be pulled out of Europe as depositors act to save themselves." The U.S. is a different proposition altogether, which is why other countries are reducing their U.S. treasury holdings. If the U.S. should ever default, that would spell the end of the primacy and privileges of the U.S. dollar regime.
GM would have more credibility if her pussy was in a donbas trench. Her prowess will no doubt impress the fighting men. Instead she sits here vying for attention because being ignored in life can we not be tolerated for so long.
What court? Anyway, europeans will simply ignore any judgement that they do not like.
Law is meaningless. Enforcement is the only thing that matters.
Anyway, we go through this song and dance routine every few months. There may be a few more twists and turns, a few polite fictions and fudges, but one way or the other, the money will be found.
There is no endgame for Europe. They are incapable of any strategic thought, only graft. They want to steal the money and keep the music playing for one more song. When it stops there will be no seat for them, and to borrow a phrase, what would they care about a world without them? They burn their own countries to the ground and lord over the ashes.
I listened to professor Popov talk about the US missile defense. Very technical, and detailed presentation on the imposibility of intercepting ICBMs. Not even 1 can be intercepted. It is all a grift and marketing nonsense. The US has the same means as Russia, to neutralize Russian strategic assets: intercepting ICBM warheads with their cities. The only thing the russians would be scared of , is that the elites in power would think that's a good idea. Honestly, Biden seemed more capable of such thinking than anybody else. The russians will continue to talk with americans just as ths Vietnamese and Taliban did as well. The russians haven't recreated SMASH(in every division midn you) and war tribunals to end this war in negotiations. If ever the ukranians were actually ready to accept Istanbul+ they would soon find the terms a lot harsher than what was presented in the media.
People are forgetting recently Putin has been talking of Novorussia and expanding the buffer zones. Other officials have discussed a 150 km buffer radiating zone from 4 oblasts, that's 60% of Ukraine. This is happening because moves are being made to accept Istanbull+, which means the russians will have to present the actual terms they want: the detaills of what demilitarization, denuclearization and denazification mean, terms so harsh that Versailles will seem a slap on the wrist. The russians will lose support if they present their actual demands, which is why they are playing this game.
>The only thing the russians would be scared of , is that the elites in power would think that's a good idea
Yes, which is why the current cuckery is so completely unacceptable.
It does you absolutely no good if you have a guaranteed second-strike capability if the other side still launches a first strike.
The purpose of the second strike is not to retaliate over the first strike, it is to prevent it in the first place.
If the other side still gets it in their heads that they can attack first, it has all catastrophically failed.
Thus absolutely no display of pathetic weakness should be permissible, and no doubt whatsoever should exist in anyone's mind that the nukes will fly immediately and in full force to where they need to go and no salami slicing will be allowed.
The General Staff have been telling Putin this for many years, and yet here we are.
> recently Putin has been talking of Novorussia and expanding the buffer zones.
And yet at the same time Ushakov has been talking about a deal being close to be reached, Dmitriev is the chief negotiator, and Putin meets for five hours with Witkoff and Kushner.
And there is no serious mobilization still to this day.
None of which suggests real seriousness about Novorossiya or the buffer zone.
Dimitriec isn't a negotiator. He is a PR mechanism. Putin talking for 5 hours with non-negotiatoros about BS is not wasted time, it's PR. If there is a need for a mobilization it will be done;when it was first ordered in 2022, they didn't even know if it would work. Today they know the systems work, stuff gets done , within the time and recources allocated. I suspect the russians want to break the morale of the ukranians first.
Nobody in the West will stop hating Russia just because Putin put a Godman Sachs banker (!!!) in charge of negotiations instead of rounding up everybody with such connections and sending them to dig for gold with their bare hands north of Magadan, as he should be.
Meanwhile within Russia people are horrified because they see obvious traitors in key positions trying to put together another dogovornyak of the worst possible kind. So if within Russia the optics are so negative, what 'PR" can we even talk about?
>I suspect the russians want to break the morale of the ukranians first.
That would have been most effectively done by physically cutting them off from weapon supplies, decapitating all the leadership, and making it very clear no new leadership will be allowed to exist for longer than it takes for them to be sworn in. Which Putin can do tomorrow if he finally finds the balls.
With regards to PR, let me tell you that in 2022 if Romanians would have been told to go fight Russia, than 70% would have. Out of 100 people 95% would have put Kaya Kalles to shame. Today 40 % are pro-Russia, 40% don't care at all , and the 20% that still believe in NATO propaganda are more of the LGTBQ flags type, than the going to war type. The Global South are 90% behind Russia, that's a very impressive achievement considering none of these countries are for annexation or changing borders(out of fear of their own borders). I know elites don't care, but only to a certain point. The chances of ww3 are lower every day. The russians have suffered for this victory, but not a lot, mildly I'd say.
Romania is still a major logistic base for Ukraine though and is launching drones towards Russia.
From a Russian perspective nothing that matters has changed.
If I was Putin, I would have issued an ultimatum:
-- The current government has 24 hours to agree to seal the border with Ukraine and another 24 hours to actually do it, and to exit NATO.
-- If it does not agree, the population has another five days to overthrow the government, and do the above
-- If it is not done, strategic nuclear strikes follow
-- If it is done, we will have eternal peace and friendship and Russia commits to protecting Romania if anyone attacks it (BTW, the latter would be an even sweeter deal for the Balkan countries, because those are the only countries in NATO that are under actual real existential threat, from Turkey, and the Americans are not going to protect them; after all, Cyprus is still half occupied and it's in the EU and hosts important NATO bases)
If the population does not do it, well, they have made their choice and at the 168th hour the missiles fly.
The plan is to take the money and give EuroClear which hold the money EU-Bonds in exchange. After Russia has paid about half a trillion USD in Reparations to Ukraine, it would get the 140 billions back. What could get wrong with this masterpiece of p?
You have to distinguish between ”cucking” and abstaining from reaction/action or being unable to react/act. Russia has not been cucking as much as they have been forced to think out new ways to perform their so called SMO. They have abstained from unlimited warfare and they have been unable to successfully use old the tactics that were present until 2023. However, the strategy is clear on the battlefield although it goes in slow-motion.
The End game?
Not 1 or 2, if I am right.
And if Russia strikes with Nukes first I will also be the first to condemn them. And wishing a Nuclear exchange is pretty deranged, in my view. End game for sure.
The Endgame could be that US finally abandon the CIA/DeepState strategy of containing Russia and applying pressure to them. From their new military strategy:
From Geroman on X:
NATO must stop expanding in Europe, according to the updated US national security strategy.
The document notes that it is likely that "within a few decades at the latest" certain NATO members may be majority non-European, and that these members may no longer share the views of those who originally signed the NATO charter”.
The last is so funny! They have realized that the migration policy from the Tribe, to undermine the whites in Europe, has eventually created a hostile population to US…
I think Trump would play scratch my back, I scratch your with Putin dividing larger part of the World, along with China, as of spheres of interest. What vasalls and useful idiots in Europe do is of no concern for them any longer.
Agree. Its a start…I think US will abandon Baltic states and former eastern states. The article was really good. Yes, Arctic will be a scene of conflict/tension.
I think EU will absorb NATO without US as a new security structure for Europe. And it will of course be no good. But they would sit on their hands - they cant do anything offensive against Russia without help from US.
3) A smoldering war that kills and dispaces millions of slavs as well as weakening Christianity in the region, while also creating yet another zone like Birobidzhan/Fraydorf/Larindorf/ the Settlement of the Pale in a rump state of Ukraine, where international elite pirates control a fiefdom in the "heartland" of the "world island" (see the geopolitical Heartland Theory), and siphon the critical natural resources away from the natives.
4) Also, to create a bifurcation of the world powers into an East vs. West, which will lead to the eventual destruction of those nations, the final stages of which could happen soon or over a longer period of time. In other words, WW3, a great meatgrinder, which will likely lead to Europe's demise first, then America and the East, then a new world order arising like a phoenix from the ashes.
Like the last two great wars, the leaders of these nations don't have their nations' interests in mind and instead have grander plans.
May the soul of Ursula, this well paid militant whore disappear in the annals of history as she is cleaning potatoes in the comfort of her well equipped kitchen.
If only I knew what Russia said to Brussels to get them so scared. “Suffer the consequences for eternity” is so ominous. I love it, Russia should still do it.
Consider that a thermonuclear generated tidal wave initiated about halfway between Colchester and Ipswich while intended to head up the Thanes estuary and finally clean up the City of London also would include a similar wave going away from the estuary- And towards a certain "low country"?
I feel so well informed, such illuminating quotes and charts, and the perspective that these are not serious people gives me hope for the future, as they’re frog marched off to corruption court, such as it is.
At the very least Russia should demand that Europe delivers unto them every natostan commander plus that bloated pigface cookies Nudleman for a Nuremberg 2.0 run. If the EU drags it's hooves, they can glass every brit city with a population density of 10k until Europe complies. Karma is just too slow imo.
The EU+Nato elite have realised that modern warfare will make crossing the Atlantic impossible for supply ships. And modern warfare is attrition warfare. Hence EU+Nato cannot win against Russian resources.
That is why they’re hysterical and in panic mode. The sad part is to observe their final strategy - EU+Nato try to bluff the Russians with military adventurism. Essentially Poker bluff vs Chess player. And the elite know that Russia is aware they’re bluffing. Hence the final corrupt attemp to steal resources, and use the corrupt Zelensky for kickbacks. All EU elites are doing is trying to launder kickbacks to the Ukrainian assistance. Beyond evil.
They cannot even reach the Russian border or major Russian cities from Poland or Romania with their jets without refueling. Crossing Ukraine airspace, they will be the the targets of a Russian turkey shooting.
Fraud and psychological warfare is all the euro pimpocracy can do. They gutted their own power base for bribes and so there was no power in the state around which reform could happen. Putin is their greatest fear.
Remember how they were selling/fearmongering for Zio Don as "American Putin"? 🤬🐸
It is quite tempting to link the Ukrainian corruption to the European and, more specifically, the investigation and resignation of Yermak to the arrest of Mogherini & co. However, they are probably independent from each other. After all, the last few years have seen quite severe blows to Ursula von der Leyen's and EU reputation (Pfizergate, Qatargate, etc.), yet - unfortunately - they are still standing and, I am afraid, they will not go down easily!
There is something never mentioned. Why ane how the witch got there. It was all about the German military industry, which is the one pushing for more war. How were the other governments and the Eurocrat parties convinced to vote for a corrupt bitch like this was all about bribery. In addition, the European Commission is atributing itself rights that it doesnt have. Its like the Council and the Court of Justice just disappeared. And this can only be the job of NATO. The German military industry, remember? NATO has effectively taken over the EU institutions and national governments. And how is NATO.controlled? Money.
NATO's primary objective is to secure the weapons market for the U.S. Military Industrial Complex.
***
Under Clinton, when the Cold war was over, Lockheed Martin's guy named Bruce P. Jackson (son of William Jackson, National Security Adviser under Eisenhower) spent millions of dollars on the committee for NATO expansion in order to push a bunch of Eastern European countries into NATO.
BTW, the same guy bankrolled the committee for the war in Iraq.
BTW, in April 2004 Ukraine signed the law allowing free access of NATO troops on its territory. And in 2017 NATO base already existed on the territory of Ukraine, even tho there was no formal membership. Russians don't care about formalities if one's trying to fool them. Bismarck's famous quote was right about that.
***
"Were the Soviet Union to sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean, the American military-industrial complex would have to remain, substantially unchanged, until some other adversary could be invented. "
My guess is they are both postcards from the now seemingly dominant Vance faction. The timing is unmistakably. The pictures of Witkoff and Kushner at the table with Putin says it all. Trump sent his personal delegation. No sleazy swamp critters, just sleazy Jared.
Corruption is the foundation of the "Anglo-American Oligarchy/Deep State/Jewish Mob" which was responsible for the elevation of people like Yermak and Mogherini to their positions of power. Think of the contempt you feel for EU leadership. How is it possible for a Nazi like Kallas to become the VP for the EU commission?
Think of it as "AIPAC for the EU".
May I recommend folks here pay more attention to Berletic and his revelations of corruption across SEA through Xinjiang? Follow it up with a heavy dose of Aaron Good and his revelations of the connections between Angleton and Lansky. Listen to Wilkerson explain how the "crazies in the basement" of the Pentagon turned on GHWB, allowing "limited hang outs" of corruption like the BCCI scandal which ultimately resulted in Bill Clinton winning where he was compromised by the Mossad Agent Lewinsky.
And these convolutions aren't even scratching the surface.
You all do not have enough imagination to understand how this works. You see billiard balls rolling around on a flat surface rather than marbles, BB pellets, rocks and boulders crashing down a mountain slope smashing the homes along the way. IOW, "It's complicated".
Back in the day when I was in charge of people, the conniving small minded backstabbing women were a running sore. Amongst the men you had your drunks and shysters but nothing was as much of a headache as the bloody women. Untrustworthy does not touch the sides, and in the main they were promoted on a numbers of game of some diversity-equality programme. It was like internal sabotage.
I do not know what happens to women when they get into a position of power but it is never good. Still, look how they run the nuclear family when they are not being beaten to a pulp by a monster partner, that is. There is one great female egregore, the Kore, who is a crone who puts on and takes off other female masks to suit the agenda, and there is only room for one of these in any outfit. Other powerful women are always lone wolves who have to quit hearth and home.
One of my favorite pearls of wisdom by a female-director was verbatim,"Yes, it was wrong. But you should have done it anyway." There is only a certain amount of BS I can take with a straight face, and then I'll say exactly what I think, come hell or high water:-)
I had some great female bosses and great male bosses but % of getting a shitty boss is higher if a female. Petty, thin-skinned, immature, incompetent, entitled...
I'd make the point that women have a harder time of it. Male social order is well-defined and competition is minimized by it. Forming pecking orders is built-in. Not so for women.
I only had once female boss and she was great. Recognized I could do the job and stayed out of my way. Always gave her fair warning if a project was about to blow up in our faces and we would mitigate fallout together.
And there are, as always, some exceptions. One of the best bosses I ever had in a STEM career, the least "political" and least arbitrary, was a headstrong woman who grew up in a red state in a mining area. She was a typical "liberal" on some social issues like abortion and whatnot, but she was fair and an excellent manager, and she was a uniting force. Not divisive. But yeah, she was childless.
Ruthless is the wrong word. It implies a disciplined focus on objectives. Women like Clinton are vengeful, spiteful, driven by emotion. Hegseth is a true member of the fairer sex.
If you check the pre-woke psychology studies, like the one below, you'll see that women on average have higher Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism scores than men. Simply speaking, they are easier indoctrinated and controlled. Also, higher on the victim hierarchy.
This makes them perfect choice for puppet political positions because they are generally easier to control. This is one of the reasons the deep state created and supported the whole "women in power" agenda..
idk why you discount millions of years of history just because we have a few thousand years of written history thats been perverted en masse in literature. I think pre polytheism we DID have a world DRASTICALLY reduced in conflict but progress and harmony are counterproductive to developing societies…
Muscles from Brussels is alright with Putin, from now on their National statue, a little fellow pissing uncompromised wil be honoured now with an eleventh golden finger.
As Russia emerges victorious from out of a vast fog of lying western propaganda the rest of the world shifts from being on the fence, to on Russia's side- because that is how it always goes. The winner takes so much more than 'victory' in the field. And that shift includes the US. Soon it will include fraying bits of europe too, rediscovering where they really belong- on the winning side, natch.
Elections will be held in former western Ukraine, and Ukraine will join the RF. There will be no need for any carve up angst or peace keepers, blah. Instead we will have a bonfire of the vanities, as in all those 'just and lasting piss plans.' Then there will come the truly bitter vicious reckoning for the old western european regime and what it has actually done with sheds loads of European dosh and debt.
Bits of europe will start choosing to quit the crumbling edifice of non entities that 'bought' them back along, and can no longer afford to make their 'membership' worth while. Russia can in due course look forward to welcoming back the East German people who are thoroughly disgusted with the West German regime.
This nasty unnecessary war which was just western cover for seizing control of Russian resources using dispensable slavs, will turn out to have been the gift of the century for Russia. Karma, as the Indians might say.
What sort of a brain dead imbecile does one have to be to think that Russia is wininng, when Ushakov and Vance both said in the last hours that a deal might be signed soon, i.e. Putin has capitulated, just as feared.
Without ever daring to fire a single shot in resistance...
I have seen it. But there were very good reasons behind them. Russia was not ready or confident enough. Things are clear now. Putin clearly has made mistakes, but overall has done well. A lot of people are looking at ww2 or ww1 as parallels for this war, but I think Putin is looking at Franco-Prussian war. Bismark declared the German Empire in Versailles and everyone applauded. I think this is what he wants to achieve in Ukraine. Take it(like Chechnya) and be appaluded for it. I live in Romania, I do understand the rotten state Russia was after communism. There simply were no institutions left, no systems, no state left to rule. People don't understand how bad the collapse actually was. Russia was not ready in 2014 for the SMO and even in 2022 it was unsure of a lot of things(mainly the economy and trade issues). This was never ww3, it was about avoiding ww3.
>But there were very good reasons behind them. Russia was not ready or confident enough.
You left out Gorbachev and the clique around him. But that is critical for understanding what happened.
Russia may not have been ready in 2014, but neither was Ukraine. Nobody can seriously claim a war then would have been more difficult than the current one. And even Putin himself has admitted that. The window of opportunity was characteristically missed.
And why was it missed? For the same reasons Gorbachev destroyed the USSR -- because a certain section of the Russian elites back then wanted to become the same kind of oligarchs that Western elites were, and for that to happen they had to dismantle the Soviet system because there was no place for rich people in that system. Those people were still in power in 2014, and in fact largely remain in power to this day. This is why Russia "wasn't ready" -- because the Russian elites didn't want to break off from the West. And it is also why there are still negotiations instead of missile launches. Which in turn is why I am so gloomy.
Also, whose job was it for Russia to be ready in 2014? It had only been known with certainty that a big war is coming since 1994, when the intention to expand NATO was first announced, and with absolute, 100% certainty by 1999, when Yugoslavia was attacked and after the US had started waging war on Russia through its Chechen proxies.
Remember that Stalin circa 1930 stoop up and said to the party that the country had a decade to make up the technological and industrial gap with the West, or it will be crushed in the coming big war. Then spent the 1930s doing precisely that. What did Putin do? He had more time and was starting from a much more favorable position.
Stalin was a great grand strategist and wartime leader, but a poor economic leader, not to mention ruthless autocrat. Famine happened because of incompetence and malice, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of dead , Stalin is responsible for. We live in a different world than Stalin did, who had a very rapidly expanding population. The communist economy as practiced in Europe and N Korea produces no wealth for the people, and is good only in ww2 style war. Such a war in an age of hypersonic missiles and nukes is imposible, as you yourself have said many times, since Russia can just rid itself of NATO in an afternoon. Putin doesn't rule Russia, he is at a head of a system of systems, that have to work well, while Russia is made up of many people. Some of those people will steal money, but also build a drone factory for the SMO, others are traitors(what was Stalin during the ww1?!), some are incompetent(Siversk commander), some are not good enough(Group of forces North commander), many are corrupt. It's very hard know which is which in a nation of 150 mil.
It turns out all your BS about your Russia gasoline crisis and refineries destruction was another pile of lies? Putin has capitulated? The Telegraph says Putin is in the driving seat. The UE is crumbling down before our eyes..The Ukranian Junta and fascist regime are sinking fast. And still everybody in the world got it wrong but you. I can only see an imbecile here and its you...
Yes, but GM is protected my Substack. I am being trolled in various chats and Substack logged me out while commenting on this troll shit. It signaled be Substack is strongly intervened and shapped. Ultimately they will get to shape a product for the critical thinkers. But by that time Substack will have become irrelevant and worthless.
He doesn’t have a piano, he has a HARPsick-ord. He plays Jew chords and scales. I’ve suggested to him that he should try one of Bach’s two-part inventions but he claims Bach was a Jew-lover because the second cousin of the Margrave of Brandenburg’s grandfather lived one street over from Jew Street, and furthermore the tempering on the modern piano was developed by Salieri who the Jew press unfavorably compared to what’s his name—the guy with all the “K” numbers—I forget his name…
Remember the whole Osama bin Laden exercising remote mind control over the Bush admin causing them to suicide America thing? Russia is fucking kryptonite to the west. The level of self-destructive hubris and total delusion is mind boggling. It’s as if the very existence of a force that dares push back even a little bit stoked a suicidal rage in the west, conjuring from a docile, defeated people a most fearsome resurrection. It’s incredible how fucking retarded the leaders of the west have been with Russia. We could have coasted on Breton woods for another century but controlling 75% of the world wasn’t enough so they have ruined us and we will ultimately have nothing.
They aren’t going to stop the suicide by cop. Contrast Putin’s demeanor with the prior seminal speeches. It used to be please don’t poke the bear, now it’s FAFO.
There was a pragmatic reason for this latest western war on Russia, loaded as western europe is with continent sinking debt without the real resources to back that debt. That was what it was all about. Everything else was just a veneer, like all western virtue signalling.
Specific individuals and their families, perhaps. And the Catholic Church hating the Orthodox. And the Poles hating the Slavs down to the level of the peasants who overthrew their false Russian Czar. Or the Lithuanians who hate how Russia ended their empire. Or the Swedes who hate how Russia ended their empire. Or the Brits who hate how Russia continue to threaten their empire. Or... Or... Or....
Plus the ESG regulation of commerce that the EU planned to contaminate supply chains with, leading to banks exercising full control over any trades item anywhere. A Russia unwilling to bow to that scheme is an existential threat to domination.
Just now watching Alex’s review….it looks realistically brutal.
"I have been converting his videos into texts lately"
I've been doing the same thing. Someone also gave me pointers on how to copy/paste a transcript (say, from YouTube) into DeepSeek and have it generate a "detailed summary with timestamps".
Speaking of DeepSeek, that's the difference between Chinese AI and US AI. China does something useful. The US uses it to target its perceived enemies. The former is much easier to program and learns more rapidly. The later will turn on you like Skynet did in "The Terminator".
Sorry, don't recall who or where I heard this from.
Thanks for that FM. It made me wonder whether the Belgian - Russian trade had something to do with Diamonds, as Russia is a big producer of the raw product, whilst Belgium was or still is a substantial producer of the finished (cut & polished) product.
Cry Havoc and let slip the dogs of war...
Yes. But these dogs come in many different breeds. Would not be surprised, seeing how afraid Belgium seems to be of Russia's reaction to VDL's "theft of the century" that it has been promised a very very special treatment. What can this be? Destroying Euroclear physically or through some cyber attack (note that Euroclear has a cyber hub employing 800 persons in Krakow, controlling most of the delicate IT infrastructure without which Europe capital markets would collapse - probably long infiltrated by the Russian security services)? Doing the same to the EU institutions - which would leave a nasty and perhaps radioactive hole in "Europe's capital" and also in the coffers of the Belgian state. The Grand Place is lovely but loosing the eurocrats would leave Belgium without much of its income and its last remaining raison d'être. Or, more prosaically, being exposed to some kompromat which would make the Becoming Brigitte story look like a kindergarden tale. Or a combination of all of the above.
Based on what you wrote the Russia reaction to the potential theft of assets would trigger a firestorm.
Uh the footage showed firestorm already.
"I have a team working day and night on it. It would be a great story: taking money from the wicked guy, Putin, and giving it to the good guy, Ukraine."
So those who destroyed Minsk agreements are good guys?
Blowing up Nordstream, built by Partners Germany and Russia, are good guys?
Those arming and paying Azov and Reich [sic] Sector, (despite or because of our neo-liberal/neocon credentials), are good guys?
If this is not pure and simple psychological projection name a better example!
Going to war for exaggerated reasons has long been the English way, to turn Russian's self defence into the cause of WW 3 will doom the enterprise.
And you run, and you run
To catch up with the sun, but it's sinking
And racing around
To come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way
But you're older
Shorter of breath
And one day closer to death
Every year is getting shorter
Never seem to find the time
Plans that either come to naught
Or half a page of scribbled lines
Hanging on in quiet desperation
Is the English way
The time is gone, the song is over
Thought I'd something more to say...
ah close to my heart. Spring 73' I'll see you on the dark side of the moon. You nailed my reference pretty quick. Impressive.
I was struck by just how apposite those lyrics are.
At some point one just feels like saying ‘ok just fuggin do it already, and suffer the consequences. But you just know they wont because deluded as they might be…..
Interesting if Putin threatened them. Well honestly what jury has convicted him? The jury of public opinion captured by the MSM.
A case can be made that NATO has paid Ukraine to murder Russians. Seems it's now legal to hire hit men.
I’ve said this often but Ukraine is an expendable battering ram. It’s clear that the EU member states consider them undermenschen and barely pretend to care about their wellbeing. USAns are just so profoundly ignorant of history and geography to say nothing of recent events that they simply wave a flag and make “fight for freedom” mouth noises on occassion. But it makes sense. Since the end of WW2 western Ukraine, Galicia has been a jumping off point for espionage and given the region’s alignment with the fourth Reich and the SS it’s a good fit. Add to that the massive army with all the soviet era fixins Ukraine possessed before the SMO. So yeah, hired….bribed, or maybe even staged 2 coups in 10 years culminating in 2014’s civil war? Well it turns out that the plan has failed even more spectacularly than anyone could have imagined. The entire EU is going down in flames.
Belgium was allowed to come into existance in order to deny first France & later, Germany quick access to the channel coast best suited for invading England. That reason is looking to be less meaningful now, Belgium may not be a "nation state" forever. Or even next month, depending.
----------
Preventing a Strong Continental Power: After the Napoleonic Wars, the Congress of Vienna (1815) created the United Kingdom of the Netherlands (which included present-day Belgium) as a strong buffer against future French expansion.
Buffer State: When the Belgians revolted in 1830, the major powers negotiated a settlement. Britain insisted on the creation of an independent and neutral Belgium to serve as a buffer zone. The primary concern at the time was to prevent France from annexing the territory and gaining control of the valuable Channel ports and coastline.
Guaranteeing Neutrality: The 1839 Treaty of London, signed by Britain, France, Prussia (part of the later Germany), Austria, and Russia, formally recognized Belgian independence and bound the new nation to perpetual neutrality. Britain guaranteed this neutrality, seeing it as essential to its own security interests and preventing any single major power from dominating the Continent.
Greasy waffle snarfing degenerate lijers!
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36489700
Perpetual neutrality seems like a more viable alternative for security than signing up for article 5 effete [sic} money making endeavours.
Cringes every time the coalition of the 'willing' state the right of Ukraine to join NATO.
At a certain point having sympathy for people who poke the bear will go out of fashion. One can hope.
The West make a big deal about freedom, democracy and elections. Yet our leaders sell out. After being corrupted they get the 'such a deal I got for you' pitch. Take the deal or die. Rest assured the death will not be dignified.
So you raise a massive topic, with some nice imagery.
The key seems to be knowing we have been deceived for a very long time. We need to search the world for authority that has not been corrupted. Who have kept their word and their oaths. Back them!
Would you vote for a murderous, evil, psychopathic liar? Then why should we obey one when their rule is so obviously been corrupted!
To stop voting seems mutinous, but to support genocidal maniacs is not gonna save the world. Without the voters they have no mandate. It is not an individual problem we face it is systemic. Boycott.
It never really was a nation state. It’s high time for an enlightened Velvet Divorce, the Flems joining the Netherlands and the Walloons, France. Brussels can become a city-statelet, like San Marino.
Of course, when you turn the whole of the western EUSSR into a Molenbeek, where every pavement is rammed with stabby Moroccans and Eritrean sex pests, it hardly matters where anyone draws the ‘national’ lines - which is, of course, the very reason Brussels/ the WEF/ Soros have done that.
BTW the ideology of Fascism started to form after the International Financial Conference in 1920 in Brussels, where the wealthiest capitalists/bankers discussed what to do with the rise of socialist movements across Europe and emergence of Soviet Russia as an alternative system:
youtu.be/7f_V9zZNzTY?t=508
***
So Fascism itself is reactionary by nature.
As a result of that Conference they came up with the set of policies called "Austerity" or, as they called it, "Pure economics" (now, doesn't that sound Fascist..) Simply speaking, "work hard, live hard, and save hard", higher taxes on everyday goods (like VAT) for the workers and lower taxes (like Income and wealth) for the rich. And, of course, Privatization of State assets.
In the 1930-40s, It was also supported by the Swiss so-called "Mont Perelin" Society headed by Friedrich Hayek, that gave Fascism the fancy name "Neoliberalism".
youtu.be/zswexNXorOE?t=193
The SMO can be likened to a Russian tractor plowing a field. The process isn’t fast, but it is unstoppable. Once the ground has been plowed, it cannot be unplowed. The stubble, grasshoppers, and field mice don’t get a vote, the field will be plowed.
The field mice are in denial of reality, having been misled by a toothless syphilitic old bulldog across the creek. They hold meetings with the bulldog and the 27 sheep in the next paddock about plans to stop the tractor. The old bull across the lake offers to sell them gadgets to stop the tractor, if the sheep will pay for it. The words fly and a lot of money appears and then vanishes. The Russian farmer takes little notice of this nonsense and the tractor rolls on.
An illustrated children’s book is in here. Better than Aesop’s fables.
Yes. Fables for children to learn how to survive a inevitably declining pimpocratic society!
This was an excerpt from the new version of animal farm, capitalism in decline.
It is growing corruption and an empire in decline. The two go together like peanut butter and jelly.
No matter. Our lives go on. The prepared will thrive and the undisciplined will demand that the corrupt empire-in-decline save them from what they voted for.
To paraphrase deToqueville; "When the voters figure out they can vote to rob themselves, they will rob themselves."
vote for? most eu governments rule with less than 20% of the actual voting pull
nothing more expensive than free stuff
Absolutely.
I am only referring to the US. And we have the same problem with most national elections.
I gotta ask; who don't like "free" stuff?
Brilliant!
A true classic.
Very good analogy.
Substack blocked my likes and comments and logged me out for commenting on GM intoxications. This chat is FLOODED with NATO trolls 😄
Fugg’em
GM is bad, yes
You missed that the tractor is driven by a beautiful Russian woman, Masa, and while she is plowing, the Russian folk song "Poljushka Polje" is constantly playing from the tractor's loudspeaker to drown out the squeaking of the plowed mice ! :)
Hahaha...
In my country when I plow my field a coyote follows the tractor gobbling up the field mice .
Very good Cheryl! I read that to my wife and she cracked up and asked me to send it to her so she can share with her friends... Chip
Wasn’t aware that FundOfLying also has syphilis, but it makes sense as it affects the brain and hers is clearly rotten
Hmm. You’ve got me wondering. That nose of hers… Could be First Stage. It would explain a lot.
"a toothless syphilitic old bulldog across the creek" is the perfidious Albion.
Somehow, the UK has menaged to sequester almost all its honorable people and put the "toothless syphilitic" kind (Starmer, Johnson, Arbuthnots, Blairs, et al.) in charge.
I cannot disagree
Across the creek, the Dnieper? So the syphilitic fool would be...
Correct. Besides the English canine reference, the channel is not a wide body of water, fit people can swim across it. Also referred to in slang as 'the ditch', although stream sounds more attractive. As for toothless, their army could not fill a football stadium (and also English dentistry).
That’s rather well put. Like one of those ancient fables of timeless wisdom.
Perfect description.
Brilliant . The SMO has become an avalanche and its burying everything in its path .
I don't think so. It is way more complicated. It is more like 2 teams of farmers used to plow a field together. Globalist farmers told them they were doing everything wrong. Only their corporate farmers are allowed to plow fields. So they convinced one of the farmer teams to join their corporate plow structure. This structure allows the corporation leaders to create a giant money stream stealing from all the farmers under their control to buy weapons to push the recalcitrinte farmers that didn't want to join their team off their fields. A few members of the new corporate team farmers get to siphon off some of the money stream getting wealthier and more powerful. The old members of the corporation farm get their take from the money stream as always. They get even wealthier and more powerful. The little farmers in the corporate countries get poorer and less powerful. The little farmers in the new corporate farm get sent to drive the recalcitrinte farmers they used to work with off the lands. The recalcitrinte farmers are pissed off and start kicking their asses. The corporate farmers scream it isn't fair and plot new ways to send more of the little farmers in the corporate farm structure to fight the recalcitrinte farmers. The most important thing is the grift must continue. If the recalcitrinte farmers prove too tough on these lands there is always Venezuela
"Blows" lol. Vivid imagery.
I find your Simplicius analyses of Ukraine war the most credible and valuable of all . Thank you . @Tony Kevin.
Read my books. NATO = total losers ❤️🇷🇺❤️🇷🇺❤️🇷🇺🤙🏻🤙🏻🤙🏻
So what is the endgame here?
Let's say they steal the $200B, or even $300B. Most likely the Russians will do nothing and this will be yet another empty threat, following the usual principle that past behavior (in this case cucking) is the best predictor of future behavior (more cucking).
But there are limits to everything, as Karaganov said a few weeks ago.
And there are limits to how far that money will go too. Between the double digit percentage that will be siphoned off through various schemes, the absurdly inflated costs of Western weapons, and what the Russians blow up, it will prolong the war, but not defeat Russia. And then we will be in the same situation but with no more Russian money to steal.
Then Europe will have to go in directly. And surely that must be understood if not in the EU part of Brussels, then certainly in the NATO HQ.
And then the nukes fly, and it's all over quickly, as Putin said.
Which also has to be well understood by everyone. These people may be corrupt and the public faces stupid too, but those behind the scenes who actually pull the strings are not stupid.
So again, what is the end game?
1) A bet on Russian elites selling out the country once again as they did in the 1980s, this time truly terminally? It has been a good bet so far, but the situation never came close to truly critical.
2) They have some military-technical plan in the works to neutralize Russian strategic weapons.
If the latter is the case, Russia has to strike now, before it is too late. If it's the first scenario, and the Western plan is to take things to the brink and bet on traitors in the Kremlin folding once again, then it again makes sense to strike first.
What absolutely does not make sense is negotiations with the Americans, unless those negotiations are for how the US will stay out of it. But the US cannot stay out of it, because Russia nuking Europe means the US loses the Middle East too...
That will be quite a short war
Europe is not even dreaming of military confrontation with Russia. The peoples would not accept any such thing.
I don't know where are you from. I am European and know some big European countries decently well.
If someone would be stupid enough to try and send the troops against Russia, the answer would be a fallen government the day after. It would be one of the shortest wars in history.
France's resistance in 1939 would be an example of resilience in comparison.
Yes the Europeans are still dreaming of war. My guess is that they will try to make it happen in 2026. I hope I’m wrong!
Yes, they seem to be dreaming of it. They seem.
They cannot stop talking about it. No, they cannot.
"If they believe what they say... " No, they do not.
Some generals are trying to display some bravado. Yes, they do. May be to impress their wives.
As to "fallen governments": what I suppose would happen.
1. Huge violent riots in European capitals. Many police forces siding with the people.
2. Masses of men and women trying to leave the warring countries into neutral ones. Several millions cars waiting to cross the Swiss or Hungarian border.
3. Million of non European inmigrants stating that this is not their war.
That France, for instance, may be at war with Russia, but Algeria is not. Millions declare to be Algerian and demand free passage to their country. Moroccans in France pretending to be Algerians and flee with them.
Millions of Turks in Germany waiting for instructions from Erdogan, etc.
4. Votes of no confidence in parliaments, with practically everyone voting against the governments. Macron has a acceptance index closer to 10% than to 20%.
Now, imagine that he starts a war and asks males born in the year XYZZ to present themselves in the nearest recruitment centre. A joke.
In a few words, one of the shortest wars in history.
I repeat my prognosis: French resistance in 1939
would be an example of heroic virtue compared to what would happen now.
Not much "Aryan Hingabe" in Germany's youth either.
European leaders know that.
They want tension to increase explain the increase of the military budgets, so that they can rob blank the taxpayers. They can also use "Russian disinformation" to introduce censorship and increase repression.
This is the nature of their game.
In one thing you are absolutely right. This brinkmanship game is very dangerous because even if no leader, Russian, American or European, wants a general war it might still happen.
One thing is not to start rioting in Paris or Rome, because the Palestinians are being slaughtered, and other, very different the reaction, when some young French or Italian receives a nice little letter announcing that he will be most probably killed a couple of months after finishing a short period of
training.
Unless refusal to be conscripted is punished by a court martial and an immediate shooting sentence, no Western European country could fight Russia for more than a month. Standing armies are to small and even prison sentences would not make people accept mobilisation.
It is natural for cats to look at stupid, oafish, grasping humans and to feel contempt.
Luiz,
Europe does not have the logistics to wage war on Russia for anything beyond a week or two . The call for war is coming from those who own Rheinmetall and military manufacturing assets or are funded by them . The rise in their valuations along with the AI bubble is pretty much all the action in the market. The world economy is fuelled by increasing debt and in the longer term that's disaster . Europe has no cheap energy or resources and that will force them to blow up or shut down . Events are speeding up and desperation is now becoming obvious .
Never forget how "Civilized" European Oligarchy threw millions of their own working Class citizens into the WW1,2 meat grinders, and this is exactly how the term "Cannon fodder" was coined.
***
youtube.com/watch?v=rIB4e8AfPcM
youtube.com/shorts/RdbTIEqcScQ
Trying to force the current generation into a fight will be about as easy as stuffin a warm butter bar up a wildcats ass….
Of course europeans cannot fight. The plan is to get Americans to do thr fighting for them.
Yeah no, that aint gonna happen.
Thank Fuck for that!
The conquerors of Vietnam and Afghanistan will teach those Commies a thing or two!
Or even if refrigerated…..
Yours is not the real story.
European authorities did not send the working class citizens to the front.
They sent the whole nation. The sons of the bourgeoisie and aristocracy were not excepted from military service.
Bush junior belonged to the first US generation that was ready to see less fortunate Americans do all the fighting in a great war.
Mine?
***
"When the rich make war, it’s the poor that die."
– Jean-Paul Sartre
Jean Paul Sartre lived in Paris under German occupation and had quite comfortable relations with the Wehrmacht's command. He was a pocket communist and had to say things like that.
But you are right. It is not an original idea of yours.
It is just not accurate.
I repeat. Even sons of millionaires like JF Kennedy and Bush senior fought in the war, not to speak of the German and British aristocracies.
Luis. It's like the millionaires giving up their seats on lifeboats on the Titanic.
In the past there was a concept of Noblesse Oblige.
Nowadays not so much.
It’s fine for these gilded technocrats to beat the drums of war for the younger generation to dance to, but it becomes challenging to actualize when there is not actual army of any meaningful size of capability to do the fuggin fighting.
Europeans are world class wimps. Europeans, however, are confident that the United States will again ride to the rescue rather than leave europe hanging out to dry.
Sabre rattling only. We couldn't put enough troops in to the field to be more than a speed bump to the Russian army. We have no experience of fighting a drone war and we're too arrogant to ask the Ukrainians.
Our airforces aren't equipped for attritional warfare, or facing top level AAA.
And we can't afford to build a defence industry that could threaten Russia conventionally.
Even if we could, can you imagine how inept an EU army would be? 27 chiefs and direction by Kallas and Von Der Leyen.
I think end game is China Russia and USA partner up and ditch psycho Europeans. At least under Trump. US needs Russia and China to save it's ass financially and they are more than happy to placate the monkey with hand grenade (nukes) from failing.
Well neocons will just have to come to their senses and go multipolar. There is no sense in nuclear holocaust. There is sense in exploiting the arctic with Russia and China investing in America. I remain an optimist. Anything else is too depressing.
Unfortunately the US is run by lunatics and racists who will never agree to taking a back seat to what they firmly believe are "lesser" beings. On the other hand Canada has much more Arctic territory with more useful resources, and would probably be a better bet.
Can you explain this "racism" you see?
Many if not most of the elites believe Western European whites are inherently superior to Asians, Africans, Native Americans, Aborigines, Arabs, Slavs, and any other group you can name because they're somehow the "chosen people". It means nothing to them that there is no evidence, they (currently) have the money and the power so that makes them correct in their minds.
ziocons will never come to their senses -- that would be against their deeply-ingrained indoctrination in supremacist lunacy and sadistic hatred of "others."
zionism / judaism must be banned worldwide.
solve the jew problem and europe will solve its problems...
zionism is jewish fascism and must be banned worldwide - preferably along with the anti-human judaism (tora/talmud) teachings
All Jew teachings must be banned.
US cannot ditch Europe
Even if useless on its own, Europe is the logistics base for both Israel and US control of the Middle East
Hope so. Have on you the antacids
First, the US made sure euroslaves have no energy to power their industry by destroying the Nordstream pipeline, and now.. they will sell them their LNG and weapons x6 the price..
youtube.com/watch?v=lpf6ZeABP1I&t=1334s
***
5% of GDP for daddy NATO aka Uncle Scam! "Protection Racket" at its finest..
FWIW: "Israel" is suppose to have a plan to decamp to Argentina. While far-fetched, recall that the Coleone family left NYC for Las Vegas. There are now dozens of pundits who have declared that Israeli society is falling apart. Sachs was reporting on such events just this morning. (12/5/25) I want to be clear, he was not talking about Argentina, merely that Israel is about to consume itself.
So, no Israel, no need to stay in Europe.
There are other even more fantasmic possibilities. Unfortunately, none seem to offer hope of destruction of the "Anglo-American Oligarchy/Deep State/Jewish Mob". Rather it seems predicted to become even more entrenched.
A "partnership between Russia, China and the USA"? No way.
Argentina has little oil and controls no trade routes.
Israel was put where it is because the Middle East is where the oil is while sitting on the intersection of Europe, Africa and Asia.
P.S. There is a reasonable argument to be made that ancient Canaanites spawned what later became Jews to a large degree because of that crossroads between everyone factor.
"israel" was "put there" by jew terrorists who believe in their stupid volcano demon forskin for land books....
citation? : "reasonable argument to be made that ancient Canaanites spawned what later became Jews to"
Metastasizing is strategy.
I forgot to mention -- Argentina is one of the least likely to get nuked places...
Wow! Can't believe I'm upvoting you😁. You do have a rational side after all.
Cheers.
The best propagandists always post a significant percentage of facts and truths that are agreeable to the majority, to give themselves an aura of objectivity and respectability. If every single thing they said was provably false garbage, they wouldn't be able to get any "upvote" respect whatsoever.
Argentina had the largest jewish pimping organization that prospered for almost a century. They do not teach about Zvi Migdal at their whining holo-museums.
“Zvi Migdal was a large powerful prostitution cartel established and owned by Jewish immigrants from Poland. ... it was one of the largest networks in the South America, with branches and connections in Shanghai, Johannesburg, Rio de Janeiro, and many other places. At the peak of their activity they had tens of thousands of women working for them, some 2,000 brothels...
The cartel had an original marketing tactic: every once in a while a polite Jewish gentleman used to come to the Jewish communities in Eastern Europe and spread ads calling “Jewish girls from good homes” offering either jobs at homes of rich Jews in Buenos Aires, or marriage.
While still on the ship to Argentina, the girls were locked, beaten, raped and starved, which the Jewish pimps referred to as their “re-education”. Landing in Buenos Aires they were herded to a house where they had to undress and be inspected by pimps, who sold them in auctions as sex slaves."
"The number one weapon of 20th century imperialism is Zionist dollarism, and one of the main bases for this weapon is Zionist Israel. The ever-scheming European Imperialists wisely placed Israel where she could geographically divide the Arab world, infiltrate and sow the seed of dissension among African leaders and also divide the Africans against the Asians."
-Malcolm X, after visiting Gaza in 1964
***
One should think of Israel as the biggest of 800+ overseas U.S. military bases, "Unsinkable ? carrier", created to control (bomb) this whole oil-rich region.
Especially the Suez Canal and the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil transit chokepoint.
***
youtu.be/tOfXpW5lSMM?t=93
youtube.com/shorts/A-WThZHZpEw
youtube.com/watch?v=mVVtDd9c94c
***
It allows Western Imperialist Oligarchy to control the Oil prices and maintain the hegemony of PETRODOLLAR.
rumble.com/v6tuvs5-explained-how-the-petrodollar-rules-the-world.html
the jew, like rats, will always move around to survive - they key is to make sure they never again have home base and have to wander forever....
I'm not sure that rats migrate. Were you thinking of wildebeest or Reindeer?
How did they get to wake island ? Rats not Jews in this case.
Also I said move around. Migration suggests return
Oy veh… Lucky Argentinians: they’d better start arming themselves, getting organised and digging bomb-shelters. As soon as they have a foothold in Buenos Aires, I expect Herzog, Ben Gvir and Meilkowsky will demand the Falkland Islands and South Georgia (having found a previously undiscovered book of the Talmud that promised them to the Children of Israel); and ‘Sir' Queer Starmer and ‘Lord’ Hermer will be only to happy to hand them over, plus £80bn or so in compensation for not having done so earlier.
once again, the jew problem - remove that illegal jew HQ in occupied palestine and most problems go away...
No. The nomadic tribe can't help itself but preach supremacist lunacy and tribal cohesion. Think of their dishonorable teachings (Kol Nidre) and celebrations of sadism and genocide (purim).
Only a ban on the judaic education, zionism in particular, can alleviate the problem.
Voltaire about jews: they are "ignorant and barbarous people united by the most sordid avarice with the most detestable superstition and the most invincible hatred for every people by whom they are tolerated and enriched. ... I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race."
Thanks for keeping it short.
There was a little war that Israel ran that the Euros refused US to fly through their air space..... hint it was followed by a big oil embargo for those too young to remember.
US has depots in EU for saving chihuahuas.
I don't think that's remotely likely.
The US doesn't do partnerships, they have to be the boss.
Neither China, nor Russia will accept that.
The Europeans and USA will stay shackled together, because the US likes having vassals.
Add to that that the Americans are demonstrably incapable of dealing with other countries in good faith, and there's no way the US could be involved in a multi-state cooperative effort.
And Euros apparently enjoy being vassals. That way they can avoid any responsibility for agency. "We can't do nuthin', we're just vassals of that big bad guy across the Pond".
Thatguy. I wish that was true, but they insist on speechifying and bloviating as if they mattered.
Europeans are property of banking cartel.
"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” — Gutle Schnaper Rothschild, Mayer Amschel Rothschild's wife
Upvoted, but would like to see a reliable source for that quote.
Don't hold your breath.
The US is certainly not gonna squeeze anything out of moribund Europe, they have little in the way of natural resources, their industries are in the toilet, and they're fiscally close to bankrupt. The UK, France, and Germany are in a race to the bottom to see which can be first to achieve third world status, if they can't right the ship, they're citizens will start finding Moldova more attractive.
I think the best combo is US, Russia, India on one side and China on the other. Nice balance.
GM
<<<<<Most likely the Russians will do nothing and this will be yet another empty threat, <<<<<
Russia doesn't have to *do* anything. They will simply take their clearly winning case to a court somewhere (Singapore?) and get a judgement against the E.U. steal operation. If the E.U. ignores the judgement (and Ursula is bringing in legislation to make it possible to ignore international judgements they don't like) then the holders of the forty four *trillion* dollars on deposit with Euroclear and central banks that backstop the E.U.'s role in the global financial system will be pulled out of Europe as depositors act to save themselves.
The entire E.U. financial system that supports their economy will collapse and the E.U. enterprise will disappear for all eternity. (taking small countries heavily dependent on the participation in the E.U. financial system with it)
It ain't going to happen no matter how hard Ursula and Kallas try to get around existing unanimous consent provisions protecting individual countries in the E.U. from blatant reckless disregard of international law.
The rest of your comment is just your usual thirsting for all out nuclear war.
The very notion of an international court is laughable when it comes to conflict on this level.
Because there is no eforcement mechanism
It's the same story with US debt -- who is going to collect on it and how? The West collects on itts debts by bombing countries, which is ultimately the only way to force a non-compliant debtor to pay. Who is going to do the same to them?
Which has stopped the drones and missiles flying into Russia how?
GM
Actually there are enforcement measures. Plenty of them. Europe has assets all over the world that could be seized to settle any judgement.
But aside from that, Europe can't walk away from the Western global financial system like Russia did. They aren't self sufficient and in possession of all manner of things that much of the world depends on as is the case with Russia.
Russia can and, according to the Europeans, is disrupting the entire world. What can Europe do except talk about how every one should watch what they will be able to do in about ten years or so?
Even taking that statement as granted, what court will order this seizure you speak of?
Try not to make to big of a fool yourself just be trying to push a phony argument.
The drones and missiles flying into Russia are an anecdote. Nothing of real strategic consequence because they are extremely limited.
>The drones and missiles flying into Russia are an anecdote.
Over 100 of those fly into Russia every single day. An anecdote indeed.
And a remarkable success of the "demilitarization" goals Putin declared four years ago.
look how the jew controlled "west" reacted when iran flew a few missiles and drones into their illegal HQ in occupied palestine....
GM
Precisely 10 civilians killed is a tragedy be it in Ukraine or Russia, but this number is not much above the number of people killed in traffic accidents. Something to be regretted, but not a rational motive to alter the conduit of the war.
I am not one in the ranks of those who are in favour of the destruction of the Ukrainian State, hoping that peace and reconciliation are still possible.
If not, the fact is that the US is now clearly begging Moscow to please stop advancing.
Threats of secondary sanctions have produced the recent visit of Putin to India and counter sanctions by China.
A completely different situation from the one that existed in 2022, when the Western talk was about the imminent collapse of the Russian economy, the omnipotent
economic and military weapons of the West and how the 2023 Ukrainian offensive would
expell the Russians from Crimea.
Right. People in Ukraine are also humans.
Yes, people often don't understand how thinly capitalized many investment banks (which today means pretty much all major banks) really are.
I think that even if they don't go to court somewhere - countries will start to withdraw their cash from European banks if they steal the Russian money. I'm sure they can find other places for their money somewhere.
how many European factories are in russia that immediately become russian?
AI: "studies from 2023-2025 show over 100 EU firms operating, with some reports highlighting hundreds of major EU/G7 companies with subsidiaries..."
You are avoiding the hard part in the comment that you answer to, as usual.
Other mass amounts of money will flee the EU, that's the crucial part and the consequences are beyond what 'old Europe' will be able to handle.
How does that help Russia in any way?
Is it going to stop the drones and missiles from flying deep into Russia?
One of the skyscrapers in Grozny just had a 9/11-type accdient a couple hours ago. But these aren't the firecracker drones that flew into Moscow City buildings in 2023, they carry 50-100 kg explosives, i.e. they are proper cruise missiles now. And the results is that you have a lot of the previously shiny brand new building in very bad state now.
Which is starting to become a bit of a problem, because the Chechens are the type of people who only respect strength and power, and Russian rule there rests on the perception of such established after the Second Chechen War, thus pathetic displays of humiliating weakness such as not allowing such strikes all the way to Grozny will not be accepted without much of a fuss there the same way it is by the regular Russians, beaten into submission by four decades of Perestroika.
And that is precisely why this strike was carried out. More will follow.
Again, how is Euroclear going bust going to stop such strikes? And how is Euroclear even going to go bust if everyone diligently gets in line after Russia has been destroyed?
This what you idiots don't understand -- money does not matter in the real world, it's just symbols on screens. Real physical power does. Money comes secondary.
Yep: in terms of industrial power and fighting capability, the EU vs Russia is as much of a mismatch as TF Rutte vs Artur Beterbiev.
And FWIW, I’d pay more to watch that than Jake Paul v Anthony Joshua.
I suppose Russia will benefit from not having their money stolen and maybe eventually use that money for more air defense.
But I think it's not so much a help for Russia but definitely a loss for Europe.
And that’s why even if they steal the money it will not stop the war or change its trajectory in any way. Are the Chechens are going to rebel against Russia because Ukraine is bombing their high rises? What kind of leader do you think they will install if they were to depose Putin?
GM
Uhhh.....did you catch the part where the money is being stolen for the purpose of funding those missiles, drones etc. that you refer to? (as well as pay the soldiers) Not that your tiny number of such strikes make much difference anyway.
No stolen money equals no money for anything except cheap, short range drones and then not enough of them to compete with the Russians.
Money might be stolen, but the missiles and drones hitting Russian factories and infrastructure are very much real
Ron, don't waste your time on the troll. It has had explanations laid out to it repeatedly over the years. An intelligent person would have understood. But never will a troll. It's here to clog the discussion and spread FUD.
just had a 9/11-type accident - yes, the jew blew both up. dancing Israelis.
" You idiots don't understand this " Really ? Then teach us Master ! :) Since part of your tirade is about Chechens, I would like to ask, have you ever seen a living Chechen in your life? Or rather, have you seen a bearded, funny man in some Hollywood movie who was quite afraid even of the mafia ! I especially like the way you talk about the Russians, as if you were someone who had lived in Russia for fifty years and who perfectly understood the soul of the Russian people ! :) Well, I would like to note that when it comes to the Russians, I rather keep in mind the opinions of people who were not like you, an anonymous GM logo nobody, but like Messrs. Metternich, Bismarck and Talleyrand, whose opinions were unanimously the same, it's better not to mess with the Russians, because it always ended in a Russian occupation ! As for the recurring powerful oligarchs in the Kremlin living in your fantasy, who you think have such power that they can remove Putin from his throne at any time, well, dream on, princess ! :) As if you forgot the nuanced detail that Putin was an active KGB officer (was and is and will be !), who is not a living dead autopen president, not a real estate swindler whose talent is exhausted in trickery, but a fluent speaker of several languages ( I think this is a concept largely unknown in the USA :) ) and when he speaks, it contains remarkable facts, legally supported, and if he promises something, it will be kept at a fair price !
"if he promises something, it will be kept at a fair price !"
-- This is what the zionized western "deciders" can't wrap their heads around.
Don't forget Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery: "The first rule in the Book of War is 'Don't march on Russia!'
"One of the skyscrapers in Grozny just had a 9/11-type accdient a couple hours ago."
False hyperbole. The skyscraper had damage to a few floors but it DID NOT collapse into its own footprint at freefall acceleration.
Yeah, but that's only because the Mossad is rather pre-occupied with more important matters these days.
GM how does that help Russia?
It will weaken the economies of countries who have declared themselves Russia's enemies thereby reducing their ability to purchase armaments to threaten Russia. QED.
Pure idiocy.
Nobody in this kind of situation cares about "the economy".
What matters is whether the weapons physically exist and whether the delivery means to launch them into Russia exist.
And inversely, from a Russian perspective, what should matter is destroying the capability of the other side to produce and launch weapons
Which should be done Before its own capacity to inflict that destruction is reduced by constant unanswered strikes.
"Is it going to stop the drones and missiles from flying deep into Russia?" No, but Mr. Oreshnik and his friends will.
“Will”. In some indefinite future, i.e. never.
Where will that money flee to?
In my case towards China led projects, Asia in any case generally. Maybe some into Africa based endeavors but then there is India with promising prospects. Relative big players like European pensionfonds are already using small steps to sneak away from Black Rock bubbles since concentrating capital on that scale produces a conflict of interests especially with the tendency to monopolizing and looting the rest - unhealthy and unsustainable.
If the cake is not growing with the tempo that your claimed piece is growing, you ask for trouble economically since there is a certain wisdom in Henry Ford's words: 'cars are not buying cars'
I don't think you understand. Nobody is going to start depositing those kinds of sums in Indian (or whatever) banks unless forced to.
Yeah, the U.S. could use old Henry for Treasury Secretary, pronto.
The drones hitting Russia are mosquitos in the grand scheme of things. Totally meaningless as they attack soft targets which do nothing to slow the progress of the war. They are for PR only and the more they do hurt the civilian population the more recruitment numbers increase. What war has ever been won by terrorism?
How would Putin put a stop to it exactly?
Two options:
1) Physical prevention -- he nukes Europe and all US bases in Eurasia, so that there is nobody and nowhere to launch stuff from. Then he finishes Ukraine at his leusire
2) Direct deterrence enforcement -- he starts an extermination campaign against the Western oligarchy with conventional precision strikes so that they back off, on a reciprocal-plus basis, i.e. for every Russian civilian casualty, two members of the Western elite die the next day. That means drones and missiles at the oligarchy's residences, i.e. the key billionaires, including and especially those that most people have not even heard of, but pull the strings from behind the scenes. Perhaps some small tactical nukes at some remote mansions and bunkers will be needed too, because they are large/difficult objects and can't be taken out with single 500-kg warheads.
P.S. Putin did in fact promise to do something like 2), on the very day he launched the SMO. He promises strikes on "decision-making centers" if they interfere. Well, they interfered, he did nothing. Which is why he repeated that phrase a couple more times in 2022, then stopped mentioning it at all.
Those may have been acts of terror but they were strategic and devastating. Bombing an apartment building or an oil refinery does nothing to slow the war’s inevitable progression so it cannot be strategic. Putin knows that the public must not waver in its support for the achievement of the defeat of the anglozionist proxy. These pinpricks further that goal. We are talking about the existence of their culture and civilization. Collateral damage in defending that is unfortunately acceptable… And how exactly will Russia stop these pinpricks launched from within Russia? The sleeper cells are already there and equipped. Even if Russia nuked Ukraine into total oblivion the terrorist attacks will continue for a while. These are improvised drones not storm shadows. They are directed by the west anyway and short of total capitulation by Russia (which will never happen) the west will continue to terrorize. They have no other option. They have already been defeated morally. The rest of the process of total defeat inevitably follows.
"It boggles the mind that people on this forum who recognize how insane Russia would be to send drones into Miami see nothing wrong with the US doing that to Russia."
It is not that we see nothing wrong. The US has plausible deniability - very few in the west believe the US is directly attacking Russia. Any response by Russia directly against the west would, I think, swing public opinion in the West very strongly towards all out war. Exactly what the nut-jobs in power are desperate for.
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
Mujahideen, Contras, ISIS, Al-CIAda, Boko Haram…
***
"The Muslim terrorist apparatus was created by US intelligence as a Geopolitical weapon"
-Zbigniew Brzeziński, interview with Le Nouvele Observateur, published 15-21 Jan 1998
youtube.com/watch?v=wtwwk5cuOvU
***
"Al-Qaeda is on our side in Syria"
-Jake Sullivan, US National Security advisor, to Hillary Clinton, 2012-02-12
youtu.be/D8pZgwOdIuA?t=494
***
CIA training Syrian "rebels" to fight against Assad, CBS, 2013:
youtube.com/watch?v=vqyqrLePwns
One man's cat is another man's dog. And vice versa. What is the meaning of all this? I don't KNOW!
Scene from classic cultural film PeeWee's Big Adventure....
https://youtu.be/VY9t7TTQHiE?si=QRW7ssXWF4bajsSt
"You're either with us or with the terrorists"
-George W. Bush
youtube.com/watch?v=zjf-WDGflLo
I am sure the people wounded and killed in those strikes share your dismissive attitude and are immensley thankful to Putin for being wise and restrained and not having put an immedaite permanent stop to such attacks, which he can do within an hour of finding the courage and integrity to issue the relevant orders.
So your solution is to escalate the war against a nuclear-armed irrational enemy who is in the midst of a civilizational suicide? Right that will definitely reduce the number of Russians killed by the west.
Europe is not nuclear armed.
You wipe out everything east of Lille (i.e. you don't touch France and the UK, unless you are sure you can disable them completely, in which case you do wipe them out too), you move in with ground forces, finish off the survivors, that territory becomes Russia from here on permanently, NATO has been pushed back 2,000 km, and nothing will be flying into Russia proper anymore.
And nobody will dare fire a single shot back because nobody will sacrifice Boston, NYC, DC, LA and SF just to retaliate over what no longer exists.
the jew fights all wars via terrorism. dresden nagasaki, hiroshima palestine....
They are doing it to themselves. Russia doesn’t have to bomb them, these morons have already sent all their munitions and tanks to Ukraine to be destroyed. Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake.
>these morons have already sent all their munitions
Is that why the attacks on Russia contnuously intensify?
Because Europe is out of munitions? Where are the drones and missiles coming from then?
A few drones fired at nonmilitary targets will not change the trajectory of the war. I shouldn’t have to say this 100 times.
Then why is Russia not flying Gerans into Europe and the US to strike refineries and chemical plants there if it is no big deal?
…”a few drones” is a grave underestimation. It hurts Russia. And kills people. What would happen if the same occured in Toulon?
I’m not sure that’s the way things work when two opponents face each other. The national resentment built up over such attacks tends, I think, toward eventual massive retaliation. At some point the retaliation will be nuclear (as GM has correctly pointed out here).
The enforcement mechanism is a. The Russian military and b. V. Putin.
The very notion of you stop lying is laughable
That’s a fair point. Using the British Army violently to enforce the Khedive’s gigantic debt to the Rothschilds is how London ended up controlling Egypt, the Suez Canal, the Gulf, Aden and the Sudan.
The enforcement mechanism has already been noted: " the holders of the forty four *trillion* dollars on deposit with Euroclear and central banks that backstop the E.U.'s role in the global financial system will be pulled out of Europe as depositors act to save themselves." The U.S. is a different proposition altogether, which is why other countries are reducing their U.S. treasury holdings. If the U.S. should ever default, that would spell the end of the primacy and privileges of the U.S. dollar regime.
GM would have more credibility if her pussy was in a donbas trench. Her prowess will no doubt impress the fighting men. Instead she sits here vying for attention because being ignored in life can we not be tolerated for so long.
If Putin was to fly the hammer and sickle flag, I would be signing up quickly.
But he flies a flag that Vlasovites used...
I’m not afraid to fight, it’s just that I have these new pants on and I don’t want to ruin them
Ah ha. GM shows his colors
He has shown them before. He reveres Stalin and the USSR. He wants the world to tremble before their military might.
Yes. The West is about to find a miraculous way for neutralising the Russian strategic systems.
One of the most absurd comments in the past years of conflict.
On a par with von der Leyen's washing machines and "Russians fighting with shovels" analysis.
Nothing if not consistent this GM thingy….its our job to pile on the ridicule….Avast!!
You can, but honestly it gets boring after a while.
Indeed it can…I generally skip over those comments
What court? Anyway, europeans will simply ignore any judgement that they do not like.
Law is meaningless. Enforcement is the only thing that matters.
Anyway, we go through this song and dance routine every few months. There may be a few more twists and turns, a few polite fictions and fudges, but one way or the other, the money will be found.
There is no endgame for Europe. They are incapable of any strategic thought, only graft. They want to steal the money and keep the music playing for one more song. When it stops there will be no seat for them, and to borrow a phrase, what would they care about a world without them? They burn their own countries to the ground and lord over the ashes.
the jew cares not what happens to the white goy. SOLVE THE JEW PROBLEM
Not sure that solving the Jew problem would find you a girlfriend mate?
Can you not see the Jew problem ?
It’s implied but yeah
I listened to professor Popov talk about the US missile defense. Very technical, and detailed presentation on the imposibility of intercepting ICBMs. Not even 1 can be intercepted. It is all a grift and marketing nonsense. The US has the same means as Russia, to neutralize Russian strategic assets: intercepting ICBM warheads with their cities. The only thing the russians would be scared of , is that the elites in power would think that's a good idea. Honestly, Biden seemed more capable of such thinking than anybody else. The russians will continue to talk with americans just as ths Vietnamese and Taliban did as well. The russians haven't recreated SMASH(in every division midn you) and war tribunals to end this war in negotiations. If ever the ukranians were actually ready to accept Istanbul+ they would soon find the terms a lot harsher than what was presented in the media.
People are forgetting recently Putin has been talking of Novorussia and expanding the buffer zones. Other officials have discussed a 150 km buffer radiating zone from 4 oblasts, that's 60% of Ukraine. This is happening because moves are being made to accept Istanbull+, which means the russians will have to present the actual terms they want: the detaills of what demilitarization, denuclearization and denazification mean, terms so harsh that Versailles will seem a slap on the wrist. The russians will lose support if they present their actual demands, which is why they are playing this game.
>The only thing the russians would be scared of , is that the elites in power would think that's a good idea
Yes, which is why the current cuckery is so completely unacceptable.
It does you absolutely no good if you have a guaranteed second-strike capability if the other side still launches a first strike.
The purpose of the second strike is not to retaliate over the first strike, it is to prevent it in the first place.
If the other side still gets it in their heads that they can attack first, it has all catastrophically failed.
Thus absolutely no display of pathetic weakness should be permissible, and no doubt whatsoever should exist in anyone's mind that the nukes will fly immediately and in full force to where they need to go and no salami slicing will be allowed.
The General Staff have been telling Putin this for many years, and yet here we are.
> recently Putin has been talking of Novorussia and expanding the buffer zones.
And yet at the same time Ushakov has been talking about a deal being close to be reached, Dmitriev is the chief negotiator, and Putin meets for five hours with Witkoff and Kushner.
And there is no serious mobilization still to this day.
None of which suggests real seriousness about Novorossiya or the buffer zone.
Dimitriec isn't a negotiator. He is a PR mechanism. Putin talking for 5 hours with non-negotiatoros about BS is not wasted time, it's PR. If there is a need for a mobilization it will be done;when it was first ordered in 2022, they didn't even know if it would work. Today they know the systems work, stuff gets done , within the time and recources allocated. I suspect the russians want to break the morale of the ukranians first.
PR directed towards who?
Nobody in the West will stop hating Russia just because Putin put a Godman Sachs banker (!!!) in charge of negotiations instead of rounding up everybody with such connections and sending them to dig for gold with their bare hands north of Magadan, as he should be.
Meanwhile within Russia people are horrified because they see obvious traitors in key positions trying to put together another dogovornyak of the worst possible kind. So if within Russia the optics are so negative, what 'PR" can we even talk about?
>I suspect the russians want to break the morale of the ukranians first.
That would have been most effectively done by physically cutting them off from weapon supplies, decapitating all the leadership, and making it very clear no new leadership will be allowed to exist for longer than it takes for them to be sworn in. Which Putin can do tomorrow if he finally finds the balls.
With regards to PR, let me tell you that in 2022 if Romanians would have been told to go fight Russia, than 70% would have. Out of 100 people 95% would have put Kaya Kalles to shame. Today 40 % are pro-Russia, 40% don't care at all , and the 20% that still believe in NATO propaganda are more of the LGTBQ flags type, than the going to war type. The Global South are 90% behind Russia, that's a very impressive achievement considering none of these countries are for annexation or changing borders(out of fear of their own borders). I know elites don't care, but only to a certain point. The chances of ww3 are lower every day. The russians have suffered for this victory, but not a lot, mildly I'd say.
Romania is still a major logistic base for Ukraine though and is launching drones towards Russia.
From a Russian perspective nothing that matters has changed.
If I was Putin, I would have issued an ultimatum:
-- The current government has 24 hours to agree to seal the border with Ukraine and another 24 hours to actually do it, and to exit NATO.
-- If it does not agree, the population has another five days to overthrow the government, and do the above
-- If it is not done, strategic nuclear strikes follow
-- If it is done, we will have eternal peace and friendship and Russia commits to protecting Romania if anyone attacks it (BTW, the latter would be an even sweeter deal for the Balkan countries, because those are the only countries in NATO that are under actual real existential threat, from Turkey, and the Americans are not going to protect them; after all, Cyprus is still half occupied and it's in the EU and hosts important NATO bases)
If the population does not do it, well, they have made their choice and at the 168th hour the missiles fly.
still believe in NATO propaganda are more of the LGTBQ flags type, because NATO is the Negor and Tyranny Org
white people in the west do not hate russia. the jew and their puppets like zion don and ursula hate russia...
I agree take all of ukraine unconditional surrender put the zalinsky and his jew mob on trial an hang them
destroying moscow would destroy white russia. Destroying the subhuman infested cities in the USA would improve the USA
The plan is to take the money and give EuroClear which hold the money EU-Bonds in exchange. After Russia has paid about half a trillion USD in Reparations to Ukraine, it would get the 140 billions back. What could get wrong with this masterpiece of p?
In matters of stupidity , you are unquestionably well qualified (some would say over qualified). A senior role in the EU surely awaits
the endgame here is to kick NATO agents like you out of this channel.
You have to distinguish between ”cucking” and abstaining from reaction/action or being unable to react/act. Russia has not been cucking as much as they have been forced to think out new ways to perform their so called SMO. They have abstained from unlimited warfare and they have been unable to successfully use old the tactics that were present until 2023. However, the strategy is clear on the battlefield although it goes in slow-motion.
The End game?
Not 1 or 2, if I am right.
And if Russia strikes with Nukes first I will also be the first to condemn them. And wishing a Nuclear exchange is pretty deranged, in my view. End game for sure.
The Endgame could be that US finally abandon the CIA/DeepState strategy of containing Russia and applying pressure to them. From their new military strategy:
From Geroman on X:
NATO must stop expanding in Europe, according to the updated US national security strategy.
The document notes that it is likely that "within a few decades at the latest" certain NATO members may be majority non-European, and that these members may no longer share the views of those who originally signed the NATO charter”.
The last is so funny! They have realized that the migration policy from the Tribe, to undermine the whites in Europe, has eventually created a hostile population to US…
I think Trump would play scratch my back, I scratch your with Putin dividing larger part of the World, along with China, as of spheres of interest. What vasalls and useful idiots in Europe do is of no concern for them any longer.
Not expanding any further doesn't solve all that much.
It needs to be pushed back to Brussels.
https://thebulletin.org/2025/12/the-looming-missile-crisis-in-the-arctic/
Agree. Its a start…I think US will abandon Baltic states and former eastern states. The article was really good. Yes, Arctic will be a scene of conflict/tension.
I think EU will absorb NATO without US as a new security structure for Europe. And it will of course be no good. But they would sit on their hands - they cant do anything offensive against Russia without help from US.
you should remember that a Poisonous Snake (banking cartel/war profiteers) needs a careful approach.
What is the end game?
3) A smoldering war that kills and dispaces millions of slavs as well as weakening Christianity in the region, while also creating yet another zone like Birobidzhan/Fraydorf/Larindorf/ the Settlement of the Pale in a rump state of Ukraine, where international elite pirates control a fiefdom in the "heartland" of the "world island" (see the geopolitical Heartland Theory), and siphon the critical natural resources away from the natives.
4) Also, to create a bifurcation of the world powers into an East vs. West, which will lead to the eventual destruction of those nations, the final stages of which could happen soon or over a longer period of time. In other words, WW3, a great meatgrinder, which will likely lead to Europe's demise first, then America and the East, then a new world order arising like a phoenix from the ashes.
Like the last two great wars, the leaders of these nations don't have their nations' interests in mind and instead have grander plans.
May the soul of Ursula, this well paid militant whore disappear in the annals of history as she is cleaning potatoes in the comfort of her well equipped kitchen.
If only I knew what Russia said to Brussels to get them so scared. “Suffer the consequences for eternity” is so ominous. I love it, Russia should still do it.
A short eternity is implied.
Consider that a thermonuclear generated tidal wave initiated about halfway between Colchester and Ipswich while intended to head up the Thanes estuary and finally clean up the City of London also would include a similar wave going away from the estuary- And towards a certain "low country"?
I feel so well informed, such illuminating quotes and charts, and the perspective that these are not serious people gives me hope for the future, as they’re frog marched off to corruption court, such as it is.
At the very least Russia should demand that Europe delivers unto them every natostan commander plus that bloated pigface cookies Nudleman for a Nuremberg 2.0 run. If the EU drags it's hooves, they can glass every brit city with a population density of 10k until Europe complies. Karma is just too slow imo.
The USA normalised kidnapping for the purpose of trials and judgements, they even gave it a cute name, rendition.
My point is, why can't Russia do so too?
exactly. nuland, pagan, soros, kushner, whitkoff should start disappearing...
Wasn't Simon Wiesenthal first? :^)
LOL.
The EU+Nato elite have realised that modern warfare will make crossing the Atlantic impossible for supply ships. And modern warfare is attrition warfare. Hence EU+Nato cannot win against Russian resources.
That is why they’re hysterical and in panic mode. The sad part is to observe their final strategy - EU+Nato try to bluff the Russians with military adventurism. Essentially Poker bluff vs Chess player. And the elite know that Russia is aware they’re bluffing. Hence the final corrupt attemp to steal resources, and use the corrupt Zelensky for kickbacks. All EU elites are doing is trying to launder kickbacks to the Ukrainian assistance. Beyond evil.
They cannot even reach the Russian border or major Russian cities from Poland or Romania with their jets without refueling. Crossing Ukraine airspace, they will be the the targets of a Russian turkey shooting.
MacGregor elaborates on the NATO bluff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPf7HgIVneg&
"Sounds good!"
Galloway is awesome too... Chip
Fraud and psychological warfare is all the euro pimpocracy can do. They gutted their own power base for bribes and so there was no power in the state around which reform could happen. Putin is their greatest fear.
Remember how they were selling/fearmongering for Zio Don as "American Putin"? 🤬🐸
It is quite tempting to link the Ukrainian corruption to the European and, more specifically, the investigation and resignation of Yermak to the arrest of Mogherini & co. However, they are probably independent from each other. After all, the last few years have seen quite severe blows to Ursula von der Leyen's and EU reputation (Pfizergate, Qatargate, etc.), yet - unfortunately - they are still standing and, I am afraid, they will not go down easily!
Have you seen Ursula's face? She has permanent cocksucker's cramp. She definitely goes down easily.
LOL.
Ursula von der Leyen
@vonderleyen
EU and Israel are bound to be friends and allies.
Because the history of Europe is the history of the Jewish people.
Our democracy flourishes if Jewish life flourishes, too.
I am committed to fighting antisemitism and fostering Jewish life in the EU.
It’s actually the force of the suction from the demon extracting the remains of her soul….
If they will not go down, well they go up…in smoke.
There is something never mentioned. Why ane how the witch got there. It was all about the German military industry, which is the one pushing for more war. How were the other governments and the Eurocrat parties convinced to vote for a corrupt bitch like this was all about bribery. In addition, the European Commission is atributing itself rights that it doesnt have. Its like the Council and the Court of Justice just disappeared. And this can only be the job of NATO. The German military industry, remember? NATO has effectively taken over the EU institutions and national governments. And how is NATO.controlled? Money.
Wer will für Rheinmetall sterben? Oder BlackRock? Treffen Sie Ihre Wahl ! Das ist echte Demokratie!
@ChatterX
"Who wants to die for Rheinmetall? Or BlackRock? Make your choice! That's true democracy."
Exactly.
NATO's primary objective is to secure the weapons market for the U.S. Military Industrial Complex.
***
Under Clinton, when the Cold war was over, Lockheed Martin's guy named Bruce P. Jackson (son of William Jackson, National Security Adviser under Eisenhower) spent millions of dollars on the committee for NATO expansion in order to push a bunch of Eastern European countries into NATO.
BTW, the same guy bankrolled the committee for the war in Iraq.
youtube.com/watch?v=t0DLNDAgAwU
***
BTW, in April 2004 Ukraine signed the law allowing free access of NATO troops on its territory. And in 2017 NATO base already existed on the territory of Ukraine, even tho there was no formal membership. Russians don't care about formalities if one's trying to fool them. Bismarck's famous quote was right about that.
***
"Were the Soviet Union to sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean, the American military-industrial complex would have to remain, substantially unchanged, until some other adversary could be invented. "
-George F. Kennan, 1987
My guess is they are both postcards from the now seemingly dominant Vance faction. The timing is unmistakably. The pictures of Witkoff and Kushner at the table with Putin says it all. Trump sent his personal delegation. No sleazy swamp critters, just sleazy Jared.
It is a business meeting. Not a negotiation between nation states.
That has got to be the case…
Corruption is the foundation of the "Anglo-American Oligarchy/Deep State/Jewish Mob" which was responsible for the elevation of people like Yermak and Mogherini to their positions of power. Think of the contempt you feel for EU leadership. How is it possible for a Nazi like Kallas to become the VP for the EU commission?
Think of it as "AIPAC for the EU".
May I recommend folks here pay more attention to Berletic and his revelations of corruption across SEA through Xinjiang? Follow it up with a heavy dose of Aaron Good and his revelations of the connections between Angleton and Lansky. Listen to Wilkerson explain how the "crazies in the basement" of the Pentagon turned on GHWB, allowing "limited hang outs" of corruption like the BCCI scandal which ultimately resulted in Bill Clinton winning where he was compromised by the Mossad Agent Lewinsky.
And these convolutions aren't even scratching the surface.
You all do not have enough imagination to understand how this works. You see billiard balls rolling around on a flat surface rather than marbles, BB pellets, rocks and boulders crashing down a mountain slope smashing the homes along the way. IOW, "It's complicated".
There is a "spy behind every tree".
Berletic is a straight shooter.
Lol the female leaders of the EU. They are so noble and kind. Glad we are now beyond the age of brutal patriarchy.
If only Hillary won in 2016. The world would be at peace now. /s
And/or Kamala...
Chris, if Kamala had won, we'd all be dead from laughing.
now we laugh at zion don
Robin Williams used to joke that if women ruled the world there would be no more war but every 28 days there would be intense negotiations.
Back in the day when I was in charge of people, the conniving small minded backstabbing women were a running sore. Amongst the men you had your drunks and shysters but nothing was as much of a headache as the bloody women. Untrustworthy does not touch the sides, and in the main they were promoted on a numbers of game of some diversity-equality programme. It was like internal sabotage.
I do not know what happens to women when they get into a position of power but it is never good. Still, look how they run the nuclear family when they are not being beaten to a pulp by a monster partner, that is. There is one great female egregore, the Kore, who is a crone who puts on and takes off other female masks to suit the agenda, and there is only room for one of these in any outfit. Other powerful women are always lone wolves who have to quit hearth and home.
One of my favorite pearls of wisdom by a female-director was verbatim,"Yes, it was wrong. But you should have done it anyway." There is only a certain amount of BS I can take with a straight face, and then I'll say exactly what I think, come hell or high water:-)
It is the one cosmic power the woman acquires in compensation for all that male fisticuffs stuff- the power to speak the truth.
I had some great female bosses and great male bosses but % of getting a shitty boss is higher if a female. Petty, thin-skinned, immature, incompetent, entitled...
I'd make the point that women have a harder time of it. Male social order is well-defined and competition is minimized by it. Forming pecking orders is built-in. Not so for women.
Doubt. Why drag old dirt into a new house?
The Problem: They get promoted only because of a single reason. They have an uterus.
the only question is the jew question.
I only had once female boss and she was great. Recognized I could do the job and stayed out of my way. Always gave her fair warning if a project was about to blow up in our faces and we would mitigate fallout together.
And there are, as always, some exceptions. One of the best bosses I ever had in a STEM career, the least "political" and least arbitrary, was a headstrong woman who grew up in a red state in a mining area. She was a typical "liberal" on some social issues like abortion and whatnot, but she was fair and an excellent manager, and she was a uniting force. Not divisive. But yeah, she was childless.
Someone once said that if women ruled the world, it would be a kinder, gentler world without war. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Madelyn Albright 😤 Hillary Clinton 😤😤 evil, just as ruthless as men. 😡🤬
Thatcher too.
Nuland
Gina Haspel; Torturer in Chief.
Madelyn Albright - JEW
Hillary Clinton - JEW puppet
Worse because I they are even more degrees removed from the carnage….and then there is that capital B thing…..
Ruthless is the wrong word. It implies a disciplined focus on objectives. Women like Clinton are vengeful, spiteful, driven by emotion. Hegseth is a true member of the fairer sex.
Remember the sick bitch Albright saying that half a million dead children was worth the regime change war in Iraq?
rumble.com/vya5yf-albright-the-price-dead-children-was-worth-it.html
If you check the pre-woke psychology studies, like the one below, you'll see that women on average have higher Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism scores than men. Simply speaking, they are easier indoctrinated and controlled. Also, higher on the victim hierarchy.
***
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149680/
***
This makes them perfect choice for puppet political positions because they are generally easier to control. This is one of the reasons the deep state created and supported the whole "women in power" agenda..
***
How "Imperial Feminism" is Used to Justify War:
youtube.com/watch?v=tTAM4Pw2VJQ
***
BTW The godmother of bourgeois liberal feminism, Gloria Steinem, was a CIA agent:
youtu.be/O1sJ2uZ4aaQ?t=208
The TERRIFYING Female Guards Of The Concentration Camps:
youtube.com/watch?v=kZU9ksjylcQ
***
Irma Grese. The Hyena of Auschwitz:
youtube.com/watch?v=95F1k6YIh80
***
Anneliese Kohlmann - The Beast Of Neuengamme
youtube.com/watch?v=wAJWXtVPB0k
***
Ewa Paradies - Sadistic NAZI Guard:
youtube.com/watch?v=ZRS-cDm-svI
***
Ilse Koch - Bestial Nazi guard & Sexual Deviant:
youtube.com/watch?v=tFGodTJH4ws
Killary "Rotten" Clinton Complains About "Men Starting Wars":
youtube.com/watch?v=5Im95wmmu8M
***
"Women have always been the primary victims of war."
-Killary "delusional" Clinton, 1998
idk why you discount millions of years of history just because we have a few thousand years of written history thats been perverted en masse in literature. I think pre polytheism we DID have a world DRASTICALLY reduced in conflict but progress and harmony are counterproductive to developing societies…
Kaya Kallas stunning and brave 😳😂 more like stupid and ignorant.
We won't talk to Putin, we won't put up with his toxic masculinity 🤡🤣🤣
Muscles from Brussels is alright with Putin, from now on their National statue, a little fellow pissing uncompromised wil be honoured now with an eleventh golden finger.
As Russia emerges victorious from out of a vast fog of lying western propaganda the rest of the world shifts from being on the fence, to on Russia's side- because that is how it always goes. The winner takes so much more than 'victory' in the field. And that shift includes the US. Soon it will include fraying bits of europe too, rediscovering where they really belong- on the winning side, natch.
Elections will be held in former western Ukraine, and Ukraine will join the RF. There will be no need for any carve up angst or peace keepers, blah. Instead we will have a bonfire of the vanities, as in all those 'just and lasting piss plans.' Then there will come the truly bitter vicious reckoning for the old western european regime and what it has actually done with sheds loads of European dosh and debt.
Bits of europe will start choosing to quit the crumbling edifice of non entities that 'bought' them back along, and can no longer afford to make their 'membership' worth while. Russia can in due course look forward to welcoming back the East German people who are thoroughly disgusted with the West German regime.
This nasty unnecessary war which was just western cover for seizing control of Russian resources using dispensable slavs, will turn out to have been the gift of the century for Russia. Karma, as the Indians might say.
Mitákuye Oyás'iŋ❤️🐈⬛
>As Russia emerges victorious
What sort of a brain dead imbecile does one have to be to think that Russia is wininng, when Ushakov and Vance both said in the last hours that a deal might be signed soon, i.e. Putin has capitulated, just as feared.
Without ever daring to fire a single shot in resistance...
Come on man, don't be so gloommy. Talk is cheap. Nothing will be signed. You know that.
You have not really seen Gorbachev and co. betraying everything, then Putin doing Minsk-1/2 and Astana.
I mean, you have seen it, but you have not really understood it.
One you do, you always expect the worst from these people.
Because it is still the same people there who did all that.
I have seen it. But there were very good reasons behind them. Russia was not ready or confident enough. Things are clear now. Putin clearly has made mistakes, but overall has done well. A lot of people are looking at ww2 or ww1 as parallels for this war, but I think Putin is looking at Franco-Prussian war. Bismark declared the German Empire in Versailles and everyone applauded. I think this is what he wants to achieve in Ukraine. Take it(like Chechnya) and be appaluded for it. I live in Romania, I do understand the rotten state Russia was after communism. There simply were no institutions left, no systems, no state left to rule. People don't understand how bad the collapse actually was. Russia was not ready in 2014 for the SMO and even in 2022 it was unsure of a lot of things(mainly the economy and trade issues). This was never ww3, it was about avoiding ww3.
>But there were very good reasons behind them. Russia was not ready or confident enough.
You left out Gorbachev and the clique around him. But that is critical for understanding what happened.
Russia may not have been ready in 2014, but neither was Ukraine. Nobody can seriously claim a war then would have been more difficult than the current one. And even Putin himself has admitted that. The window of opportunity was characteristically missed.
And why was it missed? For the same reasons Gorbachev destroyed the USSR -- because a certain section of the Russian elites back then wanted to become the same kind of oligarchs that Western elites were, and for that to happen they had to dismantle the Soviet system because there was no place for rich people in that system. Those people were still in power in 2014, and in fact largely remain in power to this day. This is why Russia "wasn't ready" -- because the Russian elites didn't want to break off from the West. And it is also why there are still negotiations instead of missile launches. Which in turn is why I am so gloomy.
Also, whose job was it for Russia to be ready in 2014? It had only been known with certainty that a big war is coming since 1994, when the intention to expand NATO was first announced, and with absolute, 100% certainty by 1999, when Yugoslavia was attacked and after the US had started waging war on Russia through its Chechen proxies.
Remember that Stalin circa 1930 stoop up and said to the party that the country had a decade to make up the technological and industrial gap with the West, or it will be crushed in the coming big war. Then spent the 1930s doing precisely that. What did Putin do? He had more time and was starting from a much more favorable position.
Stalin was a great grand strategist and wartime leader, but a poor economic leader, not to mention ruthless autocrat. Famine happened because of incompetence and malice, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of dead , Stalin is responsible for. We live in a different world than Stalin did, who had a very rapidly expanding population. The communist economy as practiced in Europe and N Korea produces no wealth for the people, and is good only in ww2 style war. Such a war in an age of hypersonic missiles and nukes is imposible, as you yourself have said many times, since Russia can just rid itself of NATO in an afternoon. Putin doesn't rule Russia, he is at a head of a system of systems, that have to work well, while Russia is made up of many people. Some of those people will steal money, but also build a drone factory for the SMO, others are traitors(what was Stalin during the ww1?!), some are incompetent(Siversk commander), some are not good enough(Group of forces North commander), many are corrupt. It's very hard know which is which in a nation of 150 mil.
And right on cue General Moron inserts his doom and gloom member in to the vulva of Russian victory.
Like fuggin broken record
It turns out all your BS about your Russia gasoline crisis and refineries destruction was another pile of lies? Putin has capitulated? The Telegraph says Putin is in the driving seat. The UE is crumbling down before our eyes..The Ukranian Junta and fascist regime are sinking fast. And still everybody in the world got it wrong but you. I can only see an imbecile here and its you...
Look in a mirror to see a full blown brain dead idiot.
Your “Putin/Russia losing, disaster, turning into Syria, etc, etc trope is deflating faster than your hero the Green Goblin’s credibility.
Your analysis skills are in the same class as his piano playing skills, even though lacking a piano I expect.
Yes, but GM is protected my Substack. I am being trolled in various chats and Substack logged me out while commenting on this troll shit. It signaled be Substack is strongly intervened and shapped. Ultimately they will get to shape a product for the critical thinkers. But by that time Substack will have become irrelevant and worthless.
I also had some weird thing where I couldn’t post, likely some kind of tech error…..unless of course GM is some kind of tech shaman….LOL.
He doesn’t have a piano, he has a HARPsick-ord. He plays Jew chords and scales. I’ve suggested to him that he should try one of Bach’s two-part inventions but he claims Bach was a Jew-lover because the second cousin of the Margrave of Brandenburg’s grandfather lived one street over from Jew Street, and furthermore the tempering on the modern piano was developed by Salieri who the Jew press unfavorably compared to what’s his name—the guy with all the “K” numbers—I forget his name…
Without ever daring to fire a single shot in resistance...{GM}
He invaded another fucking country.
You don't get any more hardcore than that!
It's a fully disposable proxy that has invaded and occupied some 500,000 km2 of Russian land.
Nothing hardcore about that.
What was required is to strike London, DC, Brussels and the relevant mansions and bunkers.
Vance said something and you believe it?
Why do you hate Putin so much?
Weirdo Vance his street shitter wife and goblin like Jew chief of staff
Why would the Russians sign any deal with the Jew ?
Remember the whole Osama bin Laden exercising remote mind control over the Bush admin causing them to suicide America thing? Russia is fucking kryptonite to the west. The level of self-destructive hubris and total delusion is mind boggling. It’s as if the very existence of a force that dares push back even a little bit stoked a suicidal rage in the west, conjuring from a docile, defeated people a most fearsome resurrection. It’s incredible how fucking retarded the leaders of the west have been with Russia. We could have coasted on Breton woods for another century but controlling 75% of the world wasn’t enough so they have ruined us and we will ultimately have nothing.
They aren’t going to stop the suicide by cop. Contrast Putin’s demeanor with the prior seminal speeches. It used to be please don’t poke the bear, now it’s FAFO.
There was a pragmatic reason for this latest western war on Russia, loaded as western europe is with continent sinking debt without the real resources to back that debt. That was what it was all about. Everything else was just a veneer, like all western virtue signalling.
no - the jew hates white christian russia and the jew wanted to dismantle that.
yes maybe. But more importantly the Jew needed more collateral for his banks. Look at what’s happening with silver.
Specific individuals and their families, perhaps. And the Catholic Church hating the Orthodox. And the Poles hating the Slavs down to the level of the peasants who overthrew their false Russian Czar. Or the Lithuanians who hate how Russia ended their empire. Or the Swedes who hate how Russia ended their empire. Or the Brits who hate how Russia continue to threaten their empire. Or... Or... Or....
The Jew overthrew the czar and murdered his family in a Jew. Blood torture ritual
The Jew bolsheviks attacked Lithuania committed crimes then fled to their illegal Jew state in occupied Palestine.
Poles are Slavs themselves.
Plus the ESG regulation of commerce that the EU planned to contaminate supply chains with, leading to banks exercising full control over any trades item anywhere. A Russia unwilling to bow to that scheme is an existential threat to domination.
I like the sound of this 👍